SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WECC Board of Directors April 21-23, 2004 Seattle, Washington WECC Procedure for Reporting of System Events Disturbance Reports Rod Maslowski OC Vice Chairperson.
Advertisements

PER
June 6, 2007 TAC Meeting NERC Registration Issues Andrew Gallo, Assistant General Counsel, Litigation and Business Operations ERCOT Legal Dept.
ERCOT Compliance Audits Robert Potts Sr. Reliability Analyst March 23, 2005.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
SPS Mis-operation – DRAFT Proposal for ERCOT procedures.
April 11, 2007 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development Process.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
1 Non-Transmission Alternatives to Reduce Local Congestion Costs Bill Bojorquez June 3, 2004.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Texas Regional Entity Compliance Report TAC July 9, 2009.
System Operations Staffing Request Presented to the ERCOT Board Of Directors By Sam Jones, COO November 16, 2004.
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards TPL Discussion – PCC Steering Committee March 25, 2014.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Implementing the New Reliability Standards Status of Draft Cyber Security Standards CIP through CIP Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team.
Other Binding Documents Ann Boren ERCOT TAC/TAC Subcommittee Structural and Procedural Review ERCOT Public August 27, 2014.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Update On The ERO Transition Activities To Comply With The 2005 EPAC ERCOT TAC Meeting March 9, 2006 Sam Jones, COO.
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
WB Carbon Finance Project Cycle and Role of Key Players Introduction to Carbon Finance March 10, 2004.
Status Report for Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
© Property of ERCOT /06/20041 Overview of SPS in ERCOT February 5, 2004.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call August 17, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
Transmission Outage Process April Purpose In compliance with the Protocols and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Operating Guides,
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People RAS Guideline Initiative March 23, 2009.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call April 20, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Enterprise Data Warehouse Section 8 – Performance Monitoring.
Outage Planning Subcommittee Mark Wilson. Outage Planning Subcommittee Created to address Market Participant concerns with existing rules and procedures.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 16, 2005.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
ERCOT Guideline for Interim Updates to the Network Operations Model Excerpted from the “Modeling Expectations” whitepaper D.W. Rickerson.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
Teknologi Pusat Data 12 Data Center Site Infrastructure Tier Standard: Topology Ida Nurhaida, ST., MT. FASILKOM Teknik Informatika.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT 2006 TAC Subcommittee Review ERCOT Board February 21, 2006.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures for COPS & PRS May 17, 2005.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures May 5, Revision of TAC Procedures Project began in October 2004 to incorporate the Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
03/06/2008 TAC CREZ Transmission Optimization (CTO) Study Update Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
RTO WEST Summary of RTO West 9/18/02 Declaratory Order Presentation to The Committee on Regional Electrical Power Cooperation (CREPC) by John Carr 10/1/02.
Remedial Action Scheme Workshop RAS Workshop May 9, 2016.
1 NPCC – A-2 Dr. Mayer Sasson Transmission Planning Consolidated Edison of New York June 1, 2006 Presented to the NYSRC-RRS.
Nodal Planning Go Live Austin, TX February 3, 2011
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
NERC Published Lessons Learned Summary
Software Project Configuration Management
Transposition of European Network Codes
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
NOGRR-169 OWG discussion Bill Blevins June 28, 2017.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Modifications to Planning Charter
Agenda 5.11 General Regulations
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
Presentation transcript:

SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004

06/16/2004 Definition Special Protection Scheme (SPS): Section 2.1 of the ERCOT Protocols defines a Special Protection Scheme as, “A protective relay system specially designed to detect abnormal system conditions and take pre-planned corrective action (other than the isolation of faulted elements) to provide acceptable system performance.” Section of the ERCOT Operating Guides expands upon this definition, stating that, “SPS actions include among others, changes in demand, generation, or system configuration to maintain system stability, acceptable voltages, or acceptable facility loadings.”

06/16/2004 Approval SPSs Special Protection Schemes must meet several requirements before they can be considered for approval. An SPS must: Be coordinated and approved by all affected parties. be used in a limited way only for the time required to construct replacement transmission facilities, or replacement transmission facilities have been determined by ERCOT to be unnecessary ( for example, due to excessive cost, inability to construct, or agreement by all parties, etc) comply with all applicable ERCOT and NERC requirements be incorporated into the calculations performed by ERCOT where applicable

06/16/2004 Approval Furthermore, an SPS must: Be fully automatic. Not operate except as necessary (see SPS Misoperation) Consider the possible interactions of multiple SPS installations. Provide a methodology and medium for ERCOT System Operations to monitor the conditions that would actuate the SPS. Be approved by ERCOT staff prior to any modification, or after it has been in service for more than five years, or when system conditions have changed; invalidating the original assessment. Section of the ERCOT Protocols states that TOs, “…shall coordinate with ERCOT the following types of work for any addition, replacement or modification to the ERCOT Transmission Grid…”

06/16/2004 Approval The decision making authority for all SPS approval is ERCOT Operations, which includes System Operations and Transmission Services. There are two time periods for SPS approval: Normal, and Urgent. The Market Participant proposing an SPS has the option of requesting a Normal or Urgent timeline for review. However, the party requesting an Urgent timeline shall provide sufficient justification for the Urgent request (e.g. frequent occurrence of congestion in daily operations) at the time it submits its proposal. ERCOT Transmission Services will determine within two (2) days of receipt if the Urgent request is justified. Normal and Urgent timelines are described as follows:

06/16/2004 Normal Approval Normal Timeline Review for SPS The Market Participant who is proposing an SPS will submit the proposal to the lead Transmission Services engineer at ERCOT for the corresponding Regional Planning Group (RGP). Within two days of receipt, the RPG lead planning engineer will initiate a 30-day review period by ERCOT Transmission Services, ERCOT System Operations, and the associated TO. Concurrent to the 30-day review period described above, the RPG lead planning engineer will forward the proposal to the appropriate RPG and Operations Review Group (ORG) distribution list. RPG and ORG members will then have 21 days to submit comments on the proposal to ERCOT with copies to the RPG and ORG distribution list. This 21-day comment period will run concurrent with the first 30- days of the review period, leaving nine (9) days for ERCOT to consider comments received prior to issuing a preliminary decision on the proposal.

06/16/2004 Normal Approval At the end of the 30-day review period, ERCOT Operations will issue a preliminary decision on the proposal to the appropriate RPG and ORG distribution lists. Market Participants will have 7 days after the filing of ERCOT’s preliminary decision to file any comments regarding that decision to the appropriate RPG and ORG distribution lists. ERCOT will consider any additional Market Participant comments received and issue a final decision within 10 days of the filing of its preliminary decision. The final decision will be sent to the appropriate RPG and ORG distribution lists. For an SPS that is approved, the associated TOs will develop and submit to ERCOT an exit strategy on a schedule to be determined by ERCOT. ERCOT, with any needed assistance from the relevant RPG(s) will then assign a status to the SPS, either Temporary or Permanent. For a Permanent SPS, the transmission facility exit strategy implementation will be deferred indefinitely until and unless the assigned status is changed by ERCOT. For a Temporary SPS, the associated TOs will include the exit strategy in its transmission plan, and will be expected to pursue necessary approvals and construction activity on a schedule consistent with other facilities of comparable necessity in its transmission plan.

06/16/2004 Urgent Approval The Market Participant who is proposing an SPS for Urgent review will submit the proposal to the lead Transmission Services engineer at ERCOT for the corresponding Regional Planning Group (RGP) and to ERCOT System Operations, along with all supporting information necessary. ERCOT System Operations may tentatively approve the proposed SPS on an exception basis pending full review. The tentative approval will be treated as ERCOT approval until 9 months after the final ERCOT review is complete. ERCOT Transmission Services will review the proposed SPS to confirm reliable operation.

06/16/2004 Urgent Approval ERCOT Transmission Services will then forward successful initial review to appropriate ERCOT Task Forces as deemed necessary. Task Force questions and comments are sent back to ERCOT Transmission Services and addressed. Work with the owner may be necessary to address all issues. Upon resolution of issues identified in the reviews, the Director of ERCOT Operations, with concurrence of ERCOT Transmission Services and ERCOT System Operations, provides the 5 year approval for the SPS and informs the SPS owner. TAC and subcommittees are informed at their next meeting. ERCOT Transmission Services puts the review documentation on file.

06/16/2004 ERCOT Process Update SPS manual in Operations Post SPS to ERCOT secured web site

06/16/2004 Mis-operation SPS Misoperation is not explicitly defined in the ERCOT Protocols or Operating Guides, but is described as the operation of an SPS when the conditions of the SPS have not been met, or the lack of operation of an SPS when the conditions have been met. The ERCOT Operating Guides section does list several events that could describe an SPS misoperation. These events are listed below: Failure to Operate – Any failure of an SPS to perform its intended function within the designated time when system conditions intended to rigger the SPS occur. Failure to Arm – Any failure of a SPS to automatically arm itself for system conditions that are intended to result in the SPS being automatically armed. Unnecessary Operation – Any operation of an SPS that occurs without the occurrence of the intended system trigger condition(s). Unnecessary Arming – Any automatic arming of a SPS that occurs without the occurrence of the intended arming system condition(s). Failure to Reset – Any failure of a SPS to automatically reset following a return of normal system conditions if that is the design intent.

06/16/2004 Mis-operation When an SPS operates, the TO shall file a report with ERCOT per section (15) of the ERCOT Operating Guides. After reviewing the report, ERCOT System Operations will make a determination as to whether or not the SPS had misoperated. Executing this process is the responsibility of the Engineer Supervising the Operations Support Group. ERCOT Operations shall make this determination using the process outlined below: ERCOT System Operations and Transmission Services shall independently review the report filed by the TO. ERCOT System Operations and Transmission Services shall meet and discuss the results of their review within fifteen (15) working days of the event. Any remaining questions or comments remaining shall be sent to the TO.

06/16/2004 Mis-operation ERCOT System Operations and Transmission Services shall review the replies from the TO, if any, and prepare a technical opinion as to whether or not the SPS has misoperated within thirty (30) working days of the event. The technical opinion shall then be sent to the Director of System Operations and the Director of Transmission Services for official determination of correct operation, which will then be sent out to the TO and to the Reliability and Operating Subcommittee. Should an SPS misoperate 2 times or more for the same reason within the 5 year period of the SPS, ERCOT may request that the SPS be disabled until further review of the SPS and its misoperations can be made.

06/16/2004 Mis-operation If it is determined that the SPS had misoperated, a request will be made to the TO requesting an outline of steps to be made to ensure that this same misoperation will not happen in the future.

06/16/2004 QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION