Transparency Indicator IATI Steering Committee Copenhagen 13 March 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mutual accountability and aid transparency Mutual accountability and aid transparency Republic of Moldova 1IATI meeting, OECD Conference center.

Advertisements

Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.

Africa is still facing significant development challenges Institutional capacity to adequately improve livelihoods of Africas citizens Systematic pan-African.

1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.

SAI Performance Measurement Framework

Linn OHLSSON, IATI Secretariat Rudolphe PETRAS, Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD IATI Steering Committee, 3 October 2013 The Common Standard.

BUILDING BLOCK FOR HLF-4 PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES ON TRANSPARENCY FOR BETTER PREDICTABILITY, ENGAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY Alma Kanani, World Bank, IATI.

Welcome to the IATI TAG meeting Moor Hall, Cookham 14—15 May 2012 Overview of IATI Brian Hammond Chair of the TAG.

TRENDS IN DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS FOR AIDS RESPONSE Kevin Kelly Inaugural SAMEA Conference March 2007, Johannesburg.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Update on Indicator to Measure Transparency IATI Steering Committee, 3 October, Copenhagen

CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.

MID-TERM REPORT FOR THE UGANDA IAP PROJECT By Telly Eugene Muramira Director; Policy, Planning and Information NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHRORITY.

Transparency Beyond Mexico IATI Steering Committee Lessons Learnt and proposals on a way forward for the Busan « Transparency » indicator and the common.

Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators

HIV/AIDS COORDINATION AND FAITH BASED ORGANISATIONS: EXPERIENCES FROM UGANDA JOHN RWOMUSHANA, MD, MSc Director, Research and Policy Development UGANDA.

Challenges of Global Alcohol Policy Developments FIVS Public Policy Conference 7-9 April 2014 Brussels, Belgium.

Introduction A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE WCD FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS & APPLICATION Alex Muhweezi & Chihenyo Mvoyi IUCN Uganda Country Office.

Concept Note to Strengthen the DPG Secretariat in the Context of the Changing Aid Environment DPG Proposal December 4 th, 2007.

Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Key findings Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop Seoul, March 2014.

PARTNER REPORTING ON STATISTICAL SUPPORT (PRESS) June 2008.

REGIONAL ANALYSIS ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION EDUCATION IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION IN THE CONTEXT OF HFA PRIORITY 3 IMPLEMENTATION Bangkok, March 2009 Prepared.

Presentation to Asia Health Policy Program Palo Alto, CA 20 October 2011 ASIA PACIFIC OBSERVATORY ON HEALTH POLICIES AND SYSTEMS.

Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.

Task Group on development of e-Government indicators (TGEG) 2008 Global Event on Measuring the Information Society Report on e-Government indicators 2008.

Global aid transparency standard: progress, challenges and benefits prepared by Bill Anderson and Danila Boneva, IATI Secretariat 21st of June 2011.

1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.

Africa Health Workforce Platform & Observatory Presentation to the 1st conference of the Asia-Pacific Action Alliance on HRH (AAAH): October 2006.

1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action.

Africa is still facing significant development challenges ● Institutional capacity to adequately improve livelihoods of Africa’s citizens ● Systematic.

AID EFFECTIVENESS A GLANCE FROM GLOBAL TO COUNTRY LEVELS Cao Manh Cuong Foreign Economic Relations Dept. Ministry of Planning and Investment.

Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.

Working Group Three Non-State and Multilateral Actors: examining roles and responsibilities Group three focused on the role and responsibility of the private.

Developing Consensus Principles and Standards for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs) Progress Report to the Fifth Meeting of the.

Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.

Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.

International Workshop on the future of the CBD PoWPA, Jeju, 2009 Summary: International Workshop on the Future of the CBD Programme of Work on Protected.

IATI - Outreach 15 th October 2014 IATI Steering Committee Presenter: IATI Secretariat.

Statistics for Transparency, Accountability, and Results: The Busan Action Plan for Statistics PARIS21 & The World BankMeeting on the Busan Action Plan.

Report from Partner Countries Work Stream – Day 1 Room 2.

Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.

EUWI Monitoring & Reporting: background, methodology and indicators Voorburg, 24 May 2006 Umberto Triulzi IPALMO Italian Ministry.

Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy

Observatories for the Health Workforce in Africa VIII REGIONAL MEETING OF THE OBSERVATORIES OF HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH IN THE AMERICAS LIMA, PERU

Core Principles and Action Plan February 4, 2004.

IATI Indicator Report to IATI Steering Committee – 3 December 2015.

M&E Joint Programming in Mozambique 12 th May 2009.

5 April, 2013 Indicator 4 on Transparency Consultation IATI Steering Committee, 3 Dec 2015 Alejandro Guerrero UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team (Global Partnership.

More Timely, Credible and Cost Effective Performance Information on Multilateral Partners Presented by: Goberdhan Singh Director of the Evaluation Division.

Workshop and Steering Committee Meeting Globally-important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Project Rome, 7-9 June 2004 Components and Processes.

Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.

Update on Monitoring IATI Steering Committee Meeting Copenhagen, 15 October.

The Busan Action Plan for Statistics: Discussion of the Implementation Roadmap The World Bank and PARIS21 Secretariat PARIS21 Board Meeting: Special Session.

The Busan Action Plan for Statistics: An Update on the Implementation Shaida Badiee, Director, Development Economics Data Group, World Bank Committee for.

1 |1 | UHC 2030 – the new IHP+ Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny Assistant Director General, WHO Presentation IHP+ Steering Committee 8 th April 2016.

. Smart Sustainable Cities in the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda: the way forward Gulnara Roll Head, Housing and Land Management Unit, UNECE.

WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.

Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.

Page 1 3rd SAICM EU-JUSSCANZ Regional Meeting Paris, France February 12, 2008 Developing Reporting Modalities for SAICM Implementation.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.

Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.

Open Ag Data : Landscape Analysis ●Who is involved in collecting data on agricultural investments, and from whom? ●How is data publicly shared? Which.

Effective development cooperation principles and quality of partnerships in the post-2015 and Financing for Development context ---Bangladesh perspective.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,

Aid Transparency Assessment

Session 6 – Communications & Outreach

The value of UNCAC Session 5.

IATI External Evaluation 2015

IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI

The Universal Tool for Assessing Public Procurement Systems

Presentation transcript:

Transparency Indicator IATI Steering Committee Copenhagen 13 March 2014

Rationale and process for the indicator A direct response to the Busan High-Level Meeting in 2011 June 2012: The common, open standard is endorsed at the final meeting of the Working Party on Aid Effectiveness in June 2012 June 2012: Mandate by the Post-Busan Interim Group to monitor the implementation of the common standard A participatory process 2013 Development of approach building on work of the Ad-Hoc Group Core group technical work to construct proposal Oct-Nov: Consultation on the construction of the indicator Dec-Feb: Piloting of the transparency assessment

Coverage ratio Timeliness (in CRS and IATI) - How frequently do providers report? - How fresh is the data when it is published Comprehensiveness: level of detail (in CRS and IATI) - For how many of the data fields is information provided? Forward looking (in FSS and IATI) - For how many years ahead is information provided? [1, 2 or 3 years] - How disaggregated / detailed is the data? [activity / sector / country level] What are we measuring?

Methodology and guiding principles Full methodolology available on the Global Partnership Teamworks community site A few guiding principles: Building on existing systems (OECD CRS/FSS and IATI) Covers all ODA providers with an implementation schedule Focus on ODA (CPA for forward-looking dimension) Simplicity (grade from A to E) Room for evolution (pilot approach) Piloting carried out in close collaboration with common standard secretariats

Key findings from the analysis A good start: the average provider Reports data once a year, that is 6-9 months old Information for 50% of data fields Provides some forward-looking information (75%) Progress by 2015 requires Timeliness: more frequent reporting, fresher data Comprehensiveness: more systemic completion of data fields needed (quality of reporting also important) Forward-looking: much more effort needed, start with country envelopes

Context for findings and way forward Indicator measures one specific aspect of transparency Baseline / starting point –goal set for 2015 Entry point for focusing efforts going forward Wide range of grades allows for improvement  Reinforce political momentum in Mexico  Provide basis for further technical efforts beyond (including possible refinement of the indicator) Key issues for consideration How to link global and country-level transparency – ensure information provision at both levels? How to ensure that information is geared to support countries’ strategic planning?