1 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 United States Army Corps of Engineers Association of the United States Army: Annual Meeting 2005 Role of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Army Basing Role of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Army Basing LTG Carl A. Strock Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers LTG Carl A. Strock Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

2 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - 24,000 Personnel - Navigation - Hydropower - Flood Control - Shore Protection - Water Supply - Regulatory - Recreation Civil Works $6.1 B - 10,000 Personnel - Military Construction - Contingency Ops - Installation Support - International / Inter- agency Support Military Programs $15.4 B - Seven Diverse Research Laboratories - $700 M Annual Research Program Engineer Research and Development Center HQ 9 Divisions Engineer Commands 45 Districts - Homeland Security - Environmental - Real Estate Contractors execute 65% of architect-engineer services & 100% of construction

3 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 USACE Alignment With Installations Fort Belvoir Aberdeen Proving Ground Fort Story Fort Lee Fort Eustis Fort Monroe Ft. AP Hill Radford AAP Tobyhanna Army Depot Letterkenny AD Carlisle Barracks Fort McNair Ft. Meade Fort Myer Walter Reed Ft Detrick Adelphi Lab Ctr Charles E. Kelly Spt Fac (USAR) Fort Drum West Point Fort Monmouth Picatinny Arsenal Watervliet Ars Ft. Hamilton Fort Dix (USAR) Natick R & D Ctr USA Cold Reg Lab Fort Devens RFTA (USAR) Fort McPherson Fort Gordon Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield Fort Jackson Ft Buchanan, PR Fort Campbell Fort Knox Redstone Arsenal Fort Benning Fort Rucker Anniston AD Ft. Gillem Milan AAP Holston AAP Mississippi AAP Blue Grass AD Fort Bragg MOT Sunny Point Presidio of Monterey Fort Irwin Yuma Proving Ground Fort Hauchuca Riverbank AAP Sierra Army Depot Hawthorne AD Camp Parks (USAR) Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR) White Sands Missile Testing Center Fort Sill Fort Bliss Fort Hood Fort Polk Pine Bluff Ars McAlester AAP Red River AD Lone Star AAP Camp Stanley Storage Actv Louisiana AAP Fort Sam Houston Corpus Christi AD Northeast Southeast Southwest Detroit Ars USAG Selfridge Lima Army Tank Plt Fort McCoy (USAR) Fort Leonard Wood Fort Riley Fort Leavenworth Iowa AAP Kansas AAP Lake City AAP Dugway Proving Ground Pueblo Depot Fort Carson Tooele AD Deseret Chem Depot Fort Lewis Yakima Training Center Umatilla Chem Depot Vancouver Barracks (USAR) Rock Island Arsenal Northwest Europe NAD Korea POD* Fort Shafter Schofield Barracks Fort Wainwright Fort Richardson Ft. Greely Pacific Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara Okinawa Kwajalein Director Locations NE: Ft Monroe SE: Ft McPherson NW: Rock Island Ars SW: Ft Sam Houston Europe: Heidelberg Pacific: Ft Shafter Korea: Yongsan SWD*/SPD NWD*/LRD NAD* SAD*/LRD POD* * = Lead USACE Division 7 LNOs at Regions 23 PM-Fs at Key Installations

4 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 The Execution Challenge IGPBS BRAC 05 MILITARY WORKLOAD Multiple ‘Peaking’ Programs w/Critical Facilities Needs $30-40B of Facilities for Restationing of 142,000 soldiers Temp Bldgs GWOT Spt Army Modular Forces IGPBS Temp Bldgs Army Modular Forces

5 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 DA Guidance Develop a strategy and implementation plan to support the major permanent restationing initiatives that the Army will execute. Overall objective is to provide the ability to establish, reuse/re-purpose facilities with minimum lead- time, leverage private industry standards and practices, and to reduce acquisition/lifecycle costs … Nov 2004

6 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 Why MILCON Transformation? Current standards/processes do not support the Army’s requirement of getting quality facilities in the timeframe needed Status-quo will most likely result in a program- wide funding shortfall

7 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 MILCON Strategy Goals Deliver quality facilities in less time and at lower costs Provide permanent MILCON solutions to eliminate requirement and use of temporary facilities Construct adaptable facilities for the long term Achieve lower O&M costs thru sustainable facilities Streamline acquisition strategy

8 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 MILCON Transformation Execute MILCON as a program, not individual projects Support Master Planning Adapt new criteria and processes Standardize Facilities’ Criteria Partnering “Faster, Better, Cheaper, and Greener solutions”

9 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 Execute MILCON as a Program Program entire Brigade Combat Team (BCT) requirements as one project Gain economy of scale thru consolidating requirements installation-wide and/or regionally

10 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 Support Master Planning Teamed with IMA to increase master planning competency within the Army Supplemented in-house master planning capability with A-E support Created military construction project templates (DD1391) for light, heavy and aviation BCT configurations Teamed with ACSIM/IMA for Planning Charrettes and in development of quality DD1391s “Success requires quality planning and programming”

11 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 Criteria and Processes Standardize functional and technical criteria for facilities –Incorporate reuse and repurposing capabilities throughout the facility life cycle –Achieve consistency –Streamline acquisition time –Focus on end result; not “how to” Adopt industry best practices and proven solutions to get facilities on the ground faster –Pre-engineered alternatives –Fast-track design/build

12 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 Partnering Internal (Army) –Synchronize execution with Army needs –Develop consistent DD 1391s –Address real estate actions –Complete NEPA in a timely manner –Ensure sufficient master planning competency External –Team with Private Sector –Adopt industry best practices –Develop trust thru long-term relationships

13 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 MILCON Transformation Implementation Plan Execute FY06 BRAC construction using Fast-track design/ build approach Standardized Request for Proposal packages using performance based criteria Pre-manufactured/engineered solutions Established regional construction contracts Established “GSA –like” preferred provider schedules “Adapt – build” for Army BRAC and MILCON construction

14 ~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~ USACE 3 October 2005 “One Team: Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable”