Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, 2010. Brussels. Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, 2010. Brussels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development and Cooperation Preparing the Communication on Civil Society Organisations in Development.
Advertisements

Disability and human rights What are the human rights of people with disabilities?
PRESENTATION Youth and Health-an overview from the European Youth Forum Laura Cottey Member of European Youth Forum Working Group on employment and social.
 Joined-up governance describes a strategy that aims to coordinate the development and implementation of fundamental rights across government structures.
Lucila Beato UNMIL/HRPS
“Understanding the UNCRPD and making the rights a reality” Heather Logan Disability Action’s Centre on Human Rights for People with Disabilities.
Human Rights and People with Psychosocial Disabilities Presented by: Ms Robinah Alambuya At the 2 nd Annual Malawi Mental Health Research and Practice.
UPR – the role of National Human Rights Institutions Duncan Wilson, Head of Strategy and Legal Geneva, Inter-Parliamentary Union, 12 November 2012.
Introduction to the UN CRPD with a special focus on Article 33 Gauthier de BecoAlexander HoefmansAssociate Researcher Catholic University of Louvain (UCL)
ORGANISED LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA (SALGA) PRESENTATION TO CNM Scope of the relationships between local governments of IBSA July 2009.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
POLICY REFORM OPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS TO CONSIDER PRESENTATION TO A PUBLIC FORUM OTTAWA, DECEMBER 2, 2014.
Supporting Citizenship – The Future of Services for Persons with Disabilities in Ireland: Some Reflections on the Impact of the UN Convention on the R.
Implementing article 33 of the Convention: cases, positions and lessons Linnéa Arvidsson Regional Office for Europe UN Human Rights.
Who can do what? IMP 5.4 UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Section.
Putting the UN Disability Convention into practice Sara Brunet, Senior Lawyer and UNCRPD lead officer, EHRC.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CRPD: INTRODUCTION TO THE NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 4: Maternity Protection at work: Who are the main stakeholders?
Planning and submitting a shadow report Charlotte Gage Women’s Resource Centre.
Belgrade, 24 April 2015 Sabrina Ferraina Senior Policy Officer
Quality of Service… beyond costs… towards investment Luk Zelderloo, Secretary General EASPD.
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
Jyothi Kanics Advocacy & Policy Specialist The UNICEF General Measures of Implementation Project.
European implementation and monitoring UNCRPD Inmaculada Placencia Porrero Deputy Head of Unit DG Employment social affairs and equal opportunities European.
1 OUR RIGHTS, OUR CONVENTION BUT FOR ALL - THE CRPD, FOCUSING ON THE SOUTH. BY SYLVESTER KATONTOKA. PRESIDENT. MENTAL HEALTH USERS NETWORK OF ZAMBIA
Dr. Eilionóir Flynn, Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Disability Law and Policy, National University of Ireland Galway.
Module 6 National implementation and monitoring frameworks.
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A new framework of rights for a new century Presented by Anna MacQuarrie.
Future Challenges for Europe in the field of Intellectual Disability Luk Zelderloo, Secretary General EASPD 24 April 2008, Las Palmas.
IFAP Special Event: Information and Knowledge for All, Emerging Trends and Challenges Major trends Access to the public domain information: Russian experience.
Dr. Valentin Aichele, LL.M.1 Work Forum for the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Brussels, November.
GPDD/HI training Mozambique –February 22, 2010 Charlotte McClain-Nhlapo- Senior operations officer.
STRUCTURE AND TASKS OF FOCAL POINTS Focal Points’ activities – ideas for the Finnish model.
University of New South Wales Sydney Seminar on the CRPD February 2009 University of New South Wales Sydney Seminar on the CRPD February 2009 Gerard Quinn.
COMPLYING WITH THE UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
PRESENTATION ON INTERNATIONAL MONITORING BY ANURADHA MOHIT Dublin
Joana Mendes Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, University of Amsterdam Jean Monnet Seminar, University of Macau 27 October 2011 Participation.
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Development Cooperation Training course Brussels, 29 th & 30 th November 2012 Module 3: The CRPD as a key driver.
The EU disability policy Civil society's perspective Donata Vivanti - Vice-president EDF.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
Astana Economic forum - May 2012 Prevention of corruption systems and institutional frameworks Francesco Checchi, UNDP Anti Corruption Specialist.
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Development Cooperation Training course Brussels, 29 th + 30 th November 2012 Module 5: Supporting National efforts.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
Protocol on Water and Health: added value and challenges for public participation Tsvietkova Anna MAMA-86’s Water and Sanitation Program Workshop on Water.
Global policy framework and standards on ICT accessibility UNDESA/DSPD FPRUM DISABILITY INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT Nairobi, Kenya 28 October.
The European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care Claire Champeix, Coordinator European Expert Group on the Transition.
ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING SOCIAL PROTECTION FLOOR Global Network, Cape Town 7 December 2012 BY AFRICAN LABOUR RESEARCH NETWORK (ALRN)
Women Inclusion in decision making structures for public sector Tilitonse Thematic call guidance session Fannie Nthakomwa December 2015.
Monitoring of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) Kapka Panayotova Youth Summer School on Independent Living Istanbul,
Uniting Nations by Learning Together UPR as a process of accountability: Opportunities for inclusiveness Regional Governance Week Social Accountability.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO The principle of integration and its dilemmas Hans Chr. Bugge Professor of Environmental Law University of Oslo.
“THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ART. 33 IN EUROPE: SETTING THE SCENE” AVV. DELIA FERRI PH.D IN ITALIAN AND EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW " REALIZATION OF ARTICLE.
Hvala vam na pozivu. Handisam Swedish Agency for Disability Policy Coordination Expert Authority to the Government 29 employees.
Mainstreaming horizontal principle Prevention of discrimination based on disability and accessibility
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Disability Summer School Galway 21 June 2016
European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue
National CRPD Monitoring Mechanism Monitoring CRPD
Towards full participation of ageing persons with disabilities
How the Ombud interact with UN treaty bodies
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
CRPD: National implementation and monitoring frameworks
Joined-up governance for fundamental rights
Implementation measures
1. Introduction to the Convention 2
National implementation and monitoring frameworks
THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
Presentation transcript:

Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, Brussels. Article 33 UN CRPD Work Forum Preparatory Meeting 14 October, Brussels. Gerard Quinn Article 33 – The Engine of the Convention

1. The Purpose/s of the Engine – Key Textual Departures Points. 4. Key Challenges in building the engine. Opening the Engine…… Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context.

33- A Shift away from the Traditional Focus of Int HR Treaties 33- A Shift away from the Traditional Focus of Int HR Treaties 1. The Purpose/s of the Engine.

And to Overcome the Traditional Isolation of International Law Window & Transmission Belt Key Vehicle to Carry the ‘New Paradigm’ of disability into domestic order International Legal Order Domestic Legal Order Committee on the Rts of PWD: 34 Conference of States Parties: 40 By… Imagining a New Domestic Institutional Architecture for Change National Implementation Focal Point 33.1 Co-ord Mechanism 33.1 National Monitoring ‘protect, promote, monitor’ 33.2 Active Consultation with PWD 33.3 Adding missing ‘Voices’ To the process Research Supporting Action

2. Linked Back to General Provisions – the engine in context General Obligation to Consult. Adding Voice to the Entirety of the Process. 31. Develop an evidence base to a Key Tool in the Process. Research, data. 32 (b). Obligation to contribute to capacity-building. You are not alone. 32 (c). Co-operation in research. Share ideas CRPD sets a floor – you can go beyond it. 9.2 & 16.3 also mention ‘monitoring’. Treat as lex specialis All Provisions (which must include 33) apply to all parts of Federal States

Article ‘National implementation and monitoring’ 1.States Parties, in accordance with their system of organization, shall designate one or more focal points within government for matters relating to the implementation of the present Convention, and shall give due consideration to the establishment or designation of a coordination mechanism within government to facilitate related action in different sectors and at different levels. Confers a Certain Margin of Appreciation Gvt has the Choice – but it must be exercised…must it consult? Can be a Plurality – no express Criteria given – [e.g., authority across Gvt, effectiveness, link to int law, etc] What does ‘due consideration mean’? How does its role differ/overlap with ‘focal point’? 3. Art 33 – Key Textual Departures Points. Notice – focus is the Implementation of the Convention – presumably through National Law & Policy

Confers a Certain Margin of Appreciation What are the criteria of ‘Independence’. 3 Very Different Roles Paris Principles for NHRIs??? Framework??? Might be a plurality ‘ Take into account’???

33.3. Civil society, in particular persons with disabilities and their representative organizations, shall be involved and participate fully in the monitoring process. Confined to Monitoring only??? +++Protect? +++Promote?

4. Key Challenges in building the engine. Which Ministry…(symbolism, authority across Ministries, special case of Federal Administrations. Singularity or Plurality of ‘Focal Point/s’? Does the logic point to a National Strategy/Action Plan (to implement convention?) or link existing strategy to convention? What statistical and other ‘learning tools’ should be developed? Is it a Bridge between External/Internal….(role of Foreign Ministry?) External Face of Focal Point/s…to International Community. Clarity on Division of Labour between Focal Point/s & Coordination Mechanism. Does Coord mechanism simply ‘implement’ policy set by Focal Point or play other roles? Accountability/accessiblity of Focal Point/s to other Institutions of State. Interface with Civil Society, How, to what purpose… The Focal Point/s…coordination Mechanism What is its Essential Mission? Implement Convention…thru national law/Policy The Focal Point/s…coordination Mechanism What is its Essential Mission? Implement Convention…thru national law/Policy

Independent Monitoring Mechanism. What is meant by promote, protect and monitor? Does the Framework ‘promote, protect and monitor’ the convention via domestic law singular or pluralityOne or more – singular or plurality? If a plurality, how does the Framework maintain integrity and cohesion? What are the criteria of independence? Must all elements of the Framework be independent? Does Civil society have a say? Relationship of Framework to International Community. Parallel reports.

Civil Society Engagement 33.3 and 4.3 read together…Consultation applies across the board. Interface with Focal Point/Coord mechanisms. What: Consult to set policy, monitor effectiveness, provide part of the information loop to make Gvt a learning organisation, consult on drawing up national strategy, reporting to UN and other bodies. How, platform, questions of representivity? Avoid ‘drown out’ of voices by more powerful voices. Preserves prerogative of Gvt to consult more widely (trade unions). Interface with Monitoring Mechanism Very novel! Promote – educational drives. Awareness raising. Protect – informing strategy, but the mechanisms retain independence. Monitor – reality check for the monitoring task (but can be done by civil society separately) Capacity Issue. Supporting civil society to become active interlocutors.