Synergistic effect of ozone and microgard 300 for controlling Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat cooked and cured ham. R. JHALA 1, K. Muthukumarappan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effectiveness of Irradiation in Controlling Pathogenic and Spoilage Microorganisms in Meats Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science Pennsylvania.
Advertisements

Most Probable Number Statistical Procedure used to estimate the number of bacteria that will grow in liquid media. Gives a 95% probability that the bacterial.
Washes and Sanitizers to Reduce Microbial Contamination JIM DICKSON DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE INTER-DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM IN MICROBIOLOGY Iowa State.
Danisco A/S FOOD PROTECTION SYMPOSIUM SAO PAULO, BRAZIL JUNE 2005 Natural Food Safety in the DAIRY WORLD Steffen Thun Application Technologist Dairy Applications,
CONTROL OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN MEAT PRODUCTS BY SANITATION, DRYING AND ANTIMICROBIALS John N. Sofos Colorado State University
Meat evaluation There are some important parameters such as temperature, acidity (pH), water activity (aw) and cooking loss. Other physical parameters.
Post-Processing Interventions to Control Listeriosis Don L. Zink, Ph.D. Office of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages Center for Food Safety and Applied.
Kelly J.K. Getty, Ph.D. Kansas State University.  Packaging effects on jerky, snack sticks, kippered beef steak, and turkey tenders  Intrinsic factors.
Effect of Mustard Powder on the Survival of Salmonella ser. Typhimurium in Packaged Shredded Cheese Dipak Pokhrel, Naveen Chikthimmah, & Joongmin Shin.
Microbial Control - Physical Means
Week: 10 FOOD PROCESSING.
A Simulation Model for Predicting the Potential Growth of Salmonella as a Function of Time, Temperature and Type of Chicken Thomas P. Oscar, Agricultural.
Microbial Growth. What do they need to grow? Physical needs –Temperature, proper pH, etc. Chemical needs –Molecules for food, ATP production, coenzymes,
Culture media.
Listeria Guidance – Part 1 Sally Hasell. Purpose of Guide 1 1.Gives an overview of the issues – why controls are needed and why this need is becoming.
BIO 205 – Microbiology Chapters 8, 9, end of Ch. 3.
THE PRODUCTION OF BACTERIOCINS FROM LACTIC ACID BACTERIA M.P.Zacharof ¹and R.W. Lovitt² Multidisciplinary Nanotechnology Centre, Swansea University, Swansea,
Listeria monocytogenes survival in refrigerator dill pickles Jin Kyung Kim a, Elaine M. D'Sa b, Mark A. Harrison a, Judy A. Harrison b, and Elizabeth L.
The Control of Microbial Growth
Control of Bacterial Growth l Definitions –Sterilization - Processes that kills living organisms including spores –Disinfection - Destruction of vegetative.
1 High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) Technology presentation.
Eastern Regional Research Center Bacterial Inactivation in Apple Juice by UV-light and Radio Frequency Electric Fields Processing Dike O. Ukuku Ph.D. FSIT-ERRC-ARS-USDA.
Alternatives 1 & 2 for Control for Listeria monocytogenes
Interventions to improve microbial safety –Compounds, Ingredients, Processes 1. Carcass washing - remove, reduce beginning numbers –remove bacteria before.
Antimicrobials from Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from turmeric (Curcuma longa linn.) and their applications as biopreservative and in edible film Melada.
A Bacterial Analysis of Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Meat Megan Markland Department of Biological Sciences York College, PA Introduction Hypotheses H.
Culturing requirements
Laboratory Experiment to Determine Batch Ethanol Production by S. cerevisiae Benjamin Reves May 11, 2005.
Inactivation of Wine Spoilage Yeasts Dekkera bruxellensis Using Low Electric Current Treatment(LEC ) Kenneth, Eriko, Zach, Jihee.
Antibacterial Inhibition of Common Cooking Spices Against Escherichia coli Mariah Weir Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
The Antibacterial Effects of a Household Cleaner Greg Vojtek Central Catholic Pittsburgh Grade 9.
The efficacy of preservation methods to reduce the level of viruses is subdivided into methods: 1. To hinder microbial growth during storage 2. To inactivate.
Derya Boyacı İ zmir Institute of Technology Turkey Development of Whey Protein Based Edible Films with pH-controlled Release for Active Packaging.
Aquatic Thermal Tolerance of E.coli
Overview of Post-Harvest Food Safety in ARS
Food Science and Industry
Efficacy of a novel bactericide for elimination of biofilm in food processing facilities Tong Zhao Center for Food Safety University of Georgia For 3 rd.
Lecture 4 Dr. Dalia M. Mohsen Prof. of Microbiology.
Types of meat products Canning of meat Production of sausage
Lab #10.
Controlling of Microbial Growth
Universidad Michoacana of San Nicolas Hidalgo
Task 1.1:Conceptual visualisation of bioagents in food chains. Decontamination: a way to reduce Salmonella prevalence in the slaughtered swine carcass?
Chapter 3: Animal Products Chapter overview: –Chapter 3 reviews the history, availability, and processing of animal products, including: composition and.
Microbial Growth refers to increase in number of cells not in size.
Food preservation by high temperature. By destructive effect of heat on microorganisms Temperature higher than ambient temperature is applied to food.
Microbial Growth Growth in Batch Culture
Extrinsic parameters affecting growth of microorganisms in foods.
Listeria monocytogenes serovar prevalence and dominance dynamics in meat products: A useful insight into the underrepresentation of serovar 4b strains.
PORK the Other White Meat Original Power Point Created by Randal Cales Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office June 2002.
Lecture 2   Meat drying in combination with additional treatment i) Pre-salting ii) cured dried meat iii) smoked dried meat iv) dried meat with spices.
Materials and Methods (Continuation) Results (Continuation)
Control Measures.
Thermal and Non-Thermal Preservation
Evaluation of chemical immersion treatments to reduce microbial counts in fresh beef Ahmed Kassem1, Joseph Meade1, Kevina McGill1, James Gibbons1, James.
Effects of E-vapor Juice on Microbial Flora
Scallop Powder Containing Ice for Fresh Fish Preservation: A New-fledged View about Food Safety of Bangladesh Sunzid Ahmed1,Md. Tanvir Islam1*, Sharmin.
Food preservation.
Increase in number of cells, not cell size Populations Colonies
Biofilms Microbial communities Form slime or hydrogels
Presented By: Sugam Birthare M. Tech (FT)
The Control of Microbial Growth
Effect of Environmental Conditions on Listeria monocytogenes Attachment and Biofilm Development on Food Plant Surfaces. Angie Rubi1, Ilan Arvelo2, and.
Food Preservation An Overview of Methodologies
The Control of Microbial Growth
The Control of Microbial Growth
Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science
Effects Of Fertilizer on Yeast Cell and E. Coli Survivorship
Anti-microbial Technologies
Food and Microbes Test 6 Notes.
Presentation transcript:

Synergistic effect of ozone and microgard 300 for controlling Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat cooked and cured ham. R. JHALA 1, K. Muthukumarappan, J. L. Julson, and R. I. Dave. (1) Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, AE #2120 South Dakota State University,, Brookings, SD Abstract The effectiveness of ozone and Microgard® (MG300) on the survival of known number of Listeria monocytogenes in ham sample was investigated in a closed system. The survival rate of Listeria monocytogenes was studied as a function of gaseous ozone concentration, Microgard ®, temperature and storage period for a fixed treatment period of 30 min and storage temperature of 4ºC. The results indicate that a synergistic effect of ozone, MG300 and storage period can inactivate up to 99.94% of Listeria monocytogenes on cooked and cured ham. The temperature does not have any significant effect on %kill of Listeria monocytogenes. The combination of ozone and MG300 can be an effective hurdle to control Listeria monocytogenes in cooked and cured ham. Isolation  Listeria monocytogenes culture was obtained from Alfred Chair’s Laboratory (SDSU, Brookings, SD).  The culture was maintained at –80°C in glycerol-nutrient broth. Propagation  The cultures were given three transfers ( hrs) before replications for the purpose of full activation.  Media used for activation was trypticase soy broth with 0.6% yeast extract.  Probable number of Listeria monocytogenes was determined by optical density measurement (at 603 nm) using an UV spectrophotometer Inoculation  About 0.1ml of the active culture of known number of Listeria monocytogenes is spread on cm 2 area of Hyvee brand reduced fat (97% fat free) cooked cured ham slices.  The inoculated samples are stored for 20 minutes under refrigerated condition, to allow the culture to absorb to the surface of the ham. Experimental Design Ozone (ppm) - 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 MG300 (%) - 0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 Temperature (°C) - 10, 15, 20 Exposure time - 30 min Storage days - 1, 5, 10 Experimental set-up  The inoculated samples were exposed to gaseous environment of ozone in a closed system housed in an incubation chamber to control the temperature.  The percent solution of MG300 was prepared in pH – 7.0 phosphate buffer.  0.1 ml of MG300 (%) solution was spread after the ozone treatment to study the synergistic effect.  The samples for the storage study were vacuum packed (Food saver) and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. Microbial Analysis  Enumeration of the surviving Listeria monocytogenes was done according to the method suggested by murano et al, using the pour plate technique.  The efficacy of the above treatment has been reported as percent kill of (%Kill) Listeria monocytogenes. Statistical Analysis  According to the experimental design a total of 432 samples were treated. The whole experiment was replicated thrice (4 ozone level X 4 MG300 level X 3 temperature X 1 exposure time X 3 storage period X 3 replication).  The mean %kill data was analyzed using split- split- split-plot experimental design model with the help of statistical analysis software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Introduction In the recent years, Listeria monocytogenes has caused major listeriosis outbreaks in the U.S. associated with ready-to-eat meat products(). Food pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes may survive the conventional food processing methods like pasteurization and cooking. Moreover, there is a demand for safe and judicious usage of sanitizers, bleaching agents, preservatives and chemicals in food processing (1). Thus, the food industry is currently in need of innovative processing technologies in order to meet consumer’s demand for fresher and safe ready-to-eat meat products (2). There are several methods available for inactivation of microorganisms in foods; thermal, high pressure, pulsed electric field, oscillating magnetic field, irradiation and ozonation. In August 2001, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ozone as a direct food additive for the treatment, storage and processing of food in gaseous and aqueous phases (3). Ozone’s antimicrobial action is through the oxidation of bacterial cell wall components (4). The technologies used singly to ensure that a food is free of pathogens may cause changes in the sensory attributes of the food. Thus, in the food industry, the use of multiple parameter known as “Hurdle Concept” has been suggested (5). Microgard ® 300 is a bacteriocin like, low molecular weight metabolite material of Propionibacterium shermanii in a skim milk base. It has been used as a preservative in cottage cheese and other food products to inhibit psychrotrophic spoilage bacteria, yeast, mold and gram-positive organisms like Listeria monocytogenes (6). In this study we have hypothesized that application of ozone and Microgard ® 300 hurdle concept can better control pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes in cooked and cured ham. Objectives - To evaluate the individual and synergistic effect of ozone and MG300 for controlling Listeria monocytogenes in cooked and cured ham. - To Study the effect of treatment temperature in improving the synergy - To Study the effectiveness of the synergy of ozone and MG300 for controlling Listeria monocytogenes in cooked and cured ham over the storage period. Materials and Methods Ozone Concentrator - GeneratorPlexiglass Sample Treatment Chamber O 3 in O 3 out Ham sample Results References G.Vignolo, S. Fadda, M.N. de Kairuz, A.A.P. de Ruiz Holgado, G. Oliver, Control of Listeria monocytogenes in ground beef by lactocin 705, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus casei CRL 705. Intl. J. Food Microbiol. 29: Barnby-smith, FM Bacteriocins:application in food preservation. Trends in Food Sci. Technol. 3: Khadre. M.A, A.E. Yousef, and J.-G. Kim, Microbiological aspects of ozone application in food: A Review.J. Food Sci. 66: Federal Register, Secondary direct food additives permitted in food for human consumption. Federal Register 66(123): Muthukumarappan, K. F. Halaweish, A.S. Naidu, Ozone. In Natural food antimicrobial systems. Eds. A. S. Naidu, pp CRC Press LLC. 6. Daeschel, M.A Antimicrobial substances from lactic acid bacteria for use as food preservatives. Food Technol. 43: Murano, E.A., P.S Murano, R.E. Brennan, K. Shenoy, and R.G. Moreira Application of hydrostatic pressure to eliminate Listeria monocytogenes from fresh pork sausage. J. Food Prot. 62:  As indicated in Table-1, ozone, MG300 & Days have significant effect on mean %kill of Listeria monocytogenes in cured ham. The table also indicates the significant interaction parameters of the experiment.  The group – 1 graphs shows that as ozone concentration increases from 0.0 to 0.5 ppm microbial inactivation significantly increased but above 0.5 ppm the inactivation was not significant.  Increasing the MG300 level up to 2.0% significantly increases the mean %kill of Listeria monocytogenes.  As the storage days increases from 1 to 5 and from 5 to 10 days the mean %kill of Listeria monocytogenes increases exponentially.  Temperature has no significant effect on mean %kill of Listeria monocytogenes.  Group – 2 graphs show the effect of interaction of experimental parameters.  The difference of least square means indicate that ozone & MG300 has a synergistic effect in inactivating Listeria monocytogenes with ozone being a predominant inactivating parameter.  Storage days have a predominant inactivating effect in the interaction of storage days and ozone. While MG300 has a predominant inactivating effect in the interaction of MG300 & storage days. Conclusions DAY 3 DAY 2 DAY 1 OZONE LEVEL – 0 PPM OZONE LEVEL – 0.2 PPM OZONE LEVEL – 0.5 PPM OZONE LEVEL – 1 PPM MG300 0% MG300 1% MG300 2% MG300 3% INTERACTION OF OZONE AND MG300 INTERACTION OF STORAGE DAYS AND OZONE INTERACTION OF STORAGE DAYS AND MG300 GROUP 2 GROUP 1