Agenda Present overview of the structure and purpose of the Framework for Teaching. Identify characteristics and behaviors of excellent teachers and align.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

1 Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 1/11/2014pbevan 1.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
EDU 250 Roxanne Stansbury  It is important to learn about Danielson’s Domains because they are the framework for how we measure effective teaching.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
PD Plan on the Danielson Framework ADSUP 731 Kelli McDaniel May, 2013
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.
The TxBESS Framework Dr. Jan Seiter Ms. Donna Dagar.
Resources and Beyond FfT Facilitator Training January 8, 2013.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
November 29, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 3 Developed by Teaching.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Assessment By: Michael Sazama and Adam Stresing.  Dictionary definition: a judgment about something based on an understanding of the situation What do.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Agenda Identify and define the key elements of formative assessment. Determine the relationship between the key elements of formative assessment and student.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
A brief introduction to
New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation Danielson Framework Yukon Koyukuk School District New Teacher Training.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Learning Management System
From Compliance to Quality TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS IN PA: SAS Institute 2011 Debra Dendas Eric Rosendale Cristine Wagner-Deitch,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
The Framework for Teaching
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Present overview of the structure and purpose of the Framework for Teaching. Identify characteristics and behaviors of excellent teachers and align them with the Framework for Teaching. Match teaching vignettes with domains and components of the Framework for Teaching. Distinguish between evidence and opinion. Observe teaching and collect evidence. Use evidence-based coaching skills for professional growth conversations. 2

Learning Outcomes Participants will Become familiar with the purpose and structure of the Framework for Teaching (FFT). Build familiarity with the FFT and its uses for classroom observation, teacher reflection, and professional growth. 3

What Does “a Framework for Teaching” Mean? A description of the teacher responsibilities that promote improved student learning. A definition of what teachers should know and be able to do in the exercise of their profession, based on research and best practice. A common language that allows opportunities for educators to discuss good teaching. A structure designed to address the complexities of teaching applicable to all practitioner levels from novice through accomplished. 4

The “Wow” Factor If you were to observe an excellent teacher, either in the classroom or another professional setting, what might you see or hear that would cause you to think that you were in the presence of an expert? What would make you think, “Wow, this is good! If I had a child this age, this is the class I would want to choose.” Write one idea per sticky note. 5

A Framework for Teaching: The Domains 1: Planning and Preparation 2: The Classroom Environment 3: Instruction 4: Professional Responsibilities 6

A Framework for Teaching: Domains and Components of Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy Demonstrating knowledge of students Setting instructional outcomes Demonstrating knowledge of resources Designing coherent instruction Designing student assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an environment of respect and rapport Establishing a culture for learning Managing classroom procedures Managing student behavior Organizing physical space Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on teaching Maintaining accurate records Communicating with families Participating in a professional community Growing and developing professionally Showing professionalism Domain 3: Instruction Communicating with students Using questioning and discussion techniques Engaging students in learning Using assessment in instruction Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness 7

Considering the Best Fit Using Handout 2, determine the best fit of domain and component for each vignette. 8

Evidence and Best Fit EvidenceDomain and Component The desks in Mr. T’s 2nd grade classroom are arranged in groups of four. A couch and beanbag chair are provided for students in the reading corner. 2e Ms. A was unable to locate her list of which students had returned their permission slips for the field trip. 4b Ms. C has her class watch a clip of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech using a video guide containing questions that are factual, interpretive, and analytic in nature. After the film clip, students work in pairs to respond to the questions. 3b After his 1st hour geography class, Mr. M concluded that the lesson was successful because everyone received an A on the quiz. 4a 9

Mr. B has designed a rubric for student presentations. It identifies key elements of a good presentation and three levels of performance for each of the elements. 1f When students enter the classroom, they begin work on a brief assignment that is written on the board while Ms. L takes attendance. 2c Students in Mr. H’s math class are looking puzzled after he provides an explanation of “slope” in algebra. Instead of assigning a worksheet as he had planned, he tries a different approach to clarifying the concept. 3e Ms. E plans to give the students a Web site to explore as an extended learning activity on understanding the judicial system. 1d For one of her flexible grouping assignments, Ms. R plans to create cooperative groups that will each include two English language learners. 1b 10 Evidence and Best Fit EvidenceDomain and Component

Evidence: A Reporting of the Facts Evidence may include statements, actions, or behaviors. Evidence may also include artifacts prepared by the teacher, students, or others. Evidence is not personal opinion or bias. It is selected through the observer’s and/or teacher’s use of professional judgment. 11

Evidence or Opinion? 1.Bulletin boards could be more informative. 2.Student: “I can’t do it!” Teacher: “Yes, you can. Let’s talk about it.” 3.As the journal review ended, students knew exactly what to do next (ready themselves so that the journal could receive a stamp, and then clear off their desks). 4.Classroom is neat. 5.The teacher said, “Boys should not take family and consumer science.” 6.Near the end of the period (about 10:40), students began to lose their focus. 12

Evidence vs. Opinion Is observable. Is not influenced by observer’s perspective. Is free of evaluative words. Does not draw conclusions. Makes inferences. Depends on observer’s perspective. Includes evaluative words. Draws conclusions. 13

Observing Professional Practice (Part I) As you watch the brief video clip, write down evidence that you note as it applies to the components of – Domain 2 – Classroom Environment – Domain 3 – Instruction Use Handout 3, Classroom Observation Record. 14

Observing Professional Practice (Part II) Share your evidence with colleagues at your table. Be prepared to share with the whole group. 15

Mediational Questions Mediational questions help the colleague Hypothesize what might happen. Analyze what worked or didn’t. Imagine possibilities. Compare and contrast what was planned with what ensued. Extrapolate from one situation to another. Evaluate impact. Some mediational question stems include the following: What’s another way you might... ? What would it look like if... ? What do you think would happen if... ? How was... different from (like)... ? What sort of impact do you think... ? What criteria do you use to... ? How did you decide... (come to that conclusion)? When have you done something like... before? 16

Conversations That Promote Teacher Thinking and Growth Using evidence collected from the teaching clip, role-play with a partner a reflecting conversation (observer and teacher). The observer should – Share the evidence. – Invite the teacher to comment. – Ask mediational questions. Switch roles and repeat the role-play. 17

Debrief Questions about today’s learning? Reflection (please respond to at least one): – In what way(s) can the Framework for Teaching benefit you as a professional? – How might the Framework for Teaching promote a professional learning community in your school? – What aspect of today’s learning resonates with you? Why? 18

Thank You! © 2009 by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), 1703 North Beauregard Street, Alexandria, Virginia All rights reserved. This PowerPoint is intended for professional development by the purchaser and authorized staff, where no fee is charged, and may be: (a) Presented at face-to-face meetings, professional development presentations, classrooms, and school community gatherings; (b) Photocopied and distributed; and (c) Posted on secure, password protected Web pages. For all other uses, written permission must be secured from ASCD. Visit Rights & Permissions on our Web site at 19