Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0652r0 Submission May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration Date:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1426r1 November 2014 Gustav Wikström et al., EricssonSlide 1 DSC and legacy coexistence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission January 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC Date: 2015/01/12.
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r0 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0319r1 Submission March 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Impact of TPC coupled to DSC for legacy unfairness issue Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:
Further Considerations on Enhanced CCA for 11ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0050r0 January 2015 Yu Wang et al., EricssonSlide 1 Modeling components impacting throughput gain from CCAT adjustment.
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0105r0 January 2015 Sean Coffey, RealtekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse AP Management Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission January 2015 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 11aa GCR-BA Performance in OBSS Date: 2015/01/12 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0623r1 May 2015 Guido R. Hiertz, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 TGax simulation scenario “Box 5” – calibration results Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0374r1 Mar 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Further Considerations on Legacy Fairness with Enhanced CCA Date:
Dynamic CCA control and TPC Simulation Results with SS1~SS3
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1039r0 Chuck Lukaszewski et al. Aruba Networks, an HP Company Spatial Reuse Measurements September, 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0304r2 March 2015 Joonsuk (Apple) etc.Slide 1 Evaluating Power Save Performance Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1138r1 Month Year Filip Mestanov (Ericsson)Slide 1 To DSC or not to DSC Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission Eduard Garcia-Villegas Drivers of the dynamic CCA adaptation Authors: Nov Date:
Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC
Doc.: IEEE /1172r2 Submission September 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Multicast Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/9/15 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0801r0 Submission July 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 1 DCCA/DSC Reference Simulation Results Date: 2015/07/12 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0376r2 Slide 1Tatsumi Uwai, Radrix co. ltd March 2015 UL-MU MAC Throughput under Non-Full Buffer Traffic Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 1 Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria for Coexistence.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Simulation-based evaluation of DSC in enterprise scenario
TG ax DSC Summary Date: Authors: July 2015 April 2013
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
Summary of Power Save Calibration Results
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Results for SS6 calibration case for single BSS and OBSS
Box 5 results for Single BSS Calibration Case
DSC Calibration Result
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration Date: 2015/05/12 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Masahito MoriSony Corp Yuichi Morioka Yusuke Tanaka Takeshi Itagaki Graham SmithSR Sayantan Choudhury Nokia Tuomaala Esa Kneckt Jarkko Chinghwa YuMediaTek Inc. No. 1, Dusing 1st Road, Hsinchu, 300 Taiwan Knut

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 2 Authors (continued): NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kentaro David Guido Yasuhiko InoueNTT1-1 Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa Japan Shoko Koichi Ishihara Yasushi Takatori Yusuke Asai John (Ju-Hyung) SonWILUS Institute Geonjung Jinsam Sean

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Abstract Many simulation results of dynamic CCA / DSC have been presented at TGax However the simulation conditions were diverse and the results were inconsistent [1] In order to move forward, interested parties discussed and agreed on a set of common assumptions, to derive consistent simulation results as a reference The goal of the effort is to build a common ground to do an apples-to-apples comparison between proposals This simple scenario is presented in this contribution May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Reference Simulation Model The document defines a simple scenario to have consistent reference simulation results –Deployment scenario (topology) –Traffic model / MCS selection –Operational parameters –Receiver state machine May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Reference Deployment Scenario May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 5 34m 3m AP1AP2 STA3 STA4 STA1 STA2

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Reference Traffic Model / MCS Selection May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Reference Operational Parameters May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Reference Operational Parameters (cont’d) May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Receiver State Machine May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 9 The reference model maintains Fig PLCP state machine from (pre ah receiver state machine) Change CCA-SD threshold (-76/-66/-56 dBm) to create 3 throughput graphs

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Summary Reference scenario and conditions for dynamic CCA / DSC calibration were presented Interested parties are encouraged to share simulation results based on this reference model, to start an apples-to-apples comparison May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission References [1] 11-14/1580r0, “Perspectives on Spatial Reuse in 11ax” [2] 11-14/0854r0, “DSC and Legacy Coexistence” [3] 11-14/0571r8, “11ax Evaluation Methodology” [4] 11-14/1523r5, “Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration” [5] 11-15/0053r2, “Box5 Results of 11ac SS6” May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 11

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Appendix May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 12

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Simulation Conditions (Relation between preamble detection threshold and distance from OBSS) May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 13 AP(TxPower 20dBm) STA (TxPower 15dBm) original CCA-SD level (-76dBm) Each AP will receive a signal at about -65dBm from the other AP 34m away In the worst case, each STA will receive a signal at -67dBm from a STA in the other network, 28m away Each STA will receive a signal at about -36dBm from its AP 3m away

doc.: IEEE /0652r0 Submission Simulation Conditions (Relation between preamble detection threshold and distance from OBSS) May 2015 Masahito Mori, Sony CorporationSlide 14 Each STA will receive a signal at about -36dBm from its AP 3m away AP(TxPower 20dBm) STA (TxPower 15dBm) original CCA-SD level (-76dBm) With a DSC margin of 20dB, each STA (on the perimeter of the circle) would be setting effective CCA at -56dBm, well below any signal from the other network 20dB margin Each AP will receive a signal at about -65dBm from the other AP 34m away In the worst case, each STA will receive a signal at -67dBm from a STA in the other network, 28m away CCA-SD level is raised