Families and Children Task Force Overview and Findings May 8, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to CHA/CHIP Work Groups August 17, 2012 Meredith Bossin Planning & Development Review.
Advertisements

Citizen Survey and Neighborhood Feedback City of Wichita District IV Spring/Summer 2013.
City Council Presentation July 1, 2014 Parks & Recreation Master Plan.
Parking Benefit District City of Austin Transportation Department Parking Enterprise Division.
Planning Family Friendly Communities Survey Results by Evelyn Israel and Mildred Warner, Cornell University, in collaboration with Carrie Fesperman, APA.
Title Slide Heading Lucy Hillier RIATT-ESA Intergenerational issues between older caregivers and children in the context of AIDS A study by Regional Interagency.
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Union: Community for a Life Time Planning for the Future The Union County Home and Community Care Block Grant Strategic Planning Committee takes an in-depth.
Tackling Sprawl and Transportation Issues Produced by Amanda Lawson Delaware Geographic Alliance – University of Delaware Funded by Space Grant.
DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable March 30, 2012.
Developing & Implementing Master Bike & Pedestrian Plans Heleen Dewey Spokane Regional Health District March 2010.
Parks, Recreation and Community Services AGE FRIENDLY EVANSTON! January 27, 2015 Age Friendly Evanston! Initiatives Christina Ferraro Assistant Director.
Building the Local Government/ School Partnership Laura Morrison City Council Member Austin, Texas.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Magnet Program Audit for Baltimore County Public Schools Presentation of Key Findings and Recommendations November 19, 2013 Marilyn Zlotnik, Vice President.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
Southern Nevada Strong Consortium Committee Meeting April 18, 2013.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Cayucos and Oceano COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANS Health Commission Presentation June 9, 2014.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
The HiAP Concept We all have a role to play in creating healthy communities.  Environments in which people live, work, study and play impact health 
Alamo Region Livability Summit Local Plans: The Decade of Downtown Ben Brewer Wednesday, August 21, 2013 San Anto Cultural Arts “La Paleta” 1.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P13 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Understanding family.
Urban Design Goals: Produce a high quality living environment for all residents. Clarify and enhance the relationship between new housing development and.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Presentation to LWM: Performance Measurement in WI Municipalities Craig Maher Associate Professor UW-Oshkosh MPA Program Alan Probst Local Government Center.
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
Virginia Housing Coalition- Top 40 Network Housing Needs and Preferences Among Millennials A Presentation to the Virginia Housing Policy Advisory Council.
Lompoc Community Assessments “What We Learned” Presented by Judy Taggart MS, CHES March 25, 2010.
MOVING TOWARD AN ELDER FRIENDLY MOBILITY FUTURE May 19, 2009 Presented by Marla Turner, Associate State Director AARP Texas.
Your Health Matters: Growing Active, Healthy Communities
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Asset Building Strategies Mayors and Working Families: City Human Service Officials May 2, 2005.
Danielle Biselli & Mary Masla Mission To support, expand and advocate for quality out-of-school time programs and activities for children,
ACPS & City of Alexandria 1.  Long Range Educational Facilities Plan to improve facilities planning, accommodate the growing student population, and.
A ‘Plug’ for Electric Vehicles! Sally Herbert Sustainable Travel Officer Newcastle City Council.
CATS CONSORTIUM & THE SUSTAINABLE PLACES PROJECT CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
URBAN STRATEGIES COUNCIL’S RECOMMENDATION TO CAC ON Shipyard Legacy Fund (SLF) PRIORITIES FOR INVESTMENT July 10, 2006.
© 2007 PMP. All rights reserved. Wednesday 18 th July South Northamptonshire Council Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study and Green Space Strategy.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
Your Health Matters: Growing Active Communities Take Action 1.
AARP’s Livable Communities Agenda The Move Toward Enhancing Mobility and Housing Options in America Workshop: Universal Design: An Investment for Aging.
Pedestrians are the lost measure of a community, they set the scale for both the center and edge of our neighborhoods. --Peter Calthorpe The Next American.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
Aquatic Facility Concept Design. “Every Dog has its Day” Park Valley Pool Pool is 28 years old and nearing the 4-9 years of identified life expectancy.
San Mateo County Parks Midcoast Plan for Recreation December 18, 2006 Purpose of this meeting: –Outline a process for to complete and implement a Midcoast.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
UP 539 Tim Davis January 29, 2009 iLabs and Economic Development.
North Vancouver Recreation Commission Needs Assessment/Facility Plan Presentation to FONVCA.
Ford Site Open Space Work Group An advisory group to the Ford Site Planning Task Force Meeting #1 June 30, 2010.
Strategic Planning in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Councillor Peter Moakes Chair, Joint Strategic Planning & Transport Member Group John Williamson.
Headline results from residents' survey Areas of personal concern for residents Which of these issues are you most concerned about at the moment?
Boise Community Forestry 2015 Management Plan “Our Living City” Brian Jorgenson, Boise City Forester Lance Davisson, Project Manager – Ecosystem Sciences.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
JUNE 2016 Downtown Bozeman, MT Comprehensive Downtown Parking Plan.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
Facilities Planning Survey ANDERSON SCHOOL Marie Y. Judisch Activity 3 – Data Collection and Analysis EDLD 574 Field Experience.
Parks, trials and recreation opportunities are a fundamental part of every good community. The City of Midway is very fortunate to be located in an area.
ARCH – 4601 Feasibility Study Presentation
Implementation of an Accommodation Strategy
CAN Language Access Report Summary
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
Open Forum: Campus Parking
Presentation transcript:

Families and Children Task Force Overview and Findings May 8, 2008

History and Charge Task Force created by Council resolution on July 21, 2007 The Task Force was charged to: –Consider a set of questions and concerns, including child care issues, appropriate/affordable housing, and transportation; –Examine best practices in peer cities and in literature; and –Make policy recommendations to the City Council

Organization and Meetings The Task Force divided the work of the charge into two subcommittees. –Child Care Subcommittee –Housing Subcommittee ( Housing, Parks/Amenities, Schools ) Monthly Task Force meetings. Additional monthly subcommittee meetings.

Methodology Consensus of Task Force was to focus on issues related to Families and Children in Austin’s urban core Urban core is defined by: –US Hwy 183 to the North and East –Ben White to the South –Mopac to the West

Survey Created an online survey to attain information from citizens in Austin March respondents –857 families with children under 18 –203 families without children under 18

Survey Question: Geographic Location

Survey Results Top Concerns: –Child care –Affordable housing –Sidewalks and bike lanes –Public transportation –Public schools –Parks and pools

Survey Question: Neighborhood Safety

Findings Related to Child Care Services: Trends More than 50% of families with children aged 3–5 in Travis County need full-time child care. Approx. 2,800 children are receiving subsidized child care. Child care capacity in Travis County has stayed constant at approx. 41,000 openings, but there is a general trend for child care centers to be closing in the central core and moving to the suburbs. Child care quality is improving; of particular note are the efforts of United Way Capital Area's Success By 6. Child care costs continue to rise: between 2005 and 2006, average cost of full-time care for children aged infant to 3 years rose by nearly $300, to $636/month in Travis Co.

Findings Related to Child Care Services FCTF survey found that more respondents were dissatisfied with the supply of quality child care in Austin than were satisfied. Survey noted that lack of affordable, quality child care services in Austin was a top concern. Three focus groups were held by Task Force members, including one with low-income students at ACC. –Almost all of the participants agreed that families' lack of access to quality, affordable child care is one of the top problems facing families in the community.

Findings Related to Child Care Services – State of Child Care Services In Austin I am satisfied with the supply of quality child care in Austin

Findings Related to Child Care Services-Economic Development Model New research indicates that childcare is an important piece of the infrastructure of a city and plays a critical role in the local economy. Availability of quality, affordable child care services affects the productivity and satisfaction of the local workforce; it affects the local economy, and it provides a measurable return on investment.

Findings Related to Child Care Services-Further Research and Analysis Needed Recommend long-term forecasting of child care need based on planned city growth and expansion. Many cities and states have invested in similar studies including the states of Kansas; Vermont; Rhode Island; New York; and Maine; as well as local areas such as Minneapolis; Long Island; and San Antonio.

Findings Related to Child Care Services - History of Previous Recommendations Recommendations from previous efforts (including Child Care Council, Jan. 8, 2008) have common themes: –Importance of the quality of child care. –Need for families, especially low-income families, to have access to that care. –Need for adequate funding of child care. –Desire for City policies and supports that allow child care to be part of neighborhoods and included in new development.

Findings Related to Housing Land Use and Planning Policies can be improved to enhance quality of life for families with children and promote family-friendly neighborhoods. The planning process should incorporate national best practices to make Austin one of the top family-friendly cities in the country. Incorporating the views of children should be a priority in the planning process.

Findings Related to Housing Affordable housing is a primary factor in multiple issues related to families with children in Austin. Lack of affordable housing was cited as one of the top concerns in the survey. Family-friendly housing should include affordable units and provide adequate square footage and number of bedrooms.

Findings Related to Housing The City should consider a pilot family- friendly development project. Other cities have established Family- Friendly Design Standards –including such features as shared streets, unit design, play areas, child accessibility, privacy, safety and security, and traffic calming.

Findings Related to School Districts Eight school districts are represented within the city limits of Austin ( Austin ISD, Del Valle ISD, Eanes ISD, Hays CSD, Leander ISD, Manor ISD, Pflugerville ISD, and Round Rock ISD ) Approximately 93 percent of the students in Austin ISD live within the Austin city limits.

Findings Related To School Districts Source: Office of the City Demographer, Austin

Findings Related to School Districts Source: Office of the City Demographer, Austin

Findings Related to School Districts Key finding: Perception of the quality of neighborhood schools is a major factor in the decision to purchase a home.

Findings Related To School Districts The community perception of the quality of Austin schools is generally good. More than half of survey respondents rated their neighborhood elementary school as “high quality” or “very high quality.” The perception of quality at secondary schools—middle and high schools—is considerably less.

Findings Related To School Districts What is your perception of the quality of your neighborhood elementary school?

Findings Related To School Districts What is your perception of the quality of your neighborhood middle school?

Findings Related To School Districts What is your perception of the quality of your neighborhood high school?

Findings Related To School Districts Austin families have a clear preference and expectation for neighborhood-based schools. The implementation of neighborhood-based schools at the elementary school level is relatively good although there are challenges in older and denser neighborhoods. The perception of neighborhood schools at the secondary school level can be improved and is largely related to school tracking patterns.

Findings Related To School Districts Planning between school districts and the City of Austin is not perceived to be tightly integrated. The only formal planning link between the City and Austin ISD is found in the City Charter stating the President of the Austin ISD school board is an ex-officio member of the Planning Commission. There does not appear to be a formal link between the City of Austin and other city school districts. City staff regularly meets with school district staff.

Findings Related To School Districts School districts should be active partners in all planning efforts (while maintaining a primary focus on education). The City should consider an “educational impact” statement for new development, to provide information on how the development will impact either existing or planned schools. Impact fees, similar to fees collected for parks, are used by other cities to fund schools and related facilities. Joint, or cooperative, use of facilities should be an expectation of school, city, and county governing bodies.

Findings Related To Parks and Amenities Austin families clearly value the City’s many outdoor amenities for families. Zilker Park and the city’s other parks and green spaces made the top of the “best of” list in the Task Force Survey. A top concern from the survey is lack of sidewalks and bike lanes in city neighborhoods.

Findings Related To Parks and Amenities There is a need to provide additional financial support for parks and indoor recreational space acquisition, enhancements, and maintenance. Many families want to be able to walk or bike to their neighborhood park, school, or local stores. The Downtown area has approximately 19 acres of parkland.

Questions?