Implementation of GEM-MACH10, A New Higher-Resolution Version of the Canadian Operational Air Quality Forecast Model Mike Moran 1, Sylvain Ménard 2, Radenko.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ozone assimilation to improve UV-index and AQHI regional forecast at Environment Canada J. de Grandpré, Y. Rochon and R. Ménard Contributors: ARQI (C.
Advertisements

EC Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System (RAQDPS) Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario Mtg on AQ.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Fonds européen de développement régional (FEDER) Common platform for air quality assessment and information in the Upper Rhine Valley Plate-forme commune.
GEOS-Chem Simulations for CMAQ Initial and Boundary Conditions 1 Yun-Fat Lam, 1 Joshua S. Fu, 2 Daniel J. Jacob, 3 Carey Jang and 3 Pat Dolwick.
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
ACCENT/GLOREAM 2006, October, Paris Photo-oxidants formation and transport over Europe during the heat wave period in July 2006 Joanna Struzewska.
Page 1 – July 3, 2015 Assimilation of surface chemical species observations into the Canadian GEM-MACH model using optimal interpolation Alain Robichaud,
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Modeling BC Sources and Sinks - research plan Charles Q. Jia and Sunling Gong University of Toronto and Environment 1 st annual NETCARE workshop.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
10th CMAS Conference Special Session on AQ Modeling Applications In Memory of Dr. Daewon Byun.
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
CMAS Conference, October 16 – 18, 2006 The work presented here was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
GEM-MACH Global The Canadian Global Air Quality Modeling/Forecasting System Dr. Sunling Gong Science and Technology Branch January 16-17, 2012.
1 René Parra, Pedro Jiménez and José M. Baldasano Environmental Modeling Laboratory, UPC Barcelona, Spain Models-3 Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Algorithms and chemical data assimilation activities at Environment Canada Chris McLinden Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada 2 nd TEMPO.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Status of the New Canadian Air Quality Forecast Model: GEM-MACH15 Michael Moran 1, Donald Talbot 2, Sylvain Ménard 2, Véronique Bouchet 1, Paul Makar 1,
George Pouliot, Christian Hogrefe, Ryan Cleary, Junhua Zhang, Mike Moran,Paul Makar, Shawn Roselle, Rohit Mathur Summary of the Emission Inventories compiled.
Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service Météorologique du Canada Two aspects of Environmental Information Air.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
PM 2.5 Response to Different Emissions Reductions Scenarios Over São Paulo State, Brazil. Taciana T. de A. Albuquerque a, J. Jason West b, Rita Yuri Ynoue.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Comparing GEM 15 km, GEM-LAM 2.5 km and RUC 13 km Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2010 Great Lakes Op Met Workshop Toronto,
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
A Comparative Performance Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modelling Systems Steven C. Smyth, Weimin Jiang, Helmut Roth, and Fuquan Yang ICPET,
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
The Canadian Air Quality Modelling Platform for Policy Emission Reduction Scenarios: Year 2010 Configuration Presented by Sophie Cousineau on behalf of.
A ir Quality Research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Environnement Canada Performance Evaluation of AURAMS for Multiple Cases Michael.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Assimilation of surface chemical species observations into the Canadian GEM-MACH model using optimal interpolation Alain Robichaud, Richard Ménard ASTD/ARQD.
Developing a Vision for the Next-Generation Air Quality Modeling Tools: A Few Suggestions Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada,
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
New Developments in Wildfire Emission and Dispersion Forecasting with FireWork – The Operational Canadian AQ Forecast System with Near-Real-Time Biomass-Burning.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
IWAQFR 2017, Toronto, Didier Davignon1
Improvements to Wintertime Particulate-Matter Forecasting with GEM-MACH15 Michael Moran1, Sylvain Ménard2 Paul Makar1, Radenko Pavlovic2, Mourad Sassi2,
Multi-Year ( ) North American Population Exposure to PM2
Recent Updates to the Canadian Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System Michael Moran, Sylvie Gravel, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Alexandru.
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Presented by: Sophie Cousineau
Presentation transcript:

Implementation of GEM-MACH10, A New Higher-Resolution Version of the Canadian Operational Air Quality Forecast Model Mike Moran 1, Sylvain Ménard 2, Radenko Pavlovic 2, Sylvie Gravel 3, Samuel Gilbert 2, Hugo Landry 2, Wanmin Gong 1, Craig Stroud 1, Sunling Gong 1, and Qiong Zheng 1 1 Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 Air Quality Modelling Applications Section, Environment Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3 Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 11 th CMAS Conference, October 2012, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Canadian AQ Forecasting System Short GEM-MACH15 Overview Changes for GEM-MACH10 Performance of New Model Talk Outline

Primary messaging tool is the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) Main target is urban areas > 100,000 population GEM-MACH15 AQ / Wx on-line forecast model provides guidance on AQHI component values (NO 2, O 3, PM 2.5 ) and meteorological fields out to 48 hours Canadian AQ Forecasting System

Follows example of Canadian national UV index Year-round, health-based, additive, no-threshold, hourly AQ index Developed from daily time-series analysis of air pollutant concentrations and mortality data (Stieb et al., 2008, J&AWMA) Weighted sum of NO 2, O 3, & PM 2.5 concentrations Range from 0 to 10+ Canada’s National Air Quality Health Index (AQHI)

Elements of Cdn AQ Forecasting System Forecasted future situation - Next 48hr - Modelled forecast values of O 3, PM 2.5, NO 2 Forecaster (1 desk/forecast region) Schematic diagram of an AQHI forecast AQHI = 10/10.4*100*[(exp( *NO 2 )-1) +(exp( *O 3 ) -1)+(exp( *PM 2.5 ) -1)] AQHI = 10/10.4*100*[(exp( *NO 2 )-1) +(exp( *O 3 ) -1)+(exp( *PM 2.5 ) -1)] Numerical forecast - Next 48 hr - GEM-MACH15 UMOS-AQ Past & present situation - Last 48 hr - Real-time observations of O 3, PM 2.5, NO 2

Acronym “GEM-MACH” Stands For modèle Global Environnemental Multi-échelle – Modélisation de la qualité de l'Air et de la CHimie et / and Global Environmental Multiscale model – Modelling Air quality and CHemistry

GEM-MACH is a multi-scale chemical weather forecast model composed of dynamics and physics (GEM) and on- line chemistry modules GEM-MACH15 is a particular configuration of GEM-MACH chosen to meet EC’s operational AQ forecast needs; its key characteristics include: –limited-area-model (LAM) grid configuration for North America –15-km horizontal grid spacing, 58 vertical levels to 0.1 hPa –2-bin sectional representation of PM size distribution (i.e., and μm) with 9 chemical components –forecast species include O 3, NO 2, and PM 2.5 needed for AQHI GEM-MACH and GEM-MACH15

GEM-LAM15 is EC’s limited-area regional weather forecast model GEM-MACH15’s grid points are co-located with GEM-LAM15 grid points GEM-LAM15 supplies meteorological initial conditions and lateral boundary conditions to GEM-MACH15 GEM-LAM15 and GEM-MACH15 Grids GEM-LAM15 core grid (blue); GEM-MACH15 grid (red)

Motivation for GEM-MACH10 New computers – 2 new IBM Power7 clusters were delivered to Environment Canada in early 2012 (faster nodes, more nodes) “Follow the Leader” (need to stay current) – GEM-LAM15 meteorological piloting model was to be replaced by GEM-LAM10 in 2012 (including reduction in horizontal grid spacing from 15 to 10 km)

GEM-MACH10 v1.5.0 Characteristics New version of GEM NWP model source code New GEM-MACH grid configuration (  ~5X more Flops): – domain virtually unchanged, – horizontal grid spacing reduced (15 km to 10 km), – number of σ-p vertical levels increased (58 to 80), – met time step reduced (450 s to 300 s), – chemistry time step unchanged (900 s) Change in meteorological piloting model from GEM-LAM15/3D-Var to GEM-LAM10/4D-Var Mostly same emissions inventories but improved emissions processing, especially for Canadian emissions

Niveaux GEM-MACH GEM-MACH15 (58 levels) GEM-MACH10 (80 levels) Lowest 47 levels are identical

Number of CPUs vs. Execution Time Target time: ~ 30 min Choice: 960 CPUs = 10 x 12 x 8

Changes to Emissions Processing (1) Emissions inventories used: ▪Canada: new version (2006 base year) ▪USA: no change (projection to 2012) ▪Mexico: no change (1999 base year) ▪Biogenics: no change but …

Sommaire des changements apportés au RAQDPS (4) ▪ Corrected and optimized boundary shapefiles ▪ Corrections and improvements to some spatial surrogate fields, including new surrogates for Canadian on-road mobile emissions ▪ Updates to some Canadian temporal profiles ▪ New library of PM speciation profiles and addition of some VOC speciation profiles ▪ Land-use-dependent transportable fraction used to scale fugitive dust emissions ▪ Removal of emissions from shut-down facilities (e.g., Flin Flon, MB) Changes to Emissions Processing (2)

Example: Changes To Spatial Distribution Of Canadian On-road Mobile Emissions– Improved Representation Of Road Type, One Spatial Surrogate Replaced By Set Of 6 Surrogates OldNew

▪ Emissions fields were prepared on GEM- MACH15 grid with SMOKE, then mass- conserving interpolation was used to transfer them to GEM-MACH10 grid; this approach gave better results than preparation directly on 10- km grid (which suggests that scale dependence of some spatial surrogates is not represented properly) Changes to Emissions Processing (3)

Difference Between Old and New Emissions (GEM-MACH15 Grid, July, Kt/month) NO2 SO2 CO NH3 PM2.5 PMC

GEM-MACH10 Chronology June 2009: GEM-MACH15 parallel run begins (2006 Cdn and 2005 U.S. emissions) Oct. 2011: New operational version of GEM-MACH15 with new emissions (2006 Cdn and projected 2012 U.S. emissions) June 2012: Start of GEM-MACH10 parallel run with GEM-MACH15 3 Oct. 2012: GEM-MACH10 v1.5.0 implementation

Objective Scores – Hourly Values Winters, 2011 and

Objective Scores – Hourly Values Summers, 2011 and

Categorical Scores: O 3 Contingency Table GEM-MACH10 vs. GEM-MACH15 – Summer 2012 Canada U.S. Hourly Values, 80 ppb Threshold 10km | OPS

Categorical Scores: PM 2.5 Contingency Table GEM-MACH10 vs. GEM-MACH15 – Summer 2012 Canada U.S. Hourly Values, 35 ug m -3 Threshold 10km | OPS

GEM-MACH10 v1.5.0, a new, higher-resolution version of Environment Canada’s operational AQ forecast model, was implemented on 3 October 2012 Horizontal grid spacing on the North American forecast domain has been reduced from 15 to 10 km Some improvements in model performance are due to improved emissions processing, but meteorological forecasts have also changed The changes in this new version are evolutionary, not revolutionary, and were required in part to keep up with changes to EC’s operational Wx forecast models Conclusions

Thank you for your attention

PM Summertime Forecast Avg PM 2.5 (ug/m 3 ) GM10GM15 OPS Diff: GM10 - GM15

NO Summertime Forecast Avg NO 2 (ppb) GM10GM15 OPS Diff: GM10 - GM15

O Summertime Forecast Avg O 3 (ppb) Diff: GM10 - GM15 GM15 OPS GM10

PM Wintertime Forecast Avg PM 2.5 (ug/m 3 ) Diff: GM10 - GM15 GM15 OPSGM10

NO Wintertime Forecast Avg NO 2 (ppb) GM15 OPS GM10 Diff: GM10 - GM15

O Wintertime Forecast Avg O 3 (ppb) GM10GM15 OPS Diff: GM10 - GM15