November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network1 Evaluation of the pilot phase of the Social Safety Net (RPS) * in Nicaragua: Health and Nutrition Impacts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Study on Poverty and Disparities in Childhood Panama, June 30 th and July 1 st, Childhood and Poverty in Brazil Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica.
Advertisements

Cash transfers and childhood poverty in developing countries Armando Barrientos IDPM and CPRC The University of Manchester
Impact of Large-Scale Infant Feeding Promotion on Child Survival and Health in Madagascar.
Evaluation of demand-side incentives to improve education and health outcomes: Evidence from past and ongoing randomized interventions in Burkina Faso.
1 RIte Care’s Culture of Continuous Improvement Based on Research & Data Analysis Presentation to Academy Health- State Health Research and Policy Interest.
Conditional Cash Transfer penalties Vs. no penalties.
Country Challenges and Achievements for Food Security & Nutrition Prepared for Scaling Up Nutrition Meeting August 2011 Cambodia Delegation.
Rates of Return of Social Protection The case for non-contributory social transfers in Cambodia Franziska Gassmann Arusha, Tanzania – 17 December 2014.
Pakistan Punjab Female Stipend Program Evaluating the Impact.
AME Education Sector Profile
The Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) June 2005.
An Overview of Food And Nutrition Situation in Pakistan Freedom from hunger and malnutrition is a basic human right. Nutrition has been expressed as a.
Hunger and Malnutrition George Norton Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech Copyright 2009 International Agricultural Development and Trade.
Multi-Indicator Cluster Survey in Macedonia- Breastfeeding Patterns in Children 0-24 Months.
Ghassemi et al., Public Health Nutrition, Feb 2002 Accelerated Nutrition Transition in Iran Hossein Ghassemi, Gail Harrison, and Kazem Mohammad.
Inequality and Poverty Reduction Brazil and Mexico Lecture # 19 Week 13.
Considering Ending Hunger after 10 years Last 10 years have reinforced role of 3 key factors in reducing poverty and hunger: Broad-based economic growth.
Assessing the benefits of unified transfers to multiple categories of individuals through targeting the household: Zimbabwe’s Harmonized Social Cash Transfers.
India Case Study ICDS and TINP. Context In the 1960s, the GOI initiated intervention measures to deal with food shortage and protein deficiency In the.
GENEVA JULY, 2015 The limits of cash transfer in addressing child labour.
Strategies for Children’s Right to Food Right to Food Campaign India.
Nutrition & Mortality Survey in Aden Governorate September 2012.
School meals and child outcomes in India Farzana Afridi, Delhi School of Economics IGC-ISI Conference, 20 th – 21 st December, 2010.
Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Utilization of Health Services Health Systems Innovation Workshop Abuja, January 25 th -29 th, 2010.
AME Education Sector Profile
1 Out with the old? In with the new? Implications of the new WHO 2006 Child Growth Standards Alison Tumilowicz, Ph.D. Megan Deitchler, MPH CORE Elluminate.
Which Form of Safety Net Transfer is Most Beneficial
Quality of life and social well being A Presentation to Annual policy dialogue meeting, Friday 27 th Jan 2012 REPOA 1.
Ariel Fiszbein Chief Economist Human Development World Bank.
CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFER PROGRAMS John Hoddinott IFPRI.
Evaluating the Early Childhood Development (ECD) Program in the Philippines Jere Behrman (U. of Pennsylvania) Paulita Duazo (OPS, U. of San Carlos) Sharon.
TARGETING POLICIES TO RESPOND TO FOOD INSECURITY SHOCK SUDARNO SUMARTO NATIONAL TEAM FOR THE ACCELERATION OF POVERTY REDUCTION (TNP2K) AND SMERU OECD-ASEAN.
Provincial Dashboard Manica n.a. --- n.a. REACH Indicator Dashboard MANICA – Situation Analysis DRAFT Not currently a serious problem Requiring.
Sonya Sultan Social Development Adviser Policy Division Social Transfers to Tackle Child Poverty 1 Palace Street, London SW1E 5HE Abercrombie House, Eaglesham.
Nutrition Security for the Poor Ahmad Kaikaus, PhD Additional Secretary Power Division 01 November, 2014.
MEXICO ’ S PROGRESA PROGRAM: WHO BENEFITS? A Presentation by Deon Filmer Of Material by David Coady.
SEMINAR PRESENTATIONS
CHILD NUTRITION IN CHINA: WITH SOME COMPARISON TO INDIA WANG ZHEN INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS, CASS 11, NOV, 2013.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
1 Social Assistance in Central Asia Countries: Government Reform Priorities Elena Glinskaya World Bank April 15, 2011.
Ministry of Social Services and Community Development DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES SOCIAL SAFETY NET REFORM September, 2013.
A Picture of Young Children in the U.S. Jerry West, Ph.D. National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences EDUCATION SUMMIT ON.
Workshop on Medium Term Outlook for India’s Food Sector Overview of the Issues by by Shashanka Bhide NCAER Project Supported by Food and Agriculture Organisation.
November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network1 Evaluation of the Family Allowance Program (PRAF) * in Honduras: Health and Nutrition Impacts Rafael.
1 Poverty Reduction Through Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) Jehan Arulpragasam Country Sector Coordinator for Human Development World Bank Office Manila.
Beyond 80%: The Effect of Conditional Cash Transfers on Vaccination Coverage in Mexico and Nicaragua Tania Barham Institute of Behavior Science Department.
Pilot Program: Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT) to Increase Girls’ Participation in Education Kano & Bauchi States, Nigeria Presented by Sadi Yahaya SESP.
Stunting Takes Over in 1000 Days Chronic Malnutrition Stunting is Irreversible at 2 years old.
Evaluating the Indonesia Early Childhood Education and Development Project.
Dr. Miguel Székely, Deputy Minister for Social Developement Cape Town, South Africa, 2005.
Supporting women to prevent malnutrition in their communities Africa Day for Food Security and Nutrition Kampala, Uganda 29 th October 2015 Allison Oman.
Poverty in the US. What do you know about this issue already? How do we measure poverty in the US? How many people are “poor” in the US? What’s the difference.
HOW CAN SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEMES BE DESIGNED FOR LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES TO EFFECTIVELY PROVIDE FOR THE POOREST? Presentation to the International Conference”
African Union 6th Africa Day for Food and Nutrition Security.
BACKGROUND TO THE SURVEY Papua New Guinea WHY DO A MICRONUTRIENT SURVEY? The prevalence of vitamin and mineral deficiencies (VMD) in Papua New Guinea.
David Evans World Bank Joint work with Brian Holtemeyer and Katrina Kosec (IFPRI) July 9, 2015.
Florence M. Turyashemererwa Lecturer- Makerere University
Assessing conditional cash transfers on health outcomes: evidence from Bataan, Philippines Mitzie Irene Conchada and Marites Tiongco The PES 52 nd Annual.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE IFPRI ARE TARGETED HUMAN-CAPITAL SUBSIDIES COST EFFECTIVE? THE CASE OF PROGRESA IN MEXICO Dave Coady IFPRI.
Annual Operational Plan 5 Mid-term (July – December 2009) Progress report Dr S K Sharif Director Public Health & Sanitation.
Evaluating Safety Net Programs Family Allowance Program-Honduras Oportunidades - Mexico Carola Alvarez, Inter-American Development Bank.
Human Development Program Oportunidades Financial Inclusion X Hemispheric Meeting Poverty and Social Protection Network, November 2008.
Micronutrient Programmes in South Africa: Where have we come from? Where are we now? and Where are we going? Ms Chantell Witten Prof David Sanders Dr Mickey.
Medicare Beneficiaries Are at Risk for High Costs Nearly one in four is underinsured (average 2013–14) BeneficiariesPercent of Medicare population Millions.
National Training Workshop on Mid-Decade Assessment for EFA
Presented by: Delaram Ghodsi PhD. in Nutrition (Minor: Economics)
Head of Social Policy & Economics
An Examination of Social Protection Coverage Across Programs in Latin America Using Indicator By Ahmad Tipu.
BASICS OF NUTRITION Date – Venue – Hotel Empires,
SMART Survey Preliminary Results
Presentation transcript:

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network1 Evaluation of the pilot phase of the Social Safety Net (RPS) * in Nicaragua: Health and Nutrition Impacts John Maluccio 1 and Rafael Flores 2 1 International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and 2 Emory University * Red de Protección Social

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network2 Presentation  Project description  Evaluation design and sample evolution  Impacts on expenditures on food  Impacts on service utilization and coverage of preventive health interventions  Impacts on nutrition

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network3 Red de Protección Social (RPS) Social Safety Net IADB (US$ 9 million) GN (US$ 1 million) Pilot Phase

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network4 The Social Safety Net pilot phase  Outputs  Increase the demand for preventive health care for children < 3 years of age  Decrease school desertion during the first four years of primary school  Increase expenditures in food at the household level

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network5 Outcome and impact indicators IndicatorChange % of children under age 3 who participate in the growth and development monitoring program + 10% % of children age months of age with complete vaccination + 10% % of households that have increased spending on food, as a fraction of the total household expenditures See trend

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network6 Demand and Supply-side Interventions: Food security, Health & Nutrition Demand  Bimonthly cash transfer (food transfer) to all eligible households  US$ 224 per household per year  Conditional upon attendance at bimonthly educational workshops and on bringing their children < 5 for healthcare appointments Supply  Child growth monitoring  Monthly: 0-2 year olds  Bimonthly: 2-5 year olds  Vaccination  Provision of anti- parasites, vitamins and iron supplements  Bimonthly health and nutrition education workshops

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network7 Demand and Supply-side Interventions: Education Demand  Bimonthly cash transfer (school attendance transfer) to all eligible households  US$ 112  School supplies transfer US$ 21 (per child/year)  Conditional upon enrollment and regular school attendance of children who have not completed 4 th grade (ages 7-13) Supply  Teacher transfer US$ 5 per child/year

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network8 Geographic Targeting  Stage 1: rural areas in all 17 departments were eligible. Madriz and Matagalpa were selected due to their needs and capacity to implement the project.  Stage 2: six out of 20 municipalities were selected because they had a participatory development program % of the rural population extremely poor and % extremely poor or poor.  Stage 3: 42 census “comarcas” out of the 59 were chosen based on a marginality index (highest scores). 50 % of the population extremely poor and 85% extremely poor or poor.

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network9 Base Line Aug-Sep 2000 Measurement Oct 2001 Measurement Oct 2002 RPSControlRPSControlRPSControl 21 a : 811 b 21:77121:76621:72421:72221:712 Evaluation design: cluster- randomized trial a Census “comarcas”: administrative areas within municipalities that include between one and five small communities averaging 100 households each b Households within 21 comarcas, planned sample size = 882 (42*21)

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network10 Survey non-response and attrition Households Completed Interview Intervention706 (80%)706 (87%) Control690 (78%)690 (90%) Not Interviewed Target

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network11 RPS average impact on per capita annual food expenditures (C$) MeasurementInterventionControlDifference ** ** Diff ** 774 ** Diff ** 566 ** ** P<0.01

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network12 RPS average impact on the composition of food expenditures Food Category expenditures C$ food share % Cereals ** Beans ** Meat656 ** 1.9 ** Milk Fats and oils663 ** 1.9 ** Fruits and vegetables 494 ** 2.3 **

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network13 Conclusions  Additional expenditures as a result of the transfers were spent predominantly on food  RPS prevented the deterioration of the food security situation in the intervention group offsetting the decline seen in the control group  The expenditure on almost every food group increased with the program  Three food groups associated with a better diet increased in absolute expenditures and as a percentage of total food expenditures

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network14 RPS average impact on percent of children age 0-3 taken to health control in past six months MeasurementInterventionControlDifference * ** Diff ** ** Diff ** 12.0 * 11.0 ** P<0.01 * P<0.05

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network15 Impact on coverage of preventive health interventions Indicator DD DD Children age 0-3 weighed in past six months % (mother report) 28.9 ** 17.5 * Children age months with updated vaccination % (health card) ** p<0.01 * p <0.05

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network16 Conclusions  RPS had a large impact on the utilization of well baby check-ups between 2000 and 2001, however this impact decreased in 2002 due to a continued improvement in the control group  Growth monitoring was markedly increased in both 2001 and However, childhood immunization did not significantly improve in these years

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network17 Impact on percentage of children < 5 who are stunted * ** Estimated from ENDESA 1998 and 2001 * * HAZ < DD= -5.3 D= -3.1 **

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network18 Impact on percentage of children < 5 who are wasted * * WHZ < -2.00

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network19 Impact on percentage of children < 5 who are underweight 1 ** ** Estimated from ENDESA 1998 and 2001 * 1 WAZ < DD= -6.0 * D= -1.7 ** * P < 0.05

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network20 Conclusions  Improved household diet and improved health care services (bimonthly health and nutrition education workshops) for children have combined to improve nutritional status of beneficiary children < 5.  Net impact was a 5 percent point decline in the percentage of children who were stunted.  This decline is more than one and a half (1.7) times faster than the improvement see at the national level between 1998 and 2001.

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network21 Impact on percent of children age 0-3 given iron supplement in past 12 months MeasurementInterventionControlDifference ** ** Diff ** ** Diff ** ** ** P<0.01

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network22 Impact on percentage of children 6-59 months of age with anemia * * Hemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL ** ** ENM, 2000

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network23 Impact on average Hemoglobin (g/dL) for children 6-59 months of age MeasurementInterventionControlDifference Diff

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network24 Conclusions  RPS has been successful in distributing iron supplements to mothers of children 6-59 months of age during its two years of operation  One out of every three children shows anemia in the area where RPS is operating  Despite improved household diet, improved health care services and improvements in the distribution of iron supplements, RPS had not succeeded in improving the grave situation on anemia nor improving hemoglobin levels

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network25 Are conditional cash transfer programs capable of improving the nutritional status of pre- school children?

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network26 Impacts (double differences ) IndicatorRPSPRAF a % children age 0-3 taken to health control in past six months / 0-5 last 30 days *** % children age 0-3 weighed in past six months / 0-5 last 30 days (mother’s report) 17.5 * 21.7 *** % children age months with updated vaccination / DTP1/pentavalent (health card) * *** p<0.001 ** p<0.01 * p <0.05 a Demand

November 6, 2003Social Policy Monitoring Network27 Impacts, changes and interventions IndicatorRPSPRAF a % children age 0-5 who are stunted % children age 0-5 who are stunted country level estimation % of total annual household expenditures 134 Supply side interventionsYesNo a Demand