Process Analysis Chapter 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Front Office Operations (Reservations)
Advertisements

 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 10 The Tools of Quality.
Statistically-Based Quality Improvement
20-1 Retail Mgt. 11e (c) 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Integrating and Controlling the Retail Strategy RETAIL MANAGEMENT: A.
With Microsoft Excel 2010 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall1 PowerPoint Presentation to Accompany GO! with Microsoft ® Excel 2010.
© 2007 Pearson Education Process Analysis Chapter 5.
4 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Process Analysis 4 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Basic Seven Tools of Quality
4 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Process Analysis 4.
Seven Quality Tools The Seven Tools
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
IES 303 Chapter 4: Process Analysis Week 4 Dec 1, 2005 Objectives:
Total Quality Management A Great Concept But What is IT ?
Chapter 6 - Total Quality Management
Pricing and Revenue Management in a Supply Chain
Business Processes Chapter 4.
© 2007 Pearson Education Process Analysis Chapter 5.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Seventh Edition © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Process.
Chapter 6 - Total Quality Management
Process Improvement Quality level Time Check Do Act Plan
© 2007 Pearson Education Process Analysis Chapter 5.
Statistically-Based Quality Improvement
Chapter 10 The Tools of Quality.
Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Statistically-Based Quality Improvement
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Voice of the Customer
9-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Seventh Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISHIKAWA’S BASIC SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALITY
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 15 Implementing and Validating the Quality System.
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 12 Statistically-Based Quality Improvement for Attributes.
Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level.
To Accompany Ritzman & Krajewski, Foundations of Operations Management © 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Process Management.
GO! All In One 2/E By: Shelley Gaskin, Nancy Graviett, Debra Geoghan Chapter 11 Creating Tables and Inserting Functions and Charts Copyright © 2015 Pearson.
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 7 Quality and Innovation in Product and Process Design.
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality and Time —modified by CB.
7-1 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Network Flow Models Chapter 7.
Chap 1-1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Business Statistics: A First Course 6 th Edition Chapter 1 Introduction.
Information Gathering and Processing in Retailing
4 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Process Analysis Chapter 4.
Operations Management Module 4 : Process Analysis S.Balachandran 2007 December 2007.
To Accompany Ritzman & Krajewski, Foundations of Operations Management © 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Process Management.
Process Analysis Process Flowcharting Types of Processes Process Performance Metrics OBJECTIVES.
4 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Process Analysis & Quality 4 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
1/34 Process Analysis. 2/34 How Process Analysis fits the Operations Management Philosophy Operations As a Competitive Weapon Operations Strategy Project.
/ 241 An Workshop Wonca Europe, September 2008, Istanbul Basic Tools of Quality Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk, Dr. Nezih Dağdeviren, Dr. Turan Set
A philosophy that involves everyone in an organization in a continual effort to improve quality and achieve customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction.
Acceptance Sampling Plans Supplement G
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality and Time —modified by CB.
IES 303 Engineering Management & Cost Analysis | Dr. Karndee Prichanont, SIIT 1 IES 303 Chapter 4: Process Analysis Objectives: Introduce some practical.
Seven Quality Tools The Seven Tools –Histograms, Pareto Charts, Cause and Effect Diagrams, Run Charts, Scatter Diagrams, Flow Charts, Control Charts.
1Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Exploring Microsoft Office Excel 2010 by Robert Grauer, Keith Mulbery, and Mary.
4 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Process Analysis 4 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
1 Chapter 6 Quality Tools. 2 The Seven Basic Quality Tools. Flowcharts Check Sheets Histograms Pareto Analysis Scatter Diagrams Control Charts Cause-and-Effect.
Data Collection & Analysis ETI 6134 Dr. Karla Moore.
Learning Curve Analysis Supplement I Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall I - 01.
Basic 7 Tools of Quality Presented by: Rajender Kumar, Asst. Prof.
GO! with Office 2013 Volume 1 By: Shelley Gaskin, Alicia Vargas, and Carolyn McLellan PowerPoint Chapter 3 Enhancing a Presentation with Animation, Video,
Slide 9-1 © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall CHAPTER 9 Marketing Strategy Reformulation: The Control Process.
Chapter 16 - slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter Sixteen Personal Selling and Sales Promotion.
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Dr. Hulya Julie Yazici, Lutgert College of Business Dr. Lisa Zidek, U.A. Whitaker College of Engineering Dr. Halcyon St Hill, College.
Chapter 07 Process Improvement
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Process Management FGCU 1. PROCESS INITIALIZATION PROCESS DEFINITION PROCESS CONTROL PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROCESS MANAGEMENT APPROACH.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Continuous Improvement
Chapter 11 Total Quality Management and Continuous Improvement.
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Quality Improvement: Problem Solving
Process Strategy and Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Process Analysis Chapter 4 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 04 - 01

What is Process Analysis? The set of tools used to identify opportunities for improvement, document current processes, evaluate processes to find performance gaps, redesign processes, and implement desired changes. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Process Analysis Steps Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Documenting the Process Flowchart – A tool to trace the flow of information, customers, equipment and materials through the various steps of a process. Swim Lane Flowchart – A visual representation that groups functional areas responsible for different sub-processes into lanes. Flow Chart of Consulting Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Swim Lane Flowchart in Manufacturing Swim Lane Flowchart – A visual representation that groups functional areas responsible for different sub-processes into lanes. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Documenting the Process Service Blueprint – A special flowchart of a service process that shows which steps have high customer contact. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Documenting the Process Work Measurement Techniques Time Study Elemental Standard Data approach Predetermined Data Approach Work Sampling Method Learning Curve Analysis Process Charts Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.1 A process at a watch assembly plant has been changed. The process is divided into three work elements. A time study has been performed with the following results. The time standard for process previously was 14.5 minutes. Based on the new time study, should the time standard be revised? Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.1 The new time study had an initial sample of four observations, with the results shown in the following table. The performance rating factor (RF) is shown for each element, and the allowance for the whole process is 18 percent of the total normal time. Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Average (min) RF Normal Time Element 1 2.60 2.34 3.12 2.86 2.730 1.0 Element 2 4.94 4.78 5.10 4.68 4.875 1.1 5.363 Element 3 2.18 1.98 2.13 2.25 2.135 0.9 1.922 Total Normal Time = 10.015 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Yes, change the time standard from 14.5 minutes to 11.82 minutes. Example 4.1 The normal time for an element in the table is its average time, multiplied by the RF. The total normal time for the whole process is the sum of the normal times for the three elements, or 10.01 minutes. To get the standard time (ST) for the process, just add in the allowance, or ST = 10.015(1 + 0.18) = 11.82 minutes/watch Yes, change the time standard from 14.5 minutes to 11.82 minutes. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Documenting the Process Work Measurement Techniques Work Sampling Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Documenting the Process Work Measurement Techniques Learning Curves Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Documenting the Process Process Charts - An organized way to document all the activities performed by a person or group Activities are typically organized into five categories Operation,  Transportation,  Inspection,  Delay,  Storage,  Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Process Charts Step No. Time (min) Distance (ft)      Step Description 1 X 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0.50 15.0 10.00 0.75 40.0 3.00 1.00 60.0 4.00 5.00 2.00 200.0 180.0 20.0 Enter emergency room, approach patient window Sit down and fill out patient history Nurse escorts patient to ER triage room Nurse inspects injury Return to waiting room Wait for available bed Go to ER bed Wait for doctor Doctor inspects injury and questions patient Nurse takes patient to radiology Technician x-rays patient Return to bed in ER Wait for doctor to return Doctor provides diagnosis and advice Return to emergency entrance area Check out Walk to pharmacy Pick up prescription Leave the building Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Process Charts Step No. Time (min) Distance (ft)      Step Description 1 X 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Summary Activity Number of Steps Time (min) Distance (ft) Operation  5 23.00 Transport  9 11.00 815 Inspect  2 8.00 Delay  3 Store  ― 0.50 15.0 10.00 0.75 40.0 3.00 1.00 60.0 4.00 5.00 2.00 200.0 180.0 20.0 Enter emergency room, approach patient window Sit down and fill out patient history Nurse escorts patient to ER triage room Nurse inspects injury Return to waiting room Wait for available bed Go to ER bed Wait for doctor Doctor inspects injury and questions patient Nurse takes patient to radiology Technician x-rays patient Return to bed in ER Wait for doctor to return Doctor provides diagnosis and advice Return to emergency entrance area Check out Walk to pharmacy Pick up prescription Leave the building Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Process Charts The annual cost of an entire process can be estimated It is the product of Time in hours to perform the process each time Variable costs per hour Number of times the process is performed each year Annual labor cost Time to perform the process in hours Variable costs per hour Number of times process performed each year = Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Process Charts If the average time to serve a customer is 4 hours The variable cost is $25 per hour And 40 customers are served per year The total labor cost is 4 hrs/customer  $25/hr  40 customers/yr = $4,000 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Data Analysis Tools Checklists Histograms and bar charts Pareto charts Scatter diagrams Cause-and-effect diagrams (Fishbone) Graphs Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.2 The manager of a neighborhood restaurant is concerned about the smaller numbers of customers patronizing his eatery. Complaints have been rising, and he would like to find out what issues to address and present the findings in a way his employees can understand. The manager surveyed his customers over several weeks and collected the following data: Complaint Frequency Discourteous server 12 Slow service 42 Cold dinner 5 Cramped table 20 Atmosphere 10 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.2 50 – 45 – 40 – 35 – 30 – 25 – 20 – 10 – 5 – 0 – Failures Discourteous server Slow service Cold dinner Cramped tables Atmosphere Failure Name Bar Chart Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Pareto Chart for a Restaurant  100% = 69.7% (42 + 20) 89 – 100.0% – 80.0% – 60.0% – 40.0% – 20.0% – 0.0% 45 – 40 – 35 – 30 – 25 – 20 – 10 – 5 – 0 – Failures Discourteous server Slow service Cold dinner Cramped tables Atmosphere Failure Name Percent of Total Pareto Chart Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.3 The operations manager for Checker Board Airlines at Port Columbus International Airport noticed an increase in the number of delayed flight departures. Draw a Fishbone Diagram to determine the root cause of the problem of Delayed Flight Departures. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.3 Aircraft late to gate Mechanical failures Equipment Passenger processing at gate Late cabin cleaners Unavailable cockpit crew Late cabin crew Personnel Weather Air traffic delays Other Delayed flight departures Late baggage to aircraft Late fuel Late food service Contractor not provided with updated schedule Materials Poor announcement of departures Weight/balance sheet late Delayed check-in procedure Waiting for late passengers Procedures Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.4 The Wellington Fiber Board Company produces headliners, the fiberglass components that form the inner roof of passenger cars. Management wanted to identify which process failures were most prevalent and to find the cause. Step 1: A checklist of different types of process failures is constructed from last month’s production records. Step 2: A Pareto chart is prepared from the checklist data. Step 3: A cause-and-effect diagram identified several potential causes for the problem. Step 4: The manager reorganizes the production reports into a bar chart according to shift because the personnel on the three shifts had varied amounts of experience. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.4 Checklists Bar Chart Pareto Chart Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Example 4.4 Fishbone Diagram Bar Chart Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Redesigning the Process Generating Ideas: Questioning and Brainstorming Ideas can be uncovered by asking six questions What is being done? When is it being done? Who is doing it? Where is it being done? How is it being done? How well does it do on the various metrics of importance? Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Redesigning the Process Generating Ideas: Questioning and Brainstorming Benchmarking Four basic steps Step 1. Planning Step 2. Analysis Step 3. Integration Step 4. Action Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Managing and Implementing Processes Seven common mistakes Not connecting with strategic issues Not involving the right people in the right way Not giving the design teams and process analysts a clear charter and then holding them accountable Not being satisfied unless fundamental “reengineering” changes are made Not considering the impact on people Not giving attention to implementation Not creating an infrastructure for continuous process improvement Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 1 Create a flowchart for the following telephone-ordering process at a retail chain that specializes in selling books and music CDs. It provides an ordering system via the telephone to its time-sensitive customers besides its regular store sales. The automated system greets customers, asks them to choose a tone or pulse phone, and routes them accordingly. The system checks to see whether customers have an existing account. They can wait for the service representative to open a new account. Customers choose between order options and are routed accordingly. Customers can cancel the order. Finally, the system asks whether the customer has additional requests; if not, the process terminates. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 1 Continued on Next Slide Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 1 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 2 An automobile service is having difficulty providing oil changes in the 29 minutes or less mentioned in its advertising. You are to analyze the process of changing automobile engine oil. The subject of the study is the service mechanic. The process begins when the mechanic directs the customer’s arrival and ends when the customer pays for the services. The times add up to 28 minutes, which does not allow much room for error if the 29-minute guarantee is to be met and the mechanic travels a total of 420 feet. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Step No. Time (min) Distance (ft)      Step Description 1 0.80 50.0 X Direct customer into service bay 2 1.80 Record name and desired service 3 2.30 Open hood, verify engine type, inspect hoses, check fluids 4 0.30 Walk to customer in waiting area 5 0.60 Recommend additional services 6 0.70 Wait for customer decision 7 0.90 70.0 Walk to storeroom 8 1.90 Look up filter number(s) 9 0.40 Check filter number(s) 10 Carry filter(s) to service pit 11 4.20 Perform under-car services 12 40.0 Climb from pit, walk to automobile 13 2.70 Fill engine with oil, start engine 14 1.30 Inspect for leaks 15 0.50 Walk to pit 16 1.00 17 3.00 Clean and organize work area 18 80.0 Return to auto, drive from bay 19 Park the car 20 60.0 Walk to customer waiting area 21 Total charges, receive payment Summary Activity Number of Steps Time (min) Distance (ft) Operation  Transport  Inspect  Delay  Store  7 16.50 8 5.50 420 4 5.00 1 0.70 1 0.30 Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 3 What improvement can you make in the process shown in Solved Problem 2? a. Move Step 17 to Step 21. Customers should not have to wait while the mechanic cleans the work area. b. Store small inventories of frequently used filters in the pit. Steps 7 and 10 involve travel to the storeroom. c. Use two mechanics. Steps 10, 12, 15, and 17 involve running up and down the steps to the pit. Much of this travel could be eliminated. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 4 Vera Johnson and Merris Williams manufacture vanishing cream. Their packaging process has four steps: (1) mix, (2) fill, (3) cap, and (4) label. They have had the reported defects analyzed, which shows the following: Defect Frequency Lumps of unmixed product 7 Over- or under filled jars 18 Jar lids did not seal 6 Labels rumpled or missing 29 Total 60 Draw a Pareto chart to identify the vital defects. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 4 Defective labels account for 48.33 percent of the total number of defects:  100% = 48.33% 29 60 Improperly filled jars account for 30 percent of the total number of defects:  100% = 30.00% 18 60 The cumulative percent for the two most frequent defects is 48.33% + 30.00% = 78.33% Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 4 7 60  100% = 11.67% Lumps represent of defects; the cumulative percentage is 78.33% + 11.67% = 90.00% Defective seals represent of defects; the cumulative percentage is 6 60  100% = 10% 10% + 90% = 100.00% Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Solved Problem 4 40 – 36 – 32 – 28 – 24 – 20 – 16 – 12 – 8 – 4 – 0 – – 100 – 90 – 80 – 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – 20 – 10 – 0 Frequency of Defects Label Fill Mix Seal Cumulative Percentage of Defects 100% 90% 78% 48% Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall