Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tevatron Beam Diagnostics: Boosting Collider Performance Vladimir Shiltsev, Ron Moore, Andreas Jansson FNAL/Accelerator Division.
Advertisements

FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
Development of a Chromaticity measurement application using Head-Tail phase shift technique.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Low Emittance Program David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education CesrTA.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
Beam Instrumentation for Orbit Stability I. Pinayev.
1 FermiLab Recycler Ring BPM Upgrade Based on Digital Receiver Technology R. Webber, J. Crisp, P. Prieto, D. Voy, C. Breigel, C. McClure, M. Mengel, S.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Beam-Beam Simulations for RHIC and LHC J. Qiang, LBNL Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation July 2-4, 2007, SLAC, Menlo Park, California.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
BPM Signal Processing: A Cartoon View Rob Kutschke Oct 13, 2003.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
Initial Performance Results of the APS P0 (Transverse Bunch-to-Bunch) Feedback System N. DiMonte#, C.-Y. Yao, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
Jean Slaughter –April 5, 2004 – all experimenters’ meeting Purposes of SDA Store to store monitoring of performance Long term trends Analysis of specific.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
BPM Upgrade Projects Status & Technical Update Bob Webber DOE Review of Tevatron Operations March 2005.
Proposal for LHC Microwave Schottky Pickups Ralph J. Pasquinelli 3/9/2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.
Craig Drennan Linac and 400 MeV BPMs January 7, 2011.
14/1/2011 LHC Lumi days - J. Wenninger 1 IP positions and angles, knowledge and correction Acknowledgments: W. White, E. Calvo J. Wenninger BE-OP-LHC.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
10/5/2005 jrz1 Not quite “All” you want to know about Flying Wires At Fermilab Jim Zagel 10/5/2005.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
1 Experiments with pulse supplies and strip-lines at ATF, Plans for fast extraction kicker for ATF2 1. Fast Kicker R&D at ATF 2. Instrumentation at ATF.
BPM Signal Processing: A Cartoon View Rob Kutschke Oct 13, 2003.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
4. Operations and Performance M. Lonza, D. Bulfone, V. Forchi’, G. Gaio, L. Pivetta, Sincrotrone Trieste, Trieste, Italy A Fast Orbit Feedback for the.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Low-Emittance Tuning at CesrTA Jim Shanks Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Accuracy of the orbit measurement by KEKB BPM system for the study of ILC damping ring H. Fukuma (KEK) Requirement for the accuracy of BPM data.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
TBT Data & Lattice Measurement for Recycler Ming-Jen Yang December 17, 2014.
SDA- Shot Data Analysis Jean Slaughter DOE Review July 21, 2003.
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Beam based measurements
P. Forck, P. Kowina, M. Schwickert, R. Singh
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Real-time orbit the LHC
Presentation transcript:

Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber2 BPM Accuracy/Resolution Specs This is Table 2 from Requirements document. Table gives the most stringent requirements on the system; for certain types of operation these requirements are relaxed. Note: resolutions are stated as 3 sigma. Key Specifications (Protons): Measurement Range:  15mm Absolute Position Accuracy: < 1.0 mm Long Term Position Stability: < 0.02 mm Best Orbit Position Resolution: < 0.02mm (0.3 sec averaging) Position Linearity: < 1.5% Relative Position Accuracy: < 5% Intensity Stability: < 2% Key Specifications (Pbars)_: Measurement Range:  15mm Absolute Position Accuracy: < 1.0 mm Long Term Position Stability: < 0.02 mm Best Orbit Position Resolution: < 0.05mm (0.3 sec averaging) Position Linearity: < 1.5% Relative Position Accuracy: < 5% Intensity Stability: < 2%

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber3 Block Diagram Cartoon of Signal Path  Note that proton and pbar signal paths from same half of BPM are directly connected together by the stripline --- reflections from one will feed directly into the signal of the other attenuator53MHz BPF Eight Channel VME Digital Receiver Proton Inside attenuator53MHz BPF attenuator53MHz BPF Proton Outside Pbar Outside attenuator53MHz BPF Pbar Inside VME CPU ACNET Diagnostic and Calibrate Signals

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber4 Demonstrated Beam Measurements  Recycler-type BPM front-end is set up for development and tests in TeV House A1  Connects to both Proton and Pbar signals of one horizontal BPM and one vertical BPM  Interfaced to ACNET with small subset of ultimate required functionality  Closed orbit and turn-by-turn measurement performance have been demonstrated  In use to assess narrowband frequency domain p/pbar signal de-convolution  Will soon demonstrate “wide” time separation of Protons and Pbars (utilize isolated bunches at the ends of the otherwise over-lapping 12-bunch trains); ~50 rather than ~5 nsec timing

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber5 Proton Positions in Load of Store #3172: Old vs New Old: rms error ~140 um for uncoalesced beam, ~70 um for coalesced beam, and 0.6 mm “step” between the two New: rms error ~25 um for uncoalesced beam, <9 um for coalesced beam, no “step” between the two

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber6 Closed Orbit Resolution During Proton Loading Green: Vertical 100 microns/div showing ~10 micron resolution and orbit changes due to leakage fields in ramping injection Lambertson magnet Red: Beam Intensity showing proton bunches loading Yellow: Time in Supercycle

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber7 Upper Limit of Closed Orbit Resolution Average of standard deviations for twelve five-minute intervals First one-hour intervalSecond one-hour interval ± mm ± mm Two one-hour periods of 1 KHz bandwidth proton position measurement data, 17 hours apart, in store #3148. (data-logged at 1 Hz) 50 microns / vertical division Demonstrates upper limit resolution of 9 microns rms in 1 Khz (any real beam motion not excluded) to meet spec of 7 micron 1 sigma in ~10Hz

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber8 Injection Turn-By-Turn --- Un-coalesced Protons Vertical A14Horizontal A15 vertical axis units are millimeters in all plots vertical tune horizontal tune

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber9 Turn-by-Turn Long After Injection Single Coalesced Bunch Vertical A14Horizontal A15 vertical axis units are millimeters in all plots Horizontal transverse motion due to persistent synchrotron oscillation

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber10 Upper Limits on TBT Resolution --- Vertical A14 If remove betatron and synchrotron motion by zeroing 17 frequency line amplitudes around betatron frequencies and one at synchrotron frequency, leaving untouched 494 of the original 512 frequencies, TBT resolution is found to be 15 microns Standard deviation of raw data is 34 microns

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber11 Same Coalesced Proton Bunch Given Big Vertical Kick Vertical A14Horizontal A15 vertical tune horizontal tune vertical tune

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber12 Antiproton Measurements  Present ratio of proton to antiproton intensities combined with directivity of stripline pick-up produces residual proton signals at the antiproton port about 50% the amplitude of antiproton signals  When antiproton intensities increase they will begin to “contaminate” the proton signals also  We opt to not pursue p/pbar separation by precise timing Typical signal from pbar end of BPM for present bunch intensities 80 nsec/tic Pbar bunch signal Undesired Proton bunch signal

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber13 Antiproton “Plan A”  Model BPM as an 8-port network at processing frequency  Measure network transfer functions with beam, e.g. ratio of proton signal on pbar end to proton signal on proton end  Measure signals then correct according to pre-determined transfer function before computing positions  Measurements in process to determine achievable accuracy Linear System BPM Upper Proton Upper Pbar Lower Proton Lower Pbar P Upper In P Lower In Pbar Upper In P Upper Scope InRefl InRefl InRefl InRefl Pbar Upper Scope P Lower Scope Pbar Lower Scope

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber14  Separate p/pbar signals with relaxed timing requiring precision and maintenance of ~50 nsec rather than ~5 nsec  Observe only “isolated” proton or antiproton bunches at ends of 12-bunch trains  No pbar bunches observable One pbar bunch observable  Five bunches observable Two bunches observable Antiproton “Plan B”

BPM Technical Update - DoE Run II Review - February Webber15 Coverage of Ring in Antiproton “Plan B”  Locations with at least one clear pbar bunch (at least 400 nsec from nearest proton bunch) at various times in cycle  x axis is feet around ring from B0, each point is BPM location  y axis is clearance >21 is “clear”