1 Stony Brook Update: A bit more on Negative Ions T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Advertisements

P-N JUNCTION.
Status of test beam data analysis … with emphasis on resistive coating studies Progress and questions 1Meeting at CEA Saclay, 25 Jan 2010Jörg Wotschack,
HBD Meeting 4/25/06 SB and BNL Crew. 4/25/06 B. Azmoun 2 Installation of HBD into PHENIX Transported HBD from USB under gas (CF4) flow (maintained ~ 1Torr.
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
PIII for Hydrogen Storage
Micromegas studies using cosmic rays Franck Sabatié May 7th 2009 Saclay cosmic ray bench Data acquisition system and analysis tools MIP detection Position.
Answers/considerations to the questions raised on the last ASSRC meeting on Sept. 24, 2013 The following is my summary from s, private communication.
1 Stony Brook Update Getting Serious about HBD East T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
1 VCI, Werner Riegler RPCs and Wire Chambers for the LHCb Muon System  Overview  Principles  Performance Comparison: Timing, Efficiency,
1 Pixel Readout of GEMs Motivation The Setup Results Next Steps A. Bamberger, K. Desch, J. Ludwig, M. Titov, U. Renz, N. Vlasov, P. Wienemann, A. Zwerger.
Prof. Reinisch, EEAS / Simple Collision Parameters (1) There are many different types of collisions taking place in a gas. They can be grouped.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
5. Simplified Transport Equations We want to derive two fundamental transport properties, diffusion and viscosity. Unable to handle the 13-moment system.
Tent Update 5 Feb 2008 Matt Durham for tent crew.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Chapter 6 Photodetectors.
HBD Operation in Run 9 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew.
Measurement of gas gain fluctuations M. Chefdeville, LAPP, Annecy TPC Jamboree, Orsay, 12/05/2009.
1 Searching for the QGT: Quantum Efficiency Gain Transparency TK Hemmick for the HBD Crew.
Status of PNPI R&D for choice of the MUCH tracking base detector (this work is supported by INTAS) ■ Introduction ■ MICROMEGAS ■ GEM ■ MICROMEGAS+GEM ■
HBD Meeting 3/14/06 B. Azmoun BNL Testing and Preparation of HBD Full Scale Prototype for Upcoming Engineering Run Puzzling Behavior of GEM’s To Do List.
SCATTERING OF RADIATION Scattering depends completely on properties of incident radiation field, e.g intensity, frequency distribution (thermal emission.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
Preliminary Results from a Trial Beam Test of the Small HBD Prototype at LEGS Bob Azmoun BNL HBD Working Group Meeting May 10, 2005.
1 Stony Brook Update T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
1 Thomas K Hemmick May 17 th, The Gas Electron Multiplier: GEM Thomas K. Hemmick Stony Brook University.
2016/6/4 Taka Kondo (KEK) 1 Issues of the SCT Digitization model 2 nd meeting of SCT Digitization TF Taka Kondo (KEK) 1.Current SCT digitization.
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
2nd RD51 Collaboration Meeting, Paris, October PENNING TRANSFERS Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department Bursa -Turkey 2nd RD51 Collaboration.
The Adventures of Sparky LeCroy TK Hemmick for the Stony Brook Crew and Maxim.
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
Simulation of GOSSIP/GridPix Nominal Detector, and GOSSIP in ATLAS.
HBD Gas and QE Monitoring Craig Woody BNL HBD Working Group Meeting October 19, 2005.
1 Stony Brook Update T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
Atsushi Aoza ( saga University ) A Simulation Study of GEM gating at ILC-TPC A.Ishikawa, A.Sugiyama, H.Fujishima, K.Kadomatsu(Saga U.) K.Fujii,M.Kobayashi,
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
HBD CDR Gas System and Monitoring Craig Woody BNL DC Upgrades/EC Meeting March 9, 2005.
Itzhak Tserruya, BNL, May13, HBD R&D Update: Demonstration of Hadron Blindness A. Kozlov, I. Ravinovich, L. Shekhtman and I. Tserruya Weizmann Institute,
HBD Status Report C. Woody For the HBD Crew DC Meeting June 13, 2007.
HBD Status for Run 10 C.Woody For the HBD Group Collaboration Meeting January 15, 2010.
Pe Collection Efficiency in CF4 Revisited HBD Meeting 04/15/08 B.Azmoun, A.Caccavano BNL.
Xe-based detectors: recent work at Coimbra C.A.N.Conde, A.D. Stauffer, T.H.V.T.Dias, F.P.Santos, F.I.G.M.Borges, L.M.N.Távora, R.M.C. da Silva, J.Barata,
Update on the HBD Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting May 11, 2005.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors Craig Woody Brookhaven National Lab B.Azmoun 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2,
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
1 HBD R&D: Update Itzhak Tserruya (for A. Kozlov, I. Ravinovich and L. Shekhtman) Weizmann Institute, Rehovot DC meeting Feb. 14, 2003.
Electron Transmission Measurement of GEM Gate Hirotoshi KUROIWA (Saga Univ.) Collaboration with KEK, TUAT, Kogakuin U, Kinki U, Saga U Introduction Motivation.
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors C. Woody B.Azmuon 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2, M.Durham 2, T.Hemmick 2, J.Kamin.
Penning transfers: survey of available data, life-time of excited states, pressure dependence Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department Bursa -TURKEY.
1 Stony Brook Update: HBD Modifications… T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Liquid Argon Calorimeter Performance at High Rates J. Rutherfoord with R.B.Walker University of Arizona 27 February 2014 V1.0.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Gas Electron Multiplier
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
Update on HBD Activities at BNL Craig Woody BNL HBD Working Group Meeting November 16, 2004.
Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy study of 3D silicon Mahfuza Ahmed.
R&D on Hadron Blind detector, recent results Issues addressed: - gain limits in CF 4 with heavily ionizing particles - operation.
1 straw tube signal simulation A. Rotondi PANDA meeting, Stockolm 15 June 2010.
Activities on straw tube simulation
Stony Brook Update: Ready to Start…
Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

1 Stony Brook Update: A bit more on Negative Ions T.K. Hemmick for the Tent Crew

2 Brief Reminder Charge Transfer Tests Flash Lamp pulsing through MgF 2 window. Simple system: Two Modes: –GEMS same; collect charge on the Grid –Grid && Top-Top same Adjust dV of GEM Adjust dV of 1 st gap Collect charge on mid GEM Preamp HV GEM Amp Scope

3 TOF Spectrometer: Increased gap to mesh. Allows “TOF” measurement to separate (somewhat) the prompt electrons from the late ions. Preamp HV GEM Amp Scope 5 mm Vmesh=900 ionselectrons

4 Procedure Low pressure allows one to achieve large mean- free-path (MFP) without sparking. Large MFP with significant field allows one to measure transmission with higher electron-ion collision energies. High Energies are necessary to achieve absorption cross sections. Results can be “partly” scaled for effective transmission coefficients: –V eff =V applied * (1 atm/P applied ) –Losses under-estimated for low pressure measurements. True Path Should Include Diffusion

5 Scans at various pressures Before absorption, existence of gas leads to some loss (8% loss 1 atm vs 0.1 atm). Tails do not align all that well after scaling. Should normalize for primary yield… Data corrected for: Noise Lamp Drift Ion tail

6 Fully Corrected scans Upper limits to 1/e length can be calculated: –Take “full yield”, Y 0 as peak of 0.1 atm scan. –Blame loss at high field: Y = Y 0 e -5mm/L0 –Learn L 0 as a function of effective V. –Compare to known cross sections… Data corrected for: Noise Lamp Drift Ion tail Equal yield at ~2000 V/5mm

7 Attenuation length – measured, Upper Limit Remember that because of decreased diffusion, the measurements are further from the truth for the lowest pressures. Fortunately, these measurements seem to be saturating in the 0.4 and 0.6 atm results. Can compare to Lower Limit from hitting the resonant cross section(s) exactly. Lowest point is yellow curve at ~300 m. Rising QE

8 Mean Free Path – theoretical Lower Limit Assume that the electron energy during a collision is exactly in resonance (worst case). λ = 1/nσ “Worst case” scenario: –λ a = 200 μm at 7 eV –λ d = 40 μm at 15 eV Since these MFP’s are smaller than the measured lengths, it is not impossible that the losses are indeed due to ion transport. Fig. 1. Electron scattering cross-sections in Ar and CF4: elastic momentum transfer (σm), vibrational excitation (σν4, σν3, σνind ), electron attachment (σa), dissociation (σd), excitation (σexc), and ionization (σion).

9 What would we do to learn final answer: Pure Theory: –Transport in gas through HBD collection field and measure the result w/ and w/o the absorption cross sections running. Measurement: –Take transmission vs. field result and run this through the HBD collection field. Common Denominator: –Need the HBD Collection Field (in reverse bias). –We’ve done 2D field simulations (Maxwell). –We must purchase $$$ code to do 3D.

10 Forward bias NOTE: Maxwell display is non-standard: –Field lines are not continuous. –Density of field lines has no meaning. –COLOR of the field lines specifies field strength.

11 Reverse Bias Different than TKH’s imagination: –In reverse bias collection region is “tall” (> 150 m). –A non-zero region of the cathode area does not enter hole. These calculations must be re-done in 3D…

12 Summary At low fields, there is no loss. At high fields, there is a loss region prior to the gain region: Limits on max loss in worst field: –Upper Limit to 1/e lengths ~300 m. –Lower Limit to 1/e lengths ~40 m. Field of HBD goes from: –Low field, good transmission. –Medium field, high absorption. –High field, gain (home free!) Need to convolute more realistic field profiles with the absorption limits to get effective transmission. Results are probably not too bad as long as the regime of medium field is fairly short in length…seems likely to TKH’s imagination.

13 Other News These will be the last measurements of the transmission for a while (even though further conclusions can be forth-coming based upon E-field calculations). We’re now getting ready for the rebuild: –Clean tent survey with brand new dust meter. –Clean up the tent’s bad spots. –Beginning survey of status of extra GEMs. Expect to make a cathode for scintillation measurements by end of week. Will start thinking about practical shades design.