US/JAPAN Accelerator R&D Thirty Years of Collaboration JLC/NLC/ILC Gregory Loew 30 th Anniversary Symposium Kona, Hawaii, October 19-22, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPS-HEP Aachen 2003R. Brinkmann, DESY Linear Colliders R. Brinkmann, DESY EPS-HEP Conference, Aachen, July 17, 2003.
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg NIM A672.
Nick Walker – GDE meeting Frascati Discussion and Approval of the BCD Nick Walker ILC-GDE Frascati –
Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
Nick WalkerECFA-DESY NIKEF Amsterdam International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee Nick Walker (DESY)
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish ILC Industrial Forum Japan 28-June-05.
Status of International Linear Collider Global Design Effort Barry Barish (by telecon) HEPAP Washington DC 18-May-05.
The Path Toward a Linear Collider Barry Barish HEP 2005 Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
Technology Breakthroughs and International Linear Collider Barry Barish AAAS Annual Meeting Washington DC 19-Feb-05.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
- Asian Single Tunnel Design Review – A Review on Design Study of the ILC Conventional Facility in Mountain Region Review Organization and Requirements.
Accelerator R&D on LC - Activities of ATF & STF - 1. Introduction 2. ATF 3. STF 4. Summary Seiya Yamaguchi, KEK The US/Japan Collaboration in High Energy.
CLIC Workshop 07 CERN, October 2007 Instrumentation Working Group In conference room Bldg Grahame Blair & Thibaut Lefevre.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting June 30, 2010 Agenda 1.Report from PMs (5 min.) 2.General Report from Group Leaders(15 min.) 3.Special Discussions 1.TDP R&D.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
ILC Accelerator Physics Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK)
The International Linear Collider and the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics Barry Barish Caltech Lomonosov Conference 20-Aug-2015 ILC.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
ILC – Recent progress & Path to Technical Design Report Brian Foster (Hamburg/DESY/Oxford & GDE) Plenary ECFA CERN 25/11/11.
Status of ILC Project Nick Walker – DESY ILD Meeting – Cracow –
Marc Ross The Normal-Conducting Linear Collider preparation - status and plans.
X-Band Deflectors Development at SLAC
SB2009/ Low energy running for ILC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Andrei Seryi John Adams Institute 19 October 2010.
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
常伝導技術での LC の可能性 LC feasibility consideration with normal conducting technology 第5回「機構の研究推進について」の意見交 換会 (ILC の推進について ) 平成 24 年 2 月 13 日 加速器・肥後寿泰.
CFS / Global – 04 Aug, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –ADI meeting 23.07: Parameter tables with low energy / low power operation –BA Workshop Planning CFS participation.
ILC Damping Rings Electron Cloud Working Group Meeting Introduction S. Guiducci (LNF) ECLOUD10, Cornell 13 October
International Linear Collider Technology: Status and Challenges Steve Holmes Fermilab Wine & Cheese Seminar September 24, 2004.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer The NLC Design Linear Collider Workshop 2000 FNAL October 24 th, 2000.
5 Nov. 07 CCAST, IHEP Global Design Effort 1 ILC accelerator related R&D in Japan K. Yokoya KEK CCAST ILC Accelerator Workshop, IHEP, Beijing, Nov
Undulator based polarized positron source for Circular electron-positron colliders Wei Gai Tsinghua University/ANL a seminar for IHEP, 4/8/2015.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
Progress and Plans for R&D and the Conceptual Design of the ILC Main Linacs H. Hayano, KEK PAC2005 5/18/2005.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
ILC R&D at KEK Beam Control Technology –ATF –ATF2 Acceleration Technology –High-gradient Cavities L-band R&D Stand –Linac System  STF –Construction of.
Top-Level Change Control (TLCC) Process by which specific themes from SB2009 will be developed and refined –Extension of established AD&I process Formal.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto th ATF2 Project Meeting Accelerator Design and Integration – New Baseline Proposal for ILC – ‘Strawman Baseline.
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
24-July-10 ICHEP-10 Paris Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10 ILC Global Design Effort.
김 귀년 CHEP, KNU Accelerator Activities in Korea for ILC.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS and Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS AND GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP CFS.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
X-band Based FEL proposal
Nan Phinney SLAC ILC Worldwide Event, Fermilab, June 12, 2013 (Many slides courtesy of Marc Ross, Akira Yamamoto, Barry Barish) ILC Accelerator A 25-year.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
WG1: Overall Design personal highlights report by Nick Walker First project meeting 2/12/2004 conveners: Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) Tor Raubenheimer (SLAC)
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Introduction and Meeting Objectives
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
NC Accelerator Structures
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
, A. Yamamoto SCRF WebEx Meeting.
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Electron Source Configuration
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
Presentation transcript:

US/JAPAN Accelerator R&D Thirty Years of Collaboration JLC/NLC/ILC Gregory Loew 30 th Anniversary Symposium Kona, Hawaii, October 19-22, 2010

Broad Chronology Phase 1: The Early Years, 1979 – 1985 RF Superconductivity (with M. Tigner at Cornell, and Y. Kojima at KEK) 150 MW S-Band Klystron Program (with G. Konrad at SLAC, J. Tanaka at KEK, and Mitsubishi/Toshiba) Surface Physics for RF Sources and Klystron Windows Phase 2: 1986 – Present Linear Collider R&D Annual HEP Meetings alternated between US and Japan, except for 1992 meeting in Kona, Hawaii Starting in 1987, Annual Collaboration LC Workshops alternated between KEK and SLAC June 1990: Sugawara and Richter decided to focus on 500 GeV c.m. LC between KEK and SLAC and speed up exchanges

KEK/SLAC LC WORKSHOP March 1-4, 1988 at KEK

Major Participants, starting at 1988 KEK Workshop Y. Kimura ( KEK Co-Chair) T. Nishikawa S. Ozaki S. Iwata S. Kamada K. Yokoya S. Kurokawa H. Mizuno T. Shintake T. Shidara K. Takata S. Takeda M. Yoshioka K. Oide And many others G. Loew (SLAC Co-Chair) B. Richter J. Paterson R. Ruth M. Allen J. Sheppard N. Toge R. Palmer H. Matsumoto J. Urakawa H. Hayano T. Higo N. Sasao H. Fukuma M. Akemoto N. Yamamoto K. Akai K. Hagiwara Y. Takeuchi S. Hiramatsu K. Kubo Later joined by: D. Burke T. Raubenheimer J. Wang G. Spalek T. Lee T. Lavine H. Hoag J. Frisch A. Vlieks G. Bowden N. Phinney Marc Ross S. Tantawi D. McCormick K. Jobe T. Smith P. Tenenbaum D. Yeremian C.Adolphsen

Major Highlights of R&D Collaboration Klystrons with Solenoid and PPM Focusing Accelerator Structures, Design, Fabrication, Wakefield and Breakdown Studies RF Pulse Compression, Cavities and Delay Lines Klystron Modulator Design SLAC Final Focus Test Beam with Laser-Compton Profile Monitor KEK ATF Linac, Damping Ring and Final Focus SLAC NLC X-Band Test Accelerator Design of Common Linear Collider Very important meetings and visitors

US/JAPAN 1991 Collaboration on HEP Meeting at SLAC

Their Majesties’ Visit at SLAC June 23, 1994

The Original 3 JLC’s in 1995 TRC Report S-Band, C-Band and X-Band

The Original NLC in 1995 TRC Report X-Band

Major Technical Achievements

The Junior KEK Brain Trust Visiting SLAC

75 MW X-Band Klystron with PPM Focusing X-Band Linac Section with 80 MV/m gradient and wakefield suppression

Details of structure design

Pulse Compression using Delay Lines producing 600 MW Peak X-Band Power

PULSE COMPRESSION WITH X4 GAIN

350 MeV NLC X- Band Test Accelerator J. Wang, T. Lavine and C. Adolphsen

Sugawara and Richter at SLAC’s NLCTA 350 Mev X-Band Linac

Final Focus Test Beam and Laser-Compton Fringe Monitor Measured sigma y of about 70 nm at 48 GeV

ATF/ATF2 AT KEK Layout of ATF/ATF2 Goals of ATF2 focus the vertical beam size to 37 nm stabilize the vertical beam position in 2 nm resolution accelerate electron beam to 1.3 GeV normalized  y = 2.8 × m ・ rad achieved in the Damping Ring ATF

JLC-X/NLC Common Design in 2003 TRC Report

KEK C-Band System Unit for LC in 2003 TRC Report

Vignettes

The Fateful Decision!

The 13 Cold Guys Sweating it Out August 11-13, 2004 in Korea

Fast Forward to Today’s ILC

Present Status of R&D Program US EUROPE JAPAN

Components of the SB2009 Design for Study and Review during Single Tunnel for main linac Move positron source to end of linac Reduce number of bunches factor of two (lower power) Reduce size of damping rings (3.2km) Re-evaluate optimum accelerating gradient Integrate central region Single stage bunch compressor Site dependent optimization RDRSB2009

upgrade Centre-of-mass energyE cm GeV Beam energyE beam GeV Lorentz factor  1.96E E E E E+05 Collision ratef rep Hz55554 Electron linac ratef linac Hz Number of bunchesnbnb Electron bunch populationN-N- × Positron bunch populationN+N+ × Bunch seperation tbtb ns Bunch seperation ×f RF  t b f RF Pulse currentI beam mA RMS bunch length zz mm0.3 Electron RMS energy spread  p/p % Positron RMS energy spread  p/p % Electron polarisationP-P- %80 Positron polarisationP+P+ % Horizontal emittance (linac exit)  x mm 10 Vertical emittance (linac exit)  y nm35 IP horizontal beta function x*x* mm IP vertical beta function (no TF) y*y* mm IP vertical beta function (TF) y*y* mm0.2 IP RMS horizontal beam size x*x* nm IP RMS veritcal beam size (no TF) y*y* nm IP RMS veritcal beam size (TF) y*y* nm Horizontal distruption parameterDxDx Vertical disruption parameterDyDy Horizontal enhancement factorH Dx Vertical enhancement factorH Dy Total enhancement factorHDHD Geometric luminosityL geom ×10 34 cm -2 s LuminosityL×10 34 cm -2 s Fraction of luminosity in top 1%L 0.01 /L Average beamstrahlung parameter  av Maximum beamstrahlung parameter  max Average number of photons / particlenn Average energy loss  E BS % Number of pairs per bunch crossingN pair × LuminosityL×10 34 cm -2 s Average energy loss  E BS % Number of pairs per bunch crossingN pair × Fraction of luminosity in top 1%L 0.01 /L Current ILC Parameters

From R&D Programs to TLCC Process Top Level Change Control WhenWhereWhat BAW 1Sept. 7-10, 2010 KEK1.Accelerating Gradient 2.Single Tunnel (HLRF) BAW 2Jan 18-21, 2011 SLAC3.Reduced RF 4.e+ source location Baseline Assessment Workshops Face to face meetings Open to all stakeholders Plenary BAW-1 Successfully completed and PM’s have forwarded recommendations to Project Director for TLCC Recommend :- No change in gradient, Single tunnel linac and continuing development of alternate RF power systems, Klystron Cluster and Distributed RF.

A Review on Design Study of the ILC Conventional Facility in Mountain Region One Example of Site Dependent Optimization Process and Input to BAW-1

International Review of ILC Facility in Mountain Region Review Chair:Victor R. Kuchler (GDE-CFS: FNAL) Reviewers:John A. Osborne (GDE-CFS: CERN) Thomas W. Lackowski (GDE-CFS FNAL) Larry L. Hammond (GDE-CFS: FNAL) Randal J. Wielgos (GDE-CFS: FNAL) Tracy Lundin (Hanson Professional Service Inc.) Wilhelm Bialowons (GDE-CFS/GS-APM: DESY) Tomoki Shiotani (Kyoto U.) Takafumi Seiki (Utsunomiya U.) Hideaki Yasuhara (Ehime U.) Satoru Yamashita (U. Tokyo) Observer Tomofumi Koyama (Kyoto U.) Assistant/Secretary: Akira Yamamoto (GDE/KEK/AAA)

Good Luck to the Next Generation!