Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting V. Kuchler1 of 17 Fermilab R&D Meeting Fermilab R&D Meeting Vic Kuchler Conventional Facilities Update October 26, 2005

Milestone One: Snowmass 2005 Conference Successfully Initiate the Global Conventional Facilities and Siting Effort and Complete the Comparative Site Assessment Matrix Format Milestone Two: December, 2005 Identify Regional Sample Sites for Inclusion into the Baseline Configuration Document Milestone Three: December, 2006 Complete Conventional Facilities and Siting Portion of the Reference Design Document V. Kuchler2 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Organizational Overview With the Establishment of the Global Design Effort (GDE), Work on the ILC has been Organized into Seven Working Groups and Six Global Groups With the Establishment of the Global Design Effort (GDE), Work on the ILC has been Organized into Seven Working Groups and Six Global Groups Each Individual Group has a Designated Representative from Each of the Three Regions, Asian Region, European Region and the Americas Region Each Individual Group has a Designated Representative from Each of the Three Regions, Asian Region, European Region and the Americas Region Global Group 4 is the Conventional Facilities and Siting Group Represented by: Global Group 4 is the Conventional Facilities and Siting Group Represented by: Atsushi Enomoto – Asian Region Jean-Luc Baldy – European Region Vic Kuchler – Americas Region V. Kuchler3 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Global Group 4 Goals Developed at Snowmass Review, Discuss and Amend the Site Assessment Matrix into a Final Working Document Review, Discuss and Amend the Site Assessment Matrix into a Final Working Document Agree Upon and Regular Means of Communication for the Conventional Facilities and Siting Work Agree Upon and Regular Means of Communication for the Conventional Facilities and Siting Work Identify Points of Contact with Each Working and Global Group as Needed Identify Points of Contact with Each Working and Global Group as Needed Determine a Working Schedule for Completion of Baseline Configuration Document (BCD - Dec 2005) and Reference Design Document (RDR – Dec 2006) Determine a Working Schedule for Completion of Baseline Configuration Document (BCD - Dec 2005) and Reference Design Document (RDR – Dec 2006) Discuss Website and Document Management System for the Control of CFS Information Discuss Website and Document Management System for the Control of CFS Information Determine Format for CFS Portion of the BCD Determine Format for CFS Portion of the BCD V. Kuchler4 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Progress To Date The Site Assessment Matrix has been Established and is Currently Being Used by all Regions to Identify a Regional Sample Site for the Baseline Configuration Document The Site Assessment Matrix has been Established and is Currently Being Used by all Regions to Identify a Regional Sample Site for the Baseline Configuration Document A Regular Video Conference has been Established Between All Three Regions to Coordinate the Conventional Facilities and Siting Work A Regular Video Conference has been Established Between All Three Regions to Coordinate the Conventional Facilities and Siting Work Points of Contact have been Identified with Each of the Working/Global Groups Points of Contact have been Identified with Each of the Working/Global Groups The Schedule and Format for the Baseline Configuration Document as well as the Website Conventions have been/will be Established by the GDE for all Working and Global Groups The Schedule and Format for the Baseline Configuration Document as well as the Website Conventions have been/will be Established by the GDE for all Working and Global Groups V. Kuchler5 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Working Group Points of Contact WG 1 – Low Emittance Transport Beam Dynamics Daniel Schulte (CERN) - Jean-Luc Baldy (CERN) WG 2 – Linac Design Hitoshi Hayano (KEK) - Atsushi Enomoto (KEK) WG 3A – Sources John Shepard (SLAC) - Vic Kuchler (FNAL) WG 3B – Damping Rings Andy Wolski (LBNL) - Tom Lackowski (FNAL) WG 4 – Beam Delivery System Andrei Seryi (SLAC) - Fred Asiri (SLAC) WG 5 – Superconducting Cavities and Couplers No Point of Contact at this Time WG 6 – Communications Judy Jackson (FNAL) - Vic Kuchler (FNAL) V. Kuchler6 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Global Group Points of Contact GG 1 – Parameters Kaoru Yokoya (KEK) - Atsushi Enomoto (KEK) Nick Walker (DESY) - Jean-Luc Baldy (CERN) Tor Raubenheimer (SLAC) - Fred Asiri (SLAC) GG 2 – Instrumentation and Controls No Point of Contact at this Time GG 3 – Operations and Availability Tom Himel (SLAC) - Emil Huedem (FNAL) GG 5 – Cost and Engineering Tetsuo Shidara (KEK) - Atsushi Enomoto (KEK) Wilhelm Bialowons (DESY) - Jean-Luc Baldy (CERN) Peter Garbincius (FNAL) - Tom Lackowski (FNAL) GG 6 – Physics Options No Point of Contact at this Time V. Kuchler7 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Moving Toward the Sample Sites Each Region is Reviewing Various Candidate Sites Using the Site Assessment Matrix as a Tool to Eventually Identify Each Regional Sample Site for Inclusion into the BCD Each Region is Reviewing Various Candidate Sites Using the Site Assessment Matrix as a Tool to Eventually Identify Each Regional Sample Site for Inclusion into the BCD The Matrix is Divided into 9 Major Headings with 99 Individual Items of Assessment The Matrix is Divided into 9 Major Headings with 99 Individual Items of Assessment Sample Site Selection Will Necessarily Include a Degree of Judgment and Subjectivity as part of the Analysis Sample Site Selection Will Necessarily Include a Degree of Judgment and Subjectivity as part of the Analysis The Asian Region is Currently Reviewing 4-5 Candidate Sites The Asian Region is Currently Reviewing 4-5 Candidate Sites The European Region is Currently Reviewing 2 Candidate Sites The European Region is Currently Reviewing 2 Candidate Sites The Americas Region is Currently Reviewing 5 Candidate Sites The Americas Region is Currently Reviewing 5 Candidate Sites V. Kuchler8 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Site Assessment Matrix Major Headings 1.Site Impacts on Critical Science parameters 2.Scientific/Institutional support Base 3.Land Acquisition 4.Environmental impacts 5.Construction Cost Impacts 6.Operational Cost Impacts 7.Environment, Safety and Health Issues 8.Regional Support Infrastructure 9.Risk Factors V. Kuchler9 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

V. Kuchler10 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Cut and Cover (Near Surface) Sites – Site A V. Kuchler11 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Cut and Cover (Near Surface) Sites – Site E V. Kuchler12 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Cut and Cover Site Considerations Perceived to be Less Expensive but this has not been Clearly Demonstrated by Work to Date Perceived to be Less Expensive but this has not been Clearly Demonstrated by Work to Date Neither Site has Uniform Depth for Excavation Which Precludes Saving from Uniform Construction Methods Neither Site has Uniform Depth for Excavation Which Precludes Saving from Uniform Construction Methods Neither Earth Curved or Laser Straight Alignment Show Any Advantage and Both Could Be Problematic Neither Earth Curved or Laser Straight Alignment Show Any Advantage and Both Could Be Problematic Surface Disruption and Surface Building Presence is Extensive with Respect to Roadways, Drainage Patterns, Rail Lines, Utility Corridors, Current Land Usage, Berms, etc. Surface Disruption and Surface Building Presence is Extensive with Respect to Roadways, Drainage Patterns, Rail Lines, Utility Corridors, Current Land Usage, Berms, etc. Requires Extensive Land Acquisition Requires Extensive Land Acquisition May Not be Environmentally Viable May Not be Environmentally Viable Precludes an Alignment Centered on the Fermilab Site Precludes an Alignment Centered on the Fermilab Site V. Kuchler13 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Deep Tunnel Sites - Site A V. Kuchler14 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Deep Tunnel Sites - Site B V. Kuchler15 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Deep Tunnel Site Considerations Uniform Construction Methods Can Be Used Throughout the Project Uniform Construction Methods Can Be Used Throughout the Project Both Earth Curved or Laser Straight Alignments Could Be Accommodated Both Earth Curved or Laser Straight Alignments Could Be Accommodated Surface Disruption and Land Acquisition are Minimized Compared to a Cut and Cover Solution Surface Disruption and Land Acquisition are Minimized Compared to a Cut and Cover Solution A Deep Tunnel Configuration is Less Susceptible to Surface Background Noise and Ground Motion A Deep Tunnel Configuration is Less Susceptible to Surface Background Noise and Ground Motion Relatively Uniform Environmental Impact Relatively Uniform Environmental Impact Could Readily Take Advantage of Existing Fermilab Site With Respect to Land and Infrastructure Could Readily Take Advantage of Existing Fermilab Site With Respect to Land and Infrastructure V. Kuchler16 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting

Near-Term Schedule – Draft BCD Documentation Due – Draft BCD Documentation Due 12.7/9.05 – GDE Meeting at INFN, Frascati, Italy with Regional Sample Sites Identified 12.7/9.05 – GDE Meeting at INFN, Frascati, Italy with Regional Sample Sites Identified BCD Accepted as Baseline and Configuration Management System is in Place BCD Accepted as Baseline and Configuration Management System is in Place 1.06 – Begin Work on Reference Design Report 1.06 – Begin Work on Reference Design Report 3.06 – GDE Meeting in Bangalore, India 3.06 – GDE Meeting in Bangalore, India Continue Working to Complete RDR Continue Working to Complete RDR – Reference Design Document Complete – Reference Design Document Complete V. Kuchler17 of 17 Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting