MATT DOW Jackson Walker L.L.P. February 14, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
Advertisements

Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC “Zubulake IV”
The Evolving Law of E-Discovery Joseph J. Ortego, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP New York, NY Jericho, NY.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
Considerations for Records and Information Management Programs in Light of the Pension Committee and Rimkus Consulting 2010 Decisions.
248 F.R.D. 372 (D. Conn. 2007) Doe v. Norwalk Community College.
By Greg Flannery. Plaintiff- David R. Lawson Charged with reviewing documents turned over by defendants. Burke and Hull were supervising the review process.
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation Jason CISO – University of Connecticut October 30, 2014 Information Security Office.
© 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Offense as Defense in U.S. Patent Litigation Anthony L. Press Maximizing IP Seminar October 31, 2005.
Ronald J. Shaffer, Esq. Beth L. Weisser, Esq. Lorraine K. Koc, Esq., Vice President and General Counsel, Deb Shops, Inc. © 2010 Fox Rothschild DELVACCA.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc.  Motion Hearing before a Magistrate Judge in Federal Court  District of Colorado  Decided in 2007.
Establishing a Defensible and Efficient Legal Hold Policy September 2013 Connie Hall, J.D., Manager, New Product Development, Thomson Reuters.
E-Discovery in Government Investigations and Criminal Law JOLT Symposium February 22,
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY March 4, 2009 Presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the Tarrant County Bar Association Carl C. Butzer Jackson.
1 Records Management and Electronic Discovery Ken Sperl (614) Martin.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
Avoiding Sanctions & Surprises The ethics of discovery Kat Meyer, Esq. President of Conquest eDiscovery, LLC.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc. (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007) Andrew S. Lo E-Discovery 10/6/09.
Thomas R. Nolasco. Desktop PCSmart phonesThumb drives LaptopUSB Storage devicesPortable hard drives TabletDigital camerasiPods/MP3 players Network file.
Is Records Management Still Relevant? Sean Regan E-Discovery Product Marketing Manager Symantec Enterprise Vault.
17th Annual ARMA Metro Maryland Spring Seminar Confidentiality, Access, and Use of Electronic Records.
Triton Construction Co, Inc. v. Eastern Shore Electrical Services, Inc. Eastern Shore Services, LLC, George Elliot, Teresa Elliot, Tom Kirk and Kirk’s.
E -nuff! : Practical Tips For Keeping s From Derailing Your Case Presented by Jerry L. Mitchell.
1 Structuring your Information Management to Ensure Litigation Readiness Julian Ackert, Principal Washington DC John Forsyth, HBOS Edinburgh Andrew Haslam,
Grant S. Cowan Information Management & eDiscovery Practice Group.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
©2011 Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley E-DISCOVERY Hélène Kazanjian Anne Sterman Trial Division.
DOCUMENT RETENTION ISSUES FOR IN- HOUSE COUNSEL Rebecca A. Brommel BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Getting Involved in Your Claims A Lawyer’s Perspective Matt Cook, Esquire.
E-Discovery PA230: Unit 9.
EDISCOVERY: ARE YOU PREPARED? Dennis P. Ogden Belin McCormick, P.C. 666 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: (515) Facsimile:
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
Rewriting the Law in the Digital Age
Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc. v. Local 100, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union 212 F.R.D. 178 S.D.N.Y
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
DOE V. NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 248 F.R.D. 372 (D. CONN. 2007) Decided July 16, 2002.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 11Slide 1 Production of Documents Scope Scope Includes documents of all types, including pictures, graphs, drawings, videos.
244 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007). Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes Inc.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Rambus v. Infineon Technologies AG 22 F.R.D. 280 (E.D. Va. 2004)
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc. 224 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007) By: Sara Alsaleh Case starts on page 136 of the book!
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
Session 6 ERM Case Law: The Annual MER Update of the Latest News, Trends, & Issues Hon. John M. Facciola United States District Court, District of Columbia.
PA321: Time, Billing & Records Management Unit 3 Seminar - E-Discovery.
The Risks of Waiver and the Costs of Pre- Production Privilege Review of Electronic Data 232 F.R.D. 228 (D. Md. 2005) Magistrate Judge, Grimm.
Defensible Records Retention and Preservation Linda Starek-McKinley Director, Records and Information Management Edward Jones
PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN ON E-DISCOVERY Gene Blanton.
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
Electronic Discovery refers to the discovery of electronic documents and data…including , web pages, word processing files, computer databases, and.
Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. Not Reported in So.2d, 2005 WL (Fla.Cir.Ct.) Ediscovery, Fall 2010 Francis Eiden.
Emerging Case Law and Recent eDiscovery Decisions.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
Zubulake IV [Trigger Date]
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
1 PRESERVATION: E-Discovery Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire &Casualty Insurance Co.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG Eastern District of Virginia 2004 Neil Gutekunst.
Proposed and Recent Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc 2007 WL (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007)
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
Morgan Stanley Team 2. Background Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 2005 LEXIS 94 (Fla. Cir. Ct. March 23, 2005.) The jury returned.
‘Make in India’ series Emerging Trends - International Arbitration: (i) E- discovery (ii) Hot tubbing.
Legal Strategies for the Construction Industry
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation
Class III Objectives Subject Matter:
Presentation transcript:

MATT DOW Jackson Walker L.L.P. February 14, 2007

The Plaintiff’s Practical Guide to E-Discovery (2005), by Craig Ball Electronic Discovery is “the single greatest litigation advantage for plaintiffs’ counsel willing to learn the ropes and aggressively assert their clients’ rights.” “Your opponent may be a courtroom whiz, but if he or she has a tenuous grasp of computer systems or doesn’t understand his or her client’s devices and data, defense counsel can’t give sound guidance about preserving digital evidence or pose the right questions to knowledgeable IT personnel.”

Plaintiffs’ Strategy Warn defense counsel of broad duty to preserve at the outset of the case File motion for a preservation order Take Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of a hands-on IT employee Propound detailed, tailored RFPs File motions to compel and for sanctions

Plaintiffs’ Goal Create the perception that the defendant is spoliating ESI because it’s hiding something Increase costs for the defendant Avoid cost-shifting Create a side-show that takes focus away from the merits of the case

Consequences Trap for the unwary Advantage: lawyers who understand the issues Advantage: clients with document retention programs that are followed More cases will settle early More cases will be filed All will have a better understanding of the merits of the case at an earlier stage of the litigation

Sanctions for Failure to Implement a Litigation Hold 3M Innovative Props. Co. v. Tomar Elecs., 2006 WL (D. Minn. Sept. 18, 2006) Transgressions: In addition to other misconduct, the defendant “failed to implement a company-wide litigation hold on relevant documents. Employees... continued to delete documents, including , after the litigation commenced.” Sanctions: Included an adverse inference jury instruction, with respect to the and other documents destroyed or withheld by defendant, that these documents support plaintiff’s claims and are unfavorable to defendant’s defenses.