Enhanced Pork Labeling Research: Study Results September 24, 2015 09/24/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MARKETING INFORMATION AND RESEARCH
Advertisements

Evaluations Kristy Myers Manager, Program Evaluations Presented by: Tom Lipetzky VP, International Programs Washington, D.C. – May 26, 2005.
Methodology Conducted from March 16 – 22, 2006
Consumer attitudes to food waste and food packaging: Summary of research findings (March 2013) In partnership with:
Agenda Background & methodology Sponsorship details Impact on key brand metrics Shifts in brand positioning & perceptions Insights from the behavioural.
Marketing Strategies for Pasture-Based Animal Products David S. Conner, Ph.D. Research Specialist C.S. Mott Group for Sustainable Food Systems Michigan.
Maltese Survey Health & Food Q.9 Would you say what you normally eat is good for your health? ANALYSIS OF RESULTS  We have the highest percentage (44%)
Broulim’s Artisan Bread and Tortilla Survey Results Caitlin Trani, Chantelle Rowley, Kristi Keister, Kyle Manning, Christian Holman.
Beef Producer Attitude Study – June 2010 Prepared for Cattlemen’s Beef Board By Aspen Media and Market Research.
Florida Statistics April Road Map: – Research Purpose & Methodology – Summary – Detailed Findings – How Dangerous Is….? – How Distracting Is….?
Consumer Evaluations of New Technology-Based Self-Service Options By Pratibha A. Dabholkar Presented by Sarah Hettervik Article 26.
BRE Confidence Index for Residential Property (2005:Q2, June 2005) Presenter: Prof. Eddie C. M. Hui Research Centre for Construction and Real Estate Economics.
Perceptions of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) Presentation by Jeff S. Sharp OLC Annual Meeting & Industry Symposium Plain City, Ohio February.
FOODIMA Food Industry Dynamics and Methodological Advances Contract No Priority 8.1 B1.1 Sustainable Management of Europe’s Natural Resources 5th.
Background Survey 15 minute online survey Data collected June 26 – July 1, 2009 Respondents 1,071 Moms participated in the survey 356 are members of the.
2012 Survey of California Home Sellers. Methodology Telephone surveys conducted in August/September of 600 randomly selected home sellers who sold in.
Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.  In 1993, a small team was tasked to identify information that would be included in a safe handling instruction.
Whole Foods Market America's First National "Certified Organic" Grocer Commitment to the organic consumer and to the preservation of the integrity of organic.
Customer Needs Assessment Survey -Philippi East Planning Area- Prepared by : Roots Research SA For : City of Cape Town August 2002.
Certificate Authority Security Council (CASC) 2015 Consumer Trust Survey.
2007 ENA Membership Needs Assessment Presentation of Key Findings and Strategic Implications Prepared and Presented by Stuart Meyer, Marketing Membership.
The 2011 International Poultry Exposition (IPE) Salmonella and Campylobacter Reduction Conference Consumer Product Comprehension.
Report of findings prepared for: FGI Research, Inc. May 2007 The Impact of CSR on the General Public A Nationwide Poll on Corporate Social Responsibility.
1 PowerPoint Presentation Design Wednesday, September 02, 2015Ms. Wear Info Tech 9/10.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Edited by teachers Maria Jose Calderone and Caterina Mammana.
Alcohol Regulation Policy National Survey Conducted April 5 – 7, 2010 n=1000 Adults MoE= ± 95% Confidence Interval Global Perspective. Innovative.
Bill Knudson, Marketing Economist MSU Product Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources Overview of Demand for Alternative Pork Products.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Green Marketing 1. Definition of Green Consumer LOHAS: (Lifestyle of Heath and Sustainability) very progressive on environment and society, looking for.
WATERMELON PRESENTATION A & U Studies (Domestic & Canada) rose research, llc. November, 2006.
YouGov Sweden AB © 2009 YouGov YouGov Nordic Food & Health Comments Question 2. What substance are you particularly concerned that food may contain? 2.
Healthcare Costs in Retirement Consumer Study – February 2012 NFM-10454AO.1.
Assertiveness Training
A decade after September 11 th 2001 For release on September 12 th, 2011.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
Persuasive Communication: Food Selection / Handling Christine M. Bruhn, Ph.D. Director, Center for Consumer Research University of California, Davis.
Changes in Consumer Knowledge, Behavior, and Confidence Since the 1996 PR/HACCP Final Rule Presented at Thinking Globally — Working Locally: A Conference.
© 2009 South-Western, Cengage LearningMARKETING 1 Chapter 5 MARKETING INFORMATION AND RESEARCH 5-1Understanding the Need for Market Information 5-2Finding.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
Changing behaviour: messy, complex but ultimately effective Emma Marsh.
Sequence Models.
Your Investment. Your Future. An Evaluation of the Importance to Consumers of Selected Niche Pork Attributes R Parker & Associates, Inc. / Ashcraft Research.
MODULE 14 Nutrition REVISED 1. OBJECTIVES  At the end of the module, the nurse aide will be able to: 1. Understand the My Plate guide to healthy eating.
Future of Privacy Forum “Icon”Survey: Online Behavioral Advertising & Privacy Final Results Prepared by Mary J. Culnan Bentley University.
Results of National Afterschool Meals Survey of Low-Income Families September 10, 2013.
2005 Design Outsourcing Study. Design Outsourcing Study 2  Web survey:  Fieldwork dates  December 15 th - December 31 st, 2005  303 usable responses.
Exploring The Impact of UGC on Consumer Behavior December 2008.
Answering the Edexcel Impact of War Paper 7thth June 2011.
Irradiation to Improve Meat Safety What do consumers expect? Studies show consumer attitudes on meat safety and willingness to accept irradiated products.
© 2009 South-Western, Cengage LearningMARKETING 1 Chapter 5 MARKETING INFORMATION AND RESEARCH 5-1Understanding the Need for Market Information 5-2Finding.
Marketing Research Sample Report Outline Stephan Sorger NOT A TEMPLATE: PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THIS PPT, CROSS OUT SHISEIDO, AND ENTER.
ECO LABELLING (or GREEN LABELLING – it means exactly the same thing)
Chapter Twelve Copyright © 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Attitude Scale Measurements Used In Survey Research.
2004 National Public Opinion Survey April 5, 2004 Consumers Attitudes About Animal Welfare.
Final Rule: Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat and Poultry Products FSIS FSIS - 1/24/20111.
Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology In the United States in William K. Hallman, PhD. Food Policy Institute Rutgers University.
Content Marketing Supermarket Research --- October 2012.
BLUE APRON Recommendations Shu Shu, Rishav, Trista, Caitlin, & Kelsey.
MENU PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (HTF255)
Impact Of Online Advertising On Consumer Behaviour By Thatipalli Sagar 10cqcma108 Under The Guidance Of Dr. Maruthi Ram. R.
Labeling Issues for Raw Beef Pathogen Control and Regulatory Compliance in Beef Processing September 9-10, 2015.
Financial and Business Planning Concepts Business owner perspectives.
National Pork Board Pork Management Conference Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. Dan Peed, Director Natural Pork Programs.
Eating Smart and Moving More with MyPlate
Flash Eurobarometer 367 / December 2012 – TNS Political & Social
Should we change the way we eat?
Independent Writing Topics
NEW ITEM INTRODUCTION: Extra Lean Line
2019 Planning & Progress Study
Presentation transcript:

Enhanced Pork Labeling Research: Study Results September 24, /24/2015

Research background and objectives Background: The new rule becomes effective January 1, FSIS: Description Designation for Raw Meat and Poultry Products Containing Added Solutions, Final Rule Specifically the new rules states that: All products that contain a solution must have specific details of the information included on the package label. This information must be shown directly below the product name and must use the same font type. The font size must be no less than one-third the size of the font used for the product name and must use the same font style (bold, italic, underline etc.). The term “enhanced” can no longer be used; instead, use the word “contains.” 2

Research background and objectives Objectives: Measure awareness and purchase behavior of “enhanced” meat and poultry under the current labeling regulations Determine how the new labels will impact overall consumer attitudes toward enhanced fresh pork or change purchase intent/behavior Ascertain the reasons for any change in purchase intent/behavior, positive and negative 3

Research methodology A 15-minute online survey with a total of 1,200 respondents was conducted summer of Potential respondents were screened to ensure that they do at least 50 percent of the shopping and food preparation for their households and that they do not avoid red meat or poultry. A sample size of 1,200 respondents has an error rate of +/-2.8% at the 95% confidence level. If this same study were repeated 100 times, in 95 of 100 times, the results would be within +/-2.8% of those of the current study. (Sample sizes of 400 have an error rate of +/- 4.9%.) 4

73% of respondents are aware of enhancements Awareness of Meat and Poultry Enhancement 5

57% of respondents said they purchased enhanced product Purchase of Enhanced Meat and Poultry Products in the Past 6

Many don’t realize they are buying enhanced products Percent of Customers Who Have Purchased Enhanced Meat and Poultry Products in the Past 7

56% said they would purchase with statement Likelihood of Purchasing Pork Product with Solution of Salt, Water and Spices 8

Reasons for concern There are too many additives. 6% I need more information before I could decide. 5% Reasons totally unrelated to enhancement of the product. 17% I don't like added solutions. 8% I prefer my meat more natural with nothing added. 10% Too much salt/sodium. 14% I’m not sure one way or the other. 9% I prefer my own spices, seasonings. 12% Reasons Given for Being Somewhat Or Very Unlikely to Purchase Pork Containing Water, Salt and Spices 9

36% would purchase with expanded statement Likelihood of Purchasing Pork Products with Solution of Water and Various Ingredients 10

Reasons for concern Too many chemicals/artificial ingredients. 24% I don’t understand what these ingredients are and if I don't know, why I would eat them. 23% Too many additives. 12% Too much salt/sodium. 11% I prefer my meat more natural with nothing added. 8% Reasons totally unrelated to enhancement of the product. 4% I’m not sure one way or the other. 4% Reasons Given for Being Somewhat or Very Unlikely to Purchase Pork Containing Water and Various Ingredients 11

Concerns grow as ingredient list grows 12 Percent of Consumers Very/Somewhat Likely to Buy Enhanced Pork Products

Positive attitudes about added solution Consumer Agreement with Positive Statements about Solution Added Meat/Poultry % of Respondents Who Somewhat/Strongly Agree 13

Negative attitudes about added solution Consumer Agreement with Negative Statements about Enhanced Meat/Poultry % of Respondents Who Somewhat/Strongly Agree 14

Conclusions and implications While 73% of consumers state they are aware of enhanced pork products and 57% say they have purchased them, there are still consumers who are not aware of this practice. When provided a label with the new statement format included, 56% of respondents said they would purchase pork with a simple solution called out, and 36% said they would purchase a product with the expanded solution. These statements do raise concerns with some consumers about additives. The simpler the solution on labels, the better the response from these consumers. Consider these results when reviewing current statements that need to be adjusted to comply with the new rule by January 1,

This message funded by America’s Pork Producers Patrick Fleming Director of Market Intelligence & Innovation 16