Stage 2 Meaningful Use Improve Population and Public Health 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Vendor Orientation Meaningful Use Informatics Division.
Presenting on behalf of the Stage 2 MU PH Reporting Requirements Task Force.
Health and Wellness for all Arizonans azdhs.gov Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) & Meaningful Use Sara Imholte Arizona Department of Health.
Medicaid and Meaningful Use – The “Other” EHR Incentive Program: What Hospital Leaders Should Know About the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Wisconsin Hospital.
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
1 Medicare Only EPs, Subsection (d) Hospitals and CAHs EHR Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Proposed Rule
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Purdue Research Foundation © MU Hot Topics for January 2015.
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
Practice Management System Electronic Medical Records Accelerate Your Practice Stage 2 Meaningful Use with MVE 2014 Practice Management.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Meaningful Use Jacqueline L. Candelaria ABQ Area Program Analyst April 25, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
CMS NPRM proposes requirements for Stage 3 of EHR Incentive Programs (in FR March 30, 2015) In conjunction with.
Electronic Health Records – Meaningful Use, Certification, and the Regulatory Rulemaking Process June 18, 2015 Lori Mihalich-Levin,JD
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Saeed A. Khan MD, MBA, FACP © CureMD Healthcare ACOs and Requirements for Reporting Quality Measures Meaningful Use Are you still missing out? © CureMD.
Lab Results Data Exchange Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
INFLUENCE OF MEANINGFUL USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS Neely Duffey, Olivia Mire, Mallory Murphy, and Dana Sizemore.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program.
CMS Proposed Changes for Meaningful Use in Mark Segal, Vice President, Government and Industry Affairs, GE Healthcare IT May 1, 2015.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Meaningful Use Core and Menu Objectives.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
Patient Volume for Meaningful Use Richard Kashinski Meaningful Use National Business Analyst DNC (Contractor) for U.S. Indian Health Service OIT Last Updated:
Discussion with BEACON Council ODJFS/OHP Medicaid Provider Incentive Program.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
Syndromic Surveillance Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome HIT Standards Committee
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission EHR & MU for HIM Professionals Resource Patient Management System.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Meaningful Use Measures Series – Session 3 Objectives related to interoperability and exchanging data to outside entity 1.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
New Jersey Institute of Technology Enterprise Development Center (EDC) 211 Warren Street, Newark, NJ Phone: Fax:
The NC Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Presented by: Rachael Williams, Program Manager Layne Roberts, Data Specialist.
Health IT Policy Committee Meeting November 4, 2014 Data Analytics Update 1.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Updates eHealth Services and Support September 24, 2014 Today’s presenter: Nicole Bennett, Provider Enrollment and Verification.
Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification Flexibility for 2014 Today’s presenters: Al Wroblewski, Client Services Relationship Manager Thomas Bennett, Client.
360Exchange (360X) Project 12/06/12. Reminders / announcements 360X Update CEHRT 2014 / MU2 Transition of Care Requirements 1 Agenda.
Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Meaningful Use and PQRS How to help your practices avoid penalties April 25 th,2015 Washington D.C. Mark Norris Medical Records Services, LLC
Meaningful Use Syndromic Surveillance DHSC March 3, 2016.
MAPIR 5.7 Walk-Through Vermont Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program May 25, 2016.
Utah Digital Health Service Commission Meaningful Use Public Health Measure: Submitting electronic immunization data to USIIS by establishing an EHR-USIIS.
MAINE PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION JUNE 27, 2016 PRESENTED BY PATTI CHUBBUCK MaineCare Medicaid 2016 Meaningful Use Program.
Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 16, 2016 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher Thomas.
Florida’s Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
Meaningful Use and Public Health
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
An Overview of Meaningful Use Proposed Rules in 2015
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #10 – Public Health Reporting Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 21, 2016 Today’s presenter:
Presentation transcript:

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Improve Population and Public Health 1

2

Health Information Exchange Public Health arrangements with HIE/intermediary to transport data are acceptable to demonstrate Meaningful Use – No certification of HIE required Can also be extension of certified technology – Requires Certification EP or EH must still ensure accomplishment of ongoing submission – Unless PHA specifically designates intermediary as acceptable for satisfying requirement

Transport EP or EH required to utilize transport method supported by PHA – Encourages use of HIE and standardization – Specifically states that the requirement is independent of ONC Certification

Ongoing Submission Must register intent to submit within 60 days of the start of EHR reporting period – CMS expects to maintain a repository of PHA capacity to accept MU transactions Must participate in on-boarding process – Must respond to PHA written requests for actions – Does not meet measure as result of failure to respond to two written requests within 30 days on two separate occasions A Provider submitting any reportable data during their normal course of operations is engaged in ongoing submission – Does not include submission to test environments

Grandfathering Public Heath measures may be satisfied if ongoing submission achieved in a previous year using either current or 2011 Edition EHR Certification – Those successfully moving into production in Stage 1 using messages can continue to submit messages as long as it is acceptable to the PHA

Public Health Letters Agreed with commenters that letters were too restrictive Any written communication (including electronic form) from the PHA affirming that EP, EH or CAH meet the appropriate measure

Exclusions PHA does not provide capacity information to central repository by beginning of EHR Reporting Period or PHA cannot accept MU transaction according to published standards(All measures) Immunization – Does not give reportable immunization Syndromic – No ED or not the provider type for which SS collected Cancer – EP does not diagnose or treat cancer

“except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice” Providers must report even if not required by law Providers do not have to report if specifically excluded by law

Specialized Registries For the purpose of exclusion applies to registries maintained by National specialty societies and specialized registries maintained by PHAs. Can also include specialized registries operated by patient safety organizations and quality improvement organizations

Zero Paid Claims The EHR Incentive Programs Stage 1 Rule stated that, in order for a Medicaid encounter to count towards the patient volume of an eligible provider, Medicaid had to either pay for all or part of the service, or pay all or part of the premium, deductible or coinsurance for that encounter. The Stage 2 Rule now states that the Medicaid encounter can be counted towards patient volume if the patient is enrolled in the state’s Medicaid program (either through the state’s fee-for-service programs or the state’s Medicaid managed care programs) at the time of service without the requirement of Medicaid payment liability. How will this change affect patient volume calculations for Medicaid eligible providers?

Changes to Stage 1 starting 2013 Adds “Except where prohibited by law” Exclusion of menu set items does not count towards overall number of menu set items met.

EHR Certification Test Tools and Procedures expected for public comment late September/early October – Cancer – Immunization – Syndromic (Hospital Based only) – ELR