1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Advertisements

Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Grades 3-8 Grade Below Basic ProficientGoalAdvanced % At/Above Proficiency (AYP Goal) % At/Above Goal (State Goal)
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
Connecticut Academic Performance Test Spotlight on Assessment University of Connecticut Neag School of Education March 28, 2008.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Assessment Update 2008 GACIS Fall Conference. Transition of Assessments to the GPS Two major tasks: 1.Content alignment “What students must know” Make.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
September 2015 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
New York State Staff/Curriculum Development Network S/CDN September 22, 2005.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
11/5/2015 Michigan’s School Accreditation System : From Education YES to MI-SAS.
Fall 2007 MEAP Reporting 2007 OEAA Conference Jim Griffiths – Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting Sue Peterman - Department Analyst, MEAP.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Star Rating Part 2 Growth, Graduation Rates and College and Career Readiness.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
ACT Aspire Data: What Does It Tell Us? October 27, 2015 Developed by the WISExplore Content Work Team WISExplore Content Work Team Members: Mary Ann Hudziak,
Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
10/25/10 SPS Goals Somers Public Schools Building and Department Goals Academic Year.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT 2009 High School Testing Report.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Legislative Requirement 2013
Indiana Area School District
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA):
District Assessment Report
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student Assessment Connecticut State Department of Education September 19, 2008

2 Assessments Administered Annually in Connecticut

3 Assessment in Connecticut CMT1986M, R, W4, 6, M, R, W Add Science5 and 8 CAPT1995M, S, R, W M, S, R, W10

4 Assessment in Connecticut: Special Populations Skills Checklist2000Functional, daily living, self-help, and social skills (one form) 4, 6, 8, 10 Skills Checklists 2006M, ELA, Access3 – 8, Add Science5, 8, 10 LAS Oral language, Reading, Writing 3 – 11 LAS_Links2006Reading, Writing, Listening, Speaking 3 – 11

5 Assessment in Connecticut: Early Grades Pre-K Inventory 2003 Acquisition of Pre-K Framework competencies Pre-K DRA 1999ReadingK - 3 DIBELS 2004ReadingK – 3 Kindergarten Inventory 2006 ‘Readiness’ K

6 Assessment in Connecticut: High School College and Voc. Prep SAT and PSAT/ NMSQT 1940’sM, R, W, and Achievement Tests 9, 10, 11 AP Tests College level courses N.O.C.T.I. Tests in trade- related areas NAEP State 19904, 8 and 12 M, R, W, and other subjects

7 CMT and CAPT Test Development

8 Curriculum Frameworks and Grade Level Expectations Blueprint Specifications for Item Development Committee Review Field Testing Pulling Forms – Pre-equating Linking Within Generations CMT and CAPT Content

9 Reporting CMT and CAPT Results

10 Site: View Report – pdf file Text report – EXCEL file Reporting On-line Data

11 Information Reported: State, District or School Performance Levels –Advanced –Goal –Proficient –Basic –Below Basic

12 This public site is designed to provide quick and easy access to student performance results on the Connecticut Mastery Test, 4th Generation (CMT4). On this site, you will find a wealth of information at your fingertips in a highly interactive and flexible format. You can create your own reports, graphs, and/or external data files with powerful tools to query and disaggregate data. State by District/School Report Performance Level Summary Report Overall Summary Report Sub-Group Report Participation Rate Report Content Strand Report Vertical Scale Analysis Report Skills Checklist Report Accommodations Summary Report For all available Connecticut reports, click here, and for more information about this application, please contact Notice: Summary numbers on this website are calculated using CMT reporting rules. The summary numbers are not calculated using NCLB reporting rules. These calculation methods are different and often result in differences in school and district calculations. Read more. © 2008 eMetriceMetric

13 State by District/School Report Grade 8, 2008 Select Content: Mathematics (Select All | Reset) Content Strands (% Mastery of Each Content Strand) Total Mathematics Number Tested Average # of Content Strands Mastered Average Raw Score Average Scale Score Percent by Level % At / Above Goal % At / Above Proficiency Select Sub-Groups for Summary: –Gender, Ethnicity, F/R Meals, Special Ed, ELL –Select Students by Demographics: (Default is all students.)

14 Evaluation of Connecticut’s Accountability System: NCLB Peer Review

15 NCLB Legislation Statewide assessment systems, aligned with state content standards, must measure students’ achievement annually in grades 3-8 and one grade from 9 – 11 in mathematics and reading beginning in , and one grade each from 3 – 5, 6– 8, and 9 – 11 in science beginning in All students must be proficient in mathematics, reading and science by 2014

16 NCLB Accountability Requirements for States Statewide system of challenging content standards for all students Statewide system of challenging academic achievement standards A single system with high technical quality

17 Alignment between content and achievement standards Inclusion of all students in the assessment system Accurate, timely and useful reports NCLB Requirements for States, cont.

18 Holding Districts and Schools Accountable

19 Adequate Yearly Progress Schools and districts that do not make ‘Adequate Yearly Progress’ (AYP) are identified annually The state institutes a range of sanctions, depending on the number of consecutive years of identification

CMT, CAPT and Skills Checklist AYP Levels for NCLB Accountability CMT AYP (Elementary and Middle Schools) Reading: 79% at/above Proficient Math: 82% at/above Proficient 95% participation CAPT AYP (High Schools) Reading: 81% at/above Proficient Math: 80% at/above Proficient 95% participation

21 AYP Status 2008 Of the 805 Elementary and Middle Schools in the State, 349 Did Not Make AYP. Of Connecticut’s 182 High Schools, 59 Did Not Make AYP. Of Connecticut’s 171 School Districts, 44 Did Not Make AYP

22 CSBE Priorities Pre-school and Early Childhood Closing the Achievement Gap High School Reform

23 Early Childhood Assessment Initiatives Pre-KIS Individual Student Fall Kindergarten Inventory (10-14n) Kindergarten Data Bulletin Legislated Pre-K through 3 Longitudinal Study Reading Summit DRA2

24 Closing the Achievement Gap Model Curriculum Development Grade Level Expectations (Instruction & Assessment) Benchmark Assessments Modified Assessments Vertical Scales Enhanced Assessment Grants - High School and Accommodations Technology

25 High School Reform Initiative Individual Student Success Plan Focused on Career Path and Support system Increased Course Requirements Model Curriculum, Model End-of- Course Exams and Performance Tasks Senior Capstone Project

26 Questions?

27 More Information about Connecticut’s Assessments cedar/assessment/index.htmhttp:// cedar/assessment/index.htm