DSU Modifications Séamus Power 12 November 2014 – EirGrid GCRP Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

Strategic Planning Update For Board Meeting December 5, 2007.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Allowing DSUs to act as Predictable Price Takers in the SEM 4th December, 2014.
1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.
DS3 Programme Status Update JGCRP 12/11/2014 Robbie Aherne.
©2012 | Commercial in Confidence | Proprietary to Ventyx, An ABB Company NYISO Real-time Market Presentation to ERCOT METF – April 26, 2012 Confidential.
MPID 223 (Failure to Follow Synchronising Instruction) JGCRP 12 th November 2014 (Anne Trotter)
Photovoltaic “Parallel System” for Duke Farms Group Members Trecia Ashman Paola Barry Mukti Patel Zarina Zayasortiz.
Joint Grid Code Review Panel POR Working Group Meeting 2 27 th March 2015 Chairperson : Michael Preston.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
MPID 263 GCRP Constitution Modification David Cashman GCRP 11 th February 2015.
DSU Commissioning and Testing Process
Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010.
Presented By: Mark Patterson ERCOT Manager, Demand Integration November 29, Minute ERS Pilot update to TAC 1.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
Draft CMP ROADMAP 19 SG meeting 30 th April 2013.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
NPRR385, Security Violation Analysis and Reporting and Negative Price Floor WMS Meeting February 15, 2012.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
Managing a Power System with 40% Wind Dr Alan Rogers EirGrid.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
Renewables and System Services Ann Scully.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
THE ALEVO ECOSYSTEM ENERGY STORAGE SUPERCOMPUTING CYBER SECURITY ANALYTICS ECOSYSTEM ANALYTICS ENERGY STORAGE SUPERCOMPUTING CYBER SECURITY FREQUENCY REGULATION.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Demand Side Units with a Maximum Export Capacity < 10MW 1 st February 2010 Michael Peters.
Hawaii Energy Storage Seminar: Utility Regulation Service
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
QSE Managers Working Group November 7 th 2011 NPRR 334 – Additional Analysis.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
ERCOT Wind Survey Leo Villanueva. Abilene McCamey Big Spring.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Emergency Interruptible Load Service Paul Wattles ROS Subgroup Feb. 7, 2006.
PRR 525 Update Prepared by ERCOT Compliance December 2005.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Smart Grid Vision: Vision for a Holistic Power Supply and Delivery Chain Stephen Lee Senior Technical Executive Power Delivery & Utilization November 2008.
BAL-001-TRE-1 CPS2 Waiver FERC-Ordered Modification to ERCOT waiver CPS2 Report to RSC December 16, 2008.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
CAP169 02/04/09. 2 Today  Agree Terms of Reference  Timetable going forward  Discussion of Part 1 and Part 2 Finalise and agree  Discussion of Part.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Proposals for Changes to Planning Application Fees Department for Communities and Local Government, November 2010.
Abilene Mc Camey Big Spring. Far West Abilene Area All the values are based on returned ERCOT survey results Total number of Wind Powered Generation.
Agenda TSOG 8th November
Transposition of European Network Codes
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
DS3 and Qualifier Trials Update
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair October 18, 2016
New transparency guidelines
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 A summary of draft LS from 3GPP in response to IEEE 802 LS in March May 2017 Authors: Name Company Phone.
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
IEEE Regulatory AHC Power Measurement Method
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 A summary of draft LS from 3GPP in response to IEEE 802 LS in March May 2017 Authors: Name Company Phone.
Update on Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
JGCRP WG on Heat States and the Impact on Notification Times
Capacity Access Review
Presentation transcript:

DSU Modifications Séamus Power 12 November 2014 – EirGrid GCRP Meeting

Modifications 1.Performance Monitoring of DSU Dispatch Instructions (MPID257) 2.Frequency Requirements for DSUs (MPID254)

Performance Monitoring of DSU Dispatch Instructions Séamus Power 12 November 2014 – EirGrid GCRP Meeting

Actions from GCRP Meeting 11/06/2014 The DSU WG should have a maximum of two more meetings to get agreement on a mechanism. Evidence will be required of how well this mechanism works. In the absence of agreement and evidence, this existing mechanism will be proposed at the next meeting in November. A mechanism to be brought to the GCRP meeting in November for approval and reviewed again in 2016.

Performance Monitoring Timeline Jul 2013 Issues with current method highlighted at DSU workshop Nov 2013 Method proposed and feedback received Jan 2014 Updated method proposed and feedback received Mar 2014 Analysis presented Apr 2014 Method refined based on vote June 2014 Brought to GCRP. Sent back to WG Jun 2014 Alternatives proposed Jul – Sep meetings analysing 3 methods. DSUs unable to reach agreement Nov 2014 Original brought to GCRP

Best-Correlated - Including Dispatch Best-Correlated - Excluding Dispatch 10 of 10 Methods

Comments Agreement among WG members that all three methods are an improvement on the current method AE concerned that Best-Correlated - Including Dispatch is open to manipulation TSOs and other DSUs –Limited Opportunity –Level of Effort –Reputational Damage –Identifiable TSOs have committed to reviewing in 2016 EE concerned that Best-Correlated - Excluding Dispatch is not suitable for highly variable sites and regular site testing by DSUs could negatively impact baselines

Ratings Criteria Best-Correlated - Including Dispatch Best-Correlated - Excluding Dispatch 10 of 10 Accuracy Unbiased3.5 Not Open to Manipulation Clear, Transparent, Understandable and Easily Calculated Known in Advance Suitable for System with High Number of Dispatches Suitable for Sites with High Variance Ratings are the average of 4 DSU Operators based on a scale from 1 to 4 – 02/09/2014

Preferred Methods Best-Correlated - Including Dispatch Best-Correlated - Excluding Dispatch 10 of 10 Electricity ExchangeElectric IrelandActivation Energy iPowerDalkia Activation Energy

DSU Frequency Requirements Séamus Power 12 November 2014 – EirGrid GCRP Meeting

Frequency Requirements CC.7.4Each Demand Side Unit shall, as a minimum, have the following capabilities: (a)Able to provide Demand Side Unit MW Response between 0 MW and the Demand Side Unit MW Capacity; (b)Maximum Ramp Up Rate not less than 1.67% per minute of Demand Side Unit MW Response as specified in the Dispatch Instruction; (c)Maximum Ramp Down Rate not less than 1.67% per minute of Demand Side Unit MW Response as specified in the Dispatch Instruction; (d)Minimum Down Time not greater than 30 minutes; (e)Maximum Down Time not less than 2 hours; (f)Minimum off time not greater than 2 hours; and (g)Demand Side Unit MW Response Time of not greater than 1 hour;. (h)maintain Demand Side Unit MW Response at Transmission System Frequencies in the range 49.5Hz to 50.5Hz; (i)maintain Demand Side Unit MW Response at Transmission System Frequencies within the range 47.5Hz to 49.5Hz and 50.5Hz to 52Hz for a duration of 60 minutes; (j)maintain Demand Side Unit MW Response at Transmission System Frequencies within the range 47.0Hz to 47.5Hz for a duration of 20 seconds required each time the Frequency is below 47.5Hz; and (k)maintain Demand Side Unit MW Response for a rate of change of Transmission System Frequency up to and including 0.5 Hz per second as measured over a rolling 500 milliseconds period.

Frequency Requirements On-site Generation operated in Continuous Parallel Mode or Shaving Mode that forms part of a Demand Side Unit, shall, as a minimum, have the following capabilities: (hl)operate continuously at normal rated output at Transmission System Frequencies in the range 49.5Hz to 50.5Hz; (im)remain synchronised to the Transmission System at Transmission System Frequencies within the range 47.5Hz to 52.0Hz for a duration of 60 minutes; (jn)remain synchronised to the Transmission System at Transmission System Frequencies within the range 47.0Hz to 47.5Hz for a duration of 20 seconds required each time the Frequency is below 47.5Hz; and (ko)remain synchronised to the Transmission System during a rate of change of Transmission System Frequency of values up to and including 0.5 Hz per second. On-site Generation operated in Lopping Mode or Automatic Mains Failure Mode that forms part of a Demand Side Unit, shall, as a minimum, have the following capabilities: (p)operate continuously at normal rated output at Transmission System Frequencies in the range 49.5Hz to 50.5Hz;

DSU Concerns Evidence required to prove compliance Interpretation of “capability” of “Generation” to “remain Synchronised” G

Rationale Potential dynamic and transient problems that could lead to material issues for the security of the power system Separate requirements for generation to have the capability is prudent and gives the TSOs the necessary confidence that the system can be operated securely TSO Drivers 1.Timings of protection/control systems 2.Generators that are not designed to handle such frequencies/RoCoF may fail (not due to protection) 3.Individual Demand Sites may change their mode of operation 4.RfG NC requirement for “Power Generating Modules” > 0.8 kW G

12 weeks