Optimization of bio-oil yields by demineralization of low quality biomass International Congress and Expo on Biofuels & Bioenergy August 25-27, 2015 Valencia,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIOENERGY.
Advertisements

Summary of NC200 work Imran & Norli Updated: 2/8/2007.
CHEC Annual Day, 2009 Effect of experimental conditions on biomass gasification in an entrained-flow reactor Ke Qin Supervisors: Prof. Anker Degn Jensen.
O. Onay, E.Atabay, S.H. Beis and O. M. Kockar Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Anadolu University, 26470, Eskisehir, Turkey World.
30 th ISTC Japan Workshop on Advanced Catalysis Technologies in Russia Fluidized bed catalytic pyrolysis and gasification of biomass for production of.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, College of Engineering Center for Applied Energy Research Collection/Storage Fractionation Biomass Characterization.
UPGRADING BIOMASS PYROLYSIS VAPOUR OVER FAUJASITE CATALYSTS T.S. NGUYEN, A. IMRAN, L. LEFFERTS, G. BREM, K. SESHAN.
Catalytic wet air oxidation The Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering Arezoo Mohammad.
Production of advanced biofuels: Co-refining upgraded pyrolysis oil F. de Miguel Mercader, Kees Hogendoorn (University of Twente) C. Geantet, G. Toussaint.
Hema Rughoonundun Research Week Outline of Presentation The MixAlco Process Introduction Sludge Materials and Methods Results Fermentation of sludge.
Striclty for educational purposes Final project in M.Sc. Course for teachers, in the framework of the Caesarea –Rothschild program of the Feinberg Grad.
Direct Oxidation of Methane to Methanol
Biomass Electricity Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009.
Using Biochar as a Soil Amendment for Sustainable Agriculture Biochar Symposium Illinois Sustainable Technology Center (ISTC) June 9, 2011 W. Zheng B.K.
Gasifier/Feedstock Effect on Syngas Composition Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University 1.
Making Biorefineries Competitive: PRO.E.SA TM The only sugar platform available today Guido Ghisolfi June 8, 2012.
PRETREATMENT OF BAGASSE TO IMPROVE FUEL QUALITY VIA TORREFACTION Noorfidza Yub Harun Muhammad T Afzal Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management.
COST FP1105 Changes On Lignin Structure Influenced By The Ionic Liquid Raquel Prado a, Xabier Erdocia b, Jalel Labidi b, Tom Welton a Department of chemistry,
ReviewObjectivesExperimentalResultsConclusionFuture work A Fundamental Study of Biomass Oxy- fuel Combustion and Co-combustion Timipere S. Farrow Prof.
Nutrient Recovery from Pyrolysis Systems Jatara Wise 1, Don Vietor 1, Sergio Capareda 2, Tony Provin 1, Derek Husmoen 1, Matthew Keough 1, Clyde Munster.
Products from Rice Husk Next. Introduction Rice husk is major by-product of paddy processing. The rice husk accounts for about one fifth of the paddy.
As regards the VFA production, the trend was similar for both the mini-reactors with crops. During the first part of the study, VFA levels were high. This.
Anaerobic Co-Fermentation of Crude Glycerol and Oilseed Meal from Biodiesel Production to Ethanol and Hydrogen Lijun Wang, Abolghasem Shahbazi and Michele.
Ion Exchange for the Production of Cellulosic Ethanol A.Hammervold, C. Cochran, J. Belsher, K. Childress Sponsored by Trillium FiberFuels, Inc. IntroductionProject.
Recent progress in the thermocatalytic processing of biomass into advanced biofuels David Serrano Rey Juan Carlos University, IMDEA Energy Institute Biofuels2015,
Content: Hydrothermal conversion: - overview - carbonization - liquefaction chemicals Conclusion Feedstock:
Pyrolytic Bio-fuels Produced from Forestry and Agricultural Feedstocks
Conservation of Feedstock Nutrients in Pyrolysis Biochars Jatara Wise, PhD
A Comparison of Batch, Stop- Flow-Stop, and Flowthrough Pretreatments of Corn Stover Chaogang Liu, Charles E. Wyman Thayer School of Engineering Dartmouth.
By Dr. Estee Yong Siek Ting
Javier Fermoso 1, Héctor Hernando 1, Ángel Peral 2, Prabhas Jana 1, Thangaraju M. Sankaranarayanan 1, Patricia Pizarro 1,2, Juan M. Coronado 1, David P.
Center for Bioenergy and Bioproducts Our work makes a new bioeconomy work.
Agenda 1.Quiz on Chapter 4 (5% added to Test 1) 2.Discuss anaerobic digestion and gasification 3.Watch video(s) on “Future of Bioenergy” 4.Example on gaseous.
Introduction 01 Experiment & Method 02 Results & Discussion 03 Conclusions 04.
1 Auburn UniversityBiomass Refining CAFI Corn stover Wood chip Bagasse Rice straw Sawdust Biomass Ethanol Fuel.
Guray Yildiz a*, Tom Lathouwers a, Hilal Ezgi Toraman b, Kevin M. van Geem b, Frederik Ronsse a, Ruben van Duren c, Sascha R. A. Kersten d, Wolter Prins.
Team 3: Liquefaction of biomass for biofuel production. Research Fellow Heidi S. Nygård, Associate Professor Dr Jorge Mario Marchetti Dept. of.
Fast pyrolysis for bioenergy and biofuels
S-1007 Multi-State Research Committee
Biodiesel production Oil extraction A big deal!. Physical extraction mechanical crushing ultrasonic extraction ( create bubbles to break cell walls, always.
Chemical Reactions Vocabulary. catalyst A ___ is used to start or speed up a reaction.
Thermo-chemical Conversion Technologies The Basics
CENTRAL PULP AND PAPER RESEARCH INSTITUTE SAHARANPUR
Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass using Concentrated Solar Radiation Emily Beagle Graduate Mentor: Daniel Mosiman Faculty Mentor: Dr. Yuan Zheng University of.
Black Liquor and Recovery boilers
Characterization of torrefied sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system. A I Anukam, S N Mamphweli, P Reddy, E L Meyer.
Phalaris aquatica L. lignocellulosic biomass as second generation bioethanol feedstock I. Pappas, Z. Koukoura, C. Kyparissides, Ch. Goulas and Ch. Tananaki.
Investigating the Fate of Nitrogen During Biomass Combustion Andrew Dyer 1, Hana Mandová 1, Lee Roberts 1, Paula McNamee 2, Leilani Darvell 3 Conclusions.
Effect of pH on Adsorption of Lead from Water onto Tree Fern Hao-Ming Hu a, Chih-Chien Tu a, Yuh-Shan Ho b# * and Wen-Ta Chiu a a Taipei Medical University.
Faculty of Life Sciences | Department Process Engineering Dipl.-Ing. Christian Augustin, M.Sc. | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Willner Investigations on vegetable.
Fate of Nitrogen During Biomass Combustion
PI: Douglas Raynie1 Co-PIs: Lin Wei2, James Julson2
 No fertilisers needed
Pyrolysis of Bioenergy Crops Grown on Reclaimed Mining Land in
  C.A. Strydom 1, T.Z. Sehume1, J.R. Bunt 1,2 and J.C. van Dyk2
Activated Carbons from Herbaceous Bioenergy Crops
Reporter : Jia-Lin Lu Advisor: Cheng-Ho Chen Date :104/12/22
Low-Moisture Anhydrous Ammonia (LMAA) Pretreatment of Corn Stover
Mr. Quinn & Ms. Tom March 17, 2014 Aim: Why do the factors we have studied affect rate of reaction? Do Now: What effect do the factors.
Assimilation of Iron in the Ocean: Acid dissolution of Micro and Nano Goethite in the Presence of Inorganic Oxy-anions Patrick Kyei, Gayan R. Rubasinghege.
Tawsif Rahman University of Science and Technology 23 May,2016
REVIEW OF SAWDUST PRETREATMENT PROCESSES FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTION
Progress report 7 December 2017
Thermochemical Recycling of Municipal Solid Waste
Experimental and statistical Analysis of CO2 Adsorption Process for Optimization of Carbon based (Biochar) Adsorbent 5th World Bioenergy Congress and Expo.
Fast Pyrolysis as an Ethanol Conversion Alternative Tim Geary CFR 521
Introduction to Biomass Gasification and Overview of it through Paper Review Special Topics in Fuel Cell Hong-Min Cho Prof. Yong-Tae Kim.
Novel Technology for Ligno-Cellulosic Biomass Fractionation Biomass economical ecological energy Conversion.
Gas measurements performed using a Gasmet DX-4000 FTIR
Bioenergy : Biomasses for energy production by gasification By : Bambang Dwi Argo Head of Bioprocess Technology Study Programe Department of Agricultural.
Presentation transcript:

Optimization of bio-oil yields by demineralization of low quality biomass International Congress and Expo on Biofuels & Bioenergy August 25-27, 2015 Valencia, Spain Dr. Angelos A. Lappas Research Director CPERI/CERTH Thermi Thessaloniki, Greece Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute (CPERI) Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH)

OUTLINE  Introduction  Materials and Methods o Biomass samples and characterization o Biomass pretreatment methods o Pyrolysis tests  Results and Discussion o Characterization of biomass samples o Preliminary demineralization results o Demineralization of different biomass types o Pyrolysis tests results o Chemical composition of the bio-oil  Conclusions

 Fast pyrolysis is an important thermochemical process for the conversion of biomass to a high added value liquid products (fuels & chemicals)  Minerals (ash) in biomass:  act catalytically during fast pyrolysis reducing biooil yield  catalyze chemical reactions during storage of biooil affecting biooil quality  deactivate the catalysts in biomass catalytic pyrolysis and/or in downstream biooil catalytic upgrading processes  Use of low cost-high ash feedstocks (agricultural residues and energy grasses) is important for the pyrolysis process economics  A strategy for process optimization is to remove the inorganics prior to pyrolysis  Inorganics can be removed by water washing, acid washing and size reduction Objectives of this study : i) to investigate the water and acid washing as biomass pre-treatment techniques for the removal of inorganics from 6 different biomass types ii) to examine how inorganics removal affects pyrolysis product yields INTRODUCTION

EXPERIMENTAL Biomass samples:  a reference commercial lignocellulosic biomass from beech wood  two forestry residues (oak and pine wood)  two agricultural residues (wheat and barley straw) and  two energy crops (miscanthus and eucalyptus) Pre-treatment:  Particle size: μm.  4 g of biomass dissolved in 80 ml water/acid under stirring  Parameters investigated: T (ambient, 50°C), residence time (2, 4, 8 and 24 h), type of acid (acetic vs nitric), acid concentration Pyrolysis:  Pyrolysis experiments were carried out on a bench-scale, fixed-bed reactor  Mass balances and product characterization were carried out for all tests

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOMASS SAMPLES Elemental analysis (wt.%, dry basis) Ash content (wt.%, dry basis) Moisture content (wt.%) Calorific value (MJ/kg) CHOS Beech Pine Oak Wheat straw Barley straw Eucalyptus Miscanthus NaKAlMgFeCaCuPTotal Beech Pine Oak Wheat straw Barley straw Eucalyptus Miscanthus Inorganics by ICP analysis (ppm, dry basis) K, Ca, Na and Mg are the most abundant inorganic elements. K, Ca, Na and Mg are the most abundant inorganic elements. Comparing a low ash (pine), with a high ash content feedstock (barley), a ten-fold increase in alkali concentration may be noted. Comparing a low ash (pine), with a high ash content feedstock (barley), a ten-fold increase in alkali concentration may be noted.

 Ash removal with H2O 25% (20°C), 43% (50°C)  Much higher de-ashing with acids  Water is adequate for removal of water- soluble metal salts but not for the cations  Nitric is better than acetic acid while higher acid concentrations are preferable  Effect of treatment time not very pronounced  Higher temperatures favor when acid concentration is low PRELIMINARY DEMINERALIZATION RESULTS WITH REFERENCE FEED Optimum Conditions Acid concentration = 1 wt% Residence time = 2 h (acid), 4 h (H2O) Washing temperature = 50°C Acids (Nitric, Acetic)

DEMINERALIZATION OF ALL BIOMASS TYPES  Washing with acids more efficient compared with water (90% vs %)  Nitric more effective than acetic acid  Ash removal from forestry residues higher than with the other biomass samples  The agricultural residues exhibited relatively high ash content, even after treatment with nitric acid  Satisfactory ash removal was achieved for eucalyptus (up to 70%) while miscanthus was much harder to treat (up to 40% ash removal)  The loss of biomass depends more on the biomass type, rather on pre-treatment conditions. Agricultural residues demonstrated the highest weight loss

ASH REMOVAL FOR EACH ELEMENT  Alkali metals, K and Na easily removed (>80% with all pre-treatment methods  Removal of Mg, Fe and Al was lower, following the order Mg > Fe > Al  Ca most affected by the treatment method and its removal increased in the order nitric acid > acetic acid > water treatment  Treatment with nitric acid the most efficient for all inorganics and all biomass types

EFFECT OF DE-ASHING (1% HNO3) ON PYROLYSIS PERFORMANCE  Bio-oil yield increases on all de-ashed samples, The effect being higher ~17% for agricultural residues  For the demineralized samples, gas yield is about 4-8 wt% lower  Most of this reduction was attributed to the reduction of the CO2 yield  Char formation also decreased, especially in the case of wheat straw, barley straw, eucalyptus and miscanthus

Scission of the o-glucosidic bonds Levoglucosan Thermal decomposition of cellulose in the absence of inorganics C.-Y. Yang, X.-S. Lu, W.G. Lin, X.-M. Yang, J.Z. Yao, Chem Res Chinese U 22 (2006) 524–532 Thermal decomposition of cellulose in the presence of inorganics Δ Levoglucosan Cellulose Metal cations act as catalysts Homolysis of the pyranose rings Formation of CO 2, carbonyls and acids Cellulose CATALYTIC MECHANISMS

GCxGC-ToFMS ANALYSIS OF BIO-OIL  Bio-oil from treated biomasses contains anhydrosugars and more specifically, levoglucosan  In the bio-oil from the untreated biomasses anhydrosugars are very low and furans, ketones and ethers increase.  Phenolics decrease in bio-oils after demineralization  This indicates that inorganics catalyze cracking of the lignin structure and oligomers, resulted in the formation phenolic monomers

Removal of ash from forestry residues, agricultural residues and energy crops was studied in this work: Washing with water removed up to 42% of the inorganics whereas washing with acidic solutions achieved higher than 90% removal Higher washing temperatures were more effective for the removal of the inorganics. Nitric acid proved to be more effective than acetic acid. K, Na can easily be removed by all pre-treatment methods Mg, Fe and Al are more refractory Ca is affected by the pretreatment conditions and mainly is removed by nitric acid solution Biomass demineralization affects strongly yields and composition of the pyrolysis products demineralized biomass yielded less gas products and solid residue while the selectivity towards the liquid product was substantially increased Biooil from de-ashed biomass contains more levoglucosan levels and is less deoxygenated CONCLUSIONS The work was conducted with support from the EU under the frame of the FP7 funded “CAScade deoxygenation process using tailored nanoCATalysts for the production of BiofuELs from lignocellullosic biomass – CASCATBEL” project (Grant agreement No ).