Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University for the CLEO Collaboration Recent Results in B and D Decays from CLEO BEACH 2002, Vancouver June 26, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.
1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Aug 6, Charm γ/φ 3 Impact from CLEO-c Using CP-Tagged D→K S,L ππ Decays Eric White - University of Illinois Qing He - University of Rochester for.
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, (2006) B Reconstruction.
Charmonium Decays in CLEO Tomasz Skwarnicki Syracuse University I will concentrate on the recent results. Separate talk covering Y(4260).
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
June 20, 2002Alex Smith University of Minnesota Recent Advances in Charm Physics Why charm physics? Searches for new physics using D meson decays –Mixing.
Page 1 B 0   Ks + quasi 2 body modes Koji Hara (Nagoya University) CKM2006 WG4    from charmless B decays.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Belle B->VV, XXXX Recontres de Moriond - Mar. 11
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo Suppressed D 0 Decays Kalanand Mishra, G. Mancinelli, B. T. Meadows, M. D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
1 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2  in Loop-Dominated Decays with B A B AR The Measurement of sin2β (eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Summary of  2 measurements at Super KEKB Hirokazu Ishino Tokyo Institute of Technology 19 Dec., 2006.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
D 0 - D 0 Mixing at B A B AR Amir Rahimi The Ohio State University For B A B AR Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
Recent B A B AR Measurements of Hadronic B Branching Fractions David N. Brown University of Louisville For the B A B AR Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Measurements of some J/ and c decays at BES
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Exclusive Semileptonic B Decays and |Vub|: Experimental
Presentation transcript:

Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University for the CLEO Collaboration Recent Results in B and D Decays from CLEO BEACH 2002, Vancouver June 26, 2002

Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University The Rare Charmless Decays B  K S 0     and K *  Outline The Color Suppressed Decay B  D 0   and Isospin Analysis of B  D  Introduction New Results from CLEO in D Mixing Conclusions

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State UniversityIntroduction These data were collected with the CLEO detector which observed symmetric e + e - collisions at the  (4S) resonance, E cm = GeVThese data were collected with the CLEO detector which observed symmetric e + e - collisions at the  (4S) resonance, E cm = GeV The CLEO detector provides both excellent tracking resolution and efficiency, as well as superb electromagnetic calorimetry.The CLEO detector provides both excellent tracking resolution and efficiency, as well as superb electromagnetic calorimetry. The hadronic B analyses presented in this talk are based on the CLEO II/II.V data sets of 9.67M BB pairsThe hadronic B analyses presented in this talk are based on the CLEO II/II.V data sets of 9.67M BB pairs The D mixing result is based on the 9 fb -1 CLEO II.V sample The D mixing result is based on the 9 fb -1 CLEO II.V sample

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University The Color Suppressed Decay B  D 0   and Isospin Analysis of B  D 

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Color Suppressed Decays: B  D 0   The Internal spectator diagram is color-suppressed.The Internal spectator diagram is color-suppressed. Observation of color-suppressed decays is an important input for the theoretical understanding of hadronic B decaysObservation of color-suppressed decays is an important input for the theoretical understanding of hadronic B decays Until recently, only color- suppressed decays into charmonium states had been observed.Until recently, only color- suppressed decays into charmonium states had been observed. First Observations of B 0  D 0(*)  0 have been published by both Belle (PRL ) and CLEO (PRL ) Favored Suppressed

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Selection is based on reconstruction of D 0 in three decay modes (K -    K -     and K -    -    combined w/ prompt  0 ’sSelection is based on reconstruction of D 0 in three decay modes (K -    K -     and K -    -    combined w/ prompt  0 ’s Event yields obtained using an extended unbinned ML fitEvent yields obtained using an extended unbinned ML fit Color Suppressed Decays: B  D 0   Event shapeB helicity angle Free parameters: N sig, N cont, N other BB Four input variables at right: PDFs for each obtained from off-res data + signal, generic BB and continuum MC.

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Br( B 0  D 0  0   x   hep-ex/ , Phys. Rev. Lett Color Suppressed Decays: B  D 0   (B0D00(B0D00

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University With the observation of the color suppressed decay, all three D  decays had been measured, making possible the estimation of the strong phase between the contributing isospin amplitudesWith the observation of the color suppressed decay, all three D  decays had been measured, making possible the estimation of the strong phase between the contributing isospin amplitudes CLEO set out to measure the color-favored modes again, in order to improve the precision with which answers about this angle could be statedCLEO set out to measure the color-favored modes again, in order to improve the precision with which answers about this angle could be stated Isospin Analysis of B  D  decays

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Isospin Analysis of B  D  decays In B  D  decays, there are two isospin amplitudes (I=1/2 and 3/2) which contribute to the decay process In B  D  decays, there are two isospin amplitudes (I=1/2 and 3/2) which contribute to the decay process We can write the amplitudes for the three B  D  decays as follows: We can write the amplitudes for the three B  D  decays as follows:

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Isospin Analysis of B  D  decays We may express the two amplitudes in the following manner: We may express the two amplitudes in the following manner: And the phase difference between these amplitudes thus: And the phase difference between these amplitudes thus: cos  I  1  final state interactions. Current PDG values, cos  I  1 by just over 1 

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University CLEO has re-measured the two color-favored B  D  decays, B -  D 0  - and B 0  D +  -CLEO has re-measured the two color-favored B  D  decays, B -  D 0  - and B 0  D +  - In these measurements D 0 is reconstructed as before in 3 modes, (K -    K -     and K -    -    and D + in one (K -     In these measurements D 0 is reconstructed as before in 3 modes, (K -    K -     and K -    -    and D + in one (K -      Yields are obtained by simple ML fits to the data, which are subject to a very few cuts in  E, event shape variables, etc, to attack BB and continuum backgrounds, respectivelyYields are obtained by simple ML fits to the data, which are subject to a very few cuts in  E, event shape variables, etc, to attack BB and continuum backgrounds, respectively Isospin Analysis of B  D  decays

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University The results of these measurements reflect improved precision with respect to the current PDG averagesThe results of these measurements reflect improved precision with respect to the current PDG averages These measurements are systematics, not statistics dominated. The two most significant syst. errors are external in nature:These measurements are systematics, not statistics dominated. The two most significant syst. errors are external in nature: –Individual D branching fractions (CLEO-c ?) –f 00 and f +- errors (help from BaBar / Belle ? ) Isospin Analysis of B  D  decays Br( B -  D 0  -   x    x   (PDG) Br( B 0  D +  -   x    x   (PDG)

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University In addition, we have determined the strong phase difference cos  I.In addition, we have determined the strong phase difference cos  I. Using the combined measurements of Br(B 0  D 0  0  by CLEO and Belle, 2.92  0.45 x 10 -4, we have obtainedUsing the combined measurements of Br(B 0  D 0  0  by CLEO and Belle, 2.92  0.45 x 10 -4, we have obtained hep-ex/ , Submitted to PRD-RC Isospin Analysis of B  D  decays  from unity

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University The Rare Charmless Decays B 0  K S 0     and K * 

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University B 0  K S 0     and K *  Recently there have been several observations of charmless two-body decays B  K  at CLEO and at the B factoriesRecently there have been several observations of charmless two-body decays B  K  at CLEO and at the B factories The pseudoscalar-vector companions to this decay, B  K *  and B  K , provide useful additional information (including, ultimately, additional avenues for observing CP)The pseudoscalar-vector companions to this decay, B  K *  and B  K , provide useful additional information (including, ultimately, additional avenues for observing CP) Here we present the observation of B 0  K S 0    , and of B 0  K *+  , based on the full CLEO II/II.V data set of 9.67 M BB pairs.Here we present the observation of B 0  K S 0    , and of B 0  K *+  , based on the full CLEO II/II.V data set of 9.67 M BB pairs.

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University In the analysis of K S 0    , K S are selected by requiring 2.5  mass consistency and well-measured displaced secondary verticesIn the analysis of K S 0    , K S are selected by requiring 2.5  mass consistency and well-measured displaced secondary vertices In analyzing both the K S 0     and K +     final states, very loose cuts are first applied on  E, M BC, cos  sph, cos  B and a Fisher discriminant formed from a combination of event shape variables.In analyzing both the K S 0     and K +     final states, very loose cuts are first applied on  E, M BC, cos  sph, cos  B and a Fisher discriminant formed from a combination of event shape variables. Signal yields are obtained from a ML fit using PDFs for the above variables as in the color suppressed analysis.Signal yields are obtained from a ML fit using PDFs for the above variables as in the color suppressed analysis. The K *  contribution to each final state sample above is obtained through simultaneous analyses of the Dalitz plotsThe K *  contribution to each final state sample above is obtained through simultaneous analyses of the Dalitz plots B 0  K S 0     and K * 

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University We observe the rare B decay B 0  K S 0     (without regard to resonant substructure) with a signal significance of 8.1 We observe the rare B decay B 0  K S 0     (without regard to resonant substructure) with a signal significance of 8.1  hep-ex/ Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. B 0  K S 0     and K *  Br( B 0  K S 0    -  (stat.)  (syst.)  x    

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Simultaneous analysis of the Dalitz plots for both K S 0     and K +     topologies reveals the process B 0  K *+ (892)    with a signal significance of 4.6 Simultaneous analysis of the Dalitz plots for both K S 0     and K +     topologies reveals the process B 0  K *+ (892)    with a signal significance of 4.6  Most predictions for this BR are in the range 2-14 x Flavor SU(3) predictions (Chiang & Rosner) obtain 17.3 x (assuming maximal P-T interference)Most predictions for this BR are in the range 2-14 x Flavor SU(3) predictions (Chiang & Rosner) obtain 17.3 x (assuming maximal P-T interference) B 0  K S 0     and K *  Br( B 0  K *+  -   (stat.)  (syst.)  x     K *  /K S   20%

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University New Results from CLEO in D Mixing

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Updated D mixing results from CLEO It’s not completely different – after all, we’re looking at the same final state of K s     It’s not completely different – after all, we’re looking at the same final state of K s      This analysis is based on 9 fb -1 of data collected with the CLEO II.V configuration (with SVX)This analysis is based on 9 fb -1 of data collected with the CLEO II.V configuration (with SVX) D * with p > 2 GeV are selected (favoring continuum-produced D* pairs), and the resulting D 0 are flavor tagged using the  s from D *  D 0  sD * with p > 2 GeV are selected (favoring continuum-produced D* pairs), and the resulting D 0 are flavor tagged using the  s from D *  D 0  s Reconstruction of the D* takes advantage of the very small vertical extent of the beam spotReconstruction of the D* takes advantage of the very small vertical extent of the beam spot

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University D mixing - motivation x mixing: Channel for new physics… y mixing: SM background… * New physics will enhance x but not y * CP violation in mixing would be a smoking gun for new physics Two types of mixing:

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University D mixing - methods Ultimately, need to fit proper decay time in order to distinguish mixing (both x and y) from doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) decays… Complication: phase difference,  K , between CF and DCS amplitudes can lead to observable quantities x’ and y’, related to x and y by a rotation doublyCabibbosuppressed (R D ) mixing (x 2 +y 2 ) CabibboFavored (CF) (CF) “Wrong sign” Notation: “right-signed” (RS) => Cabibbo- favored decays “wrong-signed” (WS) => Mixing or doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays “wrong-signed” (WS) => Mixing or doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays Look for mixing in “wrong signed” (WS) decays of D 0 …

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Current D Mixing Limits “Typical” non-SM predictions (many higher and lower, however) “Typical” upper SM predictions If  K  unknown, WS hadronic limits must be weakened to accommodate any possible rotation SU(3) flavor symmetry badly broken=> Final state interactions expected to be important - K  measurements are starting to cut into range of some non-SM predictions - LONG way to go before we hit SM levels

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University D 0  K s 0     Motivation Measure x and y (not x ’2 and y ’ ) RS and WS occupy the SAME Dalitz plot: Thus making possible a measurement of relative strong phase between CF and DCS Only mode with sensitivity to sign of x! y sensitivity comparable to CP eigenstate (eg., D 0 ->K + K - ) analyses Complicated Dalitz plot and proper time fit required

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University preliminary D 0  K s 0     Preliminary results

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University D 0  K s 0     Preliminary results

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University D 0  K s 0     Preliminary results The significance of the overall fit drops by 5  when WS K *  is forced to zero.

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Phase convention: Final fit with 10 contributing intermediate states: Right sign First measurement of strong phase difference between CF and DCS! Wrong sign D 0  K s 0     Preliminary results  Needed for extraction of  in B  DK Submitted to PRL

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University Summary: D Mixing via D 0  K s 0     We have observed several contributions to the substructure in D 0  K s 0      including a wrong sign D 0  K *+    contribution at the 5  level, which must arise from either D mixing or DCSD We have observed several contributions to the substructure in D 0  K s 0      including a wrong sign D 0  K *+    contribution at the 5  level, which must arise from either D mixing or DCSD Separate fits for D 0 and D 0 tags have been performed, with no statistically significant difference observed (no CPV evident) Separate fits for D 0 and D 0 tags have been performed, with no statistically significant difference observed (no CPV evident) In addition, CLEO will have R D (I.e. the DCSD part of the WS/RS ratio), x, y, and A CP measurements from the time dependent version of this analysis very soon In addition, CLEO will have R D (I.e. the DCSD part of the WS/RS ratio), x, y, and A CP measurements from the time dependent version of this analysis very soon

June 26, 2002Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State UniversityConclusions CLEO has observed the color suppressed decay B 0  D 0    and made new measurements of color-allowed decays B 0  D +   and B -  D 0  . We have also presented a measurement of cos  I which represents a strong suggestion of final state interactions in B  D   decays.CLEO has observed the color suppressed decay B 0  D 0    and made new measurements of color-allowed decays B 0  D +   and B -  D 0  . We have also presented a measurement of cos  I which represents a strong suggestion of final state interactions in B  D   decays. We have presented new results for B 0  K S 0     and through an analysis of the Dalitz plot, a result for B 0  K *+  We have presented new results for B 0  K S 0     and through an analysis of the Dalitz plot, a result for B 0  K *+   We have presented a preliminary update of our measurements of D mixing, this time using D 0  K s 0       a promising channel for sensitive measurements of the mixing parameters x and y. Time dependent analysis of this mode is forthcoming.We have presented a preliminary update of our measurements of D mixing, this time using D 0  K s 0       a promising channel for sensitive measurements of the mixing parameters x and y. Time dependent analysis of this mode is forthcoming.