Engineering Change to Improve the Efficiency of OTMR Maintenance Image © HaslerRail By Jamie Adamson, Engineering Graduate, First ScotRail.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

COMPANY MAINTENANCE MANUAL
for Cabin Safety Inspectors
Cross-Acceptance: UNIFE expectations Alice Polo Safety and Certification Manager.
Managing the Health and Safety of Contractors
Process and Product Quality Assurance (PPQA)
Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 7 Application of Maintenance Techniques in Engineering In this unit you will get involved with both maintenance procedures.
Checking & Corrective Action
Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.
Software Quality Assurance Plan
Business Critical Rules March 2015
Vancouver, October 08th 2013 DB Systemtechnik GmbH Marc Geisler The challenge of transforming a rule-based system into a risk-based culture on an example.
Working group L-EPPR 03 June 2014 International environmental and propulsion performance requirements for L-category vehicles – OBD expert group On-board.
The Association of Cost Engineers THE ASSOCIATION OF COST ENGINEERS 3 rd November 2009 Cost Engineers A Tiered Approach to Accreditation.
EP Transport Committee Fourth Railway Package - public hearing Brussels, 7 May 2013 Better governance of the railways – a freight perspective Tony Berkeley.
Development of Competence Profile Quality managers in VET-institutions Project no: PL1-LEO This publication [communication] reflects the.
Driving Services UK Limited. The Old Barn, Ledsham Village, Cheshire, CH66 ONE. Tel : Corporate Manslaughter & Health & Safety Considerations.
© 2006 Jupitermedia Corporation Webcast TitleSuccessful Rollout Planning 1 January 19, :00pm EST, 11:00am PST George Spafford, President Spafford.
1 Satisfiability Testing in the Railway Industry Simon Chadwick Head of Research Westinghouse Rail Systems Limited, Chippenham, UK SAT2009 Twelfth International.
Use and Care of Vertebrate Animals: What Researchers Need to Know Brian Greene IACUC Chair and Associate Professor of Biology Missouri State University.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
Mobile Video Systems Presents: Digital Eye Trans Cam 3/4G Live View vehicle camera system.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Occupational Health and Safety
University of Palestine software engineering department Testing of Software Systems Fundamentals of testing instructor: Tasneem Darwish.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
Level 2 Unit 4 Producing Engineering Solutions Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 4 Producing Engineering Solutions An Approach to Unit Delivery and Assessment.
BEWAG (UIP) General assembly European Railway Agency Jean-Marie DECHAMPS, Head of Sector (Safety) Brussels, 27 April 2015.
How Hospitals Protect Your Health Information. Your Health Information Privacy Rights You can ask to see or get a copy of your medical record and other.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Supporting European Rail Accident Investigation Inter national Rail Safety Conference Sweden 29th September 2009 Dr Jane Rajan Head of sector : safety.
© 2015 BELGORAIL 27/04/2015 – BEWAG « Staff (human) in the ECM regulation 445/20111/EU» Staff (human) in the ECM regulation.
Emission Inventory Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP/TAMS Center.
Changing risk in the liberalised rail freight market Ian Lake – Railway Safety Commission.
European Railway Safety Strategy EIM Safety Group (PhGALLEY and J-Å HALLDEN) 29 september 2009.
Design Documentation Clint Kehres, Brian Krouse, Jenn Shafner.
RE-E / IRSC / 27/09/ /10/09 1 The necessary evolution of railway safety regulations in Europe A challenge – Risks to be controlled.
Air Products Solutions for EN th of November 2014 Air Products Internal Use Only Name of speaker.
Chapter 12 Implementation and Maintenance
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Management Systems Part I.
Checking and Corrective Action EPA Regions 9 & 10 and The Federal Network for Sustainability 2005.
Safety Objectives of European Railway Agency Raigo Uukkivi Estonian Railway Inspectorate DAGOB Final Conference , Tallinn.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Pertemuan 14 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
MS Invoice E-Invoice Solution Overview March 2016.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR CONVERGING MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDER’S EXPECTATIONS Organised by National Treasury Presented by WELEKAZI DUKUZA CEREBRO.
Slide n° 1 EU railway legislation - Safety regulatory framework NAB/RB training workshop in Valenciennes, April 2016 NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes,
Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS)
Slide n° 1 Workshop to NABs & RBs on Reg. 402/2013 and Harmonised sectorial accreditation scheme for railway NOBOs - Valenciennes, April 2016 NAB/RB Training.
Scientific data storage: How are computers involved in the following?
Oversight “The NPPO of the exporting country has the responsibility for ensuring that systems for exports meet the requirements …”
1 From Regulatory Intelligence to Compliance Debbie Henderson Head, Global Regulatory Policy EU Ring May 13, 2014.
Authority Requirements Margit Markus Tallinn, 7 May 2009.
Start the program by pressing “enter”.
TRANSPORT SCIENCE: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
The Risk Assessment in the Food Industry
The move from a rule based system to a risk based system Challenges for the competent authorities October 2017.
INTRODUCTION TO GDPR 19/09/2018.
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Vytenis Andriukaitis European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety
HAVS: Where do we need to be?
Understanding Standards Physical Education Higher
European Railway Agency
Certification and Assurance
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Market surveillance cooperation at European level
HAVS: Where do we need to be?
Presentation transcript:

Engineering Change to Improve the Efficiency of OTMR Maintenance Image © HaslerRail By Jamie Adamson, Engineering Graduate, First ScotRail

Introduction to OTMR usage on railway vehicles Technology OTMR = On Train Monitoring Recorder (also known as on train data recorder, incident recorder) Railway equivalent of “black box” Monitoring of brake/throttle control circuits, brake pressures, AWS/TPWS, door controls, driver safety systems, and many more. Legislation GM/RT2472 (Data Recorders on Trains – Design Requirements) –1990s: Mandatory requirement of all new-build rolling stock –2000: Mandatory requirement of all existing rolling stock (with 5-year grace period)

Scope of Task Devise new time-saving method to verify that all OTMR system ‘channels’ are recording correctly Trial new methods, assess suitability Revise Vehicle Maintenance Instruction (VMI) tasks, complete risk assessment Submit for Vehicle Acceptance Body assurance and Leasing companies for approval

Present Verification Method Activate every switch, lever and button that operates an OTMR channel View in real-time with a laptop or take a download and analyse data Extensively test AWS/TPWS receiver Test speedometer and WSP …And do it all again for the other cab! (Note: ScotRail multiple unit fleet has 584 cabs)

Methods Considered Method 1: Data Download only Take OTMR data download covering last 3 days of service and check that all channels have been used. PROs: works fine for digital channels, takes a short time to verify channel usage CONs: No way of ensuring analogue channels work within tolerance

Methods Considered (cont) Method 2: Microsoft Excel Macro Take OTMR data download covering last 3 days of service, export to spreadsheet and use a macro to instantly search for channel usage. Full static test of analogue channel systems. PROs: Very effective, instant result. Properly verifies analogue channels CONs: Pre-requisite knowledge of MS Excel needed. Macro at risk of corruption. Would need re-written if channels were added/removed/renamed.

Methods Considered (cont) Method 3: Download check and real-time rare/analogue channel use Take OTMR data download covering last 3 days of service, static test of analogue channel systems plus rarely-used isolation channels. PROs: Properly scrutinises analogue channels, most likely to gain VAB approval and reduce timescale. CONs: Whole process is more extensive, VMI task looks more complex on paper than it is.

Risk Assessment and Evaluation Methodology follows EC directive, Notified National Technical Rules (NNTR’s) and RGS (Railway Group standards) Common Safety Method EC Regulation 352/2009 Notified National Technical Rules (NNTRs) Controlled by DfT GM/RT2472 ERA/TD/ /XA National Rule Annex Section 9.6 (Recording Device) GM/RT2472 has vague guidance regarding OTMR maintenance standards Common Safety Method was used for full risk assessment of engineering change

Risk Assessment and Evaluation – CSM Criteria CriterionExampleAssessment AdditionalitySeries of small changes that collectively evolve into a significant change No minor changes to any First ScotRail OTMR systems that would develop this engineering change into a significant change. Failure ConsequenceOTMR total failure in traffic; not detected until next download opportunity OTMR discovered as faulty, and will be repaired at depot. Unit can continue in traffic provided the other driving cab’s OTMR is functioning healthily, but schedule for repair ASAP as a matter of course. NoveltyTask format exists in similar form on class 334 VMI. Task has not been amended significantly from new, so no examples of task change to form a precedent. ComplexityMaintenance procedure change only. No physical change to on-train systems Revision of task relies more on OTMR data analysis. Staff awareness of expected channel behaviour should be checked. Analogue channels cannot be precisely checked using stored OTMR data. Real-time checking of analogue channels will continue, to ensure that calibration of these channels matches precisely with the systems they are monitoring. MonitoringProcess can be monitored to ensure new procedure is being followed correctly. Hard copy of channel check tick-sheets and back-up of OTMR data is archived. ‘Product checks’ and competence refresher can reduce likelihood of oversight. ReversibilityAbility of the change to be ‘un-done’If necessary, technical concession to revert to previous procedure could be given until solution to change is provided.

Outcome VMIs undergoing independent assurance at present My understanding of OTMRs and onboard vehicle systems has greatly improved Selling the benefits of the change to depots was a challenge Delving into EC and ERA (European Rail Agency) interoperability legislation

Future Developments Remote Condition Monitoring –Seeing real-time data accumulated by the OTMR from the comfort of the office.. –Boolean logic helps identify potential defects and notify by , while the train is still in traffic –Can verify most OTMR channels are working in an instant. –Expand range of monitored systems to include door opening/closing times, compressor running time Already working on East Coast class 91 fleet Trial on class 158s with First ScotRail

Thank you for listening.