#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IK Slide 0 First look at the WCM data from July 2012 September 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman.
Advertisements

1 Coherent Synchro-Betatron Resonance in the FNAL Booster A. Burov, V. Lebedev HB 2008.
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Data analysis BTF 23 e 24 mag 05 T1 T2 500MeV electrons Repetition Rate 50 Hz Pulse Duration 1-10 ns Current/pulse 1 to 8 particles σ XY ~2mm Max Electronic.
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Injector Optimization for Simultaneous Operation with Different Bunch Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting
Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Output to accelerator area drive laser: MHz, sync’d to master RF = 1064 nm ~7 ps pulses ~10 watts average (~120 nJ/pulse) chopper wheel: ~100Hz,
E+ Tune Measurements for 4-ns Spaced Bunches Tune Measurements of 4-ns spaced bunches: An update of the strides made using the digital BPM system to measure.
1 Sinusoidal Waves The waves produced in SHM are sinusoidal, i.e., they can be described by a sine or cosine function with appropriate amplitude, frequency,
Lecture 6: Measurements of Inductance, Capacitance, Phase, and Frequency 1.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
PI laser jitter measurements Data taken on 11 th April 2013.
Laser Notcher Pulse Energy Requirements & Demonstration Experiment David Johnson, Todd Johnson, Vic Scarpine.
Hydrogen Recombination Time (µs) RF Envelope (V) Here So We get Calculated from # of protons per bunch Calculated from energy loss (voltage drop) in the.
UNRELIABLE DATA, SEE FIRST SLIDE WARNING!!! Data taken on these shifts had attenuation factors set incorrectly and problems with faraday cup bunch charge.
ICESat TM 04/21/20031 MIT Activities Two main areas of activity: –Validation of atmospheric delays being computed for ICESat –Assessment of statistics.
Polarized Source Development Run Results Riad Suleiman Injector Group November 18, 2008.
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
Witness Bunch Experimental Studies at CESR-TA Robert Holtzapple Alfred University/Cal Poly San Luis Obispo.
#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Analysis of 2008 Beam Instability Data S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, M. Plum HB2008.
A. Fabich, CERN MERIT collaboration meeting, CERN, 7-8 February 2008 MERIT beam intensities, Feb 08A. Fabich, CERN1.
3281, 13 th December 2012 Combined fast-MCT, AR2-BPM-01, and TOA measurements. All data at \\srofs1\PSD\Alice\Work Temp\2012\12\13\Shift 3 Different parameter.
3243 Fri 23 Nov Summary INJ-BPM-01: took 1 shot of data, just a reference to compare with previous recent shifts – Did not see a strong dominant 100 kHz.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.
Jan, 2001CMS Tracker Electronics1 Hybrid stability studies Multi – chip hybrid stability problem when more then ~ 2 chips powered up -> common mode oscillation.
Experiment 17 Two Differentiators Circuit. Analog Computing Analog computers – First were mechanical systems. Electrical analog computers were developed.
BPMs period General BPM Tasks/Projects New single bunch BPM electronics on ALICE AR1 + ST2 They had been tested already last year by Alex and Ian.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop at SLAC Dec , 2007 Shilun Pei with Chris Adolphsen, Zenghai Li, Karl L. Bane, et al. SLAC, Dec. 12, 2007 TTF.
1 SiPM studies: Highlighting current equipment and immediate plans Lee BLM Quasar working group.
Microwave Measurement of Recycler Electron Cloud: Jeffrey Eldred 12/19/14.
#3205 Summary 6 th Nov 2012 Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
BASIC INSTRUMENTS - oscilloscopes
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
John Carwardine January 16, 2009 Some results and data from January studies.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –
BPM and BSM Tune Measurements August 2, 2007 B. Cerio, R. Holtzapple.
1 John McCloskey NASA/GSFC Chief EMC Engineer Code Effects of Rise/Fall Times on Signal Spectra.
Fast Electron Beam and FEL Diagnostics at the ALICE IR- FEL at Daresbury Laboratory Frank Jackson, Accelerator Science and Technology Centre (ASTeC), Daresbury.
Analog Conditioning1 Quantification of E.M.G.. Analog Conditioning2 RAW EMG Continuously changing positive and negative deflections. How do you reduce.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
SPM Users Basic Training August 2010 Lecture VIII – AC Imaging Modes: ACAFM and MAC Imaging methods using oscillating cantilevers.
4-3-3 Frequency Modulation.. Learning Objectives:At the end of this topic you will be able to; sketch, recognise and analyse the resulting waveforms for.
February 10, 2009, G-APD Workshop, GSI Darmstadt1 APD Laser Test Setup Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and.
–11.03 Hawaii Multi bunch acceleration on LUCX system Ⅰ. LUCX project Ⅱ. Simulation results for Compton scattering Ⅲ. Calculation on beam loading.
Polarized Injector Update
Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017
Alternative BPM Processing Scheme – May08 Demo
Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider
Digital Communication
Quantification of E.M.G..
MERIT beam intensities
Parity Quality Beam (PQB)
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Positive Ion Current – Hot Coulomb Explosion?
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Presentation transcript:

#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser pulse power is measured via a photodiode + splitter located downstream of the pockels cells (for macro pulse selection + burst generator), and the frequency doubler, but UPSTREAM of the attenuator. Vary the laser attenuation to see how each observable changes (this will not affect the laser pulse train). Change rep rate to 1 Hz to get simultaneous observables from a single train. Studying transients vs solenoid, corrector strengths, laser spot position. Key finding: The 6 MHz seen in October ‘12 data is not present now. This is the first shift since the commissioning break when the PI laser was adjusted to produce higher pulse power. NB. Calculation of BPM y position in the software was still incorrect on this shift in the saved BPM files in the shift folder. This is seen by the large offset in y (~-8 mm) and the fact that the y vs bunch number plot looks very similar to the charge. The incorrect software was fixed on this shift, AFTER the data files had been saved, hence the data files in the shift folder are still wrong for y.

INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics RAW DATA Note significant droop in all 3 observables Small transient at start of train x y charge 15 pC 21 pC 30 pC 43 pC 60 pC

Frequency Content, Pre-Processing Take bunches 100 bunches to 1000 to avoid early transient and later droop As always, subtract mean from data. For the CHARGE observable subtract the mean AND normalise by the mean, so that it can be compared the fcup/PI laser traces

BPM frequency content, 0 – 1 MHz Strong 300 kHz 100 kHz not apparent Norrmalised the x,y DFT so that the amplitudes are in mm

BPM frequency content, 0 – 8 MHz NO 6MHz

Faraday Cup Fourier Analysis FCUP taken at 15 pC, 21 pC, 30 pC, 43 pC, 60 pC, simultaneously with the BPM shots on previous slides (use rep rate 1 Hz) Scope records at 10 Gs/sec = 0.1 ns data spacing Take 1 in every 10 data points  effectively 1 Gs/sec = 1 ns data spacing Take the same portion of the train 100  1000 bunches == 6  60 μs Subtract the ‘background’ Subtract the mean FCUP voltage and normalise on the mean Take DFT

FCUP 60 pC example fcup after background subtraction (volts vs time) 6-60 μs (y – )/

After pre-processing described on previous slide, then compute Fourier DFT for different frequency ranges 16 MHz + harmonics = bunch frequency 300 kHz not seen lowest frequency is probably slope of data (slope still present even with background subtraction) FCUP 60 pC example

F-cup Fourier 15 pC 21 pC 30 pC 43 pC 60 pC

PI laser trace PI laser trace taken at 15 pC, 21 pC, 30 pC, 43 pC, 60 pC, simultaneously with the BPM shots on previous slides (use rep rate 1 Hz) Take ALL data points (do not do 1/10 sampling like for FCUP). 10 Gsamples/sec = 0.1 ns data spacing No other filtering/binning performed i.e. maximum information retained. Once more take 6-60 μs and compute fourier of (y- )/ Remember PI laser power is measured downstream of frequency doubler (green laser), but upstream of attenuation

PI Laser Fourier 15 pC 21 pC 30 pC 43 pC 60 pC

F-cup Fourier

BPM frequency content, 0 – 1 MHz