Educator Performance Evaluation Office of Educator Effectiveness January 31, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Advertisements

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
Defining and Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Evaluation May 10, 2015.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2014 Overview of Final Evaluation Report Administrator.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Tuesday, July 30
Fusion GPS Externalization Pilot Training 1/5/2011 Lydia M. Naylor Research Lead.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
EEF SESSION #3 MARCH 2013 Analyzing & Documenting Progress Toward Goals Please have a seat and fill out the reflection sheet (Do Now)
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Lead Teacher Session #2 1 October 2014 Welcome! Please sit at any table & complete the Do Now Wireless network: MadPkWLAN Password: 657malcolmx.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
OASYS Teacher Evaluation
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS FACILITATORS SESSION #2 JANUARY 2013 Unpacking Well-Structured Lessons.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Wednesday, July 31 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Academic Seminar Weeks 9 Announcements Share out: What have you learned? “The Evolution of your Practicum Experience” Lecture: Uses of Data (Final Reflection)
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
REVIEWING THE COURSE SYLLABUS AND EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENT TEACHERS ADVICE AND TIPS FOR SUCCESS Student Teaching Orientation.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Baseline Edge Task Force Training
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 3 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Observing Close Reading. Close Reading What do you remember about close reading ?
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 1: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, Oct 7 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Blackstone Innovation School Supervision and Evaluation SY September 10, 2013 Café nook 3:30-5:00.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Strengthening our organizational structure to support schools and student learning Principal and Headmaster Meeting January 31, 2013.
New Teacher Evaluation Process
Formative Assessments and Observations on EDFS
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Aspiring Principals Program
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Unpacking Effective Instruction
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Information
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Presentation transcript:

Educator Performance Evaluation Office of Educator Effectiveness January 31, 2013

Agenda for today  Successes & challenges  Resources  Formative Assessments  Problem Solving

Where we are today  5,079 licensed educators  82% have goals & action steps approved  6,103 observations logged in EDFS  21,133 artifacts uploaded in EDFS  285 formative assessments have been started

Nice work! % of goals and action steps have been approved at: Bradley Elementary Hurley K-8 Mildred Avenue K-8 McKinley Middle Tech Boston Academy Tobin K-8 Condon Elementary Winship Elementary Winthrop Elementary Excel High School Charlestown High Beethoven Elementary Everett Elementary Grew Elementary Sumner Elementary Ohrenberger Elementary Philbrick Elementary Dever Elementary Murphy Elementary S Greenwood K-8 Mozart Elementary Holmes Elementary Otis Elementary Boston Evening Academy BCLA Kenny Elementary Burke High Henderson Elementary Rogers Middle The Harbor School Latin Academy Bates Elementary Lyndon K-8 Another Course To College Lee Academy Umana Middle Mendell Elementary Trotter Elementary Gardner Pilot Academy Blackstone Elementary Carter Center Haynes EEC Roosevelt K-8 Warren/Prescott K-8 Boston Latin Lee Elementary CASH

Way to go! Every educator has received feedback through EDFS at: Bradley Elementary Charlestown High Philbrick Elementary Mozart Elementary Roland Hayes Middle School Academy Sumner Elementary Tobin K-8 CASH Holmes Elementary Otis Elementary Beethoven Elementary Bates Elementary Everett Elementary Rogers Middle Murphy Elementary Gardner Pilot Academy Marshall Elementary Winship Elementary Fifield Mckay Elementary Condon Elementary Umana Middle West Zone ELC S Greenwood K-8 Conley Elementary Curley K-8 Latin Academy

To Do List:  Approve goals & action plans ASAP  Log observations & artifacts in EDFS  Schedule & complete Formative Assessments

We Hear You  We know the EDFS statistics do not reflect all of the work you are doing.  We know the system needs to be improved. Developers are working hard on making EDFS more reliable.

Resources: Artifacts

Standard IStandard IIStandard IIIStandard IV Unit plans & assessments Lesson plans Data made public to students Class activities/ assignments Data analysis Plans for re- teaching Exemplars Rubrics Differentiated instructional plans & materials Class routines, rules, norms Student work samples Letters & s to families Invitations to participate in class activities Progress reports Log of contact with families Family surveys Thoughtful self- assessment, goals, & action plans Reflection on participation in PD Reflection on leadership role Records of participation in team meetings

Resources: Prescriptions

Standard IStandard IIStandard IIIStandard IV -Teacher X must post daily content and language objectives in student friendly language. - Teacher X needs to create a classroom management plan that addresses and reduces the off- task behaviors that are occurring in the classroom. - Make at least three calls home per week to the families of students in your classes to update them on their progress. Be sure to note these calls in your Call Log - Teacher X should be sure to submit work in a timely manner. She should contact her supervisor in advance of deadlines if she needs extra time or support with completing any work related tasks.

Resources: Claims Standard IStandard IIStandard IIIStandard IV

Formative Assessments: The Basics  Mid-cycle, no hard deadline  Teachers should have advance notice  Ratings on each goal and standard inform an overall rating  Overall rating may lead to a change in plans

Formative Assessments: EDFS  Can start & and save it before releasing  Info from observations & artifacts will be at the bottom of the screen  Ratings of “Needs Improvement” & “Unsatisfactory” require prescriptions  Releasing will send an to the educator; they have 5 days to comment

Formative Assessments: Guiding Principles  Rationales for ratings should include:  Claim about performance  Connection to the rubric  Evidence from observations & artifacts

Formative Assessments: Guiding Principles  Evidence accumulates throughout the year  If formative is thorough, summative may not be very different  If formative is brief, summative should have more evidence

Formative Assessments: Examples  Read through the ratings and rationales for Standard II in each examples.  Identify the claims in each  What similarities and differences do you notice?

Formative Assessments: Comparing the Examples  Looking at each rationale for Standard II,  Does it include…? o Claim about performance o Connection to the rubric o Evidence from observations and/or artifacts

Pop Quiz! Work with the people around you to check your understanding of some of the details of the evaluation process.

Pop Quiz! 1.True 2.I. Curriculum, Planning & Assessment II. Teaching All Students III. Family and Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture 3. False 4.Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Improvement, Unsatisfactory 5.False 6.Timing & implications 7.True 8.False 9. Progress toward… Proficiency in… + = Student Learning Goal Professional Practice Goal I. Curriculum, Planning & Assessment II. Teaching All Students III. Family & Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture Overall Rating

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #10: What should I do if the Formative Assessment is extremely late?  Write and release the Formative Assessment anyway, and then complete the Summative by the plan’s end date. Accept the probability that it will be grieved by the teacher.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #9: What happens I give someone on a Self-Directed plan an overall rating of “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” at the Formative Assessment?  The teacher can continue on the Self-Directed plan until the Summative Evaluation. OR  You can end the current Self-Directed plan create a new plan. The teacher may be placed on a Directed Growth Plan or an Improvement Plan.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #8: If I start someone on a new plan now, how long should it last?  A new plan will require another self-assessment, new goals and a new action plan. The plan starts when the goals are approved by the evaluator.  There are 140 calendar days between today (1/31/13) and the end of the school year (6/20/13). Allowing time for creating the plan, the maximum plan length is about 130 days.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #7: What should I do if an educator has not uploaded any artifacts?  If no artifacts are uploaded or submitted, the evaluator can note this as evidence in the rationales of the Formative Assessment.  Your responsibility is to notify the educator of the date of the Formative Assessment. The contract says artifacts should be submitted at least 2 weeks in advance, but you may choose to accept artifacts up to the day of.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #6: What should I do if an educator files a grievance after a Formative Assessment?  Contact Labor Relations at 617–635 –1577. Do not change the Formative Assessment.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #5: What can I do to streamline the writing of a Formative Assessment? 1. Review evidence: Read through the goals, action steps, observations, and artifacts. 2. Identify ratings: Use the teacher rubric to identify the educator’s performance level in priority elements in each standard. 3. Write the rationale: Use the language of the rubric to write claims, and support them by citing specific evidence.

#5 Streamlining the Formative continued…  You don’t need to restate evidence and feedback from observations, just refer to them.  If you don’t have multiple sources of evidence for each rationale, it’s ok – you can add more before the summative.  While it is a best practice, it is not mandatory to write a rationale for proficient ratings.  The same prescriptions may apply to multiple educators. Write “See rationale for Standard _” instead of restating information in the Statement/ Evidence of the Problem sections.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #4: What can I do if I release a Formative Assessment but realize something is missing?  Formative Assessments can be edited within 5 school days of being released.  If the five days have passed, changes can still be made, but the issue may be grieved.  Another option is to upload a statement about the mistake as an artifact.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #3: What if an educator wants to add comments to a Formative Assessment after the five day window has closed?  The teacher may type up his/her comments and send them to the principal. The principal can send them to OEE and we can upload the document as an artifact to the educator’s plan.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #2: What happens if someone receives an overall rating of Unsatisfactory at the end of an Improvement Plan?  Notify Labor Relations & request an “Intent to dismiss” letter  Compile all written correspondences with the educator related to performance evaluation & submit them to OEE  Meet with the educator to discuss the evaluation. Let him/her know that you are requesting the ‘Intent to dismiss’ letter.

Problem Solving: Top 10 Questions #1: Do I have to do this twice every year for every teacher?  No. All of the information from the Formative will filter into the Summative. If you complete a thorough Formative Assessment, your Summative Evaluation may not need many changes or additions.

Support: Office of Educator Effectiveness  Ross Wilson, Assistant Superintendent for Educator Effectiveness  Jared Joiner, Implementation Specialist (jjoiner)  Emily Kalejs Qazilbash, Implementation Specialist (eqazilbash)  Angela Rubenstein, Implementation Specialist (arubenstein)  Kris Taylor, Implementation Specialist (ktaylor2)  Jenna Costin, EDFS On-line System Coordinator (jcostin)  Chason Ishino, Consultant (cishino)