Welcome to LIB5080 The School Library Media Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Based Learning
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Yvonne Belanger, Duke University Library Assessment Conference
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Assessing Learning for Classroom Success Friday, February 16, :00-3:00.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
EXPLORING PURPOSE AND AUDIENCE WITH MIDDLE LEVEL WRITERS Reasons to Write Alisha Bollinger – 2015 Nebraska Reading Conference.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
1 Formative Assessment Debbie Owens AMSP University of Kentucky Kathy Strunk AMSP University of Tennessee.
THROUGH AN ONLINE PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS OCTOBER 2010 Generating and Assessing Learning.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
NAVIGATING THE WATERS: USING ASSESSMENT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE Amy Harper, Area Coordinator, Fordham University Greer Jason, PhD, Assistant Dean of Students,
Evaluating Your STEM Outreach Program MISO Spring Workshop May 7, 2012 MISO Data Analytics Team Jeni Corn, Tricia Townsend, Alana Unfried
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Intel ® Teach Essentials ICT in the Classroom Conference St John's College, Johannesburg 5-7 July 2011 Workshop by Claire Dean Senior Trainer SchoolNet.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
Management of the School Library Media Center
Unit 1 Learning Objectives Experience a science lesson that integrates CA CCSS speaking/listening, writing and reading with science content Identify Literacy.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
WELCOME BACK!! WEDNESDAY. Response to Feedback Awesome!!! Hmmm… Increased collaboration Michael’s presentation Logic model work Coordinators who understand.
Innovative Teaching and Learning MOVING FROM THEORY TO ACTION 6 th June 2012.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Reflect and Revise: Evaluative Thinking for Program Success Tom DeCaigny and Leah Goldstein Moses.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
EEA 2012 – Middle School STEM Day 3 Content Session.
Boston Geneva San Francisco Seattle Beginning the Evaluation Journey with FSG KCIC Boot Camp March 24, 2010 Prepared for:
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Creating a S.I.M.P.L.E. & Comprehensive Assessment Plan for Residence Life and Housing Dr. Mike Fulford Emory University Student Affairs Assessment Conference.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
ATL’s in the Personal Project
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
September 2007 Survey Development Rita O'Sullivan Evaluation, Assessment, & Policy Connections (EvAP) School of Education, University of North Carolina-Chapel.
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Ellen Iverson, MESI Graduate Assistant Director of Evaluation at the Science Education Resource Center (SERC) at Carleton College 1 Logic Models for Smarties.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Facilitate Group Learning
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
The Zen of Data Colorado Department of Education June 19, 2009.
Assessment for Learning ERS April, Learning Outcomes for Today I can understand and can explain to others the concepts of Assessment for Learning.
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Developing Effective Performance Measures: A Skill-Building Workshop David J. Bernstein, Ph.D., Senior Study Director, Westat Sponsored by the Government.
Using higher order questioning in planning and instruction to raise student thinking and engagement Katherine Williams, PhD Advanced Learning Programs.
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
Team Up! How to Turn Problems into Solutions PRESENTERS MARJUYUA LARTEY-ROWSER, PHD, RD MARY FRANCES NETTLES, PHD, RD.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
Multiple literacy Standards for the 21st-Century learner
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Slam Dunk Title 1. Question & Research Task
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to LIB5080 The School Library Media Program

LIB 5080 The School Library Media Program Today’s Learning IMPACT Model – Guests in AETZ Updates Cross Program Collaboration Program Planning and Evaluation

Cross Program Collaboration Briefly describe the following: Your CPC group and how you went about the work What did you learn … –About 21 st Century learning, schools, etc –About other programs/positions in K-16 education –About group processes

Planning & Evaluating Media Programs Logic Models - Providing focus for planning and evaluating school library media programs Based on SERVE Center’s Capacity for Applying Project Evaluation (CAPE) available online at

Why Plan and Evaluate? Improve programs Increase program effectiveness Maintain funding Generate additional funding Enhance communication with stakeholders Improve useful data collection Inform decision makers Increase staff and public awareness Assess needs Set program priorities Focus and prioritize data needs O’Sullivan, R. (2001). Utilization-focused evaluation. Presentation at the Siberian Evaluation Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia.

What is Evaluation? Evaluation is the systematic investigation of merit or worth. –Thoughtful, intentional, purposeful –Done for clear reasons –Organized and deliberate –Appraisal or judgment based on the best evidence available Guskey, T. (2005). Taking a second look at accountability: Strong evidence reflecting the benefits of professional development is more important than ever before. Journal of Staff Development. 26(1).

What is Formative Evaluation? "When the cook tastes the soup, that's formative evaluation. When the guests taste the soup that is summative evaluation." ~ Bob Stake Cited in Patton, Michael Quinn (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. Edition 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers, p. 69.

What is a Logic Model? A logic model is a graphic representation of the theory or logic behind a project or program. A logic model shows the forces that shape the program as well as the relationships among the key components. Coffman, J. (1999). Learning from Logic Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.

Logic Models Help to articulate the key elements of a program Provide focus for program evaluation Can lead to program efficiency and effectiveness Promote stakeholder buy-in by helping clarify how the project works

Frameworks and Examples Harvard Family Research Council Kellogg Foundation National Science Foundation CAPE

Coffman, J. (1999). Learning from Logic Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project. Retrieved April 2, 2007 from Harvard Family Research Project

Kellogg Foundation W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Logic Model Development Guide. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Retrieved April 2, 2007 from

National Science Foundation Frechtling Westat, J. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved April 2, 2007 from

Key Elements of a Logic Model Outcomes, Impacts, or Goals –Goals tell the ultimate purpose(s) of the project or program. They answer the question “What difference will the project or program make in the long run?” –In education, goals usually say what impact the program will have on learners and learning.

Key Elements of a Logic Model Objectives, Intermediate Outcomes, or Short-term Goals –Focus on program outcomes –Specify what the program will accomplish –Answer the question “How will learning, (teaching, the school, etc.) be improved as a result of this program?” –Describe what you hope will happen as a result of the program –Are measurable

Key Elements of a Logic Model Strategies –Identify the major components of the program –Are larger in scope than simple program activities –Provide details about how the program funds are spent –Describe what the program does –Are measurable

Key Elements of a Logic Model Inputs or Contexts –Are the contexts or conditions that influence program activities and strategies. –Should be considered when planning program activities, e.g., policies, plans, needs assessment data.

STEM-ICT 3D Strategies Objectives/ Goals/ Intermediate Outcomes Long term Outcomes Middle and high school students are motivated to pursue ICT careers. Teachers mentor others. Design and deliver 3D curricular materials to diverse students. Students develop virtual solutions to real world problems. Students are prepared with the skills necessary to succeed in STEM. Students teach teachers 3D technological skills. Students mentor others. Students collaborate via 3D virtual worlds. Design and deliver teacher professional development on pedagogical strategies using virtual 3D worlds. Teachers are engaged in continuous STEM learning. Teachers build and sustain ongoing relationships with colleagues through interacting in the 3-D world about topics related to delivering content through the 3-D world. Teachers engage students in the use of 3D world tools to explore solutions to real world problems. Students pursue STEM careers.

Logic Model Exercise Inside the packet are index cards labeled with components of a project. Your tasks are as follows: –organize these cards into the appropriate columns of the logic model template shown on the packet; –tape the cards on the wall chart paper provided; –connect the cards using marker or tape to make a logic model; –review the connections between objectives and strategies using “if –then”.

Healthy Living Logic Model

Reflection Describe your process for creating the logic model. What worked? What didn’t?

Discussion What could be the advantages for creating and using a logic model for the school library media program? What might be the barriers or obstacles that would have to be overcome?

Potential Benefits Logic models Provide clues to why the program does or does not work Can provide evidence for attributing outcomes Help improve programs –Expose faulty thinking –Develop a common language and understanding of a program Rogers, P., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T., & Hacsi, T. (2000). Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems. In Rogers, P., Hacsi, T., Petrosino, A., & Huebner, T. (Eds.) Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 5-13), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Used with permission ©ScienceCartoonPlus.com

Advantages to Using Logic Models Teachers became more engaged and reported greater program awareness (Finnan & Davis, 1995*) Staff understood the program better (Beckford, 1998*) Teachers were more actively involved in implementation and altered practices as a result of the evaluation (Darling, 1998*) * As cited in Huebner, T. (2000). Theory-based evaluation: Gaining a shared understanding between school staff and evaluators. In Rogers, P., Hacsi, T., Petrosino, A., & Huebner, T. (Eds.) Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities (pp ), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Logic Model Work in groups Develop a logic model for a school library media program

Sharing Logic Models Explain your logic What did you discover as you were creating your logic model?

What Happens Next? Define evaluation questions Determine benchmarks Select methods and measures Conduct the evaluation Analyze and draw inferences from data Modify the program

Writing Evaluation Questions Consider the purpose of your evaluation, what do you really care about? –Quality of implementation –Impact

Writing Evaluation Questions Evaluation questions about strategies ask how well the strategy is implemented. Evaluation questions about objectives ask about the impact of implementing the strategy.

Writing Evaluation Questions Try to avoid simple yes or no questions. Consider quantity questions (e.g., “how many,” “how much,” or “how often”). Consider quality questions (e.g., “how well,” “how effectively,” or “in what ways”). Be sure questions are self-contained – avoid putting implementation questions in terms of impacts.

Healthy Living Logic Model

Writing Evaluation Questions Examples –Implementation questions How many hours of sleep am I getting each week? (quantity) How soundly am I sleeping? (quality) –Impact question How much weight have I lost? (quantity) How has my stress level changed? (quality)

Writing Evaluation Questions Using your logic model, select one strategy and brainstorm implementation questions that you might ask, to evaluate how well it is being accomplished. Select one objective and brainstorm impact questions that you might ask, to evaluate how well it is being met. Share and discuss.

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? Writing Evaluation Questions 1.Insert a strategy from your logic model into the worksheet 1.

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? Writing Evaluation Questions 2.Write at least one implementation question for the strategy. 2.

Writing Evaluation Questions 1.Insert an objective from your logic model into the worksheet Objective: Impact Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 1.

Writing Evaluation Questions 2.Write at least one impact question for the objective. Objective: Impact Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 2.

Data Sources/Analysis Methods What do we mean by data? –“Data” are pieces of information. –Common understanding is that data are numbers – quantitative data or quantities of things. –Data may also be qualitative – about qualities that are not easily measured in numbers. –Both qualitative and quantitative data should be analyzed. – Data are what we use to conduct formative evaluation of projects.

What data do you need? –Your data needs are dictated by your evaluation questions. –Ask yourself, “What information do I need to answer this question?” –Gather all of the data you need, and only the data you need, to answer your questions. Data Sources/Analysis Methods

Where do you get the data you need? –Check whether there is data already available to you that might help answer your questions. –Determine the data sources you might use to meet remaining data needs. –Note that data sources are not data. Example – teachers’ lessons plans are a rich data source, but it is necessary to do something with them before you have actual data. Data Sources/Analysis Methods

What are analysis methods? –The approaches and tools used to pull data out of data sources –It may be helpful to think in four steps: Collecting data Storing and organizing data Analyzing data Interpreting data –Qualitative data may be quantified. Data Sources/Analysis Methods

What is “informal data?” –For an evaluation to be purposeful and systematic, data must be relatively formal, collected, stored and organized, and analyzed with some degree of rigor. –Data not handled in this way may be thought of as “informal.” –The trick is making informal data formal. Data Sources/Analysis Methods

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 1.Review each evaluation question you wrote 1. Data Sources/Analysis Methods

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 2.Identify the data source to answer the question. 2. Data Sources/Analysis Methods

Benchmarks –Are your targets. –Define levels of success. –Help you stop periodically to examine progress. Specifying Benchmarks

Look at the Healthy Living logic model. Listen to the possible benchmarks. What do you notice? –How are data used to specify benchmarks? –Are the expectations reasonable? –Do you think all the benchmarks will be met? –Is it okay if the benchmarks aren’t met?

Healthy Living Logic Model

Specifying Benchmarks Objective: Lose weight. Benchmarking –Baseline data current weight (June 2007) = 165 lbs. –Set target weight 1 year from now (June 2008) = 145 lbs. –Specify benchmarks periodically stop and examine progress.

Specifying Benchmarks Specify benchmarks – periodically stop and examine progress. By September, I will weigh 160 lbs. By December, I will weigh 155 lbs. By March, I will weigh 150 lbs. By June, I will weigh 145 lbs.

Benchmarks – one possible format (there are others…) Specifying Benchmarks Possible Format: How many of who (or what) is going to do (or be) what by when? For Example: 70% of teachers will complete a collaborative unit with the media coordinator by mid-year.

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 1.Consider the questions and data sources you have written 1. Specifying Benchmarks

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 2.Specify one or more benchmark for each data source Specifying Benchmarks

What baseline data do you have? What if you don’t have baseline data? In order to make adjustments you will want to collect, analyze, and compare data to benchmarks periodically e.g. bi-monthly, monthly, each 9-weeks, at the end of each semester

Specifying Benchmarks Be realistic and reasonable. Consider how much time it will take to collect and analyze the data.

What decisions might you make if evaluation findings show… –Problems with implementation? –Good quality implementation? –Positive impacts (benchmarks reached)? –Problems with impacts (benchmarks not reached)? Who will make the decisions? Who will the decisions effect? Making Decisions

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 1.Use the questions, data sources, and benchmarks you have written …. 1. Making Decisions

Strategy: Implementation Questions Data Sources/Analysis Methods Benchmarks Decisions What do you need to find out?How will you find out?What are your intermediate targets? What decisions will you make based on the data? 2.What decisions will you make based on your findings? 1. Making Decisions 2.

Evaluation Plan Assignment Work in your groups Revise your logic model Taking the role of a school MTAC, select one objective the school will focus on for the school year. Complete an Objective worksheet for that objective. Complete a Strategy worksheet for all strategies associated with that objective.

Homework Work on evaluation plan Finish Special Topics Project