Safety of Ambulatory Bariatric Surgery Senapati PS, Menon A, Al-Rashedy M, Thawdar P, Akhtar K, Ammori BJ Department of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Salford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification Results for the Spanish Society of Psychiatry.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Health Benefits of Gastric Bypass Surgery After 6 Years
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Outcomes in Acute Care Journal Club Arrowe Park Hospital Valluru ST4 Emergency Medicine 27/09/13.
EuroCondens SGB E.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2008 Support for this research was provided by The Commonwealth Fund. The views presented here are those.
NTDB ® Annual Pediatric Report 2010 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide National Trauma Data Bank 2010 Pediatric Report.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2009 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide Percent of Hospitals Submitting Data to NTDB by State and.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2010 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide National Trauma Data Bank 2010 Annual Report.
CALENDAR.
1 1  1 =.
ZMQS ZMQS
The 5S numbers game..
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2013 David Squires The Commonwealth Fund November 2013.
Factoring Quadratics — ax² + bx + c Topic
A sample problem. The cash in bank account for J. B. Lindsay Co. at May 31 of the current year indicated a balance of $14, after both the cash receipts.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
VOORBLAD.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Surgical Intervention Including Devices Victor F Garcia MD.
Do You Know Your Numbers? National Governors Association Using Data, Technology, and Benefit Design to Manage State Employee and Retiree Health Programs.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Shantanu Singh M. Bainbridge R. George K. Akhtar P. S. Senapati.
Mechanism of Diabetes remission after Bariatric Surgery
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Essential Cell Biology
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Essential Cell Biology
Page 0 ■ SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 The Economics of Obesity Arindam Ghosh, PhD 1 1 Analysis Group, Inc., Washington, DC, USA September 27, 2011.
The Impact of Obesity and the Value of Treatment
Revisional Bariatric Surgery Indications and potential benefits.
A review on bariatric surgery
UK Renal Registry 17th Annual Report Figure 5.1. Trend in one year after 90 day incident patient survival by first modality, 2003–2012 cohorts (adjusted.
Chapter 8: Dialysis Providers 2014 ANNUAL DATA REPORT VOLUME 2: E ND -S TAGE R ENAL D ISEASE.
Intervento differito G. LESTI Prof. Ass. Università di Chieti Fondazione Salus Fondazione Salus.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Ravi Vohra West Midlands Research Collaborative Clinical Variation in Practice of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Surgical Outcomes: a multi-centre, prospective,
Safety of Ambulatory Bariatric Surgery Senapati PS, Menon A, Al-Rashedy M, Thawdar P, Akhtar K, Ammori BJ Department of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Salford.
Complications Associated with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity Dr. Mojtaba Hashemzadeh Dr. Leila Zahedi-Shoolami Dr. Mahmoud.
L Genser (2), A Soprani(1,2), Tabbara M (2), J Cady (1) 1- Clinique Geoffroy Saint Hilaire (Paris), 2- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique,
1 Jaime Ponce, MD FACS FASMBS Director of Bariatric Surgery Hamilton Medical Center Dalton GA Outpatient Bariatric Surgery: Is it Here? MISS Morbid Obesity.
MISS Journal Club 2012 Metabolic Surgery & Emerging Technologies Goal: To review 5 important and clinically relevant papers from 2011, on Metabolic Surgery.
Cost comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Colorectal Resections in a district general hospital setting Menon A, Shapey I, Nicholson J, Muhammad KB, Solkar.
Berkshire Weight Loss Surgery Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading James Ramus, Consultant UGI & Bariatric Suregon.
Castellani RL, Toppino M, Favretto F, Camoglio FS, Zampieri N
Wilson MSJ, Alhamdani A, Mahawar K, Boyle M
Efficacy of adjuvant weight loss medication after bariatric surgery
Bariatric and metabolic surgery
Three-year outcomes of revisional laparoscopic Gastric Bypass after failed laparoscopic Sleeve: A case-matched analysis T. Malinka, J. Zerkowski, Y.
Presentation transcript:

Safety of Ambulatory Bariatric Surgery Senapati PS, Menon A, Al-Rashedy M, Thawdar P, Akhtar K, Ammori BJ Department of Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Salford Royal Hospital, UK

Demand for Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery is increasing Burns E M et al. BMJ 2010;341 ©2010 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group

But this comes at a cost…. Mean cost of laparoscopic bariatric surgery is $17000 a patient according to an economic analysis of 3561 patients Mean cost of laparoscopic bariatric surgery is $17000 a patient according to an economic analysis of 3561 patients Cremieux PY, Buchwald H et al. American Journal Management Care Sep;14(9): Cremieux PY, Buchwald H et al. American Journal Management Care Sep;14(9):

Economic costs may be addressed with ambulatory stay following surgery Meta-analysis of trials comparing ambulatory stay versus inpatient following laparoscopic cholecystectomy demonstrated reduced costs with higher patient satisfaction and comparable 30-day readmission rates. Meta-analysis of trials comparing ambulatory stay versus inpatient following laparoscopic cholecystectomy demonstrated reduced costs with higher patient satisfaction and comparable 30-day readmission rates. Ahmed et al. Surg Endosc 2008 Sep;22(9): Ahmed et al. Surg Endosc 2008 Sep;22(9): Ambulatory stay following laparoscopic gastric banding shown to reduce costs by 600 euros per patient Ambulatory stay following laparoscopic gastric banding shown to reduce costs by 600 euros per patient Wasowicz-Kemps et al. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: Wasowicz-Kemps et al. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:

Evidence for Ambulatory Bariatric Surgery Laparoscopic Gastric Band Insertion Laparoscopic Gastric Band Insertion Systematic review of 1 RCT and five cohort studies Systematic review of 1 RCT and five cohort studies 99.9% of 2549 patients were discharged within 23 hours 99.9% of 2549 patients were discharged within 23 hours 0.55% 30-day readmission 0.55% 30-day readmission Thomas H et al. Obes Surg 2011 Jun;21(6): RYGB RYGB Median stay in large study of 4631 patients is 2 days. However Medicare guidelines recommend ambulatory stay Median stay in large study of 4631 patients is 2 days. However Medicare guidelines recommend ambulatory stay Lancaster RT et al. Surg Endosc 22: Milliman Care guidelines Ambulatory Care 14 th edition, Seattle Systematic review of 4 cohort studies Systematic review of 4 cohort studies 84% of 2201 patients discharged within 23 hours 84% of 2201 patients discharged within 23 hours 1.82% 30-day readmission 1.82% 30-day readmission Thomas H et al. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Oct;21(8):

Objectives To examine discharge within 23 hours of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in terms of: To examine discharge within 23 hours of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in terms of: Feasibility Feasibility Safety Safety

Methods Retrospective single-centre review of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery between October 2008 and January Retrospective single-centre review of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery between October 2008 and January Decision to discharge made by senior member of clinical team, and after review by specialist nurses, dietician, and diabetic team (when indicated) Decision to discharge made by senior member of clinical team, and after review by specialist nurses, dietician, and diabetic team (when indicated)

Patient Selection Inclusions (Planned Inpatient Stay cases) Inclusions (Planned Inpatient Stay cases) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) Revisional bariatric surgery Revisional bariatric surgery Exclusions (short planned day cases) Exclusions (short planned day cases) Insertion of Intra-gastric Balloon Insertion of Intra-gastric Balloon LAGB port revisions/removals LAGB port revisions/removals

Outcomes and Analysis Outcome measures Outcome measures Demographic data including pre-operative Body Mass Index (BMI) Demographic data including pre-operative Body Mass Index (BMI) Successful discharge within 23 hours of surgery Successful discharge within 23 hours of surgery Readmission to hospital within 30 days of surgery Readmission to hospital within 30 days of surgery All-cause mortality following surgery All-cause mortality following surgery Analysis Analysis Comparisons made between success of 23 hour discharge between different operative groups with One-Way ANOVA test. Comparisons made between success of 23 hour discharge between different operative groups with One-Way ANOVA test. Comparisons also made between patients 23 hour stay with 2 tailed t-test and Chi-squared where appropriate Comparisons also made between patients 23 hour stay with 2 tailed t-test and Chi-squared where appropriate Demographics (Age, Gender, BMI) Demographics (Age, Gender, BMI) Operating time Operating time 30-day readmission 30-day readmission

Results Operationtype Number of patientsMedianAgeMedian Body mass index (BMI)(kg/m²)Median Length of stay (hours)Median 30 Day Readmission(%) All cases (18-67)( )(13-552) RYGB (20-67)( )(17-552) LSG (18-63)( )(19-72) LAGB (26-64)( )(13-264) Revisional (26-61)( )(16-552)

Successful Discharge within 23 hours of surgery RYGB patients significantly less likely to be discharged <23h compared to all other groups (p<0.01) LSG patients less likely to be discharged <23h compared to LAGB p<0.05) ** *

Success vs. Failure of 23 hour stay Postoperative Stay <23 hour Postoperative Stay >23 hour P value Median Age 43 years 46 years <0.001 % Females 80%76.10%0.23 BMI 50 kg/m² 50.8 kg/m² 0.61 % Diabetics 18%36%<0.001 Operating Time 85 minutes 95 minutes day Readmission2.90%2.40%0.72 Mortality0% 0.2% (1 mortality) Complications1.8%3.4%0.29

Discussion Ambulatory stay following laparoscopic bariatric surgery is feasible after laparoscopic bariatric surgery, without compromising safety Ambulatory stay following laparoscopic bariatric surgery is feasible after laparoscopic bariatric surgery, without compromising safety Age and Diabetic status may be significant factors to consider when selecting patients for ambulatory stay. Age and Diabetic status may be significant factors to consider when selecting patients for ambulatory stay. The low rates of successful 23-hour discharge with RYGB and LSG may be explained by: The low rates of successful 23-hour discharge with RYGB and LSG may be explained by: The patients in this study were not initially planned for ambulatory stay The patients in this study were not initially planned for ambulatory stay Patient co-morbidities and intra-operative factors which may or may not be modifiable Patient co-morbidities and intra-operative factors which may or may not be modifiable Higher proportion of diabetic patients Higher proportion of diabetic patients Resource limitations preventing prompt discharge Resource limitations preventing prompt discharge Further work needed to identify preoperative factors predicting successful ambulatory stay to allow better patient selection Further work needed to identify preoperative factors predicting successful ambulatory stay to allow better patient selection

Thank you for listening