MinnRock Design and Canister Layout 11-20-09. Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design and Implementation of Low- Cost Optical Telemetry to Support Radiometric Analysis of the Atmosphere University of Colorado at Boulder Alexandra.
Advertisements

Full Mission Simulation Report Temple University Fred Avery, Gene Council, Ny’Jaa Bobo, Salvatore Giorgi, Jay Shukla 4/21/12.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
May 14th, 2010 FMSTR. The Problem and Proposed Solution No current, acceptable solution exists to determine liquid volume in a tank exposed to microgravity,
Cornell University Space Systems Design Studio AIAA GNC Conference - 8/11/2009 Violet: A High-Agility Nanosatellite for Demonstrating Small Control-Moment.
Electrical and Computer Engineering SMART GOGGLES To Chong Ryan Offir Matt Ferrante James Kestyn Advisor: Dr. Tilman Wolf Preliminary Design Review.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
MinnSpec Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota / Augsburg College Douglas Carlson (Overall Team Lead), Bryce Schaefer (MinnRock II), Chris Woehrle.
CASTOR Jr. MIT 2LT Corey Crowell 2LT Matt McCormack Lucas de la Garza Spenser Parra.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
MinnSpec University of Minnesota and Augsburg College.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf
Fischertechnik ® Interface Connections. The Serial Interface Connects the Computer with the fischertechnik ® model
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
Novel Magnetometers Flight Experiment Conceptual Design Review - Draft Boston University Mag Dogs Team December 3, 2008.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Computer Hardware CSCI-N 100 Dept. of Computer and Information Science.
Skeye. Personnel John Spurgeon Daren Dotson Michael Bailee Collins.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Team 3D Erik Lorhammer Christopher BermelJosh Cornelius Electrical Computer Engineering Electrical EngineerElectrical Engineer.
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)
Translate the following message:
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Virginia Space Grant Consortium 1 RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop Colorado & Virginia Space Grant Consortium.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Hardware Overview Autopilot Control Board- Serves as common platform for other components and has autopilot code and flight plans Battery- Powers the.
Project: Weather Video Sat 4/2/04 Mesa State College, Grand Junction.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
The BRASS Project University of North Dakota Matthew Voigt Nathan Ambler Ron Fevig John Nordlie Tim Young Nirmal Patel (University of North Florida) Baike.
The Guts. CPU CPU Socket The CPU is generally a 2 inch ceramic square with a silicon chip located inside. The chip usually about the size of a thumbnail.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
Northwest Nazarene University Chad Larson, Ben Gordon, Seth Leija, David Vinson, Drew Johnson, Zach Thomas June 1 st, 2012.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
Internal & External components of the computer Abby Davis.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C 2012 Rocket Team Harding University 13 February Team Members.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Scott Luisi, Abe Fark, Trent Quick, Jack Szmanda, Tom Valkenberg AEM 1905, 11/20/2008.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
SENSOR SELECTION CALIBRATION OVERVIEWOVERVIEW DESIGN ROADMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project would not have been possible without the extensive.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
Cloudland Instruments Hawkeye Electronics Snapshot March 10th, 2016.
1 ARMADILLO – SHOT II The University of Texas at Austin Travis Imken Shaina Johl Christopher McBryde Travis Sanders June 29, 2012 Boulder, CO.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
RockOn! RockOn! Structure Build RockOn! 2009.
Power Supply.
Drill Translate the following message:
Created by Malcolm Fowler
RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop
Neurochip3.
Launch Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Presentation transcript:

MinnRock Design and Canister Layout

Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus- ME Chris Larson- ME Phillip Hoffman- EE

Mission Objective The MinnRock II board is a flight characterization board similar to the board that flew last year, the MinnRock (I) project. We aim to look at many aspects of the rocket’s flight, including: spin rate, 3D acceleration, light intensity, pressure, and temperature, and the Earth’s magnetic field as a function of the rocket’s altitude Spin rate with a single light sensor 3D acceleration (x, y, z) as a function of time The inner pressure and temperature within the canister The Earth’s magnetic field as a function of the rocket’s altitude The trajectory of the rocket using a GPS Other objectives Capture still pictures while in flight using a camera, and observe the possibility of switching to video mid-flight.

Expected Results We expect to be able to compare data from this years flight to our own existing data We wish to answer any questions regarding the use of a GPS or (video)camera

Solid Works images We have a full layout of our solid works slides This layout may change due to center of mass issues, and or the implementation of wiring The next few slides show our payload first as a whole, then separated into parts to show details Some components are shown as simple blocks because they are being made in-house and have not yet been created

MinnSpec

Lower Plate (from above)

Lower Plate (from below)

Upper plate (from above)

Electrical Schematics We have modified the schematics from RockOn! In order to integrate a camera, GPS, and magnetometer On the next slide is the modified schematic of the AVR boards

Subsystems overview The MinnRock II portion of the payload is split up into three specific areas: - Camera - GPS - AVR boards Each of the subsystems will be observed in further detail on the next slides

Camera We have recently talked with Wyoming and have decided that the optimal route for us to go is to have them utilize the optical port and take care of the camera, while we utilize the atmospheric ports with our spectroscopy experiments. We will therefore be “sharing” pictures and optical data. This means we will effectively be removing our camera from the experiment We will likely cut a space out of our tray in order to allow Wyoming ample space to center their camera on the window The question of structural integrity has been addressed with the addition of a “cut” in our plates, but any danger has been dismissed due to the presence of our steel plates

GPS New focus has been placed on the GPS in order to get it fully operational while integrated in our canister The antenna needs to be near the optical port, and has therefore been “hung” from our bottom tray in order to place it as close as possible to the port, and also to eliminate any interference from the steel trays This plan has been relayed to Wyoming in order to avoid the antenna bumping into the camera

Planned Changes to the RockOn! AVR boards Use the board to power on the video camera, which has its own battery pack and its own SD memory card. Do not wire it directly to the G-switch, lest it get turned off again during in- flight acceleration changes. Add an SD card slot to the AVR board for removable flash memory, rather than using a surface-mounted flash memory chip. Add a USB socket into which GPS will be plugged. The GPS will be powered through the USB cable and the GPS data will be returned through the USB cable, to be stored in the AVR board’s SD card. The 3-axis magnetometer chip will be wired directly to the AVR board, drawing power from the board and sending data into the AVR through 3 open input ports (port numbers TBA). The pressure sensor will be wired the same as the RockOn design, though we will use a 0-30 psi pressure sensor which will not over-range when the canister is pressurized. Rather than using a surface-mounted temperature sensor, use two standard 3-pin temperature sensors, one directly on the AVR board and the other mounted near the window and plugged into the AVR board (port numbers TBA)

Power Distribution SensorVoltage (V)Current (A)Power (W)Power x Quantity (W) Z-axis high range accel Z- axis low range accel X/Y-axis high range accel X/Y-axis low range accel Magnetometer16200 Hz4.32 MB Temperature22100 Hz0.72 MB Pressure11100 Hz0.36 MB Light Sensors66200 Hz4.32 MB GPS

Data Storage Requirements SensorNumber of Sensors Number of Outputs Channels Sampling RateTotal flight Memory Accel - Low Range23300 Hz3.24 MB Accel – High Range23100 Hz1.08 MB GPS MHz29.5 GB GPS11500 kHz900 MB Magnetometer16200 Hz4.32 MB Temperature22100 Hz0.72 MB Pressure11100 Hz0.36 MB Light Array6650 Hz1.08 MB Total Sensor Flight Memory MB

Additional Comments/Concerns We would still like to get a copy of the AVR board schematics that is modifiable to fit our experiment We will constantly be updating our solid models to fit the new design constrictions