Synchronization State Between Pre-turbulent Hyperchaotic Attractors G. Vidal H. Mancini Universidad de Navarra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Separability and entanglement: what symmetries and geometry can say Helena Braga, Simone Souza and Salomon S. Mizrahi Departamento de Física, CCET, Universidade.
Advertisements

From
Neural Synchronization Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
QUIZ Which of these convection patterns is non-Boussinesq?
The dynamic range of bursting in a network of respiratory pacemaker cells Alla Borisyuk Universityof Utah.
Cam-follower systems: experiments and simulations by Ricardo Alzate University of Naples – Federico II WP6: Applications.
Introduction to chaotic dynamics
Chaos course presentation: Solvable model of spiral wave chimeras Kees Hermans Remy Kusters.
Frequency-locking and pattern formation in the Kuramoto model with Manhattan delay Karol Trojanowski, Lech Longa Jagiellonian University Institute of Physics,
XPPAUT Differential Equations Tool B.Ermentrout & J.Rinzel.
Nonlinear Physics Textbook: –R.C.Hilborn, “Chaos & Nonlinear Dynamics”, 2 nd ed., Oxford Univ Press (94,00) References: –R.H.Enns, G.C.McGuire, “Nonlinear.
Polynomial Chaos For Dynamical Systems Anatoly Zlotnik, Case Western Reserve University Mohamed Jardak, Florida State University.
1 Universal Critical Behavior of Period Doublings in Symmetrically Coupled Systems Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National University Korea.
Dynamical Encoding by Networks of Competing Neuron Groups : Winnerless Competition M. Rabinovich 1, A. Volkovskii 1, P. Lecanda 2,3, R. Huerta 1,2, H.D.I.
Synchronization and Encryption with a Pair of Simple Chaotic Circuits * Ken Kiers Taylor University, Upland, IN * Some of our results may be found in:
10/2/2015Electronic Chaos Fall Steven Wright and Amanda Baldwin Special Thanks to Mr. Dan Brunski.
Control and Synchronization of Chaotic Dynamics in Laser Systems E. Allaria Sincrotrone Trieste Relatore: Prof. F.T. Arecchi Dipartimento di Fisica Universita’
Chaotic Stellar Dynamo Models Math 638 Final Project Rodrigo Negreiros Ron Caplan.
Dynamics of Coupled Oscillators-Theory and Applications
NON-EQUILIBRIUM IDENTITIES AND NONLINEAR RESPONSE THEORY FOR GRANULAR FLUIDS Hisao Hayakawa (Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University,
High Dimensional Chaos Tutorial Session IASTED International Workshop on Modern Nonlinear Theory (Bifurcation and Chaos) ~Montreal 2007~ Zdzislaw Musielak,
VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES Elena Martín Universidad de Vigo, Spain - Drift instabilities of spatially uniform Faraday waves.
THE ANDERSON LOCALIZATION PROBLEM, THE FERMI - PASTA - ULAM PARADOX AND THE GENERALIZED DIFFUSION APPROACH V.N. Kuzovkov ERAF project Nr. 2010/0272/2DP/ /10/APIA/VIAA/088.
Burst Synchronization transition in neuronal network of networks Sun Xiaojuan Tsinghua University ICCN2010, Suzhou
John Wordsworth, Peter Ashwin, Gabor Orosz, Stuart Townley Mathematics Research Institute University of Exeter.
UNIVERSITY OF MONTENEGRO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Igor DJUROVIĆ Vesna RUBEŽIĆ Time-Frequency Representations in Detection of Chaotic State in.
1 Mechanism for the Partial Synchronization in Coupled Logistic Maps  Cooperative Behaviors in Many Coupled Maps Woochang Lim and Sang-Yoon Kim Department.
1 Effect of Asymmetry on Blow-Out Bifurcations in Coupled Chaotic Systems  System Coupled 1D Maps: Invariant Synchronization Line: y = x  =0: Symmetrical.
Chaos in a Pendulum Section 4.6 To introduce chaos concepts, use the damped, driven pendulum. This is a prototype of a nonlinear oscillator which can.
11 Dynamical Routes to Clusters and Scaling in Globally Coupled Chaotic Systems Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National University  Globally.
Introduction: Brain Dynamics Jaeseung Jeong, Ph.D Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST.
Synchronization in complex network topologies
1 Universal Bicritical Behavior in Unidirectionally Coupled Systems Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National University Korea  Low-dimensional.
Víctor M. Castillo-Vallejo 1,2, Virendra Gupta 1, Julián Félix 2 1 Cinvestav-IPN, Unidad Mérida 2 Instituto de Física, Universidad de Guanajuato 2 Instituto.
Introduction to synchronization: History
1 Partial Synchronization in Coupled Chaotic Systems  Cooperative Behaviors in Three Coupled Maps Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National.
1 Synchronization in Coupled Chaotic Systems Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National University Korea Synchronization in Coupled Periodic.
Synchronization patterns in coupled optoelectronic oscillators Caitlin R. S. Williams University of Maryland Dissertation Defense Tuesday 13 August 2013.
Spontaneous Formation of Dynamical Groups in an Adaptive Networked System Li Menghui, Guan Shuguang, Lai Choy-Heng Temasek Laboratories National University.
1 Low Dimensional Behavior in Large Systems of Coupled Oscillators Edward Ott University of Maryland.
Entrainment of randomly coupled oscillator networks Hiroshi KORI Fritz Haber Institute of Max Planck Society, Berlin With: A. S. Mikhailov 
Amir massoud Farahmand
Chaos in Pendulum Power spectrum approach Deeder Aurongzeb Instructor: Dr. Charles Myles.
Control and Synchronization of Chaos Li-Qun Chen Department of Mechanics, Shanghai University Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Shanghai.
Chaos : Making a New Science
NanJing University of Posts & Telecommunications Synchronization and Fault Diagnosis of Complex Dynamical Networks Guo-Ping Jiang College of Automation,
1 Quasiperiodic Dynamics in Coupled Period-Doubling Systems Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National University Korea Nonlinear Systems with.
Spontaneous current induced by symmetry breaking in coupled oscillators NSPCS 1-4 July 2008 KIAS, Korea Fabio Marchesoni 1 / Hyunggyu Park 2 1 Universita.
Discrete Dynamic Systems. What is a Dynamical System?
Complexity Leadership Dynamical Systems & Leadership Jim Hazy July 19, 2007.
1 Symmetry Breaking and Conserving Blow-out Bifurcations in Coupled Chaotic Systems  Symmetrically Coupled 1D Maps Woochang Lim and Sang-Yoon Kim Department.
Arthur Straube PATTERNS IN CHAOTICALLY MIXING FLUID FLOWS Department of Physics, University of Potsdam, Germany COLLABORATION: A. Pikovsky, M. Abel URL:
Dynamic of Networks at the Edge of Chaos
Generalized synchronization on complex networks Guan Shuguang (管曙光) 16/10/2010.
Burtsing phenomena and analogies in neurodynamics
V.V. Emel’yanov, S.P. Kuznetsov, and N.M. Ryskin* Saratov State University, , Saratov, Russia * GENERATION OF HYPERBOLIC.
The intimate relationship between networks' structure and dynamics
Chaos in general relativity
S. Sabarathinam Research Scholar Under the guidance of
Ph. D. Thesis Spatial Structures and Information Processing in Nonlinear Optical Cavities Adrian Jacobo.
Spin-orbit interaction in a dual gated InAs/GaSb quantum well
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Handout #21 Nonlinear Systems and Chaos Most important concepts
Introduction to chaotic dynamics
Adrian Birzu University of A. I. Cuza, Iaşi, Romania Vilmos Gáspár
Introduction to chaotic dynamics
By: Bahareh Taghizadeh
Chaos Synchronization in Coupled Dynamical Systems
Periodic Orbit Theory for The Chaos Synchronization
W. Lim1, S.-Y. Kim1, E. Ott2, and B. Hunt2 1 Department of Physics
Presentation transcript:

Synchronization State Between Pre-turbulent Hyperchaotic Attractors G. Vidal H. Mancini Universidad de Navarra

Introduction Main Objective:  Study the synchronization states in hyperchaotic attractors. Motivation:  Gap in the literature.  Numerical and theoretical studies for preparing an experiment.

Introduction Object of study:  Bénard-Marangoni convection pattern.  Codimension-2 Takens-Bogdanov Bifurcation under square symmetry [1]. Method:  Lyapunov Exponents (LE) to detect synchronization states [2].  Phase Planes (PP) to characterize the synchronization state. [1] R. Hoyle, Pattern Formation, Cambridge Univ. Press (2006). [2] J. Bragard et al., Chaos suppression through asymmetric coupling, Chaos, 17, (2007).

Experimental System B-M convective time dependent pattern. PitchforkHopf Heteroclinic Connection [3] T.Ondarçuhu et al., “Dynamical patterns in Bénard-Marangoni convection in a square container”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3892 (1993).

The Model How can we model this pattern? d x = d·cosα α

The Model Symmetries in D 4 system mρmρ mρ2mρ2 mρ3mρ3 ρ m [1] R. Hoyle, Pattern Formation, Cambridge Univ. Press (2006).

Equation System Mathematical Model  4 variables  9 parameters [4] D. Armbruster, “Codimension-2 bifurcation in binary convection with square symmetry” pp , in Non-linear Evolution of Spatio-Temporal Structures in Dissipative Continuous Systems F.Busse and L. Kramer, Ed. Plenum Press, New York (1990).

Bifurcation System The equation system shows different dynamics according to the parameter values. a μ G.B. Midlin et al. “Comparison of Data from Bénard-Marangoni Convection in a Square Container with a Model Based on Symmetry Arguments”, IJBC, 4 (5) 1121 (1994).

Synchronization 2 identical systems are coupled with different initial conditions. System 1: Projection (x,y)System 1: Projection (z,w)

Synchronized System Coupled Oscillators Simplified Model

Synchronized System Coupled Oscillators Simplified Model

Synchronized System Using LE for detecting complete synchronization window. [2] J. Bragard, G. Vidal, C. Mendoza, H. Mancini, S. Boccaletti Chaos suppression through asymmetric coupling, Chaos, 17, (2007). Coupling Strength ε x Lyapunov Exponents

Synchronized System What happens outside the window? Coupling Strength ε x Lyapunov Exponents [2] J. Bragard, G. Vidal, C. Mendoza, H. Mancini, S. Boccaletti, Chaos suppression through asymmetric coupling, Chaos, 17, (2007).

Synchronized System Phase Planes ε x = 5.0 Plane x 2 vs y 2 Plane x 1 vs x 2 Plane w 2 vs z 2 Plane z 1 vs z 2

Synchronized System What happens inside the window? Coupling Strength ε x Lyapunov Exponents [2] J. Bragard, G. Vidal, C. Mendoza, H. Mancini, S. Boccaletti, Chaos suppression through asymmetric coupling, Chaos, 17, (2007).

Synchronized System Phase Planes ε x = 0.5 Plane x 2 vs y 2 Plane x 1 vs x 2 Plane w 2 vs z 2 Plane z 1 vs z 2

Synchronized System Sum of Positive LE Coupling Strength ε x Sum of Positive LE (mean values)

Synchronized System Synchronization Window Sum of Positive LE Coupling Strength ε x

Is this a general behaviour? Generalized Synchronization arises from Complexity Reduction?  We can compare this result with other systems, such as, Chen or Lü.

Hyperchaotic Chen Based on Chen System Sum of Positive LE Coupling Strength ε x

Hyperchaotic Lü Based on Lü System Sum of Positive LE Coupling Strength ε x

Conclusions The system’s complexity is reduced when the coupling strength is adjusted into a Lyapunov Exponents window. In TB system complete synchronization without chaos suppression exists for values of coupling parameter inside the window. The window in the LE also appears in the other systems studied together with a complexity reduction.

Future Works We are exploring if generalized synchronization in the LE window is a universal behavior. We are still looking for a minimum number of space- time sample points in order to synchronize two experiments. We are exploring to use an entrainment (or synchronization) test to validate the matching between the model and the experiment.

Publicity… Networks 08  Complex Systems, Spatio-Temporal Patterns, Networks…  