1 Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP) Fourth Cycle Becky Kemna, Coordinator School Improvement and Accreditation (573)

2 MSIP The Missouri School Improvement Program…Missouri’s system of accountability –review and classify the 524 school districts in Missouri within a five- year review cycle (since 1990) –mandated by state law –goal to promote school improvement within each district on a statewide basis –districts failing to earn accreditation face lapse or state takeover –July 1 begins first year of the 4 th MSIP Cycle

3 Standards and Indicators Outline the vision and expectations for quality schools. Organized into three sections: –Performance Standards (Student achievement) –Resource Standards (Pupil teacher ratios, course offerings, teacher qualifications) –Process Standards (compliance, instructional design and practices, school climate, differentiated instruction)

4 Third Cycle Annual Performance Report generated annually to evaluate performance standards Resource Report generated annually Process evaluated on-site by review team Number of points earned in Performance, Resource, and Process determine accreditation

5 What we’ve learned… APR does not accurately reflect improvement needs of all 524 districts APR scores are too volatile, leading to inconsistent accreditation decisions Reviews need to focus less on compliance and more on quality in order to facilitate true improvement in student performance Reviews should focus on improvement needs in districts as determined by available data at the school, subject, and grade level District level accreditation does not always reflect individual building status –leads to conflicts in accountability systems Resource and Process do not impact accreditation

6 Performance… “For an accountability system to be fair it has to be complicated.” Determines accreditation Status and Progress measures lead to More stability in APR calls More appropriate “recognition” Credit when achievement is adequate APR Provides more detailed, disaggregated data and evaluative, narrative feedback Identifies areas in need of improvement Used as a true “school improvement planning tool” Determines waiver eligibility (Limited Waiver or Full Waiver) Where we’re going …

7

DISTRICT SUMMARY OF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (APR)DATE County/District Code: «DISTCODE» District Name: «DISTNAME» MSIP Standard/ Indicator GRADE SPANGRADE LEVELTotal Points EarnedPoints Req Met/ Not Met Status Points Progres s Points Status Points Progress Points** Grade SpanGrade Level StatusProgressStatusProgress * 9.1*1 MAP Grades 3-5 Mathematics High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= 40 Status or 50 Status + Progress TOTAL= 9.1*2 MAP Grades 3-5 Communication Arts High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= 40 Status or 50 Status + Progress TOTAL= 9.1*3 MAP Grades 6-8 Mathematics High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= 40 Status or 50 Status + Progress TOTAL= 9.1*4 MAP Grades 6-8 Communication Arts High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= 40 Status or 50 Status + Progress TOTAL= 9.1*5 MAP Grades 9-11 Mathematics High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= 40 Status or 50 Status + Progress TOTAL= **No progress points may be earned for grade level test data in Year 1 of the Fourth MSIP Cycle.

9 MSIP Standard/ Indicator Status Points Progress Points Total Points Earned Points Required (Minimum) Met/ Not Met StatusStatus + Progress StatusStatus + Progress 9.3 ACTHigh 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= *1 Advanced Courses High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= Combined= *2 Career Education Courses High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= Combined= *3 College Placement High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= Combined= *4 Career Education Placement High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= Combined= Graduation Rate High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= Attendance Rate High 1= High 2= Avg= Blw Avg= Floor= Annual= Rlng Avg= 3 Over 2= 44

10 GRADESPANGRADESPAN GRADELEVELGRADELEVEL Performance Status and Progress Measures – SAMPLE YEAR 1, *1 MAP GRADE SPAN 3-5 Mathematics STATUSPROGRESS Status Measures MPI Score (5-Yr Avg) Status Points Earned Progress Measures Progress Points Earned Progress Points Possible Progress Measure Description High Annual10 per increase 4010 points for each annual MAP Performance Index (MPI) increase of 2 points. High Rolling Average 10 per increase 3010 points for each rolling average increase of 2 MPI points. Average Over points for an increase of 6 MPI points (latest three years averaged compared with the first two years averaged). Below Average Level Not Determined (LND): Zero (0) points will be awarded for grade span data when the LND is exceeded. Floor *1 MAP GRADE LEVEL 3-5 Mathematics STATUSPROGRESS Status Measures MPI Score (5-Yr Avg) Status Points Earned Progress Measures Progress Points Earned Progress Points Possible Progress Measure Description High 1NYA Annual High 2NYA Rolling Average AverageNYA 3 Over 2 Below Average NYA Level Not Determined (LND): Zero (0) points will be awarded for grade level data when the LND is exceeded. FloorNYA NYA=Not Yet Available Grade level status and progress details will be determined after Grade Level test results are available.

ACT STATUSPROGRESS Status Measures % (5-Yr Avg) Status Points Earned Progress Measures Progress Points Earned Progress Points Possible Progress Measure Description High %5Annual1 per increase 41 point for each 1% annual increase. High %4Rolling Average 1 per increase 31 point for each rolling average increase of 1%. Average %33 Over 2222 points for an increase of 2% (latest three years averaged compared with the first two years averaged). Below Average %2Status: % of graduates scoring at or above the national average on the ACT. Floor0-20.2%0 9.4*1 Advanced Courses STATUSPROGRESS Status Measures % 5-Yr Avg) Status Points Earned Progress Measures Progress Points Earned Progress Points Possible Progress Measure Description High %5Annual1 per increase 41 point for each 2% annual increase. High %4Rolling Average 1 per increase 31 point for each rolling average increase of 2%. Average %33 Over 2222 points for an increase of 5% (latest three years averaged compared with the first two years averaged). Below Average %2Combined: If the % of students enrolled in advanced and career education courses combined (Standards 9.4*1 and 9.4*2) are at or above the required Combined percentage, both standards are considered met. Floor0-32.4%0 Combined %4

12

13 Single-system of accountability reduces conflicts in accountability systems Resources allocated to provide assistance to schools that need it most School improvement efforts will be better coordinated to provide ongoing support Customized reviews will minimize paperwork/documentation necessary for on-site review Performance –Is more stable –Identifies areas in need of improvement –Allows districts to establish goals for improvement –More accurately reflects overall performance of district Summary

14 School Improvement and Accreditation (573) Questions/CommentsQuestions/Comments