Standard Photon ID performance in GMSB susy samples Helen Hayward University of Liverpool.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EOG Vocabulary Week of March 28, 2011 Math Words: Fractions and Properties.
Advertisements

Instructions for using this template. Remember this is Jeopardy, so where I have written Answer this is the prompt the students will see, and where I.
Year 10 Exam Revision 2 Groups of 4 Pupil A,B,C,D 1 point for each pupil.
PROLOG MORE PROBLEMS.
2 x0 0 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!. 2 x1 2 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!
2 x /10/2015 Know Your Facts!. 8 x /10/2015 Know Your Facts!
5 x4. 10 x2 9 x3 10 x9 10 x4 10 x8 9 x2 9 x4.
(1) MAX X1+3X2+2X3+4X4 X1=AM PHONE, X2=AM RIDE, X3=AFT PHONE, X4=AFT RIDE CONSTRAINTS AM: X1+20X2 < 12(60)=720 AFT: 2X3+30X4 < 14(60) = 840 GAS: X2+X4.
0 x x2 0 0 x1 0 0 x3 0 1 x7 7 2 x0 0 9 x0 0.
7x7=.
UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Lots of Plots Andrea Bangert Scipp meeting, March 2 nd, 2010.
Non-Pointing Photon Work at UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP ATLAS RPV/Long-lived Physics Group November Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Background studies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics May 6 th, 2010.
First Look at Conversions for Non-Pointing Photons US ATLAS Egamma Meeting March Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 26 August 2010 SUSY/MET Meeting.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
First Look at Conversions for Non-Pointing Photons US ATLAS Egamma Meeting March Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
Trigger efficiencies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics April 19 th,
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
SUSY with Photons and MET: Introduction and thoughts about Diphoton and Single Photon Analyses Annecy DESY/University of Hamburg Liverpool University Tokyo.
C.Clement MLP networks in 5 different η regions ROOT TMultiLayerPerceptron Weight events with pT x weight(type) Signal training samples: z->ee,W->ev/+jets,
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
CAT Physics meeting, 30 Aug CAT-SUSY progress report  Technical issues SUSYView, Datasets…  Simple inclusive analysis  Electron ID study  Event.
Missing Et Before and After Shutdown Yuri Gershtein.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
C.Clement Eta RegionTraining regionVariable set |  |
Ellie Dobson Z→ee and missing Et resolution In collaboration with Paul Prichard (Liverpool), Tony Weidberg (Oxford) Files produced.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Status of GMSB photons analysis Shilei Zang Bernadette Heyburn, Uriel Nauenberg University of Colorado, Boulder SUSYBSM WG3/WG4.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
1 Dead material correction status. Alexei Maslennikov, Guennadi Pospelov. Bratislava/Kosice/MPI Calorimeter Meeting. 8-December Problems with DM.
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
Elena Bruna Yale University
The truth information in the hadronic samples
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Maria Person Gulda , Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik,
Validation of valid3 samples Zee(106050) and Jpsiee(105751)
Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
R Value measurement from to GeV
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Hyeonjin Kim EG1 meeting, Feb 27, 2008
Ivan Hollins 08/05/06 The University of Birmingham
Presentation transcript:

Standard Photon ID performance in GMSB susy samples Helen Hayward University of Liverpool

Samples used Data samples: –GMSB1: shortlived neutralino-> standard pointing photons –GMSB2: Cgrav30 (non-pointing photons) –GMSB3: Cgrav55(non-pointing photons) –Background: JF17 is used. An eta cut of 2, pt cut of 20 GeV has been applied Using truth information to make sure I am only looking at photons whose parent is a susy particle.

Photon selection cuts. Corrected width in 3 strips Fraction of energy in strips Energy in strips outside core Corrected width in 3x5 cells in middle Total width using 40 strips

Photon efficiencies (cuts applied sequentially) GMSB1GMSB2GMSB3 isEM&0x2 (hadronic leakage) 0.92 isEM&0x4 (2nd sampling) isEM&0x8(1st sampling)

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.