1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
Develop an Information Strategy Plan
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
2025 Planning Contacts Meeting November 8, 2012 K-State 2025.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
© 2005 The Finance Project Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Oregon 21 st Century Community Learning Center Programs October 2011.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Identifying and Selecting Projects
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
SEM Planning Model.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Writing Grant Proposals. I. Cover letter II. Proposal Summary III. Organizational Description IV. Problem Statement V. Project Objectives VI. Methods.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Iron County Grant Writing Workshop August 20, 2003 By: Will Andresen Iron County UW-Extension.
ORC TA: Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Grant Program HRSA U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Health Resources & Services Administration.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Strategic Information Systems Planning
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Sustainability… Start Now for a Vibrant Future Sustainability Workshop for Persistently Dangerous Schools Grantees Philadelphia, PA Tuesday, September.
Strategic Planning Process for Affiliates [Insert Chapter or State Council Name Here] © SHRM 2009 Planning Today for Tomorrow’s Challenges Presented by.
Perinatal and Infant Oral Health Quality Improvement National Learning Network Estimated Number Awards: One (1) Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement Estimated.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Module CC3002 Post Implementation Issues Lecture for Week 1 AY 2013 Spring.
Developing a result-oriented Operational Plan Training
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Resource Development for Tobacco Control José L. Castro International Union Against Tuberculosis.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Nonprofit Association Finances & Fundraising Everett Ison 7 th District Commander.
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
1 The Washington State Board of Education Applying to Authorize: Authorizer Application and Evaluation Jack Archer, Senior Policy Analyst State Board of.
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
Planning for Results National Peer to Peer (NPtP) ROMA Training Project Goal 5 – Agencies improve capacity to Achieve Results.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Choosing Evidence-Based Approaches (Programs, Policies, Practices) A Comprehensive Framework.
NAVAA1 STRATEGIC PLANNING: “The Big Picture” OR A Linear Look at Strategic Planning.
Strategic Planning Crossing the ICT Bridge Project Trainers: Lynne Gibb Sally Dusting-Laird.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
COMPETENCY MAPPING ASSESSMENT & DEVELOPMENT BY : SUBHASHIS CHATTERJEE Sr. MGR (PERSONNEL)
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
June 12, 2004 Resource Planning CAUBO Meeting. June 12, 2004 Questions we want answered? How much investment will take us to where we want to be? How.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
Chapter 5 5 Planning C H A P T E R. Outcomes Differentiate between strategic planning and master planning. Understand the strategic and master planning.
Grants at Tyler Junior College. Presenters Fred M. Peters, Director, Public Affairs & Grant Development Daniel Pippin, Grants.
PROPOSED STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS DECEMBER 3, 2014 Port of Port Angeles.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Project Cycle Management
EC Strategy, Globalization, and SMEs
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
STRATEGIC PLANNING: “The Big Picture”
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling, cost and assessing impact –Key elements –Strategies for Attracting Support and Funding

2 Introduction: WHAT IS PROGRAM DESIGN? Definition: A prearranged set of activities designed to achieve a stated set of goals and objectives. in other words… It’s the process by which you decide what you want to do, how you plan to do it and how you plan on measuring your results.

3 The steps of program design generally fit into three main categories: Program Design:

4 Examples of different program design tools and uses Program Design: (cont.)

Phase I: Identifying the problem and assessing need –Covered in Day 1

6 Phase II: Strategic Planning To be a successful and effective, an organization must have a clearly defined and well-communicated vision, mission, objective, strategy and action plan. CRITICAL IN ATTRACTING FUNDING AND SUPPORT

7 Phase II: Strategic Planning (cont.) One example of a simple, flexible and adaptive strategic planning tool is: Vision Mission Objectives Strategies Action Plan

8 Phase II: Logic Models By plotting things out in if-then relationship, we are able to identify gaps, clarify assumptions and gain clear understanding of how process will work.

9 Phase II: Logic Models (cont.) Benefits to using a Logic Model: Provides clear guidance and an established structure for program implementers Enhances teamwork helps keep us from over- promisingGuides and helps focus work – helps keep us from over- promising Helps identify appropriate evaluation questions Provides coherence across complex tasks and diverse environments Identifies gaps in logic and uncertain assumptions Guides prioritization and allocation of resources Provides a clear and concise summary of the program to communicate to internal and external stakeholders

10 Phase II: Logic Models and Evaluation A Logic Model is not an evaluation model or tool – but you can use it to help you focus on the evaluation criteria that you’ll need to establish to be able to report accurate results and measure impact. Provides a program description that can guide the evaluation process –Helps match evaluation methods to the program –Helps identify the important evaluation criteria (what, where and when to measure) –Helps identify the key information

11 Phase II: Results Based Framework –Relies on carefully selected indicators to determine intermediate results and achievement of objectives –Defines cause and effect linkages between intermediate results and objectives –Sets expectations clearly –Provides opportunities to adjust implementation strategy mid-program –Like the logic model, it can be applied to almost anything, but is best utilized in when applied to projects in a broader context of meeting an organizational or government strategic objective.

12 Phase II: Results Based Framework Agency Objective Strategic Objective Intermediate Result Level 2 Intermediate Result Level 1

13 Phase II: Effectiveness Based Approach –Focus on assessing impact –Based on the concept that continual evaluation and adaptation = continual improvement –Identifies evaluation data required to assess impact in the planning stage –Applicable to programs providing direct services –Not useful for programs focused solely on: Advocacy Lobbying Fundraising

14 Phase II: Scheduling Develop a detailed work plan –Plans activities out at the start –Provides a guide for resource allocation Staff Materials Vehicles Equipment –Must match the detailed budget

Phase III: Measuring Costs Budget –Develop a realistic and comprehensive detailed budget –Include a short, thorough narrative to explain the numbers in the budget –If you include an indirect rate, be able to provide documentation to support it (audit) –Must match the work plan and address all activities –If you include cost share or matching, explain!

Phase III: Evaluating Impact Measure new data against data collected at the start of the project to determine intermediate or final impact –Accuracy is very important –Collection methods must be consistent –Track via a Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Set REALISTIC targets

Phase III: Addressing Quality and Sustainability Build in a focus on Quality and Sustainability in every step of your design. Every possible opportunity to secure local funding or support for the program should be explored, from beginning to end. Quality must be stressed as well – every chance to improve quality, from services to data collection to reporting of results, should be taken.

Key Elements Documentation of the results of the 3 Phases will serve as the basis for requests for support or funding. –If you do a thorough job planning the program, writing a proposal (for funding or support) will be fairly easy. –All requests for support should be comprehensive, well-written and tailored to a specific audience

19 Key Elements (cont.) Well designed programs factor in: Organizational Capacity and Mission Existing Management Systems Expertise and Experience (Past Performance) Monitoring and Evaluation Plans Work plans (Schedules) Budget/Cost Analysis (Detailed and Complete) A focus on Community Buy-In, Quality and Sustainability throughout

20 Key Elements (cont.) What makes a good proposal? Key personnel are known and respected by the donor Price is reasonable and competitive Substance is prepared by the technical experts who will implement and manage the program Have personal contact with the donor (if possible) and know what they need. Responsiveness to the RFP! Proposal is innovative, readable and well organized. Proposal does not argue against the donor’s priorities Proposal demonstrates it was given original attention (not boilerplate language) Good subcontractors to fill gaps and round out the team

Strategies for Attracting Support and Funding It depends…a lot of variables impact what types of funding an organization should seek. Among them: –Strength of Financial Management Systems –Past Performance and Experience –Expertise and Staff –Relationship with the Community –Size of the organization –Size of the targeted population –Capacity

Strategies… (cont.) Think Long Term Create a Funding Plan –Details how much it costs to run the current and anticipated programs over the coming years. Map it out and go after funding that fits into your plan. Approach one-time grants with an eye toward sustainability by securing local funding (municipal, through charging for services, etc.) to continue services after the grant ends.

Strategies… (cont.) Think strategically Partner Establish Networks and Relationships –Regionally and Nationally Know your audience –RFPs, Unsolicited Proposals, Community Support, etc.

24 Program Design Discussion and Questions