E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Advertisements

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
What it means for New Teachers
Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,
Oregon’s Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Presented by: ODE, OEA and Chalkboard Oregon Framework Oregon Framework.
Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness April 2011 CCSSO Ohio Principal Evaluation System.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
WPSD Educator Effectiveness 102
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
SSL/NYLA Educational Leadership Retreat New York State Teacher Evaluation …and the School Librarian John P. Brock Associate in School Library Services.
Science This school year, all of my 6 th grade science students will demonstrate measurable growth in their ability to apply the scientific practices.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION: Legal requirements after S.B. 290 Nancy Hungerford The Hungerford Law Firm Feb. 1, 2013.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 SOESD’S IMPLEMENTATION STAFF EVALUATION: LICENSED ADMINSTRATOR WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
MEASURES OF STUDENT OUTCOMES WPSD EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS 102.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support UPDATE Presented by the Oregon Department of Education November 19, 2012.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
 Multiple Measures Models and Lessons Learned. Student Growth and Professional Goal Templates  District Examples  Ashland  Lincoln Co.  North Clackamas.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
OTES AND TESTING AND BEARS… OH MY!!! WHAT IS HAPPENI NG?
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
What it means for New Teachers
Quality Compensation Program
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Five Required Elements
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
State Board of Education Progress Update
Presentation transcript:

E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013

SB290 Requirements New evaluation requirements for all licensed educators, with the goal to improve student academic growth and learning by: Need to use standards of Professional Practice: – Teachers – INTASC - Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (We have a crosswalk to the Danielson’s model) – Administrators – ISLLC - Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Differentiated Performance Levels: – Requires 4 levels – our current model has 4 levels (unsatisfactory, basic, proficient and distinguished)

SB290 Requirements Multiple Measures: Evaluation should include multiple measures from all three categories of evidence: – Professional practice: measures of the quality of a teacher’s planning, delivery of instruction, and assessment of student learning (ex. observations, lesson plans, student work, assessments, RTI data) – Professional responsibilities: measures of the teacher’s progress toward his/her own professional goals and contribution to school- wide goals (ex. professional goals, teacher reflection, setting student growth goals, peer collaboration, meets timelines) – Student learning and growth: quantitative measures of the teacher’s impact on a student (or sets of students) as measured by multiple sources of student data over time

SB290 Requirements Set two goals on student learning and growth from three categories. Student learning goals are required for all licensed staff, even teachers in non-tested (state test) subjects and grades (this includes counselors and TOSAs), and administrators. – State or national standardized assessments (ex. OAKS, ELPA) – Common national, international, regional, district- developed measures (ex. DIBELS, AP) – Classroom-based or school-wide measures (ex. student performances, tests, portfolios)

Examples of goals: “Using beginning of year assessment, I will identify the 25% of my kindergarten students with the lowest reading/pre-reading skills and provide targeted instruction so they exit kindergarten with skills no lower than pre-primer level.” Target based on Achievement Compact Target: Low percentage of 9th-graders “on track” GOAL: Increase from 50% to 60% students who have 6 or more credits at the end of 9th grade. Target based on common national measure: Target: Student growth in physical conditioning/ basic skills (elementary PE teacher). GOAL: Increase from 20 to 33% number of students in grades 1-6 scoring 80 or higher on Presidential Fitness Test.

P ENDLETON SD STUDENT LEARNING RUBRIC E XAMPLE ( S TATE OR NATIONAL STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS ):

SB290 Requirements Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle: – Critical steps in the cycle: self-reflection, goal setting, observations and collection of evidence, formative assessment, and summative evaluation – Required to discuss progress of goals mid-year and at end of year

Evaluation & Professional Growth Cycle Self-ReflectionGoal Setting Observation/ Collection of Evidence Formative Assessment/ Evaluation Summative Evaluation

SB290 Requirements Aligned Professional Learning: – Linking evaluations with high quality professional learning – Informs decisions for professional growth plans – Relevant to educator’s goals and needs Ongoing training: ⁻Calibration ⁻New teachers and administrators

N EXT S TEPS Continue conversation and work on student learning and growth goals Discuss evaluation cycle Discuss specialists evaluation (ex. counselors, TOSAs) Share out with administrators & staff at each building Update forms Plan training for administrators and staff Submit plan to ODE by June 30, 2013 Pilot evaluation system

Q UESTIONS ?