Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © 2009 University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Human Subjects Protection (HSP)
Advertisements

Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research Stacey Berg, M.D. Texas Children’s Cancer Center.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Conducting Ethical Research Slides Prepared by Alison L. O’Malley Passer Chapter 3.
Research Ethics The American Psychological Association Guidelines
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 14 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 14- Working with Human Subjects.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
CHAPTER 3 ETHICAL RESEARCH. MILGRAM’S OBEDIENCE EXPERIMENT Study of the phenomenon of obedience to an authority figure Examined the effects of punishment.
Ethics People should be treated as ends not means.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Ethical Treatment of Participants in Studies of Online Behaviors Barbara M. Wildemuth School of Information & Library Science University of North Carolina.
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Ethical Issues in Research
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
Howard University IRB Policies and Procedures
Ethical and Legal Issues Research Involving Drug Abuse and Mental Health Co-morbidities Among Youth NIDA-NIMH Conference May 23-24, 2000 Celia B. Fisher,
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract.
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
+ UW-Stout IRB News from the IRB New protocol form New online training New certification New staff.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Generating Research Evidence Ethically.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Patient Care & Ethical Dilemmas
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Class 9 Jeff Driskell, MSW, PhD
Chapter 3 Ethics in Research
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Chapter 4 Ethics.
Chapter 4 Ethics.
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Ethics of human research
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research

Research Ethics Ethics influence all aspects of inquiry: Subject recruitment Subject selection Treatment interventions Study implementation Research designs Measurement tools Data analysis Research reporting

Music Therapy Codes AMTA: Code of Ethics, 2003 Certification Board for Music Therapists: Code of Professional Practice, 2001

Ethical Principles 1.Respect for persons – respect for autonomy and protection for those with compromised autonomy (informed consent, privacy, confidentiality) 2.Beneficience – maximize benefits and minimize harm to subjects (risk/benefit analysis) 3.Justice – fairness in distribution of benefits and burdens (review of subject selection)

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Committee established to protect human research subjects Domain over studies conducted under auspices of its institution (hospital, university, etc.) Authority to approve, disapprove, or require alterations in research protocol Monitors research at regular intervals

Informed Consent 1.Capacity of the individual to understand the information presented about the study 2.Freedom of the individual to decide whether or not to engage in the study 3.Completeness of the information provided to the individual

Capacity Age Cognitive Functioning Physical Functioning Emotional Functioning Legally authorized representatives (guardians) can consent for a compromised individual

Assent Insuring Comprehension Information presented to subject in simple language (verbal or written) Often paired with consent when person is compromised Usually need both consent and assent when assent is used

Voluntariness Subject decides on basis of free will Needs time to decide Freedom to withdraw from study at any time (without prejudice) Influential Factors: capacity to understand, age, intimidation, authority of researcher, fear of incrimination or retaliation, dual relationships, etc.

11 Necessary Components Full Disclosure 1.Heading with title, names, and contact info 2.Invitation to participate 3.Purpose of the study 4.Description of procedures 5.Associated risks and discomforts of study 6.Associated benefits of study 7.Available alternative procedures 8.Assurance of confidentiality (privacy) 9.Contact information for researcher, IRB representative and contact for injury 10.Voluntariness statement and right to withdraw 11.Closing statement and signatures

Consent Written consent may be waived: when signing the contract will breach confidentiality when the research is low risk (survey)

Deception Researcher deliberately withholds information relevant to the study Actively – misinforms Passively – omits Can result in embarrassment, harm, anxiety, etc. Subjects can be informed that deception may be used (placebo)