The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 B-Physics Trigger in the TDR Demonstrate viable & affordable B-physics trigger based on the evaluation of two strategies:
Advertisements

ATLAS ATLAS PESA Meeting 25/04/02 B-Trigger Working Group Work-plan This talk:
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Steering Journée de réflexion – Sept. 14 th 2007 Till Eifert DPNC – ATLAS group.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
An Online Calorimeter Trigger for Removing Outsiders from Particle Beam CalibrationTests Denis O. Damazio José Manoel de Seixas Signal Processing Lab –
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 5.
CMS Alignment and Calibration Yuriy Pakhotin on behalf of CMS Collaboration.
1 Architecture of the ATLAS High Level Trigger Event Selection Software Monika Grothe, CERN EP, on behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ High Level Trigger group.
First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Algorithm / Data-flow Interface
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
The ATLAS High Level Trigger Véronique Boisvert CERN On behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ High Level Trigger Group Université de Montréal-McGill Seminar.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
ATLAS upgrades Xmass meeting Current ATLAS Operations ATLAS has been working very well  First beams in Sept recorded successfully by all sub- detectors.
1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai, Kazuhiko Hara (Univ. of.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
The ATLAS DAQ System Online Configurations Database Service Challenge J. Almeida, M. Dobson, A. Kazarov, G. Lehmann-Miotto, J.E. Sloper, I. Soloviev and.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Software for the CMS Cosmic Challenge Giacomo BRUNO UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium On behalf of the CMS Collaboration CHEP06, Mumbay, India February 16,
27 March 2003RD Schaffer & C. Arnault CHEP031 Use of a Generic Identification Scheme Connecting Events and Detector Description in Atlas  Authors: C.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
A Validation System for the Complex Event Processing Directives of the ATLAS Shifter Assistant Tool G. Anders (CERN), G. Avolio (CERN), A. Kazarov (PNPI),
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
More technical description:
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
integration in HLT-status and prospects
CHEP La Jolla San Diego 24-28/3/2003
Presentation transcript:

The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger Véronique Boisvert CERN On behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ High Level Trigger Group CHEP March 25th 2003

Outline Motivation Introduction The RegionSelector Tool Implementation Timing Results Conclusion

Motivation QCD Physics B Physics Higgs SUSY Top Exotics + ???  Discovery Potential! SUSY B Physics QCD Physics Higgs Top Exotics Need fast, reliable, easy to make Trigger Algorithms

Introduction bunch crossing rate: 40MHz 11m 23m 108 electronic channels ~1.6 MB/event 11m 23m

Introduction: Trigger Architecture

Introduction: Regions of Interest RoI Mechanism: Typically a few ROI / event Only few % of event data required! But more complex system

Sequence of Data Access See: Architecture of ATLAS High Level Trigger Event Selection Software tomorrow data store fetches requested collections only and caches them for subsequent requests unit of retrieval from the DAQ is 1 ReadOutBuffer possibility to do data preparation

Collections and Identifiers See “Use of a generic identification scheme connecting events and detector description in the ATLAS experiment” on Thursday Need to optimize collection granularity Trade off between judicious navigation for algorithms Minimize data access requests Use of offline identifiers In process of validating design of using “offline” code into “online” environment Facilitate development of algorithms Study boundary between Level2 and EF Allow performance studies for physics analyses Needed for Inner Detector Regions No Level 1 hardware identifier available

The Region Selector Tool Algorithms at Level2 have access to Level1 RoI regions Tool: Region in detector  Data collection identifiers Requirements Fast! Different geometrical region descriptions Cone Region following a track Etc. Code to be run in multi-threaded environment

Implementation: The RegionSelector At initialization Fill 2 maps for each layer Map < , set <identifiers>> Map < identifier, vector<min, max>> At Execution time: we want identifiers within < fmin, fmax> and <min, max> Loop over the layers Loop over f, get identifiers Loop over the identifiers and check  interval Return list of identifiers No duplicate identifier ensured EtaPhiMap

Implementation: data access granularity Preliminary

Implementation: Geometrical Regions CONE Implemented for outer most detectors TRT, LAr, Tile and Muon Simple: origin + h, Dh, f, Df WEDGE OF CHEESE Implemented for inner most detectors Pixel and SCT Complicated: origin, Dz, h, Dh(r), f, Df Realistic to account for LHC beam spread in z HELICAL ROAD Complicated: origin, 1/r (min), 1/r (max), tan q, f (min), f(max), h(min), h(max) Trajectory-oriented (for uniform B field) Future development

Timing Measurements Dh Improvements forthcoming Preliminary Using 1 GHz Pentium 3 Numbers in ms 4 GHz scaled (div 3) DF

Timing Measurements In Process of timing algorithms as well Offline way Fully timing instrumented TestBeds Running a Level2 LAr Calorimeter algorithm making use of Region Selector Preliminary numbers: O(1 ms) RegionSelector: 0.04-0.07 ms Small fraction of the algorithm time! << ~ 10 ms

Conclusion The ATLAS High Level Trigger relies on the Region of Interest Mechanism to access only relevant part of the detector The RegionSelector is the software tool used to extract the needed data collection identifiers based on some arbitrary geometrical regions The timing measurements show a very minimal overhead on the algorithms coming from this tool The RegionSelector tool will also be used for offline reconstruction of the data