Minimizing Peak Wait time at the Union Taco Bell IE 475 – Simulation Term Project Vijayendra Viswanathan Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering UW-Milwaukee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 Queueing Models
Advertisements

1 By Terence James Haydock Manufacturing Cell A simulated response in Arena.
Julian Archer Shannon Cummings Ashley Green David Ong.
Introduction into Simulation Basic Simulation Modeling.
GETTING STARTED !! TA: May Al Mousa Networking and Communication Systems Faculty of computer and information science.
MGTSC 352 Lecture 23: Inventory Management Big Blue Congestion Management Introduction: Asgard Bank example Simulating a queue Types of congested systems,
 1  Outline  Model  problem statement  detailed ARENA model  model technique  Output Analysis.
Chapter 22 Simulation with Process Model to accompany Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms 4th edition by Wayne L. Winston Copyright (c) 2004.
1 Simulation Lecture 6 Simulation Chapter 18S. 2 Simulation Simulation Is …  Simulation – very broad term  methods and applications to imitate or mimic.
1 Process Mapping BA 339 Mellie Pullman. 2 Objectives Service Process Differences Little’s Law Process Analysis & Mapping.
Chapter 13 Queuing Theory
Project Management Technique By: Penny Leahy Jackie Holohan.
Simulation.
Simulation with ArenaChapter 2 – Fundamental Simulation Concepts Discrete Event “Hand” Simulation of a GI/GI/1 Queue.
from Prof. Goldsman’s lecture notes
Introduction to Arena A Simple Simulation. Model1 We examine a simple model: parts arrive at a server, are served, and depart the system. There will be.
© 2004 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J F-1 Operations Management Simulation Module F.
JAMES YUNG DSES-6620 Simulation Modeling and Analysis Project Description: 1. ABSTRACT This report discusses and examines the results from a ProModel software.
MGTSC 352 Lecture 23: Congestion Management Introduction: Asgard Bank example Simulating a queue Types of congested systems, queueing template Ride’n’Collide.
Lecture 4 Mathematical and Statistical Models in Simulation.
Lab 01 Fundamentals SE 405 Discrete Event Simulation
Modeling Basic Operations & Inputs
Graduate Program in Engineering and Technology Management
Queuing Theory (Waiting Line Models)
Slide - 1 Dr Terry Hinton 6/9/05UniS - Based on Slides by Micro Analysis & Design An example of a Simulation Simulation of a bank: Three tasks or processes:
Truck set-up scheduling for the Elgin, IL facility Vijay Viswanathan, Graduate Student Dr. Jaejin Jang, Associate Professor Department of Industrial Engineering.
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis
Value Analysis/ Flow Analysis
Capacity analysis of complex materials handling systems.
Verification & Validation
Intro to Arena A Second Simulation.
Modeling Detailed Operations, Part II
Chapter 4 – Modeling Basic Operations and Inputs  Structural modeling: what we’ve done so far ◦ Logical aspects – entities, resources, paths, etc. 
1 Chapter 16 Applications of Queuing Theory Prepared by: Ashraf Soliman Abuhamad Supervisor by : Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh University of Palestine Faculty.
APPLICATION OF QUEUING THEORY TO WASHU DINING Presented by: Rohit Ray and Antonia Ferguson.
Chapter 10. Simulation An Integrated Approach to Improving Quality and Efficiency Daniel B. McLaughlin Julie M. Hays Healthcare Operations Management.
Single Minute Exchange of Die OR Quick Changeover
Structure of a Waiting Line System Queuing theory is the study of waiting lines Four characteristics of a queuing system: –The manner in which customers.
IE 429, Parisay, January 2010 What you need to know from Probability and Statistics: Experiment outcome: constant, random variable Random variable: discrete,
Chapter 2 – Fundamental Simulation ConceptsSlide 1 of 46 Chapter 2 Fundamental Simulation Concepts.
CSC 205 Programming II Lecture 22 Carwash Simulation.
ETM 607 – Input Modeling General Idea of Input Modeling Data Collection Identifying Distributions Parameter estimation Goodness of Fit tests Selecting.
Team # 2 Members: Sowmya Krishnaswamy Hakan Terzioglu Manu Mehan Jerome Tunaya.
Arena Simulation Language. Simulation with ArenaChapter 3 – A Guided Tour Through ArenaSlide 2 of 58 The Create Flowchart Module “Birth” node for entities.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
1 ISE 195 Introduction to Industrial & Systems Engineering.
Building Elevator System Simulation © 2012 ~ Mark Polczynski All rights reserved 1Building Elevator System Simulation.
(C) J. M. Garrido1 Objects in a Simulation Model There are several objects in a simulation model The activate objects are instances of the classes that.
Advantages of simulation 1. New policies, operating procedures, information flows and son on can be explored without disrupting ongoing operation of the.
Example 14.3 Queuing | 14.2 | 14.4 | 14.5 | 14.6 | 14.7 |14.8 | Background Information n County Bank has several.
Collection types CS Chakrabarti Motivation  Thus far the only collection types we have used are vector and matrix  Problem #1: given an input.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Queueing Theory.
Team 6th Project of Simulation Dormitory Restaurant Simulation Members: Chang-Su Jeon Wang Zhenguo Byung-Sun Park Min-Jung Geon.
Simulation modelling real processes to make predictions.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Cross-Dock Modeling and Analysis AUTHOR: Mehdi Charfi ADVISORS: Dr. Peter Hahn and Dr. Monique Guignard.
Chapter 2 Simulation Examples. Simulation steps using Simulation Table 1.Determine the characteristics of each of the inputs to the simulation (probability.
Chapter 1 What is Simulation?. Fall 2001 IMSE643 Industrial Simulation What’s Simulation? Simulation – A broad collection of methods and applications.
Manufacturing Simulation Case Studies
Computer Simulation Henry C. Co Technology and Operations Management,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
WAITING LINES AND SIMULATION
Example: A Hospital Emergency Room
Getting Started .Cont The Basic Process Panel
M6205 SYSTEM SIMULATION AND MODELLING TERM PROJECT
Introduction to Materials Management
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
Discrete Event “Hand” Simulation of a GI/GI/1 Queue
Chapter 5 Process Analysis.
Modeling and Simulation: Exploring Dynamic System Behaviour
ARENA.
Presentation transcript:

Minimizing Peak Wait time at the Union Taco Bell IE 475 – Simulation Term Project Vijayendra Viswanathan Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering UW-Milwaukee.

Overview Introduction Detailed System Description Data Collection and Modeling Issues The Model Output Analysis and Conclusion

Introduction Aim to reduce wait time at the Union Taco bell during peak time Simulation used to build a replica of the real world scenario Results Analyzed and an alternate model was proposed Alternate model validated using Simulation Resulted in an 86% reduction in wait time without any additional investment in either personnel or other resources.

System Description Employs 6 people for restaurant operations Two parallel assembly lines 3 people on each line –Steamer –Stuffer –Expediter 2 Grills, one on each line

Schematic of Restaurant Set-up Grill 1 Steamer 1Stuffer 1Expediter 1 Steamer 2Stuffer 2 Expediter 2 Grill 2 Take Orders Deliver Orders

Some Modeling Issues System Boundaries –A customer enters the system, when he/she joins the queue at the restaurant, and exits the system, when he/she leaves the delivery area with his meal. Scope of the Model –This model considers only peak time. i.e; between 12:00 and 1:30 everyday which is when, the restaurant is most busy. –At other times, there is virtually zero waiting time, as the passenger arrivals are slow enough that they can all be served immediately on arrival. –As such, it makes sense to only study and analyze this system through simulation, in peak time.

Data Collection Inter-arrival time: Personally recorded the arrival times of customers during peak-time on two different days, for half hour. –Then, Inter-arrival times were calculated by subtracting each arrival time from the previous one. –raw inter-arrival times fit into a best-fit probability distribution using the Input Analyzer Module in ARENA. [tools>fit>fit all] –best-fit distribution : * BETA (0.25, 0.881) seconds.

Data Collection Preparation time of different items – talked to the Manager of the restaurant, Ms. Lucy who has been running the restaurant for the past 5 years as also some of the employees who have working in the restaurant for sometime now. –Used TRIA to model ranges of values.

Data Collection choice of entrée during lunch-time [Spoke to Manager to obtain this data.] –approx. 30% - “Crunchwrap-Supreme + Taco” –25% - “Chicken/Cheese Quesadilla + Taco”, –“Cheesy gordita crunch” - 20% of orders. –Rest 25% was other miscellaneous orders. Discrete distribution used to model this information, using the preparation times obtained earlier. Miscellaneous orders modeled as “3 soft tacos”, which represents a typical order well, in terms of preparation time

The Model Screenshot

Output Analysis and Conclusions Basic Run –100 Replications –Warm-up time of half hour –Run length = 2 hrs. Results: –Average VA Time: s. –Average Wait time of a Customer: s. –Average Total time spent by a Customer in the system: s –Average Wait time on Line 1: s –Average Wait time on Line 2: s –Average Wait time on both lines: s –Flowtime – Order type -1: s –Flowtime – Order Type-2: s –Flowtime – Order Type-3:115.11s –Flowtime – Order Type-4:113.74s

Modifications Assign all orders that require grilling to line-1 and all orders that don’t to line-2. Put both grills on line-1, since line 2 now only processes orders that don’t require grilling. Expected to reduce wait time and make process more efficient

Results – Modified Model Average VA Time: Seconds. Average Wait time of a Customer: 49.6 Seconds. Average Total time spent by a Customer in the system: Seconds Average Wait time on Line 1: 7.65 s Average Wait time on Line 2: 7.59 s Average Wait time on both lines: 7.20 s Flowtime – Order type -1: 65.86s Flowtime – Order Type-2: 61.99s Flowtime – Order Type-3:31.68s Flowtime – Order Type-4:31.67s

Summary 86.14% reduction in average wait time 4 more customers served in the modified model compared to the base model. Represents an increased profit of $1872 per year, just for the 2 hour peak period. This doesn't take into account the increased rate of arrivals due to reduced wait time No extra investment in either people or capital

The End Questions?