Proposals for a Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy Preliminary draft Charging Schedule consultation 2011 Annex 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programme Athena Update by Martin Rayson Divisional Director HR & OD London Borough Barking & Dagenham London Heads of HR 25 th November
Advertisements

Child Poverty: The London Picture and the Child Poverty Bill Mary Hill Child Poverty Officer, London Councils.
Personalisation Workforce Building a workforce to deliver personalised adult social care Presented by Bernie Flaherty Divisional Director, Adult Social.
Benchmarking Ian Hawthorn Head of Network Management & Enforcement LB Hammersmith & Fulham.
LCE Local Government Energy Procurement Action Plan Michael Wood Head of Procurement, Haringey Council & Project Director 18 April 2007.
Page 1 An Academic Health Sciences Centre at the heart of a world city....
2009 Priorities & issues John Dickie Crossrail 2 Supporting London’s growth.
KHG Future Funding Workshop Community Infrastructure Levy – 14 June 2013 James Renwick Ashford Borough council.
This document is a Hanover Red residential investment quick report. The purpose of a quick report is to give an insight into the possibility of investing.
Christchurch Spitalfields 12 February Long Street workshops, Old Street Long Street workshops, Old Street Wood Wharf aspirational, E14.
Health and Wellbeing in the new NHS commissioning landscape 26 March 2012 Natasha Cooper Strategic Commissioning Development Manager.
This document is a Hanover Red residential investment quick report. The purpose of a quick report is to give an insight into the possibility of investing.
The Croydon Monitoring Report Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy December 2014.
Transforming Community Equipment Services Health & Wellbeing Board 26 th October 2011.
Housing benefit changes The impact in London West London Lead Members for Housing 16 th November 2010 Nigel Minto Head.
‘Forging new partnerships’ …to ‘support local action’ Well London Communities working together for a healthier city.
Occupied Households Child Benefit Records Dwelling Counts by Council Tax Band Households without Dependent Children Families with Dependent Children Population.
By Daniel Clements Royal Association for Deaf people Youth and Transition Service Coordinator.
The Recycling Challenge App RECYCLING RECYCLINGCHALLENGE.
Eleanor Davies Associate Director Joint Mental Health Commissioning Lewisham Clinical Commissioning Group and London Borough of Lewisham Commissioning.
Eleanor Davies Associate Director Joint Mental Health Commissioning Lewisham Clinical Commissioning Group and London Borough of Lewisham Commissioning.
SE London Housing Partnership – an introduction and an overview Mark Baigent London Borough of Greenwich.
This document is a Hanover Red residential investment quick report. The purpose of a quick report is to give an insight into the possibility of investing.
Thriving communities, affordable homes Housing provision: The new development framework Nick Taylor Head of Area, North West London Homes & Communities.
Sophos Anti Virus Stewart Duncan Technical Manager.
A Cluster view of quality using the General Practice Outcome Standards and Framework 5 th July 2012.
Current policy and delivery priorities and challenges for SW London LAs. Simon Latham, Executive Head of Community Living and Strategic Commissioning LB.
Council Tax Support and the Localisation of Revenues and Benefits Simon Horsington, MBA IRRV Simon Horsington and Associates.
Financing Growth in Local Authorities Alison Scott Assistant Director, Policy and Technical CIPFA.
Black, Minority Ethnic and Refugee Communities and Dementia Reflections from Implementing The National Dementia Strategy in London David Truswell Senior.
The derivations of London boroughs’ names in spite of the march of its history. Ekaterina Kotova 7 “A” form School № 10.
MOPAC CHALLENGE QUARTERLY PEFORMANCE OF THE MPS APRIL 2013.
London’s low carbon projects The role of communities.
Local Government Resource Review – Incentivising Growth Tony Travers LSE.
The London TB Plan Dr William Lynn Clinical Lead, TB project London Health Programmes 2012.
Brian Durrant Chief Executive, LGfL  Other LGfL Services  LGfL Finances.
TOTAL POLICING Most effective, efficient, loved & respected force in the UK Greatest and safest big city on earth Public services and communities tackling.
Introduction 1.What is The Clearing House? 2.What are TSTs? 3.Is this for me? 4.What happens next? 5.The future.
Map of London SURREY BERKSHIRE BUCKS HERTFORDSHIRE ESSEX KENT.
Thara RajImplementation Consultant - London London Oct 6 th 2009 Achieving effective intersectoral public health action A presentation to the London Public.
New Perceptions and Performance Data What the BVPIs tell us May 2007 Andrew Collinge Research Director, Local Government Research Unit.
The impact of commissioning changes on adults with Learning Disabilities Stephan Brusch Head of Health Access.
Hillingdon Harrow Ealing Brent Hounslow Barnet Enfield Haringey Waltham Forest Richmond Kingston Wandsworth Merton Sutton Croydon Bromley Lewisham Lambeth.
20mph – Benefits & Progress JTP Soundbites – 10 th November 2014 Jeremy Leach – London Campaign Co-ordinator.
PHE London / RCGP training online: New HCV Training in Small Bites Emma Burke, PHE London Alcohol and Drug Programme Manager.
Detective Superintendent Damian Allain. To tackle gang criminality in London by effective enforcement, suppression and proactive policing, working with.
1 Home Ownership Services LEASEHOLD MANAGEMENT FEE 31/10/12 Marco Pelazza, Home Ownership Manager REGENERATION & HOUSING.
What is the London cancer landscape? Report on London cancer intelligence Prepared by Katherine Henson, National Cancer Intelligence Network, QA by Ruth.
Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) update August 2015 London briefing London Knowledge and Intelligence Service, 4 August 2015.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
Progression to Higher Education from London FE and 6 th Form Colleges Hugh Joslin 1 ESRC HIVE-PED Project, Centre for Leadership and Enterprise, Faculty.
Community Infrastructure Levy – Charging Schedule.
1 “ Stop Before the Op: The short-term benefits of preoperative smoking cessation in London ” Dr Bobbie Jacobson OBE Director
“The Health Inequalities Targets What do they mean for London?” Justine Fitzpatrick David Hofman Dr Bobbie Jacobson Leading on Health Intelligence for.
1 Section 106: What they are and where we are DARREN WILDING DCLG.
Community Infrastructure Levy The fundamentals. Response to questions.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
Demystifying viability The local authority experience Dominick Mennie, Deputy Team Leader (Plan Making)
No.1 for Service and Value CIL – the experience Martin Howell, Group Planner – Policy & Information, Wandsworth Council
What has been achieved? Programme update 2016 Pilot update
Map of London HERTFORDSHIRE BUCKS ESSEX BERKSHIRE KENT SURREY.
Joint Waste Disposal Authorities Brexit position paper
Pan-London employment projects Helping long-term unemployed people back to work Yolande Burgess Strategy Director: Young People’s Education & Skills,
VULNERABLE FAMILIES MOVING FROM LONDON TO ESSEX
CIL In London CIL IN LONDON February 2019.
Improving hospital discharge pathways in East London
1. Remaining 2 hubs to go live in June
EHCH Workforce Training and Development
Improving hospital discharge pathways in East London
Presentation transcript:

Proposals for a Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy Preliminary draft Charging Schedule consultation 2011 Annex 2

This presentation will cover… Why is the Mayor introducing a CIL? Why is Crossrail important for London? Who benefits? Common CIL misconceptions

How the CIL works in London Mayor/boroughs both charging authorities Mayor restricted to using CIL for transport Boroughs collect Mayoral CIL Both can pay admin costs from CIL: 4% boroughs 1% Mayor Boroughs have to have regard to Mayoral CIL in setting their own

What is the Mayor consulting on? Preliminary draft Charging Schedule Mayor has issued a consultation document: Explaining the CIL Explaining Crossrail and its funding Setting out the preliminary draft schedule (section 3) Summarising the evidence on viability Explaining the judgements made by the Mayor in bringing the proposals forward

Why is the Mayor setting a CIL? Mayors current proposals just for Crossrail Will review position for post-2018 later CIL to contribute £300 million Plays a significant part in funding arrangements agreed by Mayor/Ministers If sum is not raised from CIL: Possible need to renegotiate funding agreement Possible delay in project Possible pressure on other parts of TfL budget

The Londonwide benefits of Crossrail The Mayors top strategic transport priority for London (draft new London Plan) Links, and support development of, key parts of London: Heathrow, West End, City, IoD, Thames Gateway Alleviate pressure on network Generates annual economic, transport and employment benefits of £1.24 bn by 2026 Benefits every borough in London (£ m pa) Will benefit anyone travelling on it, or lines/stations where it will relieve congestion

The rates proposed ZoneLondon boroughs Rates (£ per sq. m.) 1 Camden, City of London, City of Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Richmond-upon-Thames, Wandsworth £50 2 Barnet, Brent, Bromley, Ealing, Greenwich, Hackney, Haringey, Harrow, Hillingdon, Hounslow, Kingston upon Thames, Lambeth, Lewisham, Merton, Redbridge, Southwark, Tower Hamlets £35 3 Barking and Dagenham, Bexley, Croydon, Enfield, Havering, Newham, Sutton, Waltham Forest £20

Proposed differential rates/reliefs Zero rates for development for use for: Education Health For viability reasons No proposals for discretionary reliefs Better to deal with viability by adjusting s106, makes administration by boroughs easier Avoiding double charging between CIL and Crossrail s106 to be dealt with by the former being a credit towards the latter

Assessing Viability Viability: Fundamentally about values of land and existing uses But recognise land availability also essential House prices used as an indicator of viability Residential largest form of development Good correlation between house prices and shop/office rents – so a valid proxy Use house prices to: Assess viability Allocate boroughs by band

Viability: Conclusions Banding means CIL as a % of house prices similar for 1&2 and slightly lower in 3 – where fundamentals are weakest Have to consider land availability when looking at levels of development against prices Movement in construction costs/capital values likely to have far greater viability impact than CIL CIL at the levels proposed will not put at serious risk the overall development of Greater London

Mayors conclusions (1) Evidence presented meets legal standards Approach to viability appropriate given: Data availability (lacking at sub-borough level) Nature of judgement Use of CIL for Crossrail appropriate Particularly as it benefits all parts of London Amounts proposed should not have an undue impact on development

Mayors conclusions (2) CIL should not have undue impacts on Londons development: 40% of London Plan Opportunity Area housing and 21% employment capacity in band % of identified housing capacity in Band 2; 22% in Band 3 CIL should not have adverse equalities impacts 65% of Londons BAME population live in Band 2, 20% in Band 3

Mayors conclusions (3) Effect on borough s106/CIL take Average Mayoral CIL take: £42.8 m pa total London s106: £1.6 bn £1.3bn affordable housing £300m other With agreements from 7.1% of developments Wider pool Not a £1 for £1 zero sum game

Couldnt we… Borrow more? No – both TfL and GLA are already borrowing as much as is prudent Find the money elsewhere in the TfL budget? No – this would mean renegotiating the Crossrail funding package and either cancelling or postponing other transport priorities Renegotiate the funding package? No – no Government appetite for this, would risk delaying the project and adding to its cost Get districts outside London served by Crossrail to contribute? Mayor is lobbying ministers to this end – but has no powers to compel them himself

Couldnt we… Split Band 2 in half? We will look at this if a viability case can be shown, but would add to complexity Move particular boroughs from one band to another? Again, will consider if a viability case exists Exempt particular places/uses? This is very difficult to do within the regulations, and a strong viability case would be needed

Couldnt we…. Arrange bands according to how much benefit each borough gets from Crossrail? No – the legislation is clear that this can only be done on the basis of development viability

Next steps Preliminary consultation closes 1 March 2011 Consult on draft schedule: May Submit to examiner: June/July Examination: September Mayor approves schedule: April/May 2012 Subject to change in light of Localism Bill

In the meantime.. We will work with boroughs on implementation We will work with boroughs setting their own CIL: Officers from GLA/TfL meeting Redbridge – the only borough to propose a CIL so far We will be playing a full part in the CLG Frontrunners Group We will provide as much assistance as we can to boroughs in infrastructure planning This is a new system, and we are keen to listen