FEMA/ EARTH SCIENCE ASPECTS OF HAZUS Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation Oakland, CA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.
Advertisements

Lisbon, May 24 th and 25 th 2007, LESSLOSS Dissemination workshop Simulating Earthquake Scenarios in the European Project LESSLOSS: the case of the Metropolitan.
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
TBI Committee Members Y. Bozorgnia C.B. Crouse J.P. Stewart
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps - Inputs and Status Choi Yoon Seok Jennifer S. Haase Robert L. Nowack Purdue University.
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Kickoff MeetingApril 20, 2010.
Local Site Effects Seismic Site Response Analysis CEE 531/ESS 465.
Use of Paleoseismic Data in Seismic Hazard Analysis: Examples from Europe K.Atakan and A.Ojeda Institute of Solid Earth Physics University of Bergen Allégt.41,
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Section 19.4 – Earthquakes and Society
Earthquakes Presented you to by the Hazard Committee Madeline Galac Nicole Barstrom.
Science for a changing world The USGS and the Development of the Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Preliminary PEER-NGA Ground Motion Model Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs PEER-NGA Workshop 7 December 3, 2004.
Earthquakes. Figure 11.8 Figure 11.9A Figure 11.9B.
PEER “Sponsored” Research Projects Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER Associate Director October 9, 2007.
Rose School Lectures – 2013 S. Akkar and D. M. Boore Engineering Seismology & Seismic Hazard Assessment HAZARD and RISK, TECTONICS, EARTHQUAKES and FAULTS.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part III Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
Earthquakes. Given information on Earthquakes, you will be able to describe, in writing: a) what an earthquake is; b) what the elastic rebound theory.
Chapter 5 EARTHQUAKES and ENVIRONMENT. Earthquakes Violent ground-shaking phenomenon by the sudden release of strain energy stored in rocks One of the.
Making better reinsurance decisions… Measuring seismic risk in Turkey: Latest modelling techniques Karl Jones June 3, 2003 ©Copyright 2003 Willis Limited.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Earthquake Hazards.
Daily Review #4 Describe the 4 different pieces of evidence to support continental drift How does convection cause a plate to move? Discuss your answer.
Feasibility Level Evaluation of Seismic Stability for Remedy Selection Senda Ozkan, Tetra Tech Inc. Gary Braun, Tetra Tech Inc.
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Living in Earthquake Country Concept Maps. Overview Evidence from past earthquakes can help us predict the amount of damage to expect from future earthquakes.
Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.
Many Faults, Many Rupture Scenarios for So. NV J. Louie, EGGE 3/25/2011  Japan and Christchurch Lesson: Don’t Ignore Worst Case! dePolo, 2008, NBMG Map.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
Earth Science Mr. Barry.  Focus : the point where an earthquake originates  Epicenter : the point on Earth’s surface directly above the focus  Fault.
INCORPORATION OF EARTHQUAKE SOURCE, PROPAGATION PATH AND SITE UNCERTAINTIES INTO ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Bob Darragh Nick Gregor Walt Silva.
1 Ivan Wong Principal Seismologist/Vice President Seismic Hazards Group, URS Corporation Oakland, CA Uncertainties in Characterizing the Cascadia Subduction.
GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS AT RAPID RESPONSE SITES IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Anibal Ojeda 3, Kuvvet Atakan 1, Mustafa.
GIS APPLICATIONS IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING: NORTHWEST TURKEY
Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)
Tri-State Seismic Hazard Mapping -Kentucky Plan
Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Cascadia Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes Based on a Stochastic Finite-Fault Model Nick Gregor 1, Walter.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Ground Motion and Building Response. Building Oscillation Seismic Simulation Thanks to FEMA, for original design.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Printout 4 slides per page, give for questions by
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
Mapping of Liquefaction hazard for Salt lake and Weber Counties, Utah
NGA Dataset Brian Chiou NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting
2020 NEHRP Provisions Issues Ground Motion
What are Earthquakes? The shaking or trembling caused by the sudden release of energy Usually associated with lithospheric plates moving against each other.
Project 17 Report to Provisions Update Committee April 12, 2017
Earthquake Magnitude and Intensity
M7.1 RABOSA EARTHQUAKE 1:15 PM; September 19, 2017
Section 4: Earthquakes and Society
NGA-East Tentative Plan
NEHRP Research: U.S. Geological Survey
Chapter Menu Lesson 1: Earthquakes and Plate Boundaries
DO NOW Pick up notes sheet..
Section 4: Earthquakes and Society
Essential Question: How does Earth's composition change the landscape
There are more than 30,000 earthquakes worldwide each year!
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Chapter 2 Vocabulary Review
Preliminary PEER-NGA Ground Motion Model
End-Users Needs in Seismic Hazard Analysis
Types of Plate Boundaries
Web Pages.
Presentation transcript:

FEMA/ EARTH SCIENCE ASPECTS OF HAZUS Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group URS Corporation Oakland, CA

FEMA/ 2 HAZARDS CONSIDERED IN HAZUS  Ground Motion  Ground Failure –Liquefaction (Settlement and Lateral Spreading) –Landslide –Surface Fault Rupture  Tsunami / Seiche

FEMA/ 3 SOURCES OF GROUND MOTION INPUT IN HAZUS  Deterministic Analysis (Scenario Earthquakes) –User specifies location and earthquake magnitude –WUS fault, historical epicenter, or arbitrary epicenter  USGS National Probabilistic Hazard Maps (500 and 2500 yr maps)  User-Supplied Deterministic or Probabilistic Hazard Maps

FEMA/ 4 CALCULATION OF SCENARIO GROUND MOTIONS IN HAZUS  Select scenario earthquake  Use rock attenuation relationships  Standard shape of response spectra (pga, pgv, 0.3 and 1.0 sec SA)  Amplify rock ground motions using 1997 NEHRP Provisions

FEMA/ 5 WESTERN U.S. ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIPS IN HAZUS  Boore et al. (1993; 1994)  Sadigh et al. (1993)  Campbell and Bozorgnia (1994)  Munson and Thurber (1997) - Hawaii  Youngs et al. (1997) - Subduction Zones

FEMA/ NEHRP SITE CATEGORIES AHard Rock(> 1500 m/sec) BRock( m/sec) CVery Dense Soil and Soft Rock( m/sec) DStiff Soils( m/sec) ESoft Soils(< 180 m/sec) FSoils Requiring Site-Specific Evaluations

FEMA/ 7 SOIL AMPLIFICATION FACTORS

FEMA/ 8 HOW CAN HAZUS RESULTS BE IMPROVED? Answer:Develop hazard maps at a fine special resolution which incorporate region- and local-specific source, path, and site effects