2008 and Beyond Carol Moylan Chief, National Income and Wealth Division National Economic Accounts Data Users’ Conference Washington, DC April 13, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KLEMS and the NIPAs J. Steven Landefeld, Director World KLEMS Conference Harvard University August 20 th, 2010.
Advertisements

KLEMS & the Canadian SNA Karen Wilson Assistant Chief Statistician National Accounts & Analytic Studies Statistics Canada.
BEA’s KLEMS Statistics: Measuring Outputs and Intermediate Inputs
BEAs Industry Accounts: Improved Measures of Outputs, Inputs, and Value Added Erich H. Strassner World KLEMS Conference Harvard University.
Relationship and Consistency between BEAs Industry and National Economic Accounts Jiemin Guo OECD-NBS Workshop Beijing, China September 21-24, 2007.
Major Changes in the Presentation of the U.S. National Accounts Brent Moulton, Yvon Pho, and Robert Yuskavage Bureau of Economic Analysis.
1st Meeting of the Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services Statistics - September 2008 Australia's experience (so far) in.
Annual Industry Accounts Overview George Smith & Nicole Mayerhauser Current Industry Analysis Division Bureau of Economic Analysis Industry Accounts Users’
2006 BEA Government Statistics Users Conference The Government Division’s Research Program: 2004 – 2006 and Beyond Brooks B. Robinson Chief, Government.
Institutional Framework for Economic Statistics in Decentralized System J. Steven Landefeld Director Friends of the Chair Group on Integrated Economic.
United Nations Statistics Division Revision policy and dissemination practices Training Workshop on the Compilation of Quarterly National Accounts for.
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE TurkStat NATIONAL ACCOUNTS IN TURKEY 1 TurkStat.
BEA Economic Areas Aligning Workforce & Economic Information Association of Public Data Users APDU 2008 Annual Meeting The Brookings Institution Washington,
United Nations Statistics Division Scope and Role of Quarterly National Accounts Training Workshop on the Compilation of Quarterly National Accounts for.
Backcasting National Accounts Data Examples from United States Experience Brent Moulton Advisory Expert Group on National Accounts Washington.
GDP & Beyond: Measuring Economic Progress & Sustainability SGE Annual Conference September 21st, 2009 J. Steven Landefeld, Director.
Acceleration Update: BEA’s New Release Schedule for Local Area Personal Income and Product Statistics Jim Zavrel Association for University Business and.
Integration, KLEMS and the NIPAs J. Steven Landefeld, Director World KLEMS Conference Harvard University August 20 th, 2010.
Issues in Compensation and Profits Kurt Kunze National Economic Accounts Data Users’ Conference October 15, 2007.
1 Report on the Income- and Product-Side Estimates of Output Growth Comments Steve Landefeld Brookings Panel on Economic Activity March 19,
Update on NIPA Projects and Plans Brent Moulton BEA Advisory Committee Washington, DC May 6, 2011.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Presentation to the National Association for Business Economics December 17, 2003 Overview of the 2003 Comprehensive Revision.
OECD Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Analysis of revisions for short-term economic statistics Richard McKenzie OECD OECD Short.
A Review ISO 9001:2015 Draft What’s Important to Know Now
Intellectual Property & the Economy J. Steven Landefeld, Director “Intangible Assets in Corporate Reporting and National Accounts” A Policy.
WORKING PARTY ON NATIONAL ACCOUNTS Paris, 3-5 October 2007 Revisions in Quarterly GDP of OECD Countries: An Update Document STD/CSTAT/WPNA(2007)15 Richard.
CATASTROPHIC NATURAL DISASTER AND NATIONAL ACCOUNTS: JAPAN’S EXPERIENCE Working Party on National Accounts, OECD, Paris October, 2011 Kosuke SUZUKI.
Official Statistics and the Age of Turbulence J. Steven Landefeld May 12 th, World Congress on National Accounts.
United Nations Statistics Division
Overview of the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Accounts at the BEA Robert L. Brown Calibrating the Nevada Economy: Data Tools for Assessing Our State.
Territorial Adjustments in Government Transactions BEA Government Statistics Users Conference, Sep. 14, 2006 Benyam Tsehaye Economist, Federal Branch.
Looking Ahead: 2013 NIPA Comprehensive Revision Brent Moulton BEA Advisory Committee Washington, DC May 11, 2012.
Review of the latest development of the SNA 1993 and the related data collection requirements Giovanni Savio Chief, Economic Statistics Section Statistics.
PCE Statistics for Food and Energy Clint McCully Chief, Research Group National Income and Wealth Division APDU Annual Conference September 25, 2008.
NIPA – Flow of Funds Accounts Integration BEA Government Statistics Users Conference Charlotte Anne Bond Special Studies Branch September 14, 2006.
Revised Treatment of Disasters in the NIPAs and FAAs Preview of the 2008 NIPA Comprehensive Revision Nicole Mayerhauser National Economic Accounts Data.
Overview of the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Accounts at the BEA Robert L. Brown Monitoring Mississippi: Data & Tools for Understanding Our State.
BEA Regional Data – A Guided Tour of Washington Mauricio Ortiz Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Conference Spokane, Washington May 16, 2013.
Annual I-O Update of RIMS II The Effects of Changes in National and Local Economic Conditions on the Model’s Output Zoë O. Ambargis 65.
An Overview of BEA’s Other Data Programs Charles Ian Mead PNREAP Regional Workshop Reno, NV September 29, 2009.
BEA’s REGIONAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTS : AN UPDATE Joel D. Platt C2ER Annual Conference Oklahoma City, OK June 8, 2012.
GDP-by-Metropolitan Area Statistics Accelerated Release of Data for 2008 Sharon D. Panek Association of Public Data Users Online December 10,
BEA’s State and Local Area Personal Income Robert L. Brown Navigating the Nevada Economy Reno, NV September 29, 2009.
BEA’s Regional Economic Accounts: Past Improvements and What Lies Ahead for the Regional Program Robert L. Brown Calibrating the Nevada Economy: Data and.
Quarterly GDP by Industry Progress and Prospects Robert E. Yuskavage IAD Data Users’ Conference October 26, 2007.
Looking Beyond the Core Accounts: Research at the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Barbara M. Fraumeni Chief Economist Bureau of Economic Analysis U.S.
Rapid Estimates of U.S. GDP: BEA’s Dissemination of and Communication Policy for “Advance” GDP Estimates Dave Wasshausen International Seminar.
Benchmark Input-Output Accounts Mary L. Streitwieser, Stas Rzeznik, and Nicholas Empey Industry Benchmark Division Industry Accounts Users’ Conference.
Producing Economic Statistics for Scotland Sandy Stewart Senior Statistician Office of the Chief Economic Adviser 4 October 2007.
BEA Government Statistics Users Conference Government Insurance Programs Benjamin A. Mandel Bureau of Economic Analysis September 14, 2006.
Toward a Satellite Account for Health Ana Aizcorbe NEA Users’ Conference April 13, 2007.
Big Data in the National Accounts Experience in the United States Brent Moulton Advisory Expert Group on National Accounts Washington, DC 9.
U.S. Quarterly GDP by Industry Accounts: Methods and Research Results Brian C. Moyer 13th OECD-NBS Workshop on National Accounts Haikou, China.
Experimental Industry Estimates in BEA’s R&D Satellite Account Carol A. Robbins Industry Accounts Data Users Meeting October 26, 2007.
Cyclical Indicators for the United States Carol Moylan Third International Seminar on Early Warning and Business Cycle Indicators Moscow, Russian.
“Looking Ahead" BEA Regional Data Developments Going Forward James M. Zavrel Navigating the Nevada Economy Reno, NV September 29, 2009.
National Economic Accounts: What’s New and What’s Coming Carol E. Moylan National Economic Accounts Data Users’ Conference October 15, 2007.
BEA’s Local Area Statistics Mauricio Ortiz National Association of Counties Economic & Workforce Development Steering Committee Washington,
BEA Regional Outreach: Building New Alliances Robert L. Brown AUBER Annual Conference Bellingham, WA October 12, 2008.
New Interactive Tables: Accessing Regional Data Association for University Business and Economic Research October 9, 2011 Nicholas Empey.
Priorities for the Industry Accounts FY2008 and Beyond Erich H. Strassner Industry Accounts Users’ Conference October 26, 2007.
Karen Wilson Assistant Chief Statistician National Accounts & Analytic Studies Statistics Canada Productivity Measurement in the CSNA.
Flexible Annual Revisions Overview and Status Robert E. Yuskavage National Economic Accounts Data Users’ Conference April 13, 2007.
1 U.S. Health Care Expenditures in the NHEA and in GDP Robert Kornfeld U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Pan American Health Organization Washington,
Flexible Annual Revisions Brian C. Moyer Chief, Government Division National Economic Accounts Data Users’ Conference New York, NY March 15, 2007.
Agenda item 7b Implementation of the Action Plan for Improvement of National Accounts Statistics in Azerbaijan N. Suleymanov State Statistical Committee.
Training in National Accounts and Documentation for Users
Canadian Culture Satellite Account, 2010
COMPREHENSIVE REVISION OF JAPANESE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS: UPDATE ON JSNA
South African National Accounts benchmarking experience
Presentation transcript:

2008 and Beyond Carol Moylan Chief, National Income and Wealth Division National Economic Accounts Data Users’ Conference Washington, DC April 13, 2007

2 Comprehensive Revisions of the NIPAs  BEA prepares annual revisions of the NIPAs each July and comprehensive revisions every four to five years based on the release of the benchmark I-O table.  Revisions provide opportunity to make improvements to accounts as outlined in BEA’s strategic plan.  Next comprehensive revision will be released in October 2008.

3 Why have Comprehensive Revisions? ▪To incorporate benchmark I-O accounts ▪To keep up with a dynamic economy ▪To address data gaps and other shortcomings ▪To make the full time series consistent ▪To improve consistency and integration with other accounts ▪To improve consistency with international guidelines

4 Problem with Past Comprehensive Revisions Past comprehensive revisions: ▪Placed huge workload and stress on NEA staff:  More than 100 proposals were submitted for the 2003 revision;  Pressure to submit proposals because the next opportunity to make a needed change wouldn’t occur for another 4 or 5 years. ▪Place a large burden on users:  Several large changes to absorb at once.  Customers have been frustrated by the delays in release of tables in recent comprehensive revisions.

5 Future Comprehensive Revisions ▪Will continue to:  Incorporate latest benchmark I-O table.  Update the reference year for index numbers.  Address data gaps and improve consistency with other accounts. ▪Will provide option that definitional or major methodological changes may be implemented in a future annual revision.

6 Major Improvements for 2008 ▪Changes in definitions and classifications -- new treatment of disasters. ▪Changes in presentation (tables) -- new PCE classification. ▪Changes in source data and statistical methods -- misreporting of income.

7 Beyond 2008: Flexible Annual Revisions ▪Because of improvements in database technologies, number of years open to revision no longer the problem for users that it was previously. ▪Allow major changes to be introduced without waiting for comprehensive revisions. ▪BEA will focus on limited major changes in any given annual revision.

8 Flexible Annual Revisions (continued) ▪Better integration with Annual I-O and GDP by Industry estimates. ▪Priority will be given to proposals that are complete and ready for implementation. ▪Limited number of changes improves dependability and delivery of revised tables.