Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 5: Correcting Noncompliance and Systems of Internal Control.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
Title I LEA and Peer Review Process of School Improvement Plans Kokomo Center Schools Kokomo, IN.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) – Module #5 Requirements for LEAs Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Additional.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Webcast Section 6: Overview of PCSA and Validation Activities 1.
Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment (PCSA) Webcast Section 2: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Sampling.
Correction of Non-Compliance Prior to Notification Monitoring and Supervision March 11, 2013.
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
Hospital Patient Safety Initiatives: Discharge Planning
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
Legal Update Allison Markoski, Marge Resan, Paul Sherman, Christina Spector, Patti Williams Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 3: Conducting the Self-Assessment: Evaluating Compliance.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment (PCSA) Webcast Section 4: Reporting Results and Corrective Actions Using the Electronic Reporting System 1.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
Indicator #13 Question 1 Virginia Department of Education 1.Did the LEA hold an IEP meeting to discuss measurable postsecondary goals for the student.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Transition from PSEI to Kindergarten or First Grade November 17, 2011.
Aren’t they all the same? Differences Between Part B, Part C, and Michigan Mandatory Special Education (MMSE) Teri Johnson Assistant Director of Special.
Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 6: Validation and Verification Activities.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
IDEA FORMAL COMPLAINTS Administrative Accountability Branch Kentucky Department of Education Understanding the Self-Investigation Process.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Monitoring in California Special Education Division California.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Top Ten Policy Tips for Special Education Carol Ann M. Hudgens, Ed.S Section Chief: Policy, Monitoring and Audit Exceptional Children Division April 2015.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Continuum of Care Program (CoC) Training Requirements Related to Housing Assistance Termination of Assistance September 25, 2018.
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
12/9/2018 Notice: An Overview The MDE released documentation and a new requirement last year for districts to utilized Notices to “finalize” IEPs rather.
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Procedural Compliance Self- Assessment Webcast Section 5: Correcting Noncompliance and Systems of Internal Control

Each public agency must correct all errors identified during the self-assessment. All corrections must be completed  As soon as possible, and  No later than one year from the date WDPI notifies the district of noncompliance. Individual student corrections must be completed by February 15 when the assurance is due to DPI. Correcting Noncompliance May, 2013

Correcting noncompliance is a two-step process:  Step One: Correcting student-level noncompliance.  Step Two: Taking actions to ensure current compliance with the requirements and implementing a system of internal controls. Correcting Noncompliance May, 2013

For each instance of student-level noncompliance, implement the corrective actions specified in its Self- Assessment Report (also in Standards and Directions document). Corrective actions for student-level noncompliance are prescribed. Maintain documentation of all corrective actions. Step One: Correcting Student-Level Noncompliance May, 2013

ItemCompliance Statement Standards and DirectionsCorrection EVAL-1. The student’s parents were contacted and afforded an opportunity to participate in the review of existing evaluation data. 34 CFR § (a), (a)(1) Wis. Stats., § (2)(b)1 Indicator 8 After a parent is notified in writing of the start of an initial evaluation or reevaluation, IEP team members must review existing data to determine what additional data are needed, if any. The student’s parents, as members of the IEP team, must have the opportunity to participate in this review. After the review is complete the LEA must either notify the parent no additional assessments are needed or request parental consent for additional assessment. This requirement has three components: The review of existing data must occur afterthe parent is notified in writing of the start of an evaluation (IE-1 or RE-1). The date and method of the parent’s input must be documented. This information is often located on the Worksheet for Consideration of Existing Data (EW-1). The review of existing data must occur on or before the date on the form requesting parental consent for additional assessment or the notice no additional assessments are needed (IE-2, IE-3, RE-4, or RE-5). * * Student-level Noncompliance: If the parent was not afforded an opportunity to participate in the review of existing data, review evaluation data with the parent and determine whether additional evaluation data were needed at the time of the evaluation. If additional data were needed, decide whether a reevaluation is warranted at this time. Document the results of the discussion with the parent and the decision reached. If the parent was afforded an opportunity to participate in the review of existing data, but the review occurred before the parent was notified in writing of the start of the evaluation, no student-level corrective action is required. There must be evidence of the parent’s participation. The department will verify correction of student-.level noncompliance * * Evaluation Sample

Each public agency must take actions to ensure current compliance and implement a system of internal controls. Public agencies may choose from a menu of possible corrective actions. Examples include revising policies, procedures, or forms; training staff; or adding resources. Maintain documentation of all corrective actions. Step Two: Actions to Ensure Current Compliance May, 2013

An ongoing process for identifying noncompliance after completion of the Self-Assessment. System is both preventative and detective. Components of an effective system:  Infrastructure  Ongoing training on compliance standards  Consistent use of tools/techniques throughout the public agency. System of Internal Controls May, 2013

Step One: To verify correction of student-level noncompliance, WDPI reviews corrected student records and other documentation of correction for all areas for which noncompliance was identified. If any student records are not corrected, WDPI will provide technical assistance and direct the public agency to correct the student record(s). WDPI will review additional student records until correction is demonstrated. WDPI Verification of Correction May, 2013

Step Two: To verify current compliance, WDPI reviews student records created after the self-assessment. If the newly-created records do not demonstrate current compliance, WDPI provides technical assistance and directs correction of this noncompliance. In addition, WDPI reviews additional records until the public agency demonstrates current compliance WDPI Verification of Correction May, 2013

More information about verification is available in a subsequent webcast. Throughout the process of correcting noncompliance, the public agency should maintain documentation of all corrective actions and systems of internal control. WDPI Verification of Correction May, 2013

Janice Duff, , Courtney Reed Jenkins, , Allison Markoski, , Marge Resan, , Paul Sherman, , Christina Spector, , Paula Volpiansky, , Patricia Williams, , Questions? 11May, 2013