Presented by: Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice July 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve is part of the Excellent Public Schools Act It becomes effective school year The law can be accessed.
Advertisements

Contracts (Charter School/Sponsor and Charter School/EMO) Dana C. Reed, Director of Compliance, South Carolina Public Charter School District.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
The Monitoring Process
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Department of Education Update Florida Charter School Conference November 20,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Parental Waivers for English Learners Carlos Rivera, Administrator.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Parent Informational Presentation on the Third Grade Reading Guarantee November 7, 2012 Campus Elementary School Cafeteria 6:00 – 7:00 PM.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Presentation for FAPT February  Public schools operated by private groups  Autonomy in exchange for increased accountability  Exempt from Education.
Charter Schools Support Professional Development of Charter School Section , Florida Statutes State Board Rule 6A and Extended Time for.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Montgomery County Schools August 5, 2013.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
1 The Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP) and Charter Schools Florida’s Charter School Conference November 15, 2012 Office of Funding and Financial.
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ESE and Charter Schools.
Overview of SB 736 Legislation Pertaining to Personnel Evaluation Systems and Race to the Top 1.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Monitor and review the charter school in its progress toward the goals established in the charter. Monitor the revenues and expenditures of the charter.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
Presented by: Mr. Kurt Madden, Superintendent Mr. Walter J. Con, Asst. Superintendent – Business Services November 12 th,
Title III – General Provisions AREA OF FOCUS: PARENTAL NOTIFICATION.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Reporting Requirements for IR Charters and Authorizing Agencies v2.0, Reporting Requirements for Charter Schools and Authorizing Agencies.
1 Palo Verde Unified School District Curriculum & Instruction Department Malcolm Butler, Director of Curriculum & Instruction Single Plans for Student.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Overview “School Grading Rule” 6A Proposed CS/SB 1522 ESEA Waiver CAO March 2012.
Presentation for FAPT June  Public schools operated by private groups  Autonomy in exchange for increased accountability  Exempt from Education.
1 Reporting Section Update North Carolina Accountability Conference February 11-13, 2008 Greensboro, NC.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Historical Context on Indiana’s School Turnaround Efforts Presentation to Committee on School Turnarounds August 21,
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Excellent Public Schools Act of 2013 Instructional Collaboration Day II January 3, 2014.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Charter School New Applicant Workshop May 2, 2016.
 This presentation does NOT replace reading the Updated for Student Success Initiative Manual.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Legislative Update June 11, FY Budget  House Passes Budget (6/7/13) Base Student Cost of $2,101, up from current $2,012, below $2,771.
OVERVIEW OF THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT: TITLES I & III RIVERSIDE COUNTY PELD MEETING JANUARY 29, 2016 Presented by Patti F. Herrera, School Services.
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
State Board of Education Meeting Update May 11-12, 2016 Riverside County Regional Assessment Network May 27, 2016.
1 Educational Accountability Act of 2009 (SB09-163) Colorado Department of Education February 6, 2012.
Legislative Update April 16, FY Budget  Budget in Senate Finance Subcommittee (3/15/13) Budget passed full House on 3/15/13 Base Student.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Support and Intervention
State Board of Education Meeting Update May 11-12, 2016
Support and Intervention
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Legislative Update May 28, 2013.
School Improvement Process
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice July 2012

Major Changes for Differentiated Accountability School Improvement Plans Corrective Actions Financial Emergency Conditions Admin fee for ESE Centers

Differentiated Accountability DA Categories changed to Reward (A-B), Prevent (C), Focus (D), Priority (F) Charter schools removed from DA requirement to follow matrix of supports and services Parallel System School Improvement Plans Corrective Actions Closure

School Improvement Plans Required for “D” and “F” schools Principal and Governing Board rep must appear before Sponsor to present SIP SIP must include: Mission statement Academic data for 3 most recent years (if available) Student achievement objectives included in contract or most recent approved SIP Analysis of student performance data, include by subgroup Detailed plan for addressing each deficiency in student performance Identification of each component of school’s approved educational program that has not been implemented as described in charter Detailed plan for addressing each deficiency in educational program Identification of other barriers, with plan to address Specific Outcomes to be achieved

SIP Cont Schools that go from “F” to “D” do not have to develop a new SIP, but must continue implementing strategies in approved SIP Schools must annually report to Sponsor on progress of SIP

Corrective Actions Required: “DDD”, “DDF”, “F” __ “F” Develop SIP and Select one of the following corrective actions: Contract for educational services to be provided directly to students, instructional personnel, and school administrators Contract with outside entity that has demonstrated record of effectiveness to operate school Reorganize school under new Principal that has authority to hire new staff Voluntarily Close

Corrective Actions, Cont. Governing Board selects Corrective Action Must include detailed timeline- must be implemented school year following grade that triggered Corrective Action May request waiver of corrective action (Sponsor) If school improves by one letter grade, corrective action is not required to continue, but SIP must be continued If school does not improve letter grade within 2 years, new corrective action must be selected

Notifications FDOE will publish list of charters subject to SIP and Corrective Action requirements er_Schools/School_Improvement.asp Sponsor will notify school of requirement and date to appear before School Board– will include date by which SIP is due to Sponsor staff for review

Monitoring Sponsor monitors implementation of SIP/Corrective Action Sponsor will require annual updates before School Board (public meeting) Sponsor may waive corrective actions (discretionary)

Double “F” Charter Schools that receive two consecutive grades of “F” must be terminated- unless: The charter school is established to turnaround the performance of a district public school pursuant to s (4)(b)3. Such charter schools shall be governed by s ; The charter school serves a student population the majority of which resides in a school zone served by a district public school that earned a grade of "F" in the year before the charter school opened and the charter school earns at least a grade of "D" in its third year of operation. The exception provided under this sub-subparagraph does not apply to a charter school in its fourth year of operation and thereafter; The state board grants the charter school a waiver of termination.

Waivers The SBE may waive termination if the charter school demonstrates that the learning gains of its students on statewide assessments are comparable to or better than the learning gains of similarly situated students enrolled in nearby district public schools. The waiver is valid for 1 year and may only be granted once. Charter schools that have been in operation for more than 5 years are not eligible for a waiver under this sub- subparagraph.

Waivers, Cont. Wavier request due no later than 30 days after completion of school grade appeals Request must include name of school, MSID, physical address. Waiver request must be approved by Governing Board by majority vote at a duly noticed public meeting. See State Board Rule for details

Waivers, Cont. One time Schools in operation more than 5 years not eligible SBE will analyze student learning gains data based on comparisons between students enrolled in the charter school and similarly situated students enrolled in nearby (3 geographically closest) district public schools- may include such factors as prior performance on state assessments, disability status, English language learner status Timely filed request automatically stays pending termination

Financial Emergency Conditions Senate Bill 368 Fund Balance Deficit no longer financial emergency condition in Section (1) Auditor must reveal deficit to governing board Does not automatically trigger financial corrective action plan

Admin Fees >75% ESE Admin fee based on UFTE Revenue Estimating Worksheet has calculation (line 17)

Links House Bill 7127: pdfhttp://laws.flrules.org/files/Ch_ pdf Senate Bill 368: pdfhttp://laws.flrules.org/files/Ch_ pdf House Bill 5101: pdfhttp://laws.flrules.org/files/Ch_ pdf State Board Rule 6A id= &type=1&File=6A htm id= &type=1&File=6A htm