"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Interoperability:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COUNTER: improving usage statistics Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER December 2006.
Advertisements

Usage statistics in context - panel discussion on understanding usage, measuring success Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER AAP/PSP 9 February 2005.
Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Some outcomes of the CRM/FRBR harmonization: the definition of manifestation and a review of attributes Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana.
The HILT Pilot Terminologies Server Dennis Nicholson: Centre for Digital Library Research, Strathclyde University.
Subject Based Information Gateways in The UK Coordinated Activities in The UK Within the UK Higher Education community, the JISC (Joint Information Systems.
Collection-level description & collection management: tool for the trade or information trade-off? Collection Description Focus Workshop 4 Newcastle, 8.
The absence of interoperability : its impact on an operational service John Gilby & Fraser Nicolaides M25 Systems Team, London School of Economics 7 th.
Canada The Bath Profile and The Journey To Interoperability Carrol D Lunau Bath Profile Maintenance Agency July 7, 2003
A centre of expertise in digital information management Developing a Quality Culture For Digital Library Programmes Author & Presenter Brian Kelly UKOLN.
Collection-level description & the Information Landscape: users evaluate strategies for resource discovery Collection Description Focus Workshop 5 Cambridge,
Z39.50 Profiles The Bath Profile ZIG Meeting Leuven, Belgium July 2000 William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences University.
UKOLN is supported by: Bridget Robinson and Ann Chapman From analytical model to implementation and beyond CD Focus Schema Forum, CBI Conference Centre.
Towards consensus on collection-level description Collection Description Focus Briefing Day 1 British Library, St Pancras, London 22 October 2001 Bridget.
An introduction to collections and collection-level description Collection-Level Description & NOF-digitise projects NOF-digitise programme seminar, London,
The White Rose Collaborative Collection Partnership Brian Clifford University of Leeds.
Interoperability Principles in the Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Presented 13 March 2006 at eGY in Boulder, CO by: Eliot Christian,
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
CAIRNS goes public Stephen Winch Scottish Library & Information Council CIGS: State of the union: union catalogues in the Scottish information environment.
RDA: a new international standard for resource discovery and access Gordon Dunsire Based on a presentation created by the Joint Steering Committee for.
Basic guidelines for the creation of a DW Create corporate sponsors and plan thoroughly Determine a scalable architectural framework for the DW Identify.
University of Adelaide Library Life Impact The University of Adelaide The well connected catalogue Patricia Scott, Denise Tobin and Helen Attar.
Lecture 5 Themes in this session Building and managing the data warehouse Data extraction and transformation Technical issues.
31 Aug 2003 Talking Systems Janice Sim Technical Services Manager University of Wales College, Newport.
Music Libraries Online A virtual catalogue for UK music libraries Marian Hogg, Project Administrator EUUG Conference, Madrid.
Scottish Information Landscape An overview from SLIC Elaine Fulton Director Scottish Library and Information Council
OCLC Online Computer Library Center A Global OpenURL Resolver Registry Phil Norman OCLC Dlsr4lib Workshop March 23 rd, 2006 Arlington VA.
Collection Level Description: The RASCAL Experience A Case Study Clare McVeigh RASCAL Project Manager 8 February 2002.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
A Feasibility Study of a Unified Library Management System for NHS Scotland - A Progress Report Laura McCaig, Information Manager, E-Library Communicators.
1 Guidelines For The Future Sharing Best Practice For National Bibliographies In The Digital Era Neil Wilson Information Coordinator IFLA Bibliography.
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
1 On the Record Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging, NLM
Testing and Improving Interoperability The Z39.50 Interoperability Testbed William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences Texas Center for.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
ZLOT Prototype Assessment John Carlo Bertot Associate Professor School of Information Studies Florida State University.
An Alternative Approach to Interoperability Testing The Use of Special Diagnostic Records in the Context of Z39.50 and Online Library Catalogs William.
Collection-Level Description Gordon Dunsire Depute Director, Centre for Digital Library Research Presentation for a workshop at the Libraries in the Digital.
1 CS 502: Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Lecture 19 Interoperability Z39.50.
CONTENT DISCOVERY, SERVICES, AND SUSTAINED ACCESS Timothy Cole, William Mischo, Beth Sandore, Sarah Shreeves ~ University of Illinois Library
The concept of a national catalogue Jean Sykes Librarian and Director of Information Services, LSE Director, CC Interop Project.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century“ 11th November 2004, British Library, London Making sense of.
RDA: Benefits and opportunities Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Presented at the CIG Standards Forum,
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
1 Interoperability: architectures and connections John Gilby, M25 Systems Team, LSE Ashley Sanders, Copac Team, MIMAS "Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National.
| ZIG October 2001 | Developing Guidelines for the Bath Profile John Gilby & Fraser Nicolaides M25 Link Team.
Supporting further and higher education The JISC Information Environment Programmes Alan Robiette, JISC Development Group.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
Radioactive Metadata Records An Interoperability Testing Approach Based on Metadata Utilization William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
MARC Content Designation and Utilization Learning from Artifacts: Metadata Utilization Analysis William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
Z39.50 & The Z Texas Profile William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences University of North Texas Denton, TX.
1 Building our DNER the Z way Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UK Office for Library & Information Networking (UKOLN)
Overviews of the Library of Texas & ZLOT Project Dr. William E. Moen Principal Investigator.
A Resource Discovery Service for the Library of Texas Requirements, Architecture, and Interoperability Testing William E. Moen, Ph.D. Principal Investigator.
JISC/CNI Conference Edinburgh, 26th June 2002 Challenges of Digital Preservation – do we have a road map? Maggie Jones.
Preservation metadata and the Cedars project Michael Day UKOLN: UK Office for Library and Information Networking University of Bath
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN priorities: ●Provide advice and services to the library, education.
Achieving Semantic Interoperability at the World Bank Designing the Information Architecture and Programmatically Processing Information Denise Bedford.
No Longer Under Our Control? The Nature and Role of Standards in the 21 st Century Library William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences Texas.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
Collection-level description: from theory to practice Minerva project meeting Paris, 24 January 2003 Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2.
Resource Discovery Futures Jean Sykes Librarian and Director of Information Services London School of Economics.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Metadata – what, why and how Ann Chapman.
Overview and Key Findings. UKRISS Project 2 Duration 22 months: March 2012 – December 2013 Funding JISC – Research Information Management Programme Structure.
Online Information and Education Conference 2004, Bangkok Dr. Britta Woldering, German National Library Metadata development in The European Library.
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Key Considerations and Decisions Before Consortia Implementation
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Presentation transcript:

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Interoperability: the performance of institutional catalogues & strategies for improvement Fraser Nicolaides, M25 Systems Team George Macgregor, Centre for Digital Library Research, University of Strathclyde

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London The interoperation of catalogues in large-scale, distributed search environments The study: a comparison of the performance of physical and virtual union catalogues Non-system architecture issues (semantic interoperability):  System-level variations in the ability to process search queries  The impact of disparate cataloguing and indexing practices on recall and precision Recommendations and other remedial activities

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Scope of the study: 1 For the test methodology, search results and associated discussion, see: ‘A comparative study of the performance of COPAC and selected independent Z39.50 servers’, Issue 1 (June 2003); available at:

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Scope of the study: 2 Virtual union catalogue: 6+ CURL libraries  All contribute records to COPAC Physical union catalogue: COPAC  Subsets of the database were searched (i.e. restricted to above libraries) All of the catalogues were accessed using the Z39.50 information-retrieval protocol

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Variations in performance Consistent differences in performance were identified. These were attributed to:  The currency of the physical union database;  The availability of records that describe (and may enable access to) electronic resources;  The definition and processing of search types (‘author’, ‘title’, etc.); and  The cataloguing and indexing of bibliographical entities.

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London The ‘administrative’ issues Currency of the physical union database  The time delay in submitting records to COPAC Access to electronic resources  The non-submission to COPAC of records describing (licensed?) electronic resources  An administrative policy not extended to the institutional Z39.50 server

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London The definition of search types: Bib-1 The considerable variations between all of the systems in their support for Bib-1 attributes The use of Bib-1 attributes to define precisely the abstract concepts of ‘author’, ‘title’, ‘subject’, etc.  ‘Attribute set Bib-1 (Z ) semantics’; available at: ftp://ftp.loc.gov/pub/z3950/defs/bib1.txt  ‘Bib-1 attributes set’; available at:

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London What do we mean by a ‘title’ search? All of these (and other permutations) are legitimate forms of ‘title’ search. Their potentially highly variable impact on recall & precision. Title = ancient american civilization A string of keywords?A phrase? Should any or all of the words be truncated? Should the phrase be matched first or anywhere in the ‘title’ field(s)?

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Example definitions of the ‘title’ search type The use of Bib-1 attribute combinations to give formal semantic definition to any search type. For example: Attribute type Title search - keywordTitle search – exact match ValueAttributeValueAttribute Use (1)4Title4 Relation (2)3Equal3 Position (3)3Any-position-in-field1First-in-field Structure (4)2Word1Phrase Truncation (5)100Do not truncate100Do not truncate Completeness (6)1Incomplete subfield3Complete field

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Selective system support for Bib-1 attributes Multiple attributes – multiple attribute combinations The difficulty of finding attribute combinations shared by all of the tested systems Default behaviour – the server-end (catalogue) replacement of unsupported attributes

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London The definition of search types: a solution Z39.50-server vendors should support a common suite of attribute combinations (basic search types) The availability of formally published ‘profiles’ The core profile for bibliographic applications: ‘The Bath Profile: an international Z39.50 specification for library applications and resource discovery’, Release 2.0 (February 2004); available at:

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Implementation of the Bath Profile Vendor reluctance…  A recognition of the potential communal value of compliance;  The limited scope of their business objectives;  The cost of rebuilding indexes;  The perceived instability of the Profile. …and customer ignorance  Of profiles;  Of the Bath Profile;  Of the Areas and Levels of the Bath Profile relevant to them.

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Cataloguing and indexing the bibliographic entity Two sub-issues:  The bibliographical completeness of the catalogue records;  The indexing policies that effectively determine how those records are accessed.

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London The bibliographical record A distinct advantage of physical union catalogues:  For any bibliographic entity, there is the potential to derive index entries from records submitted by multiple contributing institutions. The cumulatively enriched COPAC records. In particular, the notable presence of comprehensive added entries (author; title; series…) and subject headings.

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Indexing policies The policies that determine:  Which (sub)fields are indexed; and  To which access points they are mapped (which (sub)fields are used to create the ‘title’ index(es)?). The impact of index functionality on the potential to support Bib-1 attributes. For example:  If the ‘title’ index does not support first-in-field matching, then the Z39.50-server cannot process queries that specify the corresponding Bib-1 Position attribute.

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Recommendations: 1 Any library that wishes to participate effectively in virtual union associations must detail to their system vendor the measure of semantic interoperability they require from their Z39.50 server.  Particular reference may be made to the constituent parts of the Bath Profile. COPAC has already attained compliance with Release 1.1 of the Bath Profile.

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Recommendations: 2 A conservative view: “Variations in cataloguing and indexing policies [are] the product of historical and local requirements and contingencies, the legitimacy of which [..] should not be challenged. It is conceivable that an increasing awareness of the impact of local policies on the performance of distributed systems will generate concerted remedial responses.” F. Nicolaides ‘A comparative study…’ (2003), p.41. An alternative view…

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Report available: The question: Improving Interoperability in Distributed & Physical Union Catalogues through Co- ordination of Cataloguing & Indexing Policies

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London CAIRNS project: Z39.50 based Clump eLib Phase 3 Originally comprised SCURL catalogues, now the Cooperative Information Retrieval Network for Scotland Not just about building services for users… Focus on interoperability Technical barriers (conformance, availability, etc.) Cataloguing barriers Formation of the CAIRNS Catalogue Issues Working Group: liaising with Cataloguing & Indexing Group in Scotland (CIGS), SCURL Scope & Background (cont.)

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Scope & Background (cont.) CAIRNS & CAIRNS Catalogue Issues Working Group Set of mappings to standard CAIRNS clump indexes (USMARC & UKMARC) produced by CAIRNS Each CAIRNS library produced mappings for the indexes used by their Z39.50 server Enabled identification of convergent and divergent practices Common standard for cataloguing & indexing in Scotland = enhanced interoperability of metadata content and supported wider aims of SCURL Mechanical & procedural changes were identified: Short Term vs. Long Term Benefits reaped…

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London CC-interop: B3 CC-interop: Deliverable B3 sought to build on CAIRNS work Much has changed since CAIRNS: MARC21, ISBN, Bath Profile conformance, global access to local records, etc. Interoperability: chasing the rainbow? B3 aim to agree a similar set of guidelines and appropriate strategies for improving interoperability and to reflect recent LIS developments Superior method: Fraser’s work, changes at University of Hull

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London CC-interop: B3 Methodology 2 one day workshops: London & Glasgow London: invitations sent to CURL and InforM24 cataloguers Glasgow: invitations sent to SCURL and Scottish FE sector Revised/generic CAIRNS guidelines distributed: home work Presentations used to stimulate open discussion Discussion tape recorded Transcribed to produce a report Distributed to attendees for comment and correction 50+ in attendance from UK cataloguing and systems fraternity!

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Recommendations General outcomes: Consensus: prescriptive guidelines essential to assist improvement of interoperability, raising awareness among senior management People interoperability CAIRNS-style guidelines inappropriate (though not without local value) Globalisation of cataloguing demands guidelines for a wider, active and nationally co-ordinated approach to improving interoperability Recommendations and strategies under 4 headings: Collaboration within distributed or physical union catalogues Standards Strategic Developments End Users

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Collaboration within distributed or physical union catalogues 1.Consortia of libraries contributing to union catalogues should develop prescriptive guidelines 2.Catalogue scope, content, accounting for local and global needs 3.One level of aggregation is outmoded: global in one environment is local in another! 4.Guidelines need to be developed at national and international levels (Anglophone community?). Identify mechanisms: Full Disclosure? Etc. 5.Consortia should consider participation in international activities such as the Program for Collaborative Cataloguing (PCC): reconcile clashes between local/global name and subject headings, etc. 6.Shared cataloguing service for digital resources: digital environment = greater choice, thus facilitating greater cataloguing variations 7.Communication among cataloguers essential (esp. Consortia)

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Standards 1.Further development of Bath Profile should encompass scope and content of specified indexes: enable standard mappings from MARC21 to Z39.50 indexes 2.Producing guidelines on required Bath conformance: reducing choice in the consortia would benefit interoperability 3.Standard rules for index content normalization should be adopted at ‘as wide a level as possible’: name punctuation, titles, subjects, inversion of personal names, etc. Use of NACO?

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Strategic Developments & End Users Consortia and individual libraries should monitor the implementation of FRBR to plan for large-scale machine processing of catalogue data to improve interoperability Meeting FRBR model dictates dis-aggregation of existing catalogue record structure and re-aggregation into different structure: precision needed FRBR implementation: The pervasive economic argument… Disclose local practices which may affect interoperability for an end-user: divided opinion… Consortia should agree standard information about each catalogue which should be disclosed as part of union catalogue service: additional information disclosed at discretion of local catalogue library

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London Further Details ‘Improving interoperability in distributed and physical union catalogues through co-ordination of cataloguing and indexing practice’ Available: ‘A Comparative Study of the Performance of COPAC and Selected Independent Z39.50 Servers’ Available: Contact:

"Hyper Clumps, Mini Clumps and National Catalogues: resource discovery for the 21st century", 11th November 2004, British Library, London