AWIPS Tracking Point Meteogram Tool Ken Sperow 1,2, Mamoudou Ba 1, and Chris Darden 3 1 NOAA/NWS, Office of Science and Technology, Meteorological Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations SPoRT Update GOES-R Proving Ground November 23, 2010.
Advertisements

SPoRT Products in Support of the GOES-R Proving Ground and NWS Forecast Operations Andrew Molthan NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT)
SPoRT Activities in Support of the GOES-R and JPSS Proving Grounds Andrew L. Molthan, Kevin K. Fuell, and Geoffrey T. Stano NASA Short-term Prediction.
24 bit GeoColor Product CIRA GOES and JPSS RGB Product Development Updates for AWIPS II D2D and NCP Debra A. Molenar 1, Scott P. Longmore 2 IntroductionArtifacts.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NASA Short-term Prediction Research and.
Update on GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the Operations Proving Ground Chad Gravelle GOES-R/JPSS All-Hands Call – 7 July 2014.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 AIRS Products for the National Weather Service Brad Zavodsky SPoRT Science Advisory.
1 GOES Users’ Conference October 1, 2002 GOES Users’ Conference October 1, 2002 John (Jack) J. Kelly, Jr. National Weather Service Infusion of Satellite.
Transitioning research data to the operational weather community Use of VIIRS DNB Data to Monitor Power Outages and Restoration for Significant Weather.
UW-CIMSS/UAH MSG SEVIRI Convection Diagnostic and Nowcasting Products Wayne F. Feltz 1, Kristopher M. Bedka 1, and John R. Mecikalski 2 1 Cooperative Institute.
Hayden Oswald 1 and Andrew Molthan 2 NASA Summer Intern, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 1 NASA SPoRT Center, NASA/MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama.
Inter-comparison of Lightning Trends from Ground-based Networks during Severe Weather: Applications toward GLM Lawrence D. Carey 1*, Chris J. Schultz 1,
Chapter 1 Ways of Seeing. Ways of Seeing the Atmosphere The behavior of the atmosphere is very complex. Different ways of displaying the characteristics.
GOES-R Proving Ground NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed Chris Siewert GOES-R Proving Ground Liaison OU-CIMMS / Storm Prediction Center.
Science Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies The SPoRT Center – Infusing.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations GOES-R Proving Grounds Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November,
Kristopher White & Brian Guyer The GOES-R Convective Initiation Product... Operational Examples and Thoughts on Proper Viewing Strategies.
GOES-R Synthetic Imagery over Alaska Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Regional And Mesoscale Meteorology Branch (RAMMB)
Synthetic Satellite Imagery: A New Tool for GOES-R User Readiness and Cloud Forecast Visualization Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations MODIS-GOES Hybrid Sixth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee 28 February -
The Lightning Warning Product Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Dennis Buechler Geoffrey Stano Richard Blakeslee transitioning.
Charleston, SC Weather Forecast Office Frank Alsheimer Science and Operations Officer NWS Charleston, SC.
UNCLASSIFIED Navy Applications of GOES-R Richard Crout, PhD Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command Satellite Programs Presented to 3rd GOES-R Conference.
Overshooting Convective Cloud Top Detection A GOES-R Future Capability Product GOES-East (-8/-12/-13) OT Detections at Full Spatial and Temporal.
Geoffrey Stano– NASA / SPoRT – ENSCO, Inc. Brian Carcione– NWS Huntsville Jason Burks– NWS Huntsville Southern Thunder Workshop, Norman, OK July.
Training in NOAA Satellite Proving Ground Anthony Mostek and LeRoy Spayd NOAA/NWS/Training Division With Jim Gurka and Tim Schmit NOAA/Satellite & Information.
Poster 1.66 An Update on CIRA’s GOES-R Proving Ground Activities Ed Szoke 1,2, Renate Brummer 1, Hiro Gosden 1, Steve Miller 1, Mark DeMaria 3, Dan Lindsey.
Woody Roberts Tom LeFebvre Kevin Manross Paul Schultz Evan Polster Xiangbao Jing ESRL/Global Systems Division Application of RUA/RTMA to AWIPS and the.
1 CIMSS Participation in the Development of a GOES-R Proving Ground Timothy J. Schmit NOAA/NESDIS/Satellite Applications and Research Advanced Satellite.
NASA SPoRT’s Pseudo Geostationary Lightning Mapper (PGLM) GOES-R Science Week Meeting September, 2011 Huntsville, Alabama Geoffrey Stano ENSCO, Inc./NASA.
Proving Ground Activities with Aviation Weather Center, Storm Prediction Center and NASA SPoRT GLM Science Meeting Huntsville, Alabama 20 September 2012.
GOES–R Applications for the Assessment of Aviation Hazards Wayne Feltz, John Mecikalski, Mike Pavolonis, Kenneth Pryor, and Bill Smith 7. FOG AND LOW CLOUDS.
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
GOES-R Recommendations from past GOES Users’ Conference: Jim Gurka Tim Schmit Tom Renkevens NOAA/ NESDIS Tony Mostek NOAA/ NWS Dick Reynolds Short and.
Geoffrey Stano – ENSCO / SPoRT David Hotz and Anthony Cavalluci– WFO Morristown, TN Tony Reavley – Director of Emergency Services & Homeland Security of.
Transitioning unique data and research technologies to operations Experimental Products Development Team (EPDT) Jason Burks NASA MSFC SPoRT.
Story from Topeka George Phillips Science and Operations Officer NWS – Topeka KS.
Transitioning research data to the operational weather community Overview of GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the Short-term Prediction Research and.
Modeling GOES-R µm brightness temperature differences above cold thunderstorm tops Introduction As the time for the launch of GOES-R approaches,
Preparing for GOES-R: old tools with new perspectives Bernadette Connell, CIRA CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA ABSTRACT Creating.
Travis Smith Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Nowcasting Applications.
GOES-R Aviation Weather Applications Frederick R. Mosher NWS/NCEP Aviation Weather Center.
SAFESEAS Overview July, 2006 Michael E. Churma Jason Taylor NOAA National Weather Service Office of Science and Technology Meteorological Development Laboratory.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 In-House Utilization of AIRS Data and Products for Numerical Weather Prediction Will.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 High Resolution Analysis Products to Support Severe Weather and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Threat Assessments over Florida 31.
AWIPS DATA VISUALIZATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM FOR OPERATIONAL RECORDS ADVISOR AWIPS DATA VISUALIZATION AND MONITORING SYSTEM FOR OPERATIONAL RECORDS September.
Developers: John Walker, Chris Jewett, John Mecikalski, Lori Schultz Convective Initiation (CI) GOES-R Proxy Algorithm University of Alabama in Huntsville.
1 Recommendations from the 2 nd GOES-R Users’ Conference: Jim Gurka Tim Schmit NOAA/ NESDIS Dick Reynolds Short and Associates.
Real-time Display of Simulated GOES-R (ABI) Experimental Products Donald W. Hillger NOAA/NESDIS, SaTellite Applications and Research (STAR) Regional And.
HimawariCast Practical Training
Total Lightning AWIPS II Operational Demonstration Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Matt Smith, and.
Satellites and NWS Aviation Activities Mark Andrews NWS Headquarters OCWWS/Meteorological Services Div. Aviation Weather Services Branch Frederick R. Mosher.
What does it cover? This session addresses “Why?”, “When?”, and “What Sensors?” will be on GOES- R, and presents examples of what to expect. If is a look.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Nearcasting Severe Convection.
Session 2 Conclusion: Future Product Development Activities Science Advisory Committee Meeting 26 – 28 August, 2014 National Space Science and Technology.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Hydrology Application Team Bob Kuligowski (STAR)
NWS / SPoRT Coordination Call 24 March, 2011 March 2011, Coordination Call.
Methodology n Step 1: Identify MOG (EDR ≥ 0.25) observations at cruising altitude (≥ FL250). n Step 2: Account for ascending/descending flights by filtering.
HWT Experimental Warning Program: History & Successes Darrel Kingfield (CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Total Lightning Applications Sixth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee 28 February – 1 March 2012 National Space Science and Technology Center, Huntsville,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
Operational Use of Lightning Mapping Array Data Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Dennis Buechler, and.
GOES-R Resources from NOAA, NASA & CIMSS
User Preparation for new Satellite generations
USING GOES-R TO HELP MONITOR UPPER LEVEL SO2
GOES-R Risk Reduction Research on Satellite-Derived Overshooting Tops
GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) Requirements
Aiding Severe Weather Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

AWIPS Tracking Point Meteogram Tool Ken Sperow 1,2, Mamoudou Ba 1, and Chris Darden 3 1 NOAA/NWS, Office of Science and Technology, Meteorological Development Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 3 NOAA/NWS, Weather Forecast Office Huntsville, Huntsville, AL and Introduction With the launch of GOES-R forecasters will have higher temporal and spatial resolution satellite data and exciting new products at their disposal. Forecaster tools to analyze this constantly increasing volume of meteorological data are more important today then ever before. Simple tools that help the forecasters focus on signals within the data rather than being overwhelmed by the volume of data are crucial. The Meteorological Development Laboratory (MDL) within the National Weather Service (NWS) is developing such a tool for use within AWIPS Migration. AWIPS Migration Tracking an Event Once the forecaster has identified that there is an event or feature of interest by visually inspecting meteorological data within CAVE they can “track” the feature by overlaying the “Sample Tool” within CAVE (Figures 4-11). When initially loaded the “Sample Tool” displays a point that must be dragged to the feature (Figure 4). After moving the point a track appears (Figure 5). The forecaster then steps forward or backward in time and adjusts the position of the point to overlay the feature of interest (Figures 6, 7, 8). Summary There are many potential uses of this tool, including but not limited to assessing cloud top cooling rates for clusters of convection or analyzing total cloud lightning data from the GOES Lightning Mapper (GLM) to make assessments of storm strength and growth rates. This tool could also be utilized in conjunction with channel difference fields to analyze a variety of trends including the potential for aircraft icing, overshooting tops, and fog and stratus development. A good example of trends of channel differences between water vapor and IR is the large positive differences seen in Figure 14 from 10:30 to 12:00 GMT which may indicate overshooting tops. Note the inversion of the trends and the subsequent collapse of convection (Figure 13). The current prototype uses a simple point sampling approach, however, additional capabilities such as averaging or calculating the minimum or maximum value over an area has the potential to make the tool more useful. Additionally, the inclusion of tracking via non linear extrapolation might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The Advanced Weather Interactive Processing System (AWIPS) was fielded to WFOs in the late 1990’s. AWIPS provides the information processing, display, and telecommunications system that integrates meteorological and hydrologic data, enabling our forecasters to prepare and issue timely, accurate weather forecasts and warnings. AWIPS Migration also known as AWIPS II is a large project currently under way within the NWS to replace the infrastructure within AWIPS so as to make it more open and flexible. Figures 1, 2, and 3 show different satellite images displayed within the Common AWIPS Visualization Environment (CAVE), the replacement for D- 2D. Figure 1: IR shown in CAVE. Figure 2: Visible satellite shown in CAVE. Figure 4: Sample Tool “Drag me to feature” mode. Figure 5: Track appears after dragging point. Figure 6: Zooming and adjusting to point of interest. Figure 7: Stepping forward and adjusting position. Meteogram After the feature of interest has been tracked the forecaster has the ability to plot a meteogram (time-series) of the layers of interest. By selecting the layer(s) of interest and clicking “Plot Meteogram” (Figure 10) a meteogram is displayed (Figure 11). The meteogram is resizable and clicking any point within the meteogram displays cross lines making it easier to see the value of the data at a particular time (Figure 12). The interface also allows the forecaster to display more than one time series within the same meteogram (Figures 13, 14). Currently, data values are determined by calculating the value of the image at the selected point. Figure 8: Another position adjustment. Figure 9: Confirming event placement at the next time step. Figure 10: Select the layer to display in the meteogram. Figure 3: Water vapor satellite shown in CAVE. Figure 12: Meteogram enlarged with cross lines to allow for closer inspection. Figure 11: Meteogram showing value of the underlying layer’s data parameter changing in time and space. Figure 13: Three series with different data axes. Figure 14: Close up of time trend of three different fields.