Моделирование электромагнитного форм-фактора протона во времени-подобной области в среде PandaRoot Д. Морозов ИФВЭ (Протвино)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
M.Mevius Open and hidden beauty production in 920 GeV proton –nucleus collisions at HERA-B M.Mevius DESY.
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
A. Kiselev BNL, 06/20/2013 EicRoot status report and calorimeter code development.
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
CALORIMETER system for the CBM detector Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) CBM Collaboration meeting, October 2004.
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
J.RItman PANDA Collab. Meeting, May 2003 Status of the PANDA Simulations Event Generator UrQMD p A MVD Resolution Time of Flight Estimates of Data Rates.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Febr.28-March 2, 2006N Nbar project at VEPP The project to measure the nucleon form factors at VEPP-2000 Workshop - e+e- collisions from phi to psi,
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
1 FAIR SIMULATION ACTIVITIES AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDIES AT IPN ORSAY PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI, Sep. 5, 2011 Béatrice Ramstein for the.
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Review and Perspective of Muon Studies Marco Destefanis Università degli Studi di Torino PANDA Collaboration Meeting GSI (Germany) September 5-9, 2011.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
IHEP group in PANDA physics: status and requests
Muon stopping target optimization
Tracking muons in Panda(Root)
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Plans for nucleon structure studies at PANDA
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
Quarkonium production in ALICE
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Моделирование электромагнитного форм-фактора протона во времени-подобной области в среде PandaRoot Д. Морозов ИФВЭ (Протвино)

Outline Introduction Experimental setup FSC PandaRoot Development Generators What is also needed Near term plans Conclusions 2June

Introduction The electromagnetic probe is an excellent tool to investigate the structure of the nucleon G E and G M of the proton parametrize the hadronic current in the ME for e - p → e - p and in its crossed process p + p - → e + e - 3June

Introduction Matrix element for elastic electron proton scattering in the frame of one-photon exchange: k 1 (p 1 ), k 2 (p 2 ) - four-momenta of the initial and final electron (nucleon) u(k),u(p) – spinors q = k 1 - k 2, q 2 < 0 Annihilation - k 2 (p 2 ) change sign and q 2 = s 4June

Introduction Annihilation process - access positive q 2 (time-like) from q 2 = 4m 2 p Unitarity of ME: – space-like FFs are real functions of q 2 – time-like - complex functions In the Breit frame, space-like FFs have concrete interpretations, they are the Fourier transforms of the spatial charge (G E ) and the magnetization distribution (G M ) of the proton – slope at q 2 = 0 gives the charge and magnetization radius of the proton In time-like region, FFs reflect the frequency spectrum of the electromagnetic response of the nucleon two complementary aspects of nucleon structure can be studied complete description of the electromagnetic FF over full q 2 range. 5June

Introduction Estimation: PANDA will be able to get |G E | and |G M | in time-like domain from ~5 (GeV/c) 2 up to ~14 (GeV/c) 2 by measuring angular distribution of p + p - → e + e -. G M up to 22 (GeV/c) 2 by measuring total cross section Unpolorized diff. cross section: where τ = q 2 /4m 2 p independent measurements of |G E | and |G M | Only BABAR and LEAR had enough statistics to extract |G E | and |G M | independently, but accuracy on R= |G E |/|G M | is ~ 50%. PANDA aim is few % in 10 7 sec 6June

FF in space-like region (JLab) 7 JLAB arXiv: [nucl-ex] June

Introduction The challenge is to suppress the huge background from hadronic channels. It’s ~10 6 times higher in cross section then signal e + e - – π + π -, K + K - EMC is ~20X 0 ~ λ 0 : 30% of hadronic interactions, charge exchange is the most harmful can produce deposition as e with same momentum – π 0 π 0 one(two) Dalitz decay e + e - γ with 1% branching still big enough direct decay then conversion in material e + e - X, where X – mesons, lepton pairs, photons – direct e + e - X – produced γ materializes in detector material a good e/pion separation is mandatory up to ~15 GeV/c PID from each detector and kinematical constrained have to be exploited 8June

Experimental setup Forward spectrometer – Dipole Magnet – EMC: FSC → PID – Forward DIRC(DSK)→ c PID – DCH → tracking – FTOF → charged PID – FTS: straw tubes→tracking 9June Pipe Central spectrometer – Solenoid Magnet – TPC (STT) → PID, tracking – MVD → vertex, tracking – EMC: Barrel, Endcaps → PID – TOF → c PID (0.3 – 1 GeV) – MDT → PID muon – GEM → tracking – DIRC → charged PID

FSC PandaRoot Development Geometry – emc_module5_fsc.root in 16 and 17 GeometryVersions – 1496 modules (54x28 with 4x4 spacing) – cell 5.5 x 5.5 x 67.5 cm 3 consists of 380 lead (0.275 mm ) scintillator (1.5 mm ) layers – wrapped by tyvek and black paper – 6x6 optical fibers 1.4 mm thick docked to PMT photocathode by a single bunch Macro to create geometry PndEmc class modified to load geometry PndEmcStructure class modified to transform the cells coordinates to the global system of geometrical indexes (for fast searching and cluster formation) PndEmcHit and PndEmcHitProducer updated to collect the hits from transport code at VMC level 10June

FSC PandaRoot Development Digitization model – Hit → electronics signal shape (Waveform): PndEmcHitsToWaveform Signal shape: analytic function of RC-CR circuit with – T int = 5 nsec — integration time, – T diff = 20 nsec — differential time and – T sig = 15 nsec — time of raising the signal in shashlyk module For each hit discrete signal shape simulating SADC was built up – N samples = 20 — the number of SADC counts – SampleRate = 180 Mhz — ADC rate – N PhotonsPerMev = 21 — N of photons per 1 MeV of deposited energy – ENF = 1.3 – excess noise factor for PMT Gaussian incoherent electronics noise with 3 MeV width added to each ADC bin the signal was converted to the integer value in each bin – Waveform → ADC digitized signal in energy units: PndEmcWaveformToDigi maximum was searched inside each digitized signal shape: magnitude → value, position→ time of signal arrival Absolute value normalization by 1 GeV delta function signal as input Cells with E digi > E digiThreshold = 8 MeV are stored for the following analysis 11June

Energy resolution for Digi hits – σ E /E = (3.0 ± 0.1)%/√E + (0.6 ± 0.1)% Compare to test beam – σ E /E = (2.8 ± 0.2)%/√E + (1.3 ± 0.1)% Utilize the algorithms for cluster finding and bumps splitting already implemented in EMC code Absent: – e PID → shower shape analysis (it’s different compare to PWO) E1/E9 (E1/E25) lateral moment of the cluster a set of zernike moments (radial and angular dependent polynomials) parameters are partially correlated – Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) may be applied (for PWO as well). The training of the MLP requires big set of single tracks for e, μ, π, K and p – Leakage correction for FSC FSC PandaRoot Development 12June

MLP output example 13 PWO in BABAR framework June

Generators Signal channel – exist in PandaRoot Background – absent but in preparation – Extrapolation of experimental data 14June

What is also needed Forward tracking? CPU/Storage – About 5∙10 8 events need to be simulated – Requires at least 30 TB of disk space – Now: local cluster (400 CPU, no space) is not sufficient. PANDA Grid can be used? – In a ~1 year: the hope is to have ~50 TB and cluster will be helpful for PANDA IHEP cluster can be incorporated to PANDA Grid 15June

Near term plans Finish FSC reco code – Shower shape parameters for shashlyk modules – MLP training? – Leakage Generator issues Production of MC data Background suppression – PID cuts – Kinematical constrains Efficiencies 16June

Conclusions FSC in PandaRoot is implemented – Some tuning and e PID required Time like form-factor could be interesting but challenging – High hadronic background – Huge amount of events → storage IHEP might be a part of Panda Grid 17June