C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 13 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Public Consultation as an integral part of RIA Charles-Henri.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lifelong Guidance: A Key to Lifelong Learning – EU Policy Perspective John McCarthy European Commission DG EAC Vocational Training Policy Unit.
Advertisements

FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Building Effective Institutions for Managing Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
C.H. Montin, Ankara 12 May Ankara, 12 May 2014 Further techniques to improve the design of legislation Charles-Henri Montin, Smart Regulation Consultant.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
Ministère du budget et de la réforme de l’Etat 6/3/2015 OECD MENA 4 May 2007 C.H. MONTIN What is a regulatory reform review and why is it useful ? Experience.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Beirut – 20 April 2011 Citizens as partners: current issues and challenges Charles-Henri Montin Senior Regulatory Adviser Ministère de l’économie et des.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Σ SIGMA Belgrade – 4 May 2011 Consultation for better policy-making.
Review of the Legal Framework regarding the NGO sector in Mauritius Pierre Rosario DOMINGUE Chief Executive Officer Law Reform Commission Thursday, November.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Planning and submitting a shadow report Charlotte Gage Women’s Resource Centre.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
6. Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Validating the way forward: Review of feedback from Plenary.
Jean-Noel Guillossou Program Manager, SSATP SSATP Institutional Framework Annual Meeting, December 2012.
1 UNDECLARED WORK IN CROATIA Executive Capacity of Governance and Underground Economy: The Case of Croatia Zagrebl, September 1, 2015.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Identifying Data Needs: Workshop on Household Surveys and Measurement of Labour Force with Focus on Informal Economy Maseru, Lesotho, April 2008.
Time to act on the Future of Europe …
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
Stakeholder analysis for project design Ingvild Oia, Programme Specialist,UNDP Photo by: Konomiho/flickr.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi,12 November Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Assessing the impacts Charles-Henri.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
POLICY INVOLVEMENT - CANADA International Seminar on Strategies and Agreements Between the Public Sector and the NonProfit Sector Estonia March 2005 Susan.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 The OECD experience of Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Workshop: RIA for Prime Ministry Experts 13 October 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Session 3 RIA Consultation for Public Sector and Government.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Policy-making Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance,
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
OFFICIAL – SENSITIVE English Language Requirement for Public Sector Workers Draft Code of Practice Consultation.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Implementation of the European code of conduct on partnership Findings of a survey by ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME Structured dialogue 12 November 2014.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
CNVOS Centre for information service, co-operation and development of NGOs Tina Michieli EU Policy.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Building Coalitions for Change Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making Experience from OECD countries Directorate for Public.
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Stakeholder Involvement in Nuclear issues Workshop: Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development November 5-9, 2007 Why Stakeholders are.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Presentation transcript:

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 13 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Public Consultation as an integral part of RIA Charles-Henri Montin, Smart Regulation Consultant Former Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 2 Contents  Definitions  The three forms of communication  What topics?  Why consult?  Who to consult?  When?  Channels  A step-by-step approach  Lessons from experience

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 3 Consulting at start of the regulatory process  “Departments are responsible for identifying interested and affected parties, and for providing them with opportunities to take part in open, meaningful, and balanced consultations at all stages of the regulatory process. “ (Canada)  Publication of proposals in the Official Gazette to allow for comments, and take comments into consideration  Standard comment period: 30 days, but it can vary based on legislative requirements, international obligations, and other considerations. 75 days at least for proposals for new and changed technical regulations that may affect international trade.

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 4 What activities constitute consultation  inform and engage citizens on the nature and implications of the public policy issue based on available evidence, science, or knowledge; include citizens in developing policy objectives;  set out the process and timelines in a clear manner so that affected parties can organize and provide input; and  provide timely feedback to citizens and affected parties on the outcome of the consultations and on the priorities considered in decision making.

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 5 Use feedback from consultation  Check validity of the options, and the quantification of costs and benefits  Check they endorse the key assumptions and data that contribute to the analysis.

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 6 Active Participation Providing information Obtaining information and public views Identifying conflict lines Verifying consistency and acceptance Engaging the public in the formulation One way process: INFORMATION or notification Government Citizens Two-way flow: CONSULTATION Government Citizens Partnership Government Citizens Forms of public-private communication 2 Topics - Policy-making - Rule-making

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 7 Why consult the public? LegitimacyCredibilityConfidenceAdded valueTransparencyAlienation and connectivityRegulatory literacyManaging conflictIncreased complianceSocial cohesion

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 8 Who to consult? Subject/ Regulation Taxpayer Government department/ Regional, Local office Academic experts Charitable, not-for-profit organisation Organised interests (trade unions, employers’ associations) Private sector (companies, employers) Public sector workers (doctors, teachers) Service users / beneficiaries

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 9 When to consult? The Policy Cycle Policy Formulation Policy Delivery / Implementation Policy Review / Assessment Ex-Ante Evaluation / Impact Assessment Consultation Communication Ex-Post Evaluation Interim Evaluation

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 10 Adopting the right mix of channels ChannelsBest suited toLimits Advisory group Permanent contact Part of established process Lack of flexibility Possible capture Public meetings Two-way dialogue Easily relayed by media Difficult focus Capture ? Opinion surveys (incl. focus groups) Specific reform projects Lack of objectivity Little interaction WebsiteWide consultation “Open” Representativity Weak feedback

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Notes: Data for 2005 and 2008 are presented for the 30 OECD member countries and the European Union concerning consultation routinely used at central government level for primary laws Source: OECD Regulatory Management Systems’ Indicators Survey 2005 and Channels of public consultation

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 12 Developing consultation with stakeholders (1) OECD Handbook recommendations  Build a framework –Legal rights of access to information, legal status of consultation –Policies –Evaluation of activities and capactiies  Plan and act strategically –Set realistic objectives supporting government policy at different levels –Define target groups (publics) to match objectives –Assess available resources to fund activities –Set up evaluation tools  Choose and use the tools –Clear messages to disseminate on all types of channels –Interactive channels for consultation (process feedback) –Engaging citizens in agenda setting: consensus conference (DK), citizens’ juries (FR)

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 13 Developing consultation with stakeholders (2)  Harness the power of ICT –Web.2 and e-government open up new field of opportunities  Put principles into practice –Commitment to citizen participation by raising awareness and providing support –Rights to be grounded in law or policy –Clear objectives and precise roles of parties, avoid false expectations –Time: early in the process, and give realistic deadlines fitting into political agenda –Objectivity of information provided, and easily accessible –Coordination across government to manage knowledge, build networks –Accountability: clear timetable, feedback to citizens –Evaluation tools to be developed, data collected. Engage citizens in evaluating events

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 14 Benefits and pitfalls of C° (UK report 1999) Consultation can – · enhance the quality and effectiveness of policy making by providing additional insights Consultation can – · create delay and administrative overload. · strengthen the legitimacy of final decisions · provide a focus for the mobilisation of resistance, · increase the responsiveness of citizens · raise expectations · produce unrepresentative views

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 15 Lessons of experience Why? Clarify the purpose of consultation at the outset of the process: A code of practice can help to enhance confidence in the consultation process Who? Consultation should be open & participation voluntary Be specific when selecting whom to consult be specific Identify the objectives and resources of stakeholders; their media use, location and pursued interests Revisit the stakeholder analysis throughout the public consultation process Be willing to talk. BUT: Be wary: Sometimes the “beneficiaries” can be the hardest group to deal with When? Set a clear framework and timescale for the consultation process Align purposes with tools of public consultation in different stages of the policy cycle How? Use a flexible approach that combines a range of consultation tools: Reach out to the stakeholders Respond to comments receive and use the input: Establish mechanism ensuring that public comments are adequately taken into account Develop new approaches to better use ICT

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 16 Questions ?

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 17 Conclusions  Consultation is a key element to make the RIA process credible  It should not be seen as an external interference, or a purely formal obligation  But an opportunity to improve the regulatory proposal

C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 18 More on the topic  « Engaging citizens in policy-making » (OECD, 2001):  “Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making :” _1_1_1,00.html _1_1_1,00.html  “Citizens as partners” Handbook (2003)  European Commission guidelines on consultation and dialogue (2002):  « Public policy and public participation »: aspc.gc.ca/canada/regions/atlantic/pdf/pub_policy_partic_e.pdfhttp:// aspc.gc.ca/canada/regions/atlantic/pdf/pub_policy_partic_e.pdf  « Civic participation in policy-making, a literature review: »  (independent viewpoint ) « Public participation: »