-1- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May 2006 9-12 May 2006 Investigation of the LabPET TM Detector and Electronics for Photon-Counting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 8. Gamma Camera (II)
Advertisements

What are PET basics?.
CT Scanning: Dosimetry and Artefacts
Image Reconstruction.
Image Quality Bushong Chapter 7.
IMAGE QUALITY.
PET Design: Simulation Studies using GEANT4 and GATE - Status Report - Martin Göttlich DESY.
Dr. Mohamed Bingabr University of Central Oklahoma
Chapter 8 Planar Scintigaraphy
Alexander Klyachko, IU Cyclotron, PTCOG51, Seoul, South Korea, May 17-19, 2012 A.V. Klyachko 1, D.F. Nichiporov 1, L. Coutinho 2, C.-W. Cheng 2, 3, M.
Computed Tomography III
Types of Radiation Interactions All or Nothing Many Small There is a finite probability per unit length that the radiation is absorbed. If not, there is.
Computed Tomography RAD309
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
Planar scintigraphy produces two-dimensional images of three dimensional objects. It is handicapped by the superposition of active and nonactive layers.
8.1 PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF X-RAYS
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Dr. Azza Helal A. Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University.
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
Very High Resolution Small Animal PET Don J. Burdette Department of Physics.
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
X-Ray Medical Imaging Physics – IB Objectives
1 Scintillators  One of the most widely used particle detection techniques Ionization -> Excitation -> Photons -> Electronic conversion -> Amplification.
Medical Image Analysis Medical Imaging Modalities: X-Ray Imaging Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, Second Edition, by Atam P. Dhawan,
Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging
A-LEVEL PHYSICS 15/09/ :49 Medical Physics.
FP7 FMTXCT Project UMCE-HGUGM first year activity report Partner FIHGM Laboratorio de Imagen Médica. Medicina Experimental Hospital Universitario Gregorio.
Fast Detectors for Medical and Particle Physics Applications Wilfried Vogel Hamamatsu Photonics France March 8, 2007.
FP7 FMTXCT Project UMCE-HGUGM second year activity report Partner FIHGM Laboratorio de Imagen Médica. Medicina Experimental Hospital Universitario Gregorio.
Fundamental Limits of Positron Emission Tomography
Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging
X - RAYS IN DIAGNOSTICS D. Krilov
Performance limits of a 55  m pixel CdTe detector G.Pellegrini, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, M. Ullan Centro Nacional de Microelectronica, Barcelona, 08193,
BMI I FS05 – Class 4 “Nuclear Imaging: Math” Slide 1 Biomedical Imaging I Class 5 – Radionuclide Imaging (PET, SPECT), Part 3: Attenuation and Scatter.
THE EFFECT OF NON-IDEAL DETECTORS ON ENERGY WEIGHTED SPECTRA USED IN X-RAY MEDICAL IMAGING George D. Patatoukas 1, Panagiotis F. Liaparinos 1, Anastasios.
High resolution X-ray analysis of a proximal human femur with synchrotron radiation and an innovative linear detector M.Bettuzzi, R. Brancaccio, F.Casali,
Optimization of Detectors for Time of Flight PET Marek Moszyński, Tomasz Szczęśniak, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Medical Image Analysis Interaction of Electromagnetic Radiation with Matter in Medical Imaging Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis,
Nuclear Medicine: Tomographic Imaging – SPECT, SPECT-CT and PET-CT Katrina Cockburn Nuclear Medicine Physicist.
CT QUALITY MANAGEMENT. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Introduction In positron emission tomography (PET), each line of response (LOR) has a different sensitivity due to the scanner's geometry and detector.
Medical applications of particle physics General characteristics of detectors (5 th Chapter) ASLI YILDIRIM.
Impact of Axial Compression for the mMR Simultaneous PET-MR Scanner Martin A Belzunce, Jim O’Doherty and Andrew J Reader King's College London, Division.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
Prospects to Use Silicon Photomultipliers for the Astroparticle Physics Experiments EUSO and MAGIC A. Nepomuk Otte Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München.
X-ray SNR in 3 steps. I ∆I. X-ray transmission SNR Review Let N = average number of transmitted x-rays N = N 0 exp [ - ∫  dz ] Emission and transmission.
1 Nuclear Medicine SPECT and PET. 2 a good book! SR Cherry, JA Sorenson, ME Phelps Physics in Nuclear Medicine Saunders, 2012.
Acquisition time6 min1 min 12 s Collimator height25 mm (Anger)12 mm (HiSens) Detector1 layer, 1 pixel / hole3 layers, 1 pixel / hole3 layers, 4 pixels.
Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation 242 NMT 1 Dr. Abdo Mansour Assistant Professor of radiology
Considerations on the possibility of Phase Contrast Mammography using ICS sources B. Golosio a, P. Delogu b, I. Zanette b, M. Carpinelli a, G. L. Masala.
DESCRIPTION OF PIXIRAD  The PIXIRAD Imaging Counter is an INFN-Pisa Spin-off  It works in photon counting  Pulse discrimination with two thresholds.
Basis of Mammography F. Milano Dept. Clinical Physiopathology University of Florence
PET Imaging Positron Emission Tomography
Introduction to Medical Imaging Week 2: X-ray and CT
Simulations in Medical Physics Y. TOUFIQUE*, R.CHERKAOUI EL MOURSLI*, M.KACI**, G.AMOROS**, *Université Mohammed V –Agdal, Faculté des Sciences de Rabat,
Computed tomography. Formation of a CT image Data acquisitionImage reconstruction Image display, manipulation Storage, communication And recording.
Time of Flight in Positron Emission Tomography using Fast Sampling Dan Herbst Henry Frisch.
IMAGE QUALITY. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
-42 Impact of signal non-repeatability on spectral CT images
Computed Tomography Data Acquisition
Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste
Reconstructions with TOF for in-beam PET
Development of a High Precision Axial 3-D PET for Brain Imaging
Application of Nuclear Physics
X. Zhu1, 3, Z. Deng1, 3, A. Lan2, X. Sun2, Y. Liu1, 3, Y. Shao2
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Presentation transcript:

-1- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Investigation of the LabPET TM Detector and Electronics for Photon-Counting CT Imaging Philippe Bérard a, J. Riendeau b, C. M. Pepin a, D. Rouleau a, J. Cadorette a, R. Fontaine b, R. Lecomte a 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology Marseille 9-12 May 2006 a Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

-2- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 IEEE NSS/MIC Portland, October 2003 (2 x 2 x 10 mm 3 ). Academy of Molecular Imaging, March 2004, Orlando FL (1 x 1 x 10 mm 3 ). 1 x 1 mm 2 single L(Y)SO pixel PET detector Standard NIM electronics Am 241  59.5 keV 1mm 3 source 74 MBq week ! 5 sec/proj10 sec/proj 20 sec/proj 50 sec/proj 40 sec/proj 30 sec/proj

-3- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Main Purpose  Develop a combined multi-modality scanner capable of obtaining anatomical & functional data using a single apparatus relying on the same detection system  Conduct successful follow-up investigations of gene expression, disease progression and therapeutic outcome in small animal models. See poster # 191 Lecomte et al. Preliminary report on the LabPET™, a high-performance APD-based digital PET scanner for small animal imaging. Investigation of photon-counting mode CT performed using LabPET™ detectors and digital electronics. Molecular Imaging Involves highly specific probes

-4- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Dose issue in follow-up studies Effects of radiation dose on small animals LD50/30 for mouse: ~ 5 – 7.5 Gy Doses in the range cGy : induce cell resistance to subsequent therapeutic doses of radiation (“adaptive response” * ) Doses in the range cGy : induce therapeutic effects on certain tumor cells *G.P. Raaphorst and S. Boyden, “Adaptive response and its variation in human normal and tumor cells”, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 75, pp , PET/CT dose objective: lower than 1 cGy Lower spatial resolution: Dose ~ Δx -4, PET scintillator ~ 2 x 2 mm 2 pixels Micro CT typical dose ranges cGy (100 µm resolution, σ ~ 25 HU) ** **Lee et al. A flat-panel detector based micro-CT system: performance evaluation for small-animal imaging, Physics in Medicine and Biology, no.48, Ford, N. L., Thornton, M. M., Holdswoth, D. W. Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals, Med. Phys., vol. 30, no. 11, pp , 2003.

-5- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Advantages of photon counting CT: Each event has equal weight independent of energy  Elimination of weight factor proportional to energy of integration imaging  Closer to optimal weighting of E -3 * Threshold detection allows discrimination of noise and scatter *R.N. Cahn et al., “Detective quantum efficiency dependence on X-ray energy weighting in mammography”, Med. Phys. 26 (12), pp , December Photon counting in CT Detector: high light output scintillators to detect low-energy X-rays, fast fluorescence to avoid pulse-pile-up  count-rate > counts/s, the higher the better Requirements :

-6- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 BGOGSOLSOLYSOYSONaI(Tl)CsI(Tl) Decay Time (ns) Light Output (APD) Peak Emission (nm) /μ (mm) at 60 keV Photoelectric probability (%) at 60 keV /μ (mm) at 511 keV Photoelectric probability (%) at 511 keV Potential PET/CT Scintillators Photon-counting CT scintillator requirements: Suitable for PET Short decay time  to avoid pulse pile-up and dead time in the front-end processing electronics High light output  low X-ray energy threshold

-7- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 PET/CT Detector LYSO best combination of : high attenuation coefficient high light output fast decay time  PET and CT imaging in photon- counting mode Decay Time (ns) Light Output (APD) Peak Emission (nm) 1/μ (mm) at 60 keV Photoelectric probability (%) at 60 keV 1/μ (mm) at 511 keV Photoelectric probability (%) at 511 keV LYSO The high photoelectric absorption  confines spatial resolution to the crystal of interaction reflector scintillator APD

-8- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 PET/CT Configuration Oxford instruments 3. Normal microfocus x-ray tube with off focal spot geometrical configuration and reconstruction. See TomXGam and PIXSCAN 1. Rod anode microfocus 2. Carbon nanotube cold cathode

-9- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Materials and Methods Stepping motors move X-ray source and phantom Data counts transferred by serial link Motor controller steps over 360 o Acquisition with a limited number of detectors Step and shoot acquisition

-10- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 LabPET TM Electronics APD Detector Module APD Bias Regulators 16-ch CSP ASIC (0.18 µm) Free- running ADCs FPGA DSP LabTEP TM 1 ‘fast track’ module See poster # 180 Fontaine et al. Digital signal processing applied to crystal identification in positron emission tomography dedicated to small animals.

-11- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Digitized CSP signal from X-ray source  A veto with a duration of 8 samples was programmed in the FPGA after threshold crossing to detect maximum Resulting non-paralyzable dead-time of 156 ns limits the count rate to 5.6 x 10 6 events/sec/channel. Signal rise time ~90 ns (at 50% ADC maximum dynamic range) Fast baseline restorer to enable fast count rate Sample number Sample value ~ 55 keV event 65 kV, 20  A d xd = 23 cm 0.6 mm Cu

-12- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Electronics count-rate X-ray source and LabPET™ detector Non-paralyzable model m = recorded count rate n = true interaction rate  = system dead time: 156 ns 10 % dead time at 1.6 x 10 6 counts/s 25 % dead time at 2.0 x 10 6 counts/s Paralyzable component from the detector ! CSP saturation Charge integration time Scintillator decay time

-13- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 CT Image Acquisition Operation characteristics Voltage : 65 kV Current : 20 μA Filter : 0.6 mm Cu Distance x-ray source – phantom : 11.5 cm Distance phantom - detectors : 11.5 cm nb detectors : 16 Linear sampling : 2 mm (detector width) 180 projections, 0.1 second/projection  25 minutes scan time 1 second/projection  45 minutes scan time Parallel FBP reconstruction algorithm : Nyquist cutoff frequency

-14- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Energy resolution of detector Energy spectrum used for image acquisition. Landmark for small animals : keV mean energy. Higher light output desirable Better SNR Better energy resolution  Lower counting threshold

-15- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Spatial Resolution PSF : FWHM 1.03 mm FWTM 2.50 mm 250 μm rod PSF FWHM FWTM

-16- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Spatial Resolution G. T. Barnes, M. V. Yester, M. A. King, Optimizing computed tomography (CT) scanner geometry, SPIE Vol. 173 Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VII (1979) MTF 10% sys exp = 0.71 lp/mm MTF

-17- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Spatial Resolution MTF sys = MTF foc  MTF det  MTF sam  MTF alg G. T. Barnes, M. V. Yester, M. A. King, Optimizing computed tomography (CT) scanner geometry, SPIE Vol. 173 Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VII (1979) MTF MTF 10% sys exp = 0.71 lp/mm a = 50  m

-18- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Spatial Resolution MTF sys = MTF foc  MTF alg  MTF det  MTF sam G. T. Barnes, M. V. Yester, M. A. King, Optimizing computed tomography (CT) scanner geometry, SPIE Vol. 173 Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VII (1979) MTF MTF 10% sys exp = 0.71 lp/mm

-19- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Spatial Resolution MTF sys = MTF foc  MTF det  MTF sam  MTF alg G. T. Barnes, M. V. Yester, M. A. King, Optimizing computed tomography (CT) scanner geometry, SPIE Vol. 173 Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VII (1979) MTF MTF 10% sys exp = 0.71 lp/mm

-20- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Spatial Resolution MTF sys = MTF foc  MTF det  MTF sam  MTF alg G. T. Barnes, M. V. Yester, M. A. King, Optimizing computed tomography (CT) scanner geometry, SPIE Vol. 173 Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VII (1979) MTF 10% sys theo = 0.73 lp/mm MTF MTF 10% sys exp = 0.71 lp/mm

-21- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May cm diameter cylinder filled with water Ring artifacts !!! 1 sec/projections Noise

-22- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Biological Tissue HU Bone100 to 1000 Soft tissues0 to 80 Adipose tissues-50 to -100 Kidney30 Liver40 to 50 Blood40 σ ~ D -0.5 Noise GORE, J. C., TOFTS, P. S. Statistical limitations in computed tomography, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 23, no. 6, pp , 1978.

-23- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Contrast phantom Average (HU) Standard deviation (HU) Density (g/cm 3 ) 1. Teflon x Polyethylene Polystyrene Air hole Polycarbonate Nylon Plexiglas cm diameter Plexiglas phantom filled with 5 mm diameter rods Several tissue-like materials can be discriminated with sufficient accuracy. Measured dose (TLD): 0.7 mGy

-24- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Conclusion detectcount APD-based inorganic scintillator detectors and fast digital multi-channel pulse processing electronics, as developed for the LabPET TM, are suitable to detect and count individual X- rays in the diagnostic energy range. Resolution : 1.03 mm Noise : 6.8 HU Dose : 0.7 mGy

-25- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Future Work Higher resolution : magnification, higher sampling, smaller detector pixel size Image artefact : CT adapted image reconstruction algorithm Add more detector, more analog and digital electronics Objectives : ~ 1 μl PET resolution, < 500 μm CT resolution

-26- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Acknowledgments Thanks to: Murray Davies and Henri Dautet of PerkinElmer Optoelectronics, Vaudreuil, QC for providing the detectors used in this study

-27- 1st European Conference on Molecular Imaging Technology 9-12 May May 2006 Thank You for your attention !