Higgs boson spin/CP at LHC N. Godinovic (FESB-Split) on behalf of CMS collaboration Outline: Motivation S CP observables Significane for exclusion non.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery of a standard model Higgs boson using vector boson fusion at the LHC Craig Buttar University of Sheffield Collaborators: G.Azuelos, V.Cavasinni,
Advertisements

Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Higgs physics theory aspects experimental approaches Monika Jurcovicova Department of Nuclear Physics, Comenius University Bratislava H f ~ m f.
Regina Demina, University of Rochester 02/08/2012 Forward-backward asymmetry in top-antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
26th Rencontres de Blois, Particle Physics and Cosmology, 2014 BSM Higgs Searches at the LHC C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous PPD, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.
Higgs Physics with ATLAS Arno Straessner Journée de réflexion du DPNC 14 septembre 2007.
THE SEARCH FOR THE HIGGS BOSON Aungshuman Zaman Department of Physics and Astronomy Stony Brook University October 11, 2010.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Higgs Searches at LEP2 E. Kneringer University of Innsbruck / Austria Collaboration LAKE LOUISE WINTER INSTITUTE Electroweak Physics February 1999.
Jose E. Garcia presented by: Jose E. Garcia (IFIC-Valencia) on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration XXXIXth Rencontres de Moriond.
Higgs and SUSY at the LHC Alan Barr on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations ICHEP-17 Aug 2004, Beijing ATLAS.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
Discovery Potential for MSSM Higgs Bosons with ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration International Europhysics Conference on.
1 Yurii Maravin, SMU/CLEO Snowmass 2001 Experimental Aspects of  physics at CLEO-c measurements of fundamental quantities, tests of weak couplings and.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Gauge Boson-Pair Production in pp Collision at 14 TeV Using ATLAS at the LHC Erez Reinherz-Aronis.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Search for CP violation in  decays R. Stroynowski SMU Representing CLEO Collaboration.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
RHUL-Royal Holloway, University of London: 16 th November 2007 Prospects of Top Quark ATLAS A.Onofre
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
Study of Higgs boson production in bosonic decay channels at the LHC (including off-shell production) Susumu Oda Kyushu University On behalf of the ATLAS.
Search for Randall-Sundrum Gravitons with 1 fb -1 of Data Amitabha Das.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Discovery Potential of ATLAS for Extended Gauge Symmetries Daisuke Naito (Okayama University, Japan) for the ATLAS Collaboration Nov. 1st, 2006
Yoshitaro Takaesu U. of Tokyo LHC limits on the Higgs-portal WIMPs arXiv: in collaboration with M. Endo (U.Tokyo)
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
New Heavy Gauge Bosons at CMS Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Vienna Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson at LHC A. Nikitenko, IC, London. On leave from ITEP, Moscow ICHEP2006, EW session, July 28, 2006 CERN, Building.
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
R. Brunelière Gauge Couplings at LEP2 1 Triple and Quartic Gauge Couplings at LEP 2 Renaud Brunelière LAPP - Université de Savoie on behalf of the four.
Moriond EW 2013BSM Higgs Searches at the Tevatron 1 Beyond the SM scalar boson searches in TeVatron Elemér Nagy CPPM on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
New Results From CMS Y.Onel University of Iowa A Topical Conference on elementary particles, astrophysics and cosmology Miami 2011, Dec 15-20, 2011 conference.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
1 Searching for Z’ and model discrimination in ATLAS ● Motivations ● Current limits and discovery potential ● Discriminating variables in channel Z’ 
Single Top Quark Studies, L. Li (UC Riverside) ICHEP 08, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside for the CDF, DØ and H1 Collaborations.
Higgs boson pair production in new physics models at hadron, lepton, and photon colliders October Daisuke Harada (KEK) in collaboration.
SM Higgs decay to dimuons Ashok Kumar, Suman Beri Panjab University – Chandigarh INDIA-CMS meet March 3-5, 2005 Chandigarh.
D. Bortoletto 1 16/June/2014D. Bortoletto. Final states and tool strategies  Develop analysis framework and tools for specific final states allowing.
Hiroshima Higgs Workshop 2006, Jan. 17 – 19, 2006 Higgs Searches at the Tevatron Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Osaka City University) for the CDF Collaboration 1.Tevatron.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
29 August, 2007 Ashfaq Ahmad, Search for Charged Higgs at the LHC 1 Search for Charged Higgs at the LHC Ashfaq Ahmad (Stony Brook)
Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
RANDALL-SUNDRUM GRAVITON IDENTIFICATION IN DILEPTON AND DIPHOTON EVENTS WITH ATLAS V.A. Bednyakov JINR, LNP with A.A. Pankov, A.V. Tsytrinov ICTP Affiliated.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
LHC Prospects on Standard Model Higgs Riccardo Ranieri INFN and Università degli Studi di Firenze on behalf of ATLAS and CMS Collaborations ICHEP’04 32.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Experimental Particle PhysicsPHYS6011 Performing an analysis Lecture 5
Greg Heath University of Bristol
Presentation transcript:

Higgs boson spin/CP at LHC N. Godinovic (FESB-Split) on behalf of CMS collaboration Outline: Motivation S CP observables Significane for exclusion non SM S CP in H->ZZ->4l Significance for exclusion non SM S CP in WBF and H->WW->2l2 Significance for CP violation in H->ZZ->4l

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 2 Motivations  Different theoretical models assign different quantum numbers:  SM  1 Higgs boson  scalar, S CP =0 ++  MSSM  5 Higgs bosons : two neutral scalars, S CP =0 ++ one neutral pseudoscalar, S CP =0 +  two charged, S CP =0 -,0 +  strongly interacting models predicts , some other model predicts pseudocalar 0 -.  CP violation could be present in the Higgs sector !

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 3 SM Higgs mass constraints from the data and theory Indirect constraints from precision EW data : M H < 260 GeV at 95 %CL (2004) M H < 186 GeV with Run-I/II prelim. (2005) M H < 166 GeV (2006, ICHEP06) Experiment SM theory The triviality (upper) bound and vacuum stability (lower) bound as function of the cut-off scale  “triviality” : Higgs self-coupling remains finite 2007: M H <153 GeV, preliminary Direct limit from LEP: M H > GeV

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 4 SM Higgs: Productions and decays

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 5 Resonance in H -> ZZ->4l ( * ) ?  Excess of events is clearly visible in 4l mass spectrum in a mass range expected for the SM Higgs boson, but is it SM Higgs boson ? 44

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 6 Higgs boson properties  SM Higgs is scalar particle 0 ++  Once the mass of the SM Higgs boson is known all its properties are known.  coupling strengths to gauge bosons  coupling strengths to fermions  width  Higgs self-couplings  Quantum number spin and CP (S CP )? However this properties have to be experimentally verified. verified.

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 7 S CP Observables in H->ZZ->4l

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 8 Scalar type HZZ couplings  Generally Higgs decay H->ZZ produces a system of two Z bosons in the helicity state:  Different couplings give rise to the following characteristic helicity states:  SM Scalar (0 ++ ) (A=1, B=C=0)  Not SM Scalar (0 ++ ) ”gauge invariant coupling” (B=1, A=C=0)  Not SM Pseudoscalar (0 +– ) (A=B=0, C=1)  CP violation (A,B,C  0), late on will consider (A,C  0)  

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 9   1,  2 are angles between negatively charged leptons in Z rest frame and direction of motion of corresponding Z in the Higgs rest frame  T – fraction of transversally polarized Z bosons  L – fraction of longitudinally polarized Z bosons  For better differentiation of different S CP cases asymmetry parameter (R) is defined: S CP observables in H  ZZ  4 l  Plane angle distribution:   is measured between two planes defined by lepton decays of two Z bosons in the Higgs rest frame  Polar angle distribution:

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 10 Theory: Plane angle distributions There are unique theoretical values of ,  for different S CP values. Parameter  Parameter 

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 11 Theory: Polar angles distributions: S CP  0 ++ Parameter R

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 12 Theory & real life Ideal detector large statistics - Real detector Our detectors are very precise but not ideal and we have to understand very detailed how our detector works and how it affects angular distributions and also we have to take in account the background influence in order to find the expected means and errors of the angular parameters in real experiment.

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 13 ATLAS Study S CP in H->ZZ->4l

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 14 Polar and plane angle distribution for SM m H =200 GeV Polar and plane angle distribution for SM m H =200 GeV Polar angle distribution Decay plane angle distribution Signal Background no cuts and detector response only detector acceptance all cuts and smearing ATLAS hep-ph/ H->ZZ->4l

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 15 Expected values and errors for: R, ,   The error reflects the statistical error form the number of events, the statistical error from the number of background events subtracted and the error made by the estimation of the number of background events. Parameter R as a function of m H 100 fb -1 Parameter  and  for m H =200 Gev

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 16 Significance for exclusion non SM S CP

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 17 ATLAS Study S CP in WBF & H->WW->2l2

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 18 S CP in H->qqWW->qq2l2 (WBF)  Higgs signature  Two forward (tag) jets with large   Two charged leptons in central region with small opening angle  ll in transverse plane and high p T  Missing E T  Background suppression  Reject events with jets in central region (between tag jets)  Cuts on P T, M jj, M ll,  ll, cos  ll,  R ll  S CP observables  Distribution of the tag jet angle:  jj  Invariant mass of the charged lepton pairs  Distribution of the angle between lepton in transverse plane:  ll (?) Eur.Phys.J.C32S2:19-54,2004 Higgs m H =160 GeV  background tt+Wt bacground W W background M T (GeV)/c 2 ATLAS-hep-ph/  jj

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 19 S CP in VBF & H->2l2 S CP in VBF & H->2l2  Distribution of the tag jets angle for the SM and non SM coupling.  jj – angle between jets in transverse plane. m H =150 GeVL= 30 fb-1

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 20  jj : Significance to exclude non SM S CP  Mean log likelihood ratio 2ln(L SM /L NSM ) obtained from a large number of MC experiments and RMS of the distribution of the likelihood ratio NSM L=30 fb -1 VBF &H->2l2 VBF &H->2l2

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 21 M ll : Significance to exclude non SM S CP  Feasibility study for exclusion non SM coupling is done by number of MC experiments with expected number of events which give the mean and RMS of the distribution of the mean di-lepton mass.  Exclusion significance=(SM-NSM)/SM RMS fb -1 VBF &H->2l2 VBF &H->2l2

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 22 CMS feasibility study to measure CP violation H->ZZ->4l p-p at the LHC produce a Higgs boson in mass eigenstate which in CP violation case is not CP eigenstate. CP violation H->ZZ->4l

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 23 CP violation in Higgs sector (1)  An effective Lagrangian (A. Skojd,P. Osland, Phys.Lett. B329, 305) which has simultaneously scalar and pseudoscalar type coupling between Higgs and vector boson leads to CP violation:  H - scalar (  0); I - CP violation term(0<  < ±  /2) A – pseuodscalar (  =±  /2) Acta.Phys. Polon. Vol. 38., 738

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 24 CP violation in Higgs sector (2)  Parameter  is determined by maximization of the likelihood function L( ,R) constructed from the angular distribution and the invariant mass distribution of the four leptons. 200 MC experiments for each value of  and Higgs mass at 60 fb -1 : mean and RMS of  - expected values and uncertainty in real experiment 0+ (  /2) 0 -

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 25 Exclusion significance  Enhancement (suppression) factor of the signal rate compared to the SM expectation: C 2 =  BR/  SM BR SM   Precison of  measurents  ~ 1/C Minimal C 2 needed to exclude SM Higgs at N  level (N=  /   ) for 60 fb -1

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 26 Summary  H  assures spin 0 or 2, 1 is excluded (Yang’s Theorem)  Spin 0 should be easily confirmed by an isotropic distribution of two gammas!  VBF and decay H->WW->2l2 have the largest discovery potential for m H <2M Z ) and it also provide very promising prospects to confirm the S CP quantum numbers of an SM Higgs with mass between 130 and 180 GeV using an integrated luminosity of 30 fb -1.  H->ZZ ( * ) ->4l: Discovery is possible with less than 10 fb -1 in a wide range of mass: 130<m H <160 and 2m Z <m H <550 GeV.  Angular correlation in H->ZZ->4l make possible to determine  ZZ-coupling and the measurement of CP violation is feasible

Backup slides

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 28 Mean value of Z * - mass distribution for M H(A) <2M Z scalar pseudoscalar d  /dM Z*  M Z* =39.87 GeV = GeV Barger et. al., Phys Rev. D49,(1994), 79 Only shape can be used to make distinction between scalar and pseudoscalar

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 29 ,  and R bellow m H <2m Z ,  and R bellow m H <2m Z  This is valid only above ZZ threshold since the narrow width approximation (NWA) is used for the Z boson propagator

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 30  To get ,  and R below ZZ threshold one has to use Finite width approximation (FWA) Finite width approximation (FWA) valid also for M H <2M Z (i.e. when one Z is off-shell) Narrow width approximation (NWA) valid only for M H >2M Z Angular distribution below ZZ threshold (M H <2M Z )

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 31 Calculating  and  below ZZ threshold  A. Skjold, P. Osland, Phys. Lett. B311(1993)261/265  Predictions for  (m) and  (m) after numerical integration (with Mathematica)

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 32 Results for  and  below threshold There is unique prediction for  and  even below ZZ threshold

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 33 How to get prediction for R?  we need T 00  Remainder: T 00

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 34 m H = 150 GeV, m H = 150 GeV, L = 400 fb -1 R , , , ,  pseudoscalarscalar R data =0,47  0,09 R th =0,498  11 single Monte Carlo experiments

N. Godinovic Four Seas Conference, , Iasi, Romania 35 Z * - mass distribution below threshold scalar pseudoscalar d  /dM Z*  M Z*  Barger et. al., Phys Rev. D49,(1994), 79  To distinguish between scalar and pseudoscalar we use shape of distribution  Other possibility: use maximum m H =150 GeV