Simulation for the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model using quantum state preparation Jinhua Aug 14, 2012 Zheng-Wei Zhou( 周正威) Key Lab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Queensland
Advertisements

Exploring Topological Phases With Quantum Walks $$ NSF, AFOSR MURI, DARPA, ARO Harvard-MIT Takuya Kitagawa, Erez Berg, Mark Rudner Eugene Demler Harvard.
Integrals over Operators
Preparing Topological States on a Quantum Computer Martin Schwarz (1), Kristan Temme (1), Frank Verstraete (1) Toby Cubitt (2), David Perez-Garcia (2)
Anyon and Topological Quantum Computation Beijing Normal university
The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Umesh V. Vazirani U. C. Berkeley Quantum Algorithms: a survey.
1 Multiphoton Entanglement Eli Megidish Quantum Optics Seminar,2010.
Quantum Error Correction Joshua Kretchmer Gautam Wilkins Eric Zhou.
Non-Abelian Anyon Interferometry Collaborators:Parsa Bonderson, Microsoft Station Q Alexei Kitaev, Caltech Joost Slingerland, DIAS Kirill Shtengel, UC.
Holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces Lian-Ao Wu Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control In collaboration with Polao Zanardi.
Twist liquids and gauging anyonic symmetries
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Jordan-Wigner Transformation and Topological characterization of quantum phase transitions in the Kitaev model Guang-Ming Zhang (Tsinghua Univ) Xiaoyong.
Quantum Circuits for Clebsch- GordAn and Schur duality transformations D. Bacon (Caltech), I. Chuang (MIT) and A. Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/ more.
Revealing anyonic statistics by multiphoton entanglement Jiannis K. Pachos Witlef Wieczorek Christian Schmid Nikolai Kiesel Reinhold Pohlner Harald Weinfurter.
Quantum Error Correction Codes-From Qubit to Qudit Xiaoyi Tang, Paul McGuirk.
Quantum fermions from classical statistics. quantum mechanics can be described by classical statistics !
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
In Search of a Magic Bottle of Error-Be-Gone Dave Bacon Caltech Department of Physics Institute for Quantum Information Decoherence errosol.
Quantum Computing Lecture 1 Michele Mosca. l Course Outline
Simulating Physical Systems by Quantum Computers J. E. Gubernatis Theoretical Division Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Algebraic Aspects of Topological Quantum Computing Eric Rowell Indiana University.
Study of Quantum Phase Transition in Topological phases in U(1) x U(1) System using Monte-Carlo Simulation Presenter : Jong Yeon Lee.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Quantum Information Group School of Physics and Astronomy Spectrum of the non-abelian phase in Kitaev's honeycomb.
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Modular Tensor Categories and Topological Quantum Computing Prakash Panangaden and Eric Paquette.
Michael A. Nielsen University of Queensland Quantum Mechanics I: Basic Principles Goal of this and the next lecture: to introduce all the basic elements.
Decoherence-free/Noiseless Subsystems for Quantum Computation IPQI, Bhubaneswar February 24, 2014 Mark Byrd Physics Department, CS Department Southern.
The Road to Quantum Computing: Boson Sampling Nate Kinsey ECE 695 Quantum Photonics Spring 2014.
Quantum Factoring Michele Mosca The Fifth Canadian Summer School on Quantum Information August 3, 2005.
A Novel Algebraic Approach to Quantum and Classical Dualities Emilio Cobanera Department of Physics - Indiana University DESY Theory Workshop 2010 Gerardo.
Bell Measurements and Teleportation. Overview Entanglement Bell states and Bell measurements Limitations on Bell measurements using linear devices Teleportation.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 667 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Richard Cleve DC 2117 Lecture 20 (2009)
1 Dorit Aharonov Hebrew Univ. & UC Berkeley Adiabatic Quantum Computation.
Tensor networks and the numerical study of quantum and classical systems on infinite lattices Román Orús School of Physical Sciences, The University of.
1 The Topological approach to building a quantum computer. Michael H. Freedman Theory Group Microsoft Research.
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
CENTER FOR EXOTIC QUANTUM SYSTEMS CEQS Preskill 1983 Kitaev 2002 Refael 2005 Motrunich 2006 Fisher 2009 Historically, Caltech physics has focused on the.
A Monomial matrix formalism to describe quantum many-body states Maarten Van den Nest Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics Montreal, October 19 th 2011.
A simple nearest-neighbour two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation Stephen Bartlett Terry.
Quantum simulation for frustrated many body interaction models Lanzhou Aug. 2, 2011 Zheng-Wei Zhou( 周正威) Key Lab of Quantum Information, CAS, USTC In collaboration.
Entangling Quantum Virtual Subsytems Paolo Zanardi ISI Foundation February Universita’di Milano.
Entanglement and Topological order in 1D & 2D cluster states
Indefinite causal order in quantum mechanics Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna & Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Vienna Mateus.
F Matrix: F F F F F Pentagon Fusion rules: 1x1 = 0+1; 1x0 = 0x1 = 1; 0x0 = 0 Fibonacci anyon with topological “charge” 1.
Mesoscopic Physics Introduction Prof. I.V.Krive lecture presentation Address: Svobody Sq. 4, 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Rooms. 5-46, 7-36, Phone: +38(057)707.
Fidelities of Quantum ARQ Protocol Alexei Ashikhmin Bell Labs  Classical Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) Protocol  Qubits, von Neumann Measurement, Quantum.
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
Richard Cleve DC 2117 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 667 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Lecture (2011)
Quantum simulation for frustrated many body interaction models
Entanglement Entropy In Gauge Theories Sandip Trivedi Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
1 The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE:
Natsumi Nagata E-ken Journal Club December 21, 2012 Minimal fields of canonical dimensionality are free S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D86, (2012) [ ].
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
Linear Quantum Error Correction
Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Topological Entanglement Entropy and Multipartite correlations Kohtaro Kato (The University of Tokyo) based on.
Algorithmic simulation of far-from- equilibrium dynamics using quantum computer Walter V. Pogosov 1,2,3 1 Dukhov Research Institute of Automatics (Rosatom),
On MPS and PEPS… David Pérez-García. Near Chiemsee
Quantum entanglement measures and detection
Topological Order and its Quantum Phase Transition
3rd Lecture: QMA & The local Hamiltonian problem (CNT’D)
On the Classification of Modular Tensor Categories
OSU Quantum Information Seminar
Topological quantum computing ▬ Toric code
Quantum Computing: the Majorana Fermion Solution
SOC Fermi Gas in 1D Optical Lattice —Exotic pairing states and Topological properties 中科院物理研究所 胡海平 Collaborators : Chen Cheng, Yucheng Wang, Hong-Gang.
in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
Presentation transcript:

Simulation for the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model using quantum state preparation Jinhua Aug 14, 2012 Zheng-Wei Zhou( 周正威) Key Lab of Quantum Information, CAS, USTC In collaboration with: Univ. of Sci. & Tech. of China X.-W. Luo ( 罗希望 ) Y.-J. Han ( 韩永建 ) X.-X. Zhou ( 周幸祥 ) G.-C. Guo ( 郭光灿 )

Outline I. Some Backgrounds on Quantum Simulation II. Introduction to topological quantum computing based on Kitaev’s group algebra (quantum double) model III. Simulation for the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model using quantum state preparation Summary

I. Backgrounds on Quantum Simulation

“Nature isn't classical, and if you want to make a simulation of Nature, you'd better make it quantum mechanical, and it's a wonderful problem, because it doesn't look so easy.” (Richard Feynman)

Why quantum simulation is important? Answer 2: simulate and build new virtual quantum materials. Kitaev’s models topological quantum computing

Physical Realizations for quantum simulation Iulia Buluta and Franco Nori, Science 326,108

II. Introduction to topological quantum computing based on Kitaev’s group algebra (quantum double) model

A: Toric codes and the corresponding Hamiltonians qubits on links plaque operators: vertex operators:

Hamiltonian and ground states: ground state has all plaque operators: vertex operators: every energy level is 4-fold degenerate!!

plaquet operators: vertex operators: anti-commutes with two plaquet operators   excitation is above ground state Excitations

excitations particles come in pairs (particle/antiparticle) at end of “error” chains two types of particles, X-type (live on vertices of dual lattice) Z-type (live on vertices of the lattice)

Topological qubit and operation

Encode two qubits into the ground state gap Perturbation theory: But for Topological protection

Phase: Abelian anyons

Hilbert space and linear operators B: Introduction to quantum double model

Hamiltonian [A(s),B(p)]=0

Ground state and excited states For all s and p, The excited states involve some violations of these conditions. Excitations are particle-like living on vertices or faces, or both, where the ground state conditions are violated. A combination of a vertex and an adjacent face will be called a site.

About excited states Description: Quantum Double D(G), which is a quasitriangular Hopf algebra. Linear bases: Quasiparticle excitations in this system can be created by ribbon operators : For a system with n quasi-particles, one can use to denote the quasiparticles’ Hilbert space. By investigating how local operators act on this Hilbert space, one can define types and subtypes of these quasiparticles according to their internal states.

The conjugacy class: The types of the quasiparticles the irreducible representations of D(G) These representations are labeled where [μ] denotes a conjugacy class of G which labels the magnetic charge. R(N[ μ ]) denotes a unitary irrep of the centralizer of an arbitrary element in the conjugacy [μ] and it labels the electric charge. The centralizer of the element μ : Once the types of the quasiparticles are determined they never change. Besides the type, every quasiparticle has a local degree of freedom, the subtype.

For an instance

Ribbon operator The ribbon operators commute with every projector A(s) and B(p), except when (s,p) is on either end of the ribbon. Therefore, the ribbon operator creates excitations on both ends of the ribbon.

Topologically protected space For the structure of Hilbert space with n quasiparticle excitations It dose not have a tensor product structure. To resolve this problem…

The base site (fixed) connect the base site with other sites by nonintersecting ribbons On quasiparticles : Type and subtype Topological state Topologically protected space the pure electric charge excitation the pure magnetic charge excitation

Braiding Non-Abelian anyons magnetic charge--- magnetic charge magnetic charge--- electric charge electric charge--- electric charge Boson---Boson

Fusion of anyons The topologically protected space will become small and the anyon with the new type will be generated.

On universal quantum computation Mochon proved two important facts: firstly, that by working with magnetic charge anyons alone from non-solvable, non-nilpotent groups, universal quantum computation is possible. secondly, that for some groups that are solvable but not nilpotent, in particular S 3, universal quantum computation is also possible if one includes some operations using electric charges.

…… Infinity × × × × × × × ×× × × × ×× × × × Trivial local noise Nonlocal noise braiding Low probability Stabilization of topological protected space

III. Simulation for the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model using quantum state preparation Simulation of non-Abelian anyons using ribbon operators connected to a common base site , Xi-Wang Luo, Yong-Jian Han, Guang-Can Guo, Xingxiang Zhou , and Zheng-Wei Zhou , Phys. Rev. A 84 , ( 2011)

Key point: to generate dynamically the ground state and the excitations of Kitaev model Hamiltonian instead of direct physical realization for many body Hamiltonian and corresponding ground state cooling. Here, we will prepare and manipulate the quantum states in the topologically protected space of Kitaev model to simulate the feature of non-Abelian anyons. In spite of the conceptual significance of anyons and their appeal for quantum computation applications, it is very difficult to study anyons experimentally. References: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, (2007); Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, (2009). Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, (2008); New J. Phys. 11, (2009); New J. Phys. 12, (2010).

A. Ground state preparation |e> ?

B) Anyon creation and braiding Ribbon operator : By applying the superposition ribbon operator arbitrary topological states of a given type can be created. the pure magnetic charge excitation :

+ Realization of short ribbon operators Key point: to realize the projection operation:

Moving the anyonic excitation (I) Mapping: 1. perform the projection operation |e><e| on the qudit on edge [s_1,s_2] 2. apply the symmetrized gauge transformation A( s _1) at vertex s _1 to erase redundant excitation at site x _1.

Moving the anyonic excitation (II) 1. map the flux at site x_2 to the ancillary qudit at p_1 by the controlled operation: 2. apply the controlled unitary operation: to move the flux from site x_2 to site x_3. 3. disentangle the ancillary qudit p_1 from the system by first swapping ancilla p_1 and p_2 and then applying.

C) Fusion and topological state measurement Braiding and fusion in terms of ribbon transformations

Realize the projection ribbon operator on the vacuum quantum number state (reason: For TQC, the only measurement we need is to detect whether there is a quasi-particle left or whether two anyons have vacuum quantum numbers when they fuse.) In principle, projection operators corresponding to other fusion channels can be realized in a similar way.

?

Measure the topological states of the anyons by using interference experiment.

D) Demonstration of non-abelian statistics Ground state A pure electric charge anyon

Demonstration for the fusion measurement

All of the 2-qudit gate has this form: 2-qudit phase gate Single qudit gate E) Physical Realization

Summary We give a brief introduction to Kitaev’s quantum double model. We exhibit that the ground state of quantum double model can be prepared in an artificial many-body physical system. we show that the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model can be dynamically simulated in a physical system by evolving the ground state of the model. We also give the smallest scale of a system that is sufficient for proof-of-principle demonstration of our scheme.

References : Integrated photonic qubit quantum computing on a superconducting chip, Lianghu Du, Yong Hu, Zheng-Wei Zhou, Guang-Can Guo, and Xingxiang Zhou, New. J. Phys. 12, (2010). Simulation of non-Abelian anyons using ribbon operators connected to a common base site , Xi-Wang Luo, Yong-Jian Han, Guang-Can Guo, Xingxiang Zhou , and Zheng-Wei Zhou , Phys. Rev. A 84 , ( 2011)