Korean Group 12 th KAGRA face-to-face Meeting August 28, 2015 on behalf Korean Gravitational Wave Group 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
Advertisements

Current Status of Collaboration Research Kyuman Cho and Shinji Miyoki Sogang University, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research and LCGT Collaboration 3 rd.
Abstract We present the application of Support Vector Machines (SVM) toward identification of noise transients in gravitational-wave analysis. SVM is a.
Yeong-Bok Bae, Chunglee Kim and Hyung Mok Lee Seoul National University in Korea.
Precision Tilt and Radius of Curvature Sensor Using Double-Pass AOM Kyuman Cho Department of Physics Sogang University.
LIGO-GXX What is LIGO (LSC/GEO/Virgo/…)? Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration.
Physics 237: Gravitational Waves A course at the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California January - May 2002 Copyright 2002 by the California.
Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.
Proposal for Being a KAGRA Member July 30, 2012 Kyuman Cho Department of Physics, Sogang Universit y.
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector Hiroshima U. NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 3rd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through.
Burst noise investigation for cryogenic GW detector TITECH NAOJ Daisuke TATSUMI 2nd Symposium ‐ New Development in Astrophysics through Multi-messenger.
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
Current status of Joint LIGO-TAMA Inspiral Analysis In collaboration with: Patrick Brady, Nobuyuki Kanda, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Daisuke Tatsumi, the LIGO Scientific.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Welcome to School of Gravitational Waves Warsaw 1st – 5th July.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
LOGO Ensemble Learning Lecturer: Dr. Bo Yuan
| October LIGO Document ID: LIGO-G Multivariate Veto Analysis for Real-time Gravitational Wave.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
Members ❖ LSC 20 Members 6 senior 3 post doctors 4 graduate students 4 technical staffs ❖ KAGRA: LSC plus 4 Senior members HW Lee (data analysis; parameter.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Probing Neutron Star EOS in Gravitational Waves & Gamma-ray Bursts Kim Young-Min, Cho Hee-Suk Lee Chang.-Hwan, Park Hong-Jo (Pusan National University)
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
Hyung Won Lee(Inje), Chunglee Kim(SNU), and Jeongcho Kim(Inje) Nov. 2013, Seoul National University.
18/01/01GEO data analysis meeting, Golm Issues in GW bursts Detection Soumya D. Mohanty AEI Outline of the talk Transient Tests (Transient=Burst) Establishing.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Gungwon Kang & Jiwoong Kim (KISTI) LIGO Data Grid and KISTI June 27, 2015 at 8 th J-K Joint Workshop on KAGRA, Gwangju in Korea.
LIGO-G v5 5/2/09Joshua Smith, Syracuse University1 Low-latency search for gravitational-wave transients with electromagnetic follow-up Joshua Smith,
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
Cosmological Heavy Ion Collisions: Colliding Neutron Stars Chang-Hwan Lee Hee-Suk Cho Young-Min Kim Hong-Jo Park Gravitational Waves & Gamma-Ray.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
LIGO- G Z August 15, 2006 August 2006 LSC meeting1 LSC Proposal Andrews University Gravitational Wave Group Tiffany Summerscales.
LIGO-G W Use of Condor by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
1 8 th E. Amaldi Conference, New York City, June, 2009 Anand Sengupta California Institute of Technology on behalf of the LSC and Virgo Collaborations.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
Development of KAGRA Burst Pipeline
KAGRA Detector Characterization
Status of KAGRA detector characterization
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Detector Characterization
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Nergis Mavalvala (age 47)
Soma Mukherjee for LIGO Science Collaboration
KAGALI PE code development
How to use generateTemplate
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
KAGALI PE code development
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Upper limits on gravitational wave bursts
Presentation transcript:

Korean Group 12 th KAGRA face-to-face Meeting August 28, 2015 on behalf Korean Gravitational Wave Group 1

Members Experiment: Tai-Hyun Yoon (Lead, Korea Univ.), Kyuman Cho (Sogang U.), Jaewan Kim (Myungji U.) Data Analysis Hyung Won Lee (Lead), Jeongcho Kim (Inje U.), John Oh, Sang Hoon Oh, Edwin Son, Hwansun Kim (NIMS), Chunglee Kim(Yonsei Univ.), Gungwon Kang, Heesuk Cho (KISTI), Chang-Hwan Lee, Young-Min Kim (PNU), Hyunkyu Lee, Kyungmin Kim (Hanyang U.) Others (Theory, Astrophysics) Hyung Mok Lee (SNU), Sangpyo Kim (Kunsan Nat. U.)

Computing Support Korea Institute for Science & Tech. Info. (KISTI) supports KGWG for its activities including KAGRA Collaboration. Current hardware includes 636 CPU cores and 155TB storages Current user groups include KAGRA Parameter Estimation Members, for the construction of PE pipeline 3 NameAffiliation Kazuhiro Hayama Osaka City Univ. Tatsusya Narikawa Osaka City Univ. Hideyuki Tagoshi Osaka City Univ. Koh Ueno Osaka City Univ. Hirotaka Yuzurihara Osaka City Univ.

Tilt Sensor for Initial Mirror Alignment of KAGRA High sensitivity, wide dynamic, low drift range tilt sensors are very important in initial mirror alignments of KAGRA. Professor Kyuman Cho, Sogang University Optical lever has been used for Local angular alignment of each mirror, Alignment control to lead to lock the interferometer, Monitor drift. Prof. Cho proposed new interferometric tilt sensor schemes which, in theory, can provide a better sensitivity, a better stability, a compatible dynamic range to an optical lever.

5

Detector’s KGWG Glitch Classification using Machine Learning Algorithms – Artificial Neural Net based Glitch identification – iDQ Pipeline (online classification using BDT, ANN, SVM, OVL) in LIGO - testing in KAGRA – Improving iDQ pipeline: applying the notion of deep neural network BDT: Bagged Decision Trees of Random Forest ANN: Artificial Neural Network SVM: Support Vector Machine OVL: Ordered Veto List – Conventional Method of Glitch Determination in LIGO Members: John Oh, Sang Hoon Oh, Edwin Son, Hwansun Kim (NIMS) Young-Min Kim, Chang-Hwan Lee (Pusan National Univ.)

Detector’s KGWG Correlation Analysis of CLIO Data: SEI and GW Channel - PearsonR & Maximal Info. Coeff. - Generating Correlation Matrix : Monitor the correlated aux. channels Event Trigger Generation - Hilbert-Huang Tranform based appoach

KGWG-KAGRA DAS activities MCMC Parameter estimation for CBC inspirals - Effects of amplitude corrections for NS-BH and BH-BH binary inspirals - Comparison of MCMC performance with the initial vs early-phase advanced LIGO-Virgo - MCMC PE with more realistic noise realizations (non-Gaussianity) Waveform Study - Reviewing the post-Newtonian formalism: TaylorF2 - Developing non-precessing TaylorF2 approximant including amplitude corrections, eccentricity effects KAGALI development(with Prof. Tagoshi) - Parameter estimation pipeline implementation for KAGALI 8 Members: Hyung Won Lee (Inje U.), Jeongcho Kim (Inje U.), and Chunglee Kim (Yonsei U.)

Joint Meetings Semi-Annual Meetings 6th meeting: June 20-21, 2014, Seoul National University 7th meeting: December 19-20, 2014, Toyama University 8th meeting: June 27, 2015, Gwangju Future direction of joint meetings Merge into F2F meeting? Merge into International meeting? To be decided later 9