Damian Brant Quality Manager

Framework for Excellence A pilots view

Framework Dimensions & Key Performance Areas Overall performance rating Responsiveness dimension Effectiveness dimension Finance dimension Key performance areas: Responsiveness to learners Responsiveness to employers Key performance areas: Quality of outcomes Quality of provision Key performance areas: Financial health Financial control Use of resources

Framework for Excellence Finance Financial health Financial control Effectiveness Quality of outcomes Quality of provision Responsiveness Delivery against plan Responsiveness to employers Responsiveness to learners Overall rating Measures data

Framework Dimensions & Key Performance Areas Overall performance rating Responsiveness dimension Effectiveness dimension Finance dimension Key performance areas: Responsiveness to learners Responsiveness to employers Key performance areas: Quality of outcomes Quality of provision Key performance areas: Financial health Financial control Use of resources

Questions Burton College considered Should we base SAR on FfE dimensions? Would this be a high risk approach as FfE may be another transient initiative? As at the start of the process little was published on FfE indicators how could we ensure we met the requirements?

Creative Studies Business, Leisure & Care TechnologySixth Form & Continuing Ed. 13 Curriculum Areas 10 cross-college Business Support Areas Devolved autonomy for Financial management/staffing/resources Curriculum development Quality improvement

FfE-Embedding The self-assessment report (SAR) process Developed single SAR process across college robust, rigorous, comprehensive and accurate Ofsted November 2007 SAR validation panels noted by Ofsted as good practice

FfE-Embedding Responsiveness Employer surveys Learner surveys National and local priorities Effectiveness Quality of outcomes – Success rates Quality of provision - Overall Ofsted grade for effectiveness Financial Efficiency Have recruitment targets been achieved? Does the area operate from a secure financial base? Efficiency : e.g. class sizes/contribution rates

QDP Ltd. Employer Survey Overall Score: 33

Learner Survey QDP Induction On-programme Exit

Faculty health checks

Financial Review Income and expenditure against budget Monitoring of financial control Efficiency e.g. contribution rates, staffing, purchase of equipment

FfE Pilot National Distribution of Pilot Providers ResponsivenessEffectivenessFinanceOverall Performance Rating Outstanding2530%3339%1720%2226% Good3543%2631%5767%4553% Satisfactory2227%2530%1113%1821% Inadequate00%0 0 0

FfE Pilot Responsiveness - Learner views and destinations- Good - Employer satisfaction- Satisfactory Effectiveness - Quality of outcomes- Satisfactory - Quality of provision- Good Finance - Health- Outstanding - Control- Outstanding - Resources- Good

Peer Review and Development

Raise awareness of governors Reorganisation of key performance indicators grouped around FfE measures with additional measures introduced Clean client relationship management (CRM) system Work with senior managers and the wider management team on overall performance ratings Measurements of employer engagement Further development to embed FfE